Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Coronavirus

Ohio Releases 28 Low-Level Offenders To Reduce Spread of Coronavirus

One man was arrested because he didn't have enough bus fare to make his court date.

Zuri Davis | 3.17.2020 10:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Courtroom | Photographerlondon/Dreamstime.com
(Photographerlondon/Dreamstime.com)

An Ohio county is minimizing the spread of coronavirus in its corrections system by releasing inmates from its jail.

Overcrowding, poor sanitary conditions, and the presence of elderly inmates contribute to the fear that American jails and prisons are ill-prepared for the spread of coronavirus. Leonard Rubenstein, a senior scientist at Johns Hopkins, told Axios that prisons are the "perfect environment for the spread of COVID-19" because of these factors.

To reduce the risk to its county jail, the Cuyahoga County Court conducted hearings on a Saturday (something that happens rarely). They processed multiple cases that ended in plea deals, sentencing, court-supervised treatment, probation, or jail time at a state facility. By the end of the day, 28 low-level offenders were released. Officials have a goal of releasing 300 offenders before the situation worsens.

Reporter Cory Shaffer tweeted that one of the inmates released was arrested after a lack of bus fare prevented him from appearing in court.

Judge Brendan Sheehan says he has gotten two inmates out of the jail so far this am — one who was charged with theft because he got mad when he didn't get a raise and stole a check and paid himself $600, another who got arrested because he didn't have bus fare to come to court. pic.twitter.com/uQcRVreb04

— Cory Shaffer (@cory_shaffer) March 14, 2020

As of Monday, Cuyahoga County reported 24 confirmed coronavirus cases. Dr. Amy Acton, the director of the Ohio Department of Health, estimated last week that 100,000 Ohioans, one percent of the state's population, was carrying the virus.

The concern for inmates is a national matter. Some states have canceled visitation, public defenders are calling for the release of non-violent offenders, and district attorneys are reconsidering bail policies. Reason's Scott Shackford reported in 2018 how America's bail system keeps poor people behind bars despite not being convicted of a crime. The Prison Policy Initiative also found in 2018 that most people sitting in jail have yet to be convicted.

Some parts of the legal system are only implementing half-measures. A Baltimore youth defender tweeted that a judge denied a motion to release a 15-year-old charged with a misdemeanor while citing coronavirus as a reason to delay his trial.

Last week, Democratic and Republican senators submitted letters inquiring the Bureau of Prisons and Immigration and Customs Enforcement about their plans to keep inmates and detainees healthy during the pandemic.

Other countries are facing similar issues. Iran, which currently has the third-highest number of confirmed cases worldwide, temporarily freed 70,000 prisoners earlier this month to curb the spread of COVID-19 in jails.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Maybe Doctors Shouldn't Need the Government's Permission To Fight Coronavirus

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

CoronavirusOhioCriminal JusticeJail
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. $park¥ is the Worst   5 years ago

    One man was arrested because he didn't have enough bus fare to make his court date.

    Really? Who knew it was illegal to not have enough bus fare?

    I suspect what actually happened is that he was arrested for missing his court date and the bus fare is irrelevant. No, that doesn’t make it less shitty, just more correct.

    1. H. Farnham   5 years ago

      Well obviously this poor soul is a paraplegic. Probably his wheelchair was stolen and the courthouse was too far to crawl. His phone must have been broken, and he had no way of calling either a friend for a ride or the courthouse to explain the situation. We can only surmise he also had laryngitis and was unable to holler for a neighbor/passerby to use their phone...

      1. BALONEY TONEY MAHONEY   5 years ago

        Can we surmise he used his bus fare to buy some weed or dope?

        1. Victor Whisky   5 years ago

          Why is it no cops raid wall street where it is know all the traders are geeked up on coke all day long? Why do they not raid movie and recording studios where they actors and musicians all admit on TV they are doing drugs all day long, which you think is cool.
          Why do they not raid high schools in affluent neighborhoods were most of the kids are smoking crack? A renovated building, funded in part by the tax payers, next to my office had an open house. I know for a fact as part of this open house celebration, they hired a young guy whose sole job was to pervey and deliver cokaine to the party goers. Those who attended were of course upstanding members of the community...lawyers, accountants and real estate agents. You are a racist of the most dangerous kind...an very ignorant one.

          1. BALONEY TONEY MAHONEY   5 years ago

            I'm not saying I'm for making drugs illegal, I'm just saying when ain't got a pot to piss in, do not spend your transportation money to got to court in order to smoke a few joints...If you do, you deserve to be in jail!

            You say:

            "Why do they not raid high schools in affluent neighborhoods were most of the kids are smoking crack?"

            Hey Bro, crack use peaked a long time ago & even when it was riding high, I'm pretty sure most affluent white high schoolers were not smoking it....Your statement is LUDICROUS!!!

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 years ago

        Everything is so terrible and unfair.

    2. mad.casual   5 years ago

      I suspect what actually happened is that he was arrested for missing his court date and the bus fare is irrelevant. No, that doesn’t make it less shitty, just more correct.

      Could potentially make it less shitty. If he was suspected of vehicle theft, it would make it ironic.

    3. Victor Whisky   5 years ago

      You are the type who believes poor people choose to be poor. It shows your level of ignorance and contempt for the poor. I attended a traffic court to kill time, between college classes, the court house being across the street. They got a poor old black man charged with driving with bald tires. Obviously, most poor people can't afford to buy new tires, they can barely buy food, but they need the car to go to work as the US mass transit system sucks. So the courts treats it as an intentional act, he was intentionally driving with bald tires. They threw a fine at him. Here's the poor guy who has no money to buy new tires, now has to find more money to pay a fine. The sure way for municipalities to raise money without taxing those who can afford to pay, thereby assuring to get reelected, is to criminalize the poor. You are one aragant stooge.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 years ago

        Yup. Everything is so terrible and unfair.

        Aragant. Haha

      2. BALONEY TONEY MAHONEY   5 years ago

        The courts do plenty of this crap to middle class white people too, but we ain't an Oppressed class!

      3. Necron 99   5 years ago

        You are the type who believes poor people choose to be poor.

        Questions for you boss; do rich people choose to be rich? Is poor the default and rich is a choice people make or is it just the luck of the draw? Are there choices poor people can make that will make them less poor, but for some reason, like the luck of the draw, they don't make those choices?

  2. loveconstitution1789   5 years ago

    Non-excessive bail is already a constitutional right under the 8th Amendment.

    Don't let government hacks get any feel good publicity when they normally violate the Constitution with smiles.

  3. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

    There's no need to BS with the truth.

    "One man was arrested because he didn't have enough bus fare to make his court date."

    He was arrested because he didn't show up for his court date.

    1. Longtobefree   5 years ago

      Well, he got a free ride from the cops AFTER he missed the date. Why don't they let folks call the cops for a free ride to the court house ON the court date?
      Oh, right. Donut sales would tank and plunge us into crisis.

      1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

        There are certain things that are necessary for the proper functioning of justice. Compelling people to come to court--either as a defendant or as a witness--is one of them. Yeah, I'd think that if people are entitled to anything from government, it's free transportation when they've been compelled to appear in court. But that's not what's going on here.

        When people are arrested, indicted, and released pending their court date, they can be released on their own "recognizance" as a substitute for bail. That means that if he's a defendant, then he recognizes that he has a legal obligation to appear in court at such and such a time on a certain date. They enter into that agreement more or less willingly--and it is the alternative to bail.

        If he was a defendant, then there was enough evidence to indict the defendant and hold him in jail until trial, but the judge agreed to release him until the trial date IF IF IF the defendant agreed to come back to court on the trial date. No bail necessary!

        If he agreed to show up and he broke that agreement--then he was arrested for breaking that agreement. If he's a defendant, I don't know whether the initial crime he was accused of was something that should be legitimately against the law, but, otherwise, this is the way things should happen in Libertopia, too. Can't have justice without compelling defendants and witnesses to appear in court.

        If all that is so, this guy was not arrested because he didn't have money for cab. He was arrested because he didn't show up on his court date. If the judge decides to let him off because he didn't have transportation, that's one thing--but then he wasn't arrested for his lack of transportation. He was arrested because he was a defendant or a witness who agreed to show up on such and such a date--and broke his agreement.

        1. mad.casual   5 years ago

          Compelling people to come to court–either as a defendant or as a witness–is one of them. Yeah, I’d think that if people are entitled to anything from government, it’s free transportation when they’ve been compelled to appear in court. But that’s not what’s going on here.

          Seems like, even in olden days, personal appearance wouldn't be necessary. I agree that they need to present or identify themselves and/or testify, but the necessity of face-to-face is a bit contrived.

          This still doesn't excuse or address his having broken the agreement. Even if the cops showed up to offer him a free ride, he could've skipped town or otherwise missed his free ride.

        2. EWM   5 years ago

          There is only one thing necessary for proper justice. It's called making the victim whole. That can happen without compelling people to come to court.
          A "Judge" is thug #1 who threatens you with violence so you will associate with him. A "police officer" is thug #2 who carries out the threat of thug #1. Yet, some people pretend to have a problem with gang rape.

        3. Victor Whisky   5 years ago

          Too bad we can't be all be millionaires with a team of high priced lawyers so we don't ever have to show up to court for crimes thousands times worse than the poor fellow supposedly committed. Municipalities achieve revenue enhancement by criminalizing the poor.

      2. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   5 years ago

        Because the cops aren't a taxpayer subsidized taxi service?

        If you have no way to get to court, you should avoid doing things that require you to go to court.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   5 years ago

    By the end of the day, 28 low-level offenders were released.

    SOFT ON CRIME

  5. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    One man was arrested because he didn’t have enough bus fare to make his court date.

    So he isn't a low level offender; he is an innocent man awaiting trial.
    You can't be an offender at any level until after a conviction.

    1. mad.casual   5 years ago

      So he isn’t a low level offender; he is an innocent man awaiting trial.
      You can’t be an offender at any level until after a conviction.

      Sure. And jails are full of lots of innocent men, some of them with their victims' blood on their hands, who just happened to be witnessed committing crimes and/or apprehended at the scene by police.

  6. Dillinger   5 years ago

    >>By the end of the day, 28 low-level offenders were released.

    tell me they were tested first.

  7. Echospinner   5 years ago

    The Cuyahoga county prison system, Cleveland police, has a long history. Much of it not pretty.

    Last I heard the local judges are asked to keep people accused of non violent, non sexual misdemeanors out of jail. I can report that local cops are just watching out for what needs attention.

  8. SharonDRyan   5 years ago

    Want To Work From Home Without Selling Anything? No Experience Needed, Weekly Payments... Join Exclusive Group Of People That Cracked The Code Of Financial Freedom! Learn More details... Read more  

  9. tracybambriz   5 years ago

    <­­­­­­­Half ye­­­­­­­ar ago, after getting fired from my previous job , i've been blessed to find this gr­­­­­­­eat site online that literally saved me... They offer online wo­­­­­­­rk for people to work fro­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­ their homes. Last check after working with them for 3 months was $12000... Ama­­­­­­­zing thing about is that only thing required is basic typi­­­­­­­ng skills and reli­­­­­­­able internet...
    More Read

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!