2019 Year in Review

Glenn Garvin's Top 10 Television Programs of 2019

Some of which did not actually appear on television networks

|

It got overlooked a bit because of the Emmy fascination with Game Of Thrones, which collected 32 nominations this year (the most ever by a single television series) and boosted HBO's total to an amazing 137. (Imagine how many nominations Game Of Thrones might have gotten if its final season was actually any good.)

But the real revelation of the Emmys is the snowballing television dominance of streaming services, especially over the foundering broadcast dinosaurs. Consider the numbers: Netflix had 117 nominations; NBC, the top broadcast network, 58. Amazon Prime had 47; CBS, the second-rank network, 43. Hulu scored 20, just under ABC's 26 and ahead of Fox's 18. Overall, the Big Three streaming services had 184 nominations, a striking 14 percent increase from 2018 and a substantial margin ahead of the broadcast nets' 145.

With the way the streaming services are pirating talent and assets from the rest of television, those numbers are certain to grow even more lopsided next year. Netflix spent $500 million on deals with mega-producers Ryan Murphy, Shonda Rhimes, and Kenya Barris. And while it won't win them any Emmys, the streamers in the past few months have spent something on the order of $2.5 billion to acquire rights to reruns of The Big Bang Theory, Seinfeld, The Office, and Friends in hopes of luring cable cord-cutters to subscribe. Rumored to be their next target: Dick Wolf's 72 seasons of the Law & Order and Chicago franchises.

For all that, there's still considerable uncertainty about the future landscape of television. Streaming services were birthed by the demented rates that government-granted cable monopolies were imposing on their increasingly disgruntled customers. Netflix's top price of $16 a month is practically free compared to Comcast's cable packages, which can hit $140 monthly even before premium channels like HBO and Showtime are added in.

But all that money to pay for Ross and Rachel and the Cal Tech nerds will have to come from somewhere, and it's unlikely to be advertisers, who have found streaming to be of uncertain value. NFL games, for instance, seem to be a hot property for streaming, with a 77 percent increase in 2019. But when advertisers looked more closely, they didn't like what they saw: The average NFL audience member stayed on-line just eight minutes, not enough to see, much less absorb, commercials. Most of them seem to be  looking in occasionally for a minute or two to check on a score, then going about their business.

So what happens when streaming prices start rising? Will it still prove attractive to cost-conscious cord-cutters? For that matter, will they even be interested in some of these old shows in the first place? Seinfeld has been in syndication for 21 years. At some point, even I Love Lucy stopped drawing viewers. The bottom line: Nobody really knows. But it's worth remembering that the cutting edge technology of 2001—satellite radio—spent itself over a cliff in pursuit of deals with Howard Stern, major league baseball and other mega-money entertainment. In the end, the two networks, XM and Sirius, were forced to merge and have never recovered. We may know that television's past is ending, but the future remains unknown.

What we also know: TV had some great moments in 2019, whether you watch it via cable, computer or even rabbit ears. The top 10 shows:

10. (tie) The Conners (ABC) and Killing Eve (BBC America). One of the great mysteries of TV is how The Conners, the successor to Roseanne, manages to be so funny while following a family dealing with some determinedly unfunny situations, including opioid addiction, single parenthood and working-class malaise. And if its realistic portrayal of the underside of blue-collar life is a service to a little-seen-on-TV demographic, so is Killing Eve, a touching and often funny look at the problems of psychosexually twisted female serial killers.

9. Evil (CBS). This mélange of serial killers, busybody demons and Catholic theology is intelligent, chilling, and hard to describe, which may explain why it's only averaging a dead-on-arrival 3.5 million viewers. Yet CBS has already renewed it for a second season, more mysterious (though welcome) than any of the enigmas its characters face.

8. Hitsville: the Making of Motown (Showtime). A documentary on the first black record label to break into white America, Hitsville is not only fascinating but fun. "Oh, it doesn't matter what you wear/Just as long as you are there/So come on, every guy, grab a girl/Everywhere around the world …"

7. County Music (PBS). Ken Burns at his yarn-spinning best, recalling the eccentrics who—when not selling goat-testicle implants or making their harmonicas sound like bagpipes—invented a populist art form.

6. Grace and Frankie (Netflix). A comedy that started off as a seeming one-shot novelty—Lily Tomlin as an aging hippie and Jane Fonda as an aging Junior Leaguer, thrust together when their husbands run off together—Grace and Frankie, five seasons later, is not only hilarious but the best TV series ever at confronting the problems of age, from the hassles of Social Security to the shortage of vibrators suited to arthritic hands.

5. Better Call Saul (AMC). A stand-up comic who turned out to have real acting talent, Bob Odenkirk's portrayal of a lovably sleazy lawyer is one of the finest ongoing performances on TV. Plus, he's got great lawyer jokes: "What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 70? 'Your honor.'"

4. The Deuce (HBO). David Simon's fascinating drama about New York City's sex industry came to an end after three seasons. Spoiler alert: The Internet ruined everything.

3. The Chi (Showtime). Like the lives of its characters—the families who live amid a Chicago drug-war combat zone—The Chi is funny, sad, horrifying, bloody, and overwhelmingly human.

2. The Morning Show (Apple TV). Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon strike fiery sparks as they try to out-sleaze their bosses at a cable news network more amoral than anything Donald Trump could ever imagine.

1. The Highwaymen. (Netflix). Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson as a pair of Texas cops chasing Bonnie and Clyde was not only riveting drama but a kind of allegory of the state of TV streaming service. With big-time, big-screen stars, lush cinematic photography and a theatrical debut of a couple of weeks to qualify it for the Oscars before moving to Netflix, was it really television? Or a movie? And does anyone care?

Advertisement

NEXT: When Is an Officer Impeached?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Country has an R in it you utterly tasteless toad.

    1. Is that level of vitriol really justified for a misspelling?

      1. In this case, yes…

  2. i wondered about Evil. and I love Odenkirk.

    1. It’s pretty good. Definitely different.

  3. I’ve only seen one of these.

    1. Same here. I love Better Call Saul. Never heard of any of the others. And where is The Expanse? Give me your nerd card, Garvin.

  4. The transition to streaming is a perfect economics lesson, that I recently gave my kids. For years people who really ought to know better would say things like “I pay $250 per month for all these channels I don’t want. I should be able to unbundle and only pay for the channels I want.”

    No, in fact, you have signaled to the market that you are willing to pay $250/month for the handful of channels that you watch. That those others were bundled in means very little. Those same people are acting surprised that their streaming bills are starting to add up to be somewhat close to their old cable bills. Sure, Netflix is $20 a month. But then, Netflix doesn’t have the disney stuff any more…that’s another $20 per month. Ooop, need to do Huluu too. And periodically buy movies from Amazon Prime. Don’t forget the $80 – $100 internet bill.

    At the end of the day, the new world order of streaming is definitely more efficient and will allow for more dynamism of content. But people should expect that they won’t get all the content they want, unless they are willing to pay near what they were paying anyways.

    1. “unless they are willing to pay near what they were paying anyways.”

      You should look into bittorrent, where you have a very wide range of choices on offer to download for free. This includes porn and cracked games etc. You neededn’t send any of your money to Huluu, Amazon, Netflix or any other internet outfit.

    2. Yes, you wildly overpay for everything, it will get cable-bill pricey.

      If you are paying $20/month for Disney, you are getting ripped off. If you buy Disney+ from Disney, instead of wherever you are looking, it is just $7/month. You are also getting ripped off on Netflix; $16/month is their highest tier. $80/month for internet gets me 1 gigabit download speed, which I don’t need at all, even with two teens. Try $55/month for 250 mbits/sec.

      Pro tip: if you have a point to make, you aren’t really making it by wildly inflating the numbers.

    3. I agree with `Overt`: subscribers are paying for the channels they like. The channels they may not care for are included by the license holder contracts to push content that people would not pay for, thereby obtaining exposure they would not otherwise receive. It is a myth that cutting these unwanted channels would save the subscriber money. Inded, the cost of maintaining and enlarging the billing infrastructure that the cable companies implement and operate, given that they could move to charging for individual channels, would drastically increase.

      In addition, the author leaves out two major points, or went light on his research.

      1. Cable companies spend a very large amount of their revenues on licences for the channels and content they provide to the home subscriber. The content license holders exercise an extraordinary amount of power via this relationship. In the middles teens, during the periodic negotiation of contract rates to distribute its content, ABC suspended its signal to one of the the major players on the east coast for a month or more. The details of the ultimate settlement were not made public. The licence holders get away with the easy dodge of saying nothing and letting the blame fall on the distribution providers (ie: cable companies). Also, the major cable companies have bought or developed their own production companies as well. Look up who owns NBC-Universal.

      The second largest amount of money spent is on sending technicians to residences. I went on such a “truck roll” as an observer from the R&D division. The subscriber complained of no service. After driving to the residence, spending about an hour verifying correct signal at various points from the top of the pole to the tvs inside the house, the tech isolated the problem: a teenager, living in the basement, had unplugged the power supply (a simple `wall wart`) to a small signal boosting amplifier in the effort to plug in something of their own.

      In summery, the streaming services know all of this very well; they are developing their own content as a result, which has always been their objective. We are seeing just the beginning of them increasing their prices.

  5. After first seeing Lily Tomlin as Ernestine the operator, I’d watch almost anything she does. But I won’t watch Jane Fonda. I never much liked any of her movies, then she insulted the country by manning an anti-aircraft gun in North Vietnam, and then she doubled down by acting as if she simply wasn’t aware of how offensive that was. I can never get those images out of my head.

  6. The second season of Castle Rock on Hulu was pretty good. There may have been one too many twists in the end (or the middle), but long stretches were fantastic.

    I’d heard that ABC and CBS were still broadcasting something other than football, but I couldn’t have verified that rumor myself.

  7. Surprised that Fox took any Emmys…

    Way to be wishy washy and cheap out on a top 10 by having a tie.

    Other than Saul and Ken Burns, the rest look/sound mostly awful. Give me the I Love Lucy reruns any day.

    1. I’d recommend The Highwaymen, if you have Netflix.

  8. My best are “Perpetual Grace, Ltd.”, Ben Kingsley as a bad ass religous con man, and “Pennyworth”, Alfred the butler as a young man fresh out of the SAS in a dystopian UK.

  9. Here it is what you want –
    https://www.banknilami.com/
    For Bank auction properties in India

  10. Veep is done, but it was fantastically funny. Peaky Blinders is quite good, so is Jack Ryan, and Seal Team. Grace and Frankie is only ok, and Saul is a disappointing shadow of BB. Flixtor for the win.

  11. AseanQQ, Promotor Poker Online, Game Domino 99, Bandar Kiu, Adu QQ, Sakong Online, Poker Capsa, Domino Online, Bandar QQ, Adu Kiu, Poker Indonesia http://27.124.27.112

  12. TV much?

    sez The Boys & Peaky Blinders.

    1. Agree on The Boys. I probably would have given up after the first episode but for a friend of mine’s recommendation. By the end–and it’s a shorter season that most–it’s diabolical.

  13. Yeah I don’t think her interpretations are all as many say.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.