Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Capitalism

Capitalism Has Improved Access to Entertainment

Central planning doesn’t work.

John Stossel | 1.22.2020 12:01 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
StosselTV | StosselTV
(StosselTV)

Reporters complain about business. We overlook the constant improvements in our lives made possible by greedy businesses competing for your money. Think about how our access to entertainment has improved.

"When I was a kid," says Sean Malone in a new video for the Foundation for Economic Education, "my TV broadcast options were PBS, Fox, ABC, NBC, and CBS. Depending on the weather, it was hit or miss whether or not they were even watchable."

1977 brought the first video rental store. "We literally had to rent a VCR along with two or three movies we could get on VHS from Blockbuster," Malone reminds us, pointing out how much changed. "Now just about anything I've ever wanted to watch is available at the click of a button."

Here's a short version I released this week of the FEE video. It wasn't government or big movie studios that made the amazing array of new options available. They dragged their feet. Malone points out that "the astounding wealth of home entertainment options we have today are the result of entrepreneurial start-ups, like Blockbuster."

Blockbuster letting people watch movies whenever we wanted was a big improvement. But people are ingrates about the things capitalism makes possible. In the 1990s, people complained that Blockbuster's chokehold on video entertainment was so strong that the company would be able to censor anything it didn't like.

Special sanitized versions of movies were distributed through Blockbuster. How would we ever get to see the movies as they were originally intended? Clearly, Blockbuster was a monopoly. Government should regulate "Big Videotape" and break up the Blockbuster monopoly!

Government didn't. Yet Blockbuster is now bankrupt. Its competitors offered so many better things.

That's something to think about now when people call Facebook and Google monopolies. A few years ago, people claimed Netflix had a monopoly.

But without government suppressing competition, Netflix had no way to maintain its temporary hold on the streaming market. Other companies caught up fast. Customers decide which businesses succeed and which ones fail.

This is why centrally planning an economy doesn't work. "Politicians and bureaucrats don't know what people are going to value," explains Malone. "They pick winners and losers based on what they want or what they think is going to earn them the most important allies."

Blockbuster's demise began when it charged a man named Reed Hastings $40 in late fees. That annoyed him so much, he started a subscription-based, mail-order movie rental company he called Netflix.

Then, Netflix made movies available online.

Now we have instant access to more entertainment than ever through Disney+, Hulu, Amazon Prime, etc., all for a fraction of the cost of the original Netflix.

Still, we complain. That's how it is with capitalism, and it's a wonderful thing. While we complain, entrepreneurs like Hastings invent faster, easier ways to get us what we want. Many offer us options we never knew we wanted, putting old giants out of business.

There is an economics lesson in that. When entrepreneurs face competition, they often lose, but the fights make life better for us consumers.

This process of old things being replaced by new and better ones was dubbed "creative destruction" by economist Joseph Schumpeter. We see creative destruction in every industry.

The first flip phone cost $1,000 and couldn't do the things we expect phones to do today. Competition drove further innovation. We got the Blackberry, and then the iPhone.

What amazing things will businesses come up with next?

Malone's video points out that the best way to find out is to keep government and central planning out of the mix.

Once government wades in with regulations, it tends to freeze the current model in place, assuming it's the best way to do things.

But the best way to do things is one that we haven't even thought of yet, produced by the endless creative process called competition.

COPYRIGHT 2020 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Supreme Court Leaves Obamacare Trapped in Legal Limbo

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

CapitalismEntertainmentMoviesJohn StosselWeb Video
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (17)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   5 years ago

    Stossel, thanks for showing unreason staff how to be Libertarian-ish.

    Pretty good for an ex-Lefty Propagandist in the MSM.

  2. IceTrey   5 years ago

    Fox started in '86 so that Malone guy grew up in the 90s when cable was available.

    1. Brandybuck   5 years ago

      I grew up with only ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS. No Fox. No cable. We did have an independent station, but eventually got bought up by Fox. It was mostly a local news plus reruns station.

  3. JeremyR   5 years ago

    I live in a rural area, so I can't get internet that will allow me to stream video. Or music, for that matter. Hell, I can't even watch Youtube, really.

    Blockbuster's demise was a number of factors. Firstly, Hollywood acted like a cartel in the VHS era, essentially pricing movies at $100 or more. This meant people could not afford to buy them, but rental businesses could. This changed in the DVD era.

    Then you had competition from libraries. Not only did they move into the DVD rental business, they also rent games. Hilariously, a local blockbuster has been replaced by a library in the same building.

    1. some guy   5 years ago

      Satellite high-speed internet will soon be an option everywhere. Keep an eye out for it.

    2. Brandybuck   5 years ago

      That's really rural then. Streaming music is bandwidth cheap. Can you get satellite?

      Blockbuster lost it's "monopoly" early on. Every tiny town had it's tiny video shop with only a few dozen titles (plus porn in the back). But real competitors did pop up. I saw the demise start with kiosks, and then with cheap DVD purchases. But it was the Netflix DVD service that finally did them in.

      Blockbuster could have lasted, but it was too slow to change. Not it's fault, as Netflix DVD had special arrangements from the US Post Office so no one else could compete with them on shipping speed and cost. Now they're trying to push net neutrality for the same reason, special privilege from the government.

  4. Real Books   5 years ago

    People should be attending struggle sessions, not watching entertainment!

    1. Earth Skeptic   5 years ago

      That, and awarding Social Credit points.

  5. Ryan (formally HTT)   5 years ago

    Thanks John, any word on which of the two major parties speaks well of capitalism? Perhaps libertarians should consider supporting the people who support capitalism. States rights? I think there's a party that supports that much more than the other.

    Any chance they're one in the same?

    1. Brandybuck   5 years ago

      > Perhaps libertarians should consider supporting the people who support capitalism.

      That's certainly NOT the Democrats. But neither is it the modern Republican Party, which abhors free trade, loves crony deals, and tries to issue edicts to private businesses via tweets from the D.C.

      The Libertarian Party is the only party today who supports the principles of capitalism: freedom in all economic areas, with only force or fraud being outlawed. At one time the Republican had some rhetoric sort of in that area, but they've dropped even that.

      1. Mr. JD   5 years ago

        Your best efforts to paint a few Trumpisms as "just as bad as the Democrats" have failed miserably.

    2. Jett Rucker   5 years ago

      One in the same?

  6. Kevin Smith   5 years ago

    Sometimes capitalism works a little too well and now I have to sign up for 6 different streaming services to get all the content I want

    Still cheaper than cable though lol

    1. wstu   5 years ago

      That content is also on-demand and ad-free (at least for now). If money is tighter, you can rotate between services as they don't have contracts or equipment installation.

  7. Jett Rucker   5 years ago

    I wish capitalism (or something) could improve access to what we (each other) think(s). As it is, intellectual-property rights enable prive operators like Amazon.com to censor expressions of ideas they disapprove of, and few, if any, can every express those ideas, and even fewer happen across those expressions. http://www.codoh.com

  8. George K. Lewis   5 years ago

    Hi Member of Reason.................

    This is very Amazing when i saw in my Acount 10000$ par month .Just do work online at home on laptop with my best freinds . So u can always make Dollar Easily at home on laptop ,,
    Check For info Here,
    ===> BEST USA WORK <===

  9. RanksWord   5 years ago

    capitalism works a little too well and now I have to sign up for several different streaming services to get all the content I want.

    Still cheaper than cable and airocide

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Third-Rate Romance

Charles Oliver | 5.30.2025 4:00 AM

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!