Inhuman Conditions

Inhuman Conditions is a new board game loosely based on the idea of the Turing test—a way to evaluate a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior, devised by codebreaker and mathematician Alan Turing in 1950.
In the game, one player is assigned the role of either robot or human. The other is an investigator attempting to figure out whether his or her opponent is a robot through conversation. The result is a surprisingly goofy romp in which humans pretend to be robots pretending to be humans.
As with many of the entrants in today's tabletop gaming renaissance, making it to the initial round of play requires some upfront investment of time and brainpower. But once you get into the groove, the natural logic of the game's structure emerges, and there are just enough gimmicks—including actual inked stamps with which the investigators make their final pronouncements—to keep play light.
The robots in the game are so quirky (and even violent) that a deadpan affect won't do you much good. The best strategy to appear human, it seems, is to be emotionally volatile, deeply awkward, and occasionally irrational.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The result is a surprisingly goofy romp in which humans pretend to be robots pretending to be humans.
Or as we call it, the Reason commentariat.
You mean all those claims of making money at home to buy fancy cars aren’t from people?
I mean FoE is actually a finely tuned algorithm developed by ENB.
That would certainly explain why all the Fist of Etiquette jokes are NP-hard to understand.
If ENB could develop algorithms, she wouldn't be working for a third rate publication like this.
Hmm, can the game also detect levels of human stupidity too low to be allowed out in public?
Just for the rest of the story:
This new game was released in 2018.
It is for ages 12 and up.
It has a 5 minute playing time.
It has a complexity rating of 1.75 out of 5 on Boardgamegeek.
As an example of one of the cards involved; I quote "Did the other person thought the conversation went well or badly?"
A few comments from the publisher:
From the co-creators of Secret Hitler & Better Myths: a Blade Runner-inspired, five-minute party game for two players.
There are no right or wrong answers, only suspicious and innocuous ones, and one slip of the tongue could land Humans and Robots alike in the Bureau's Invasive Confirmation Unit. There, alongside Investigators who make improper determinations, they will await further testing ...
It all sounds a bit too familiar to me. Yesterday's headlines for instance.
Liza Make money online from home extra cash more than $18k to $21k. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26K in this month by just working online from home in my part time.BGf every person easily do this job by just open this link and follow details on this page to get started..... New Income Opportunities
Does the game have panzers in it? No? Not interested.
Ich liebe Panzer.
The best strategy to appear human, it seems, is to be emotionally volatile, deeply awkward, and occasionally irrational.
"Reason" commenters will be unbeatable.
I always questioned the Turing Test method of weeding out replicants in Blade Runner. If they were androids, there would be much simpler and direct ways to find out, such as doing an X-ray. If they were fully organic, i.e., clones, then they’d be just as human as anyone else. A clone is no less a real human being than someone’s identical twin would be.
You're getting caught up in a 'artificial/natural' divide that is, ironically, completely artificial. Because there is no such divide in nature.
A 'living' organism is a machine - the parts are just on a molecular scale.
You're also ignoring the main question of the movie - what is 'human'? What is 'a person'? Because the replicants are completely man-made, are self-aware - but are deemed to be 'not people' because of their differing mental architecture. Which is what the VK test is intended to root out.
But the movie handwaves away any issues of testing genes or looking for other structural clues in order to be able to focus on the 'what is a a people' question that forms the core of the movie.
To be clear - they're not clones of a person. They're designer organisms.
My last month cheque was for 1500 dollars… All i did was easy on-line work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the net and they paid me for it 95 usd each hour. See more detail http://www.Topcitypay.com
I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year agone i used to be unemployed during a atrocious economy. I convey God on a daily basis i used to be endowed these directions and currently it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody, Here is I started..... http://www.Topcitypay.com
Whoa, dude. That was meta.