Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Congress

Congress Will Vote Today on Continuing Resolution That Hikes Spending, Extends Patriot Act Surveillance

Rep. Justin Amash and some progressive lawmakers are trying to block it, but most Democrats seem happy to hand more spying powers to a president they are investigating for abusing his power.

Eric Boehm | 11.19.2019 11:10 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
admphotostwo564116(1) |  AdMedia/Newscom
( AdMedia/Newscom)

At the same time that Democrats are holding impeachment inquiries to determine if President Donald Trump abused his executive power, they apparently have no qualms about letting him continue to spy on Americans.

While impeachment hearings are getting most of the attention on Capitol Hill today, House Democrats will also hold a vote on a continuing resolution that will postpone a government shutdown—slated for this Thursday, if Congress can't agree on a budget deal—until December 20. Included in the short-term budget deal is a provision to fully re-authorize the Patriot Act for an additional three months beyond its current sunset at the end of the year, extending it through March 2020. That will postpone any effort to reform or abolish the 9/11-era law that grants the federal government broad surveillance powers including the ability to collect phone records and online data.

"Very cool way to resist Trump by ensuring he continues to have terrifying authoritarian surveillance powers," wrote Evan Greer, deputy director for Fight For The Future, a digital rights advocacy group, on Twitter.

Rep. Justin Amash (I–Mich.) introduced an amendment on Monday night that would have removed the Patriot Act reauthorization from the continuing resolution, but the amendment was blocked by Democratic leaders.

I introduced an amendment to strip the Patriot Act extension from the spending bill. It has no business being in there. Just like GOP leaders, Dem leaders ruled my amendment out of order. Neither party protects your rights, even though securing rights is why government exists! https://t.co/6kCKt5zisP

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) November 18, 2019

The continuing resolution will also boost pay for the military, fund next year's census, and hike overall spending by about $322 billion—a figure that was agreed to earlier this year, but still seems irresponsible given the rapidly rising deficit and $23 trillion national debt.

The four-week stopgap funding bill also punts on the question of paying for Trump's border wall. That shortcoming might be the best way to stop the reauthorization of the surveillance provisions, since Trump has demanded funding for the border wall in exchange for his signature on a continuing resolution. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) has suggested that Trump might veto the bill in an effort to hamstring the ongoing impeachment investigation.

The continuing resolution's passage in the House seems assured, but some Democrats are signaling their unwillingness to support the bill because of the surveillance issues. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (D–Minn.) tweeted that they opposed the Patriot Act's reauthorization.

Yeah that's gonna be a no from me dog https://t.co/O6t8h6zkgs

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 18, 2019

Yeah…no. Count me out. https://t.co/3MsfgzdVsc

— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) November 19, 2019

Progressive groups including Demand Progress have also highlighted the Patriot Act reauthorization in tweets and emails encouraging opposition to the continuing resolution. But while Democrats may face a small revolt from their left flank, there is little reason to think the passage of the continuing resolution will be in doubt when it is brought to the floor later on Tuesday.

Asked about the possible progressive opposition to the spending bill Tuesday, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D–Md.) told CNN's Haley Byrd that the three-month extension will allow time for lawmakers to "deal with the issue legislatively," rather than simply letting the Patriot Act lapse.

If there is a silver lining in today's likely reauthorization of mass surveillance of Americans, it could be that Democratic leaders commit to at least considering the possibility of maybe reforming an 18-year-old law that's eroded civil liberties without making Americans much safer.

"Every representative in Congress should oppose this legislation," Amash tweeted on Monday. It would be a huge surprise if more than a handful of lawmakers do.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Andrew Yang's 'Department of the Attention Economy' Is Why Libertarians Don't Trust Democrats

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

CongressGovernment ShutdownSurveillancePatriot ActTrump AdministrationDemocratic Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (38)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rich   5 years ago

    At the same time that Democrats are holding impeachment inquiries to determine if President Donald Trump abused his executive power, they apparently have no qualms about letting him continue to spy on Americans.

    It's investigations all the way down!

    1. "Ugh" says the prog   5 years ago

      "Rep. Justin Amash and some OTHER progressive lawmakers"

      FTFY.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   5 years ago

        Which policies, specifically, of Amash's do you think are progressive?

        1. Nardz   5 years ago

          Using the government as a weapon to attack one's political enemies by any means necessary

          1. Leo Kovalensky II   5 years ago

            He's not the one under investigation for this very thing.

  2. Enjoy Every Sandwich   5 years ago

    but most Democrats seem happy to hand more spying powers to a president they are investigating for abusing his power

    One of the many reasons I have trouble taking all of their hysterical talk about Nazi Germany, Gilead, etc. seriously.

    1. Idle Hands   5 years ago

      They don't believe it themselves. If they did they wouldn't always talk about enacting laws that would disarm themselves and leave them to the mercy of this orange dictator either.

  3. Quo Usque Tandem   5 years ago

    Amash: A Voice Crying in the Wilderness; he may be dead on with most issues but nobody seems to care in a world of business as usual and moar goverment

    1. Nardz   5 years ago

      Amash completely impotent?
      At least, he seems to like it that way

  4. Idle Hands   5 years ago

    Democrats seem happy to hand more spying powers to a president they are investigating for abusing his power.

    Of course they are. It makes more sense when you realize this president isn't actually in control of the bureaucracy he was elected to be in charge of. As we see in Russia gate and this most recent Ukranian business. The security state is actively aligned with the Dems against the republicans right now, so why screw up a good thing? Why piss off the people who are actively helping politically?

    1. Ron   5 years ago

      What Idle says is true

    2. Jerryskids   5 years ago

      They know the Orange Usurper is only there temporarily and as soon as he's gone it will be back to business as usual. Why would they vote to give themselves a permanent disadvantage in the name of giving their enemy a temporary disadvantage?

      1. Kevin Smith   5 years ago

        Exactly, they know that whether its in 2020, 2024, or even 2028, eventually the power will be theirs to abuse again

  5. loveconstitution1789   5 years ago

    Congress Will Vote Today on Continuing Resolution That Hikes Spending, Extends Patriot Act Surveillance

    Why not stick with what "works"?

    1. loveconstitution1789   5 years ago

      Rep. Justin Amash and some progressive lawmakers are trying to block it, but most Democrats seem happy to hand more spying powers to a president they are investigating for abusing his power.

      Who knows what Republicans are going to do. The Media Narrative has not been released. Boehm only cares about Democrats.

      1. SIV   5 years ago

        A quick scan of the twitters shows Thomas Massie and some Freedom Caucus members opposing it. I guess they aren't progressive enough for the provocative centrists at Reason.

  6. Ron   5 years ago

    they have cried SHUTDOWN so many times does anyone listen anymore

  7. Dillinger   5 years ago

    shame We let them get away with pretending to be Congressmen.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   5 years ago

      Oh, they are being Congressmen. That's part of the problem.

      1. Dillinger   5 years ago

        AOC can't even dawg right

  8. TrickyVic (old school)   5 years ago

    So a Democrat control house will pass a spending bill that will probably add to the debt. Sure the Republican controlled Senate will probably pass it, and Trump sign it. But it's all the republican's fault and the dems have no dirt on their hands.

  9. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    Yeah that’s gonna be a no from me dog

    So cool. So with it. So outta sight!

  10. $park¥ is the Worst   5 years ago

    Yeah that's gonna be a no from me dog

    — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 18, 2019
    Yeah…no. Count me out.

    — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) November 19, 2019

    This is what serious politicians look like.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

      Well, at least they're voting no. Hopefully they at least understand that they can't cast their vote via SnapChat.

      1. Longtobefree   5 years ago

        They are saying on social media they will vote no.
        Want to bet the vote is a voice vote?

      2. $park¥ is the Worst   5 years ago

        How much longer do you think before vote selfies start showing up? I can see at least bubble-head A posing with duck lips and flashing the V sign while trying to figure out if Yea or Nay means no.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

          Isn't that how AOC got elected?

        2. MP   5 years ago

          You don't know what you're talking about, dog.

    2. "Ugh" says the prog   5 years ago

      You're half right.

    3. DaveSs   5 years ago

      They voted Yes to waive the 72 hour rule so it could pass today.

  11. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    Can we pass a constitutional amendment to the effect that any year in which the congress does not pass a "real" budget, does not count toward congressional pensions, all members forfeit half of their campaign funds, and all committee chairs have to resign?

  12. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    Why not just have a constitutional amendment that Congress is dissolved if they don't pass a real budget.

  13. Atlas_Shrugged   5 years ago

    Don't I remember POTUS Trump saying he did not want to sign these things anymore? He should just veto the damned thing and make Congress do their jobs and do the people's business.

    The Patriot Act is an abomination. Terrible name, as there is nothing patriotic about it at all.

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   5 years ago

      And when he signs it (like he always has) will you criticize him for it?

      1. "Ugh" says the prog   5 years ago

        What a strange thing to police.

        1. Leo Kovalensky II   5 years ago

          Holding people accountable for their actions over their words is for cucks. Amirite?

      2. Atlas_Shrugged   5 years ago

        Yep. The criticism is deserved.

        The Patriot Act IS an abomination. It eviscerated our individual liberties. Rep. Amash might be a total poser, but he is not wrong about this.

        Spending must be addressed much more concretely and directly. Are we really saying that in a 322B package, we cannot take out 16.1B (just 5%)?

        1. TJJ2000   5 years ago

          ^Dido.

          "will you criticize him for it?", Yes Leo -- bad policy is bad policy (period).

          No matter how much your wet crotch wants to believe the masses of registered Republicans are just supporting Gangster Colors over anything else... Sorry to say; That gangster-groupie mentality seems to mostly come from lefties.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!