Movies

Review: Cats

Pretty hate machine.

|

I was so looking forward to panning this movie. I mean mercilessly, with one of those no-adjectives-spared broadsides that reviewers enjoy lobbing at pictures they find especially worthless. I think anyone who reared back in horror at the disturbingly weird first trailer for Cats when it came out last summer will know this feeling.

But it turns out there's a bit more to the movie than its baked-in silliness. (You either will or won't roll with a film in which all of the actors are flocked with digital cat fur, except the ones in mouse or cockroach drag.) And while I'm certain I'll never feel the need to sit through it again, I suspect there are many who'll feel differently—after all, it took a lot of people to keep Andrew Lloyd Webber's uber-popular musical humming along on stage for 21 years in London, and 18 years in New York, and pretty much nonstop around the world. The movie has trudgy stretches, no denying that, and there's still not a lot of story—basically this is a procession of showcase numbers, dominated, of course, by the ineffably maudlin "Memory."

On the other hand, James Corden, with a lick of his paw and a swipe at his whiskers, makes a jaunty song-and-dance cat called Bustopher; Ian McKellen, as a "theatre cat" named Gus, laps milk from a plate with an old-pro's total commitment; and Taylor Swift, deploying a faint English accent and a spray-can of glittery catnip, brings some popstar energy to the role of the feline fatale Bombalurina. (Swift also cowrote a new song with Webber called "Beautiful Ghosts," and it fits in nicely amid the older material.) Also slinking around the cobbled streets and oversized interiors are a tap-dancing cat, a top-hatted magical cat, a pair of felonious B&E cats, and a couple of cats with boobs, too—which is, OK, a little off.

Director Tom Hooper (Les Misérables, The King's Speech) keeps his cameras prowling around relentlessly, but he can't shake off all of the staginess left over from the original show. (An overhead view looking down at dancers scampering around a big room on a bare wooden floor might have been shot in a rehearsal hall.) But this feeling of enclosed action (on madly imaginative sets designed by Hooper's longtime collaborator, Eve Stewart) does suggest how exciting early productions of Cats must have seemed in the malleable reality of a theatre. New York Times critic Frank Rich, reviewing the show when it opened on Broadway in 1982, wrote that it "believes in purely theatrical magic, and on that faith it unquestionably delivers."

This is not quite the case with the movie, which at times creates the sensation of being up onstage with live performers and getting in their way. And it's crowded up there: Along with the movie's nominal star, Francesca Hayward—a legit English ballerina playing the abandoned cat Victoria with a wide-eyed sweetness—we also have Idris Elba, with a rakish fedora and green-glowing eyes, as the gangster cat Macavity; Rebel Wilson as the generously upholstered, roach-munching housecat Jennyanydots; Judi Dench as the purring matriarch Old Deuteronomy, who wears a real fur coat over her coat of CG fur; and Jennifer Hudson as the tragic "glamour cat" Grizabella, bringing her formidable pipes to bear on the show's most famous song.

Cats has been made with skill and affection by people who clearly revere the old stage show (or maybe just like cats a lot). Those who feel the same will be down with this movie; those who don't will run screaming in terror. I think you know who you are.

Advertisement

NEXT: It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Why would they use CGI fur when the stage shows have used practical costumes the whole time?

    1. So many questions to ask about this movie…

      1. …or not. We could just ignore it and hopes it goes away the stray cat that shows up on your front porch.

  2. applause for not piling on.

  3. They wanted to make the cats “lifesize” by placing these odd digitally mastered large sets around them but unless they wanted to portray teacup kittens they way overdid it. Have the people involved in making this film ever seen a cat? I kept thinking if a much better film The Borrowers.

    1. they sent the actors to How to be a Cat School or something

  4. Cats has been made with skill and affection by people who clearly revere the old stage show (or maybe just like cats a lot).

    Lotta overlap on the Venn diagram between those two groups.

  5. Which feline movie has a better soundtrack? Cats or Josie and the Pussycats?

    I think we know the answer.

    1. I was shocked by how good the music was in Josie And The Pussycats. I was expecting horribly formulaic commercial garbage, but it turned out to be really good ’90s pop-punk.

      1. That’s because all the non-DuJour songs were written and performed by Letters to Cleo, a ’90s pop punk band.

        I have the soundtrack. It still holds up today.

  6. I love the play. I have no interest in seeing the movie. All the things I love about the play have been removed and the cats are just creepy.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.