New York City Jails Now Have at Least 75 Confirmed Coronavirus Infections

Another 300 low-level offenders set to be released, but the city’s jails house more than 5,000.


The number of confirmed COVID-19 infections in New York City's prison population (both workers and inmates) has more than doubled in just two days.

As of Wednesday morning, New York City's Department of Correction reported that 75 people in the city's jail system have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and that 37 of them are facility personnel. This is a dramatic increase since the weekend, when officials reported 17 workers and 21 prisoners were infected. The number of infected inmates jumped to 50 on Monday and continues to increase.

Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday that New York will release another 300 nonviolent inmates from Rikers Island who have been serving sentences of less than a year for misdemeanors. But he said that his authority as mayor to free people from jail is limited and he needs the state and prosecutors to help increase those numbers.

This should be a high priority for state and local governments around the country. The prison complex needs its own system to "flatten the curve" and reduce disease transmission. New York City has 5,000 inmates, in close quarters, mostly on Rikers Island. They are not engaged in "social distancing." Health officials warn that Rikers will essentially become an incubator to spread the virus.

"We cannot socially distance dozens of elderly men living in a dorm, sharing a bathroom," tweeted Ross Macdonald, chief physician of Rikers Island, last week. "Think of a cruise ship recklessly boarding more passengers each day."

Meanwhile, the New York Police Department is reporting that 211 of its employees have been diagnosed with coronavirus, 177 of them uniformed officers. About 3,200 officers have called in sick, which is triple the normal rate. New York City now has more than 17,000 diagnosed infections out of 55,000 confirmed cases nationwide.

Crime, by the way, continues to fall in New York City as this pandemic cleans out the streets. Criminals thus far do not appear to be taking advantage of the situation, though NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea worried that the dramatic decline in sexual assaults and domestic abuse is actually a result of victims not reporting the incidents to police.

As is often the case whenever we debate reducing jail populations, a common response is that every person currently behind bars deserves to be there. That argument has two problems: the first is that having been convicted of a crime doesn't make you more deserving of being exposed to a painful and potentially fatal virus (and that includes Harvey Weinstein); the length of time for which a prisoner is incarcerated is their punishment, they do not also "deserve" to be infected with COVID-19, any more than they "deserve" to be sexually assaulted or tortured. The second issue, and one that is particularly relevant when discussing Rikers, is that our jails are full of people who have not been convicted or are serving short sentences for minor offenses.

With impeccable timing, the nonprofit Prison Policy Initiative has just released its regular report calculating how many people are locked up in America and why. Local jails across the United States hold 470,000 people who are awaiting trial and have not been convicted. Of the 161,000 people convicted of crimes who are serving time in local jails (as opposed to state prisons), 86,000 of them are incarcerated due to drug or public order crimes.

If we prioritize releasing people who aren't dangerous or haven't committed violent crimes, then the prison system would be better able to control the spread of the coronavirus among the people who are too dangerous to be released.

Yesterday, Gov. Andrew Cuomo insisted "We're not going to put a dollar figure on human life" as he justified ignoring the economic impacts of closing down businesses the state deems "non-essential." But New York's jail system is doing exactly that by slow-rolling the population reductions that will help reduce the risk of exposure for both inmates and jail personnel.

NEXT: Ring's Expanding Public-Private Panopticon Doesn't Actually Stop Crime

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The most current numbers I could find for NYC are 17,856 infections. Divided by population, that’s 0.2% of the city confirmed as having gotten it, included those who are recovered/recovering.

    How high do we think the actual number is?

    Also, it seems clear that there’s both reporting issues, and people freaking out creating more problems. 177 uniformed officers have been diagnosed with the virus, right? And yet there’s about 2,000 more officers calling in sick than is typical? It’s possible some of those 2,000 are undiagnosed COVID-19 cases, but it sounds more like opportunism.

  2. Health officials warn that Rikers will essentially become an incubator to spread the virus.

    As opposed to, having appropriately restricted “visitors”, becoming a compassionate laboratory to study the virus?

  3. Holy shit, is Reason really going to choose the “release violent criminals infected with the plague into the general public” as the hill to die on?
    Not a fucking story or even word on the small businesses consequences of the latest panic, but 6 fucking articles a day on how we should pity free convicts.

    1. Funny, we’ve been “dying on this hill” for 50 years now.

      1. You’ve been dying on a lot of idiotic hills, Scott

  4. At least they’re getting tested.

  5. Things are just getting worse and worse.

  6. Honestly, releasing a bunch of COVID-19 infected people into the wild just to “try and limit the spread of coronavirus” in the jail is exactly the fate that New York City deserves.

    Where’s that shithead SimonP and all the other bugmen that love to laud the benefits of living in hyper-dense urban cities? Has that over-compensating, self-loathing hicklib Rev. Arty gotten the coofs yet from living in his “successful, educated urban area,” as he so richly deserves?

    1. Never mind, he popped up in the economy thread. Looks like he’s trying to rationalize how to keep his shithole city from being overrun by Chinkercoofs.

  7. God it would be helpful if we could find out if these were NEW infections (yesterday I was negative today I am positive) or simply NEWLY DISCOVERED cases (my first test was positive). The number of infected doubling over the weekend wouldn’t be surprising at all if the number of people tested were also doubled.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.