Use of Force

Body Camera Footage Shows Florida Cops Laughing About Using Rubber Bullets on Anti-Police Brutality Protesters

Scenes from anti-brutality protests are renewing the debate around the controversial use of rubber bullets.

|

A Florida police department is investigating officers who joked on camera about the protesters they shot with rubber bullets.

Body-worn camera footage obtained by the Miami Herald shows officers with the Fort Lauderdale Police Department (FLPD) shooting rubber bullets towards protesters during an anti-brutality protest on May 31 and then making jokes.

One officer is heard shouting, "Beat it, little fucker," to a protester who appears to be hit after picking up a tear gas canister and throwing it back in the direction of police. At one point, another officer asks if the body-worn camera is on and then laughs that he "plugged his ass three fucking times."

In a statement released this week, FLPD Chief Rick Maglione says that a longer video "clearly demonstrates our officers were under attack by a group of people who chose to use violence instead of peace to antagonize the situation." Maglione also says the officers were "dealing with the chaos of a developing situation."

FLPD has been criticized for its conduct during the May 31 protest. The department said it was fending off violent agitators in a city garage, but video and photos from the protest do not appear to back this version of events. The protesters appear to have remained peaceful until an officer was seen shoving a kneeling protester. Another police officer quickly stepped in to reprimand him and protesters began to throw water bottles in his direction. The situation escalated when more officers arrived on the scene. One protester was hit with a rubber bullet and suffered a fractured eye socket.

Like the protest in Fort Lauderdale, scenes of aggressive policing tactics at recent anti-brutality protests have renewed the debate around the use of rubber bullets.

The moniker itself is a bit misleading. These large, palm-sized munitions can contain metal cores and are covered by rubber, plastic, and other materials. And while "rubber bullet" suggests a softer impact, which is certainly the case when compared to a live round, this kinetic impact projectile can still cause penetrative injury.

When freelance photographer Linda Tirado described her experience of being shot in the eye with what she believed to be a rubber bullet at a Minneapolis protest, she said, "I was aiming my next shot, put my camera down for a second, and then my face exploded." Protesters carried Tirado away from the scene. Following surgery, a doctor informed her that her vision was not likely to recover.

An American Civil Liberties Union fact sheet breaks down the risks by body part. This includes potential blindness or brain injury if shot in the eye, bleeding if shot in the abdominal region, and lacerations, though the rounds aren't marketed as intended to break the skin. While described by law enforcement as "non-lethal" or "less than lethal,"  documentation on social media proves these rounds can cause gruesome injuries. 

In an article debunking myths about rubber bullets, Inverse found that about 15 percent of injuries caused by the projectile resulted in permanent damage, especially when a person is struck in the head or neck.

Manufacturers advise that these projectiles should only be used for the lower extremities. Some departments, like the Minneapolis Police Department, mandate in their policies that "large muscle groups in the lower extremities including the buttocks, thigh, knees" should be the intended target for 40mm less-lethal rounds. The MPD even notes that targeting other areas such as the "head, neck, spinal cord, groin and kidneys" can cause "injury that can lead to a permanent physical or mental incapacity or possible death."

The FLPD body camera footage and the documented damage from these projectiles around the U.S. demonstrate that law enforcement agencies need to find safer alternatives for crowd control.

Advertisement

NEXT: Post-Pandemic Americans May Be Done With Taking Orders

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. So why are you pretending that the marxist rioters are anti-police brutality protesters? Are you stupid or just a fellow traveler?

    1. Hmm
      Beat me to it!

      1. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had.TRe I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life.

        For more details………………Home Profit System

      2. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had.TRe I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life.Click For Full Details.

      3. They should have used real bullets and laughed about it. And you morons at “reason” should have been there to soak up some of the blood with your bodies.

        If you are blocking the road, you are not peacefully protesting. If you are blocking driveways with your body, you are not peacefully protesting. If you are lighting things on fire or spray painting objects with your messages, you are not peacefully protesting. The rest of us are tired of your stupid sh*t, and we are getting to that point were it’s becoming funny when you die. Maybe you ought to rethink your tactics.

      4. hy my friend you can earn a lot of money by click on that link
        …………………………money34
        you can earn a lot from your home in just few hours  

    2. Why are you pretending that all protesters are rioters?

      1. If you’re fine with these commie assholes shitting up your nest, more power to you. Just don’t expect the rest of us to have any sympathy.

        1. I am happy to have protesters of whatever persuasion. Apparently you cannot distinguish between rioters and protesters.

          1. If they’re commies, they’re trash regardless.

            1. I know, right?
              Even the First Amendment says so:

              “Congress shall pass no law abridging freedom of speech, except if it’s against commie trash, in which case, it’s open season on those assholes.”

              1. Freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences.

                1. Consequences, huh? What, like a cop walking up and kicking ya? Putting a boot on your neck? That kind of consequences?

                  You sound like the progtards after Charlie Hebdo. Yeah, you can draw all the cartoons you want, but if you get blown up, it’s your own damn fault! You had it coming. So, that’s what you are, now, eh, Red? Maybe you should complete the circuit and just convert to Islam. You’d fit right in. 😉

                  1. Show us on the doll where Roscoe P. Coltrane touched you.

                    1. Shut up, muzzie.

                    2. Make me, twerp.

                  2. ●Google pay 95145$ consistently my last pay check was $9452163 working 10 hours out of every week on the web. My more young kin buddy has been averaging 15k all through ongoing months and he works around 24 hours consistently. Click For Full Detail.

                2. why you people fight each other

              2. –>”I know, right?
                Even the First Amendment says so: Congress shall pass no law abridging freedom of speech, except if it’s against commie trash, in which case, it’s open season on those assholes.”

                The first amendment has the words “peaceful” in it. “Assemble peacefully” – which blocking a road is not, dumb f***.

          2. I have an answer for you: Tough shit. Wrong place, wrong time.

            I agree, peaceful, non-violent protestors are fine. In fact, we should encourage them. They are how our national consciousness gets energized to change things.

            Now when protestors have rioters and people who commit violent acts against the police in their midst…too fucking bad. Maybe you need to be more careful about the company you keep. The protestors could have left when they saw ritoers attacking the police (which is something you do not ever do).

            1. Oh so we’re back to the whole ‘collective guilt’ thing now.

              Why should the protestors be the ones to leave?

              1. No chem, not collective guilt. An inapt comparison by you.

                Be careful of the company you keep is more apropos.

              2. –>”Why should the protestors be the ones to leave?”

                Because they are blocking the f***** road??? Which is illegal, and not peaceful.

          3. –>”I am happy to have protesters of whatever persuasion. Apparently you cannot distinguish between rioters and protesters.”

            If they are blocking a road, they are not peaceful protesters dumb sh*t. Use some “reason.” Imagine them blocking the singular community entrance to your homeowners association, preventing you from leaving or entering your home. Not peaceful. I’d have used real bullets and p*ssed in the bullet holes in their skulls.

      2. –> “Why are you pretending that all protesters are rioters?”

        If they are in the street, they aren’t peaceful. Clear them of the street. Streets don’t belong to protesters. It is illegal for me to stand in the street and block the road. If you are blocking the road you need pepper bullets to the face and for people to laugh at you.

      3. The peaceful protestors need to clearly distance themselves from the anarchists. That some do not, is a problem.

    3. Haha, the cops started it, you fucking retard. You must’ve missed that part, assuming you even read it at all:

      “The department said it was fending off violent agitators in a city garage, but video and photos from the protest do not appear to back this version of events. The protesters appear to have remained peaceful until an officer was seen shoving a kneeling protester. Another police officer quickly stepped in to reprimand him and protesters began to throw water bottles in his direction. The situation escalated when more officers arrived on the scene. One protester was hit with a rubber bullet and suffered a fractured eye socket.”

      Heh. Guess you’re the stupid one. Learn to read, dipshit.

      1. Right, an activist like Zuri would never lie or edit out context to further a narrative. Got it.

      2. If the “protesters” were blocking the entrance to the garage, then the cops didn’t start it – they were responding to a non-peaceful protest.
        F***tard.

  2. These are not “anti police brutality protesters”, you credulous bitch.
    They’re useful idiots and marxist agitators.
    And history has shown time and again that if they get what they want, the brutality of their police will be vastly greater than what we have today.

    And why do we never speak of things in terms of social brutality?
    Is cancel culture not brutal? Is calling someone racist not brutal? Is subjecting employees to compulsory diversity training not brutal?
    Police brutality is an extremely miniscule concern compared to leftism

    1. Because “marxist agitators” deserve the iron boot of the state on their necks, even while they do nothing but exercise their rights. Got it.

      1. –>”Because “marxist agitators” deserve the iron boot of the state on their necks, even while they do nothing but exercise their rights. Got it.”

        Blocking roads isn’t “exercising their rights” dumbf***. They need a Chauvin there to pinch the life out of them with their knee. Rather than call in the cops, citizens should have just ran over them with their car for blocking the road. When they screamed in rage chasing the car, the motorist should stop, step out with a rifle, and mow their a$$es down (while laughing). Maybe you could be there to give support and clean up after the mess, retard.

      2. Yes, the same way Nazis, fascists, communists, monarchists, and all violent political movements deserve it. You can’t couch calls for violence in freedom of speech just because you’re not literally killing me right now as you say those words.

    2. Is cancel culture not brutal? Is calling someone racist not brutal? Is subjecting employees to compulsory diversity training not brutal?
      Police brutality is an extremely miniscule concern compared to leftism

      Regrettably, George Floyd is unable to respond to your comments.

      1. Same for Breonna Taylor. But hey, at least she never had to deal with some blue-haired little spaz calling her a racist! That’s the important thing.

        1. Nardz, along with more than a few right-wing commenters here, are outing themselves more and more as fascists by their responses to the protests.

          Frankly, I say keep it up. Keep illustrating to everyone precisely what you believe. They want the state to punish ‘leftists’ based purely on their beliefs? They want to claim they are the ‘real victims’ for ‘suffering’ about 1/1,000,000,000th the amount that real victims of state abuse have suffered? Fine, please continue whining. Let’s see how the public weighs these claims. Hmm… George Floyd dead? Or Nardz going to a diversity seminar? Who had the worse result here? Let’s see….

          1. chemtard, you wouldn’t know a fascist if one loaded you on a cattle car.

            1. It’s noteworthy that you chose to insult me rather than to say anything at all regarding the poster above who literally minimized the horror of a victim being murdered to the police, compared to the ‘brutality’ of attending a diversity seminar.

              Perhaps when you are finished calling me ‘chemtard’ you could find it within yourself to say something noteworthy about that.

              1. Your mewling ass doesn’t deserve anything but insults, chemtard.

                1. No I get it.
                  Insulting me is ‘easy’.
                  Actually taking a stand against fascist little shits like Nardz is harder. (Evidently.)

                  1. You misunderstand. I insult you because I hate your fucking child-molester defending guts, not because I’m particularly concerned about what Nardz is posting on any given day.

                    1. You hate me, therefore everything I say is a lie?
                      You hate me, therefore you must criticize everything I write?

                      When I write “their liberty is your liberty”, because you hate me, you must oppose that statement? Amazing.

                      You’re a real piece of work.

                    2. You hate me, therefore everything I say is a lie?

                      I never said you lied. You revealed a hell of a lot more in that statement than I think you realize.

                      You hate me, therefore you must criticize everything I write?

                      Don’t flatter yourself. I’ve barely responded to your comments since you decided to pop your head back in here.

                      You’re a real piece of work.

                      I least I don’t stick up for child molesters.

                    3. I never said you lied. You revealed a hell of a lot more in that statement than I think you realize.

                      Oh so you agree with me but you just pick fights with me because you hate me. What a mature little shithead you are.

                      I least I don’t stick up for child molesters.

                      Oh and just so the audience is aware:
                      I have never defended the crimes of child molesters.
                      I have stuck up for the rights that all people have, including horrible people like child molesters.
                      It is quite amusing, that my detractors will on one day claim I am some sort of left-wing proggie, then on the very next day when I do the most libertarian thing imaginable – defend the rights even of scumbags – those same detractors will bash me for that.

                      Why it’s almost as if it doesn’t matter what I do or say, they just hate me for being me.

                    4. Oh so you agree with me but you just pick fights with me because you hate me. What a mature little shithead you are.

                      Now you’re whining because your pathetic attempt to make yourself a victim fell apart.

                      I have never defended the crimes of child molesters.
                      I have stuck up for the rights that all people have, including horrible people like child molesters.

                      Just so people are clear:
                      chemtard was whining that not allowing child molesters to enter the country was infringing on their liberty.

                      Why it’s almost as if it doesn’t matter what I do or say, they just hate me for being me.

                      Yeah, that’s not it, sparkles.

                    5. Just so people are clear:
                      chemtard was whining that not allowing child molesters to enter the country was infringing on their liberty.

                      Nope that’s not it.

                      There is a program that allows people who are persecuted by foreign oppressive governments to seek asylum.

                      And the mainstream response around here was that only “good” applicants should be permitted to apply for asylum, but the “icky” applicants should not be.

                      Evidently, oppression against church ladies is an intolerable evil, but that same oppression applied against people of less moral worth is totes okay.

                      Claims of asylum should be judged based on what the OPPRESSOR did, and not what the OPPRESSED did. Because the idea is that oppression like torture is unacceptable always, whether it is applied against church ladies or against child molesters.

                      But according to the RRWP standard, and sadly most of the commenters around here, asylum should be reserved only for the “good people” who suffered oppression, and not for the “bad people” who suffered oppression. Which of course sends a big glaring signal to all of the butchers out there that they have free license to torture whomever they want as long as they are ‘bad people’.

          2. –>”Nardz, along with more than a few right-wing commenters here, are outing themselves more and more as fascists by their responses to the protests.”

            No you have it backwards. The violent protesters destroying everything are the facists. Get a dictionary. Read it, And then f*** yourself with it, retard.

            –>”Frankly, I say keep it up. Keep illustrating to everyone precisely what you believe.”

            Oh we will. And we’ll see you on the battlefield. I’ll pop your eyeball out with my baynonet, then skullf*** you death with my j*** exploding out your ears. Then you go meet your buddy Floyd and you two can hold hands and sing together while riding a unicorn sandwiched together.

            1. Well, you sound pleasant.

          3. Fascism – National Socialism implemented for race/religious uniformity.

            Oh, so NOW you think the U.S. Constitution is a form of “religion”?

          4. Nardz is calling for the government to provide a facade of private ownership of the means of production while the government maintains complete control over every aspect of the economy? Weird.

            Also weird how you completely ignore that the cops in almost all of these high profile cases work at the behest of cities that have been controlled by Democrats for 40+ years. But sure, it’s the more conservative people that post here that are the fascist.

      2. –>”Regrettably, George Floyd is unable to respond to your comments.”

        The death of Floyd was very regrettable. I protested it more than anyone. But after what has happened since then, I would prefer to have several unknowing George Floyd’s every year, than pack wolf protesters destroying society, killing innocent people, and destroying the work of honest people that had nothing to do with it. George Floyd can go f*** himself in his gold casket. He was a garbage human anyways. Home invader. Armed assault. Pointing guns at pregnant woman’s belly. Drug addict loser. Who gives a s*** about George Floyd thinks about anything.

    3. Getting called a racist by some fat, barren cunt with blue hair is worse than getting shot dead in your own bed by a rabid SWAT team, with no warning, as you sleep, while your boyfriend shoots back and gets charged for attempted murder. You heard it here, folks.

      1. I know, right?
        Going to a diversity training seminar is just as bad as having a cop’s knee on your neck for 9 minutes until you die.

        1. That’s right, Jeff. Good Ol’ George just doesn’t know how good he’s got it, does he…

          1. “But the diversity seminar was 3 whole hours!!!!!”

            1. “UH KNO, RITE?”

        2. these are all need another training a better better training need to upgrade system

        3. —>”Going to a diversity training seminar is just as bad as having a cop’s knee on your neck for 9 minutes until you die.”

          And you George can go f*** yourselves at your diversity training seminar.

      2. Getting called racist is worse than being kidnapped, watching your boyfriend get executed in the back of the head and set on fire, then getting taken to a house to be repeatedly sexually assaulted and sodomized with a broom handle before being murdered by having bleach poured down your throat.

        Tell me more about how I should give a damn about a bunch of self-hating white commies getting gassed by the po-po, you worthless sack of shit.

        1. Either you believe in liberty on principle, or you don’t.
          If you don’t, then keep doing what you’re doing – defending liberty for yourself, but shitting on liberty for everyone else.

          1. Save your pathological altruism for the campus coffeehouse.

          2. –>”Either you believe in liberty on principle, or you don’t.
            If you don’t, then keep doing what you’re doing – defending liberty for yourself, but shitting on liberty for everyone else.”

            Nothing says liberty like a bunch of violent protesters intimidating everyone into their ideology. But yeah – sorry you can’t have the liberty to do that. What a let down.

        2. Tell me more about how I should give a damn about a bunch of self-hating white commies getting gassed by the po-po, you worthless sack of shit.

          Their liberty is your liberty.

          If you cannot see that, then it is you who are the worthless piece of shit.

          1. Nah, they’re trash, and so are you for constantly coming to their defense.

            1. Your precious blue heroes are trash. And so are you for constantly coming to their defense, Mohammed.

              1. Tell Roscoe about it, not me, child.

          2. –>”Their liberty is your liberty.”

            I don’t want the liberty to riot, destroy property, and intimidate people into an ideology. Pass!

          3. –>”If you cannot see that, then it is you who are the worthless piece of shit.”

            Whoa whoa. Check your privilege you POS white cisgendered s***lord. You don’t talk to people of color that way, Racist scumbag.

        3. It appears to me that all you protesters are missing out on a way to make protesting safer and make millions of dollars while doing so. I read somewhere in the article that what was needed was a safer crowd control. No CS, No pepper, No rubber bullets.

          So invent it already.

  3. Would you rather have happy cops shooting rubber bullets or deadly serious coppers shooting lead?

    1. I’d rather have a bunch of dead cops shot with lead, to be perfectly honest with ya. *shrugs*

      1. Well I am not an anarchist so I can’t agree with that sentiment.
        But cops do need to be held to a higher standard. A cop pissed off by some protestor should act more professionally than some hothead pissed off by their neighbor’s antics.

        1. I was mainly talking about these particular cops, and others like them. Fats was kinda flippant in his framing of the situation, to say the least, and I just couldn’t resist. A rubber bullet in the eye ain’t nothing. Can’t leave that kinda bullshit just *lying* there…

          I mean, if you’re gonna attack someone while they’re fucking kneeling and not doing shit to you, and protesters respond by throwing fucking PLASTIC BOTTLES [OHHHH NOOOO!!!] at them, and then they start firing rubber bullets in response, and some reporter in the crowd gets a fucking busted eye socket out of it and they think it’s real funny [they saw it and you know it], yeah, I’m not gonna really care what happens to the fuckers. 😉

        2. –>”Well I am not an anarchist so I can’t agree with that sentiment.
          But cops do need to be held to a higher standard. A cop pissed off by some protestor should act more professionally than some hothead pissed off by their neighbor’s antics.”

          LOL! Maybe you should STFU and do the job yourself then. You sitting around in your armchair complaining about others using too much force on the job. I’d like to see you get attacked by a mob, have a bottle of water smashed upside your head and see how professional you act. Moron.

      2. may cops doing this is there these are rules of our system

  4. ok and?

  5. Office camera footage of Sidd shows same.

  6. Cops shooting protestors, even with rubber bullets, is not at all funny and should never be treated lightly. But that being said, it’s fucking hilarious. I mean, you ain’t got a humorous bone in your body if you can’t laugh at some stupid fucker getting pegged right smack in the balls just as he’s raring back to heave some shit at the cops. On a loop, about 12 or 40 times, over and over. That shit’s funny!

    1. –>”Cops shooting protestors, even with rubber bullets, is not at all funny and should never be treated lightly.”

      It’s hilarious! Especially if the protesters are blocking streets and garages.

  7. the Minneapolis Police Department, mandate in their policies that “large muscle groups in the lower extremities including the buttocks, thigh, knees” should be the intended target for 40mm less-lethal rounds.

    Because city cops are celebrated for their marksmanship!

    Can’t fault the cops for firing rubber bullets when rocks are thrown at them. Rioters’ cheerleaders in the media and Donkey party must share a large portion of the blame.

  8. This is a coping mechanism for extreme stress. I can tell you from personal experience that in combat situations, ghoulish humor is very common. Stress relief through humor is much preferable to just letting it build up until you have some sort of breakdown.

    With time and distance, the things we found absolutely hilarious then now just seem depressing. But we got through it.

  9. I’m not really seeing any problems here. A little humor isn’t a bad thing, it’s a way to cope. We need to stop trying so hard to be outraged at cops. There are definitely police policy and training that needs to be looked into and possibly changed, but let’s not forget what the actual job entails and that these are simply people doing that job.

  10. I’d have more sympathy but many of these protestors are committing violence and mayhem and deserve a kick in the balls.

    I am not going to go on defense for some fucking marxist douchebag.

    1. Who, the reporter that wasn’t doing anything that got shot in the eye with a rubber bullet and lost her sight, or the kneeling protester that was just sitting there when the pig walked up and kicked them?

      1. Bitch deserved it.

        1. Yup, you’re a real piece of shit, Red, and you just proved it. Someone needs to gouge your fucking eyes out.

          I

          1. Stop drunk-posting, loser. You’re not doing jack shit and you know it.

  11. Some departments, like the Minneapolis Police Department, mandate in their policies that “large muscle groups in the lower extremities including the buttocks, thigh, knees” should be the intended target for 40mm less-lethal rounds.

    “Mandate.”

  12. Good heavens. The police behavior is appalling, and the comments are even more appalling.

    Today’s “marxist agitators” could be tomorrow’s “right-wing protestors” in terms of the police response to protests. You don’t want the police going overboard in either case. If you value your right to protest your government, you will protect the rights of others to protest the government, even if you don’t believe in their cause.

    No one deserves to be shot in the eye or kicked in the nuts for doing nothing but protesting. regardless if they are Marxists or not.

    1. Oh, we’re gonna have a LOT of “right-wing protesting” in due time. Lockdown Reloaded is coming to a theatre near you, and when it does, the copsuckers aint gonna know what hit them. You’re gonna have incident after incident of cops being assholes [just like the previous lockdown] and the same fuckers sucking cop dick now are gonna be playing ‘Cop Killer’ at max volume when one of their buddies gets brutalized by some pig for sitting on his front porch. Just you wait. 😉

      1. Well, fascist little shits like Nardz expect that the police are “on his side”. So what does he have to lose from advocating that the “marxist agitators” are mistreated? Right?

      2. LMAO–they didn’t do shit last time, what makes you think the next one will be different?

        1. Hmm. So what you’re saying is the Reason commentariat is full of shit and a bunch of pussies. And or that the American people are full of shit and a bunch of pussies. Got it.

          1. No, I’m saying you’re a moron with an inferiority complex.

        2. He needs them to in order to claim “both sides.” It’s tough when your team is the only one rioting, killing, looting, and setting stuff on fire. Thus, he has to hope the other team does it too so he can retreat back to our country’s favorite argument of claiming, my team isn’t as bad as your team. It’s literally taking pride in not being the lowest common denominator.

  13. Whatever happened to that heat ray thing?

  14. I have earned $18394 last month by working online from home. I am a full time college student and just doing this job in my part time for maximum 2 hrs a day using my laptop. This job is just awesome and regular earning from this easy home job is much times better than other regular 9 to 5 office jobs. I suggest you all to join this right now and start earning easily by just follow details on the given website……..www.cashbarr.com

  15. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $30h – $72h…how? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.
    Heres what I’ve been doing…  ,,, ONLINE WORK

  16. what the hell is this is this is our country why police man doing this

  17. I basically earn Easily at home 10,000$ par month .just do work few hours . last 3 year i was free but now i am happy with this website so i advise u……Click For Full Details.

  18. “Alexa records thousands of family making racially insensitive jokes while mocking BLM within the privacy of their own homes.”

    Humor as a coping mechanism is officially outlawed.

  19. hy my friend you can earn a lot of money by click on that link
    …………………………money34
    you can earn a lot from your home in just few hours  

  20. It would not be bad at all to accept some wisdom of the anti-immigration ethno-state called Wakanda. The basic wisdom consists of knowledge that migrants brought their problems with them. No hatred was left behind. No wrong was forgiven or even forgotten.HERE?Click For Full Details.

  21. Kind of hard to condemn this, when I’m probably laughing harder than the cops.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.