When a 'Controlled Buy' Turns Into a Daytime Parking Lot Shootout
A drug bust gone wrong in a Pittsburgh suburb leaves the suspect dead, an agent injured, and kids and shoppers terrified.

On a typical sunny Tuesday afternoon, Northland Plaza on busy McKnight Road in the affluent Pittsburgh-area suburb of Ross Township is buzzing with people. Big Lots is full of daytime shoppers, parents are taking their young children to summer dance classes at Cynthia's School of Dance, and toddlers are taking advantage of a rare sunny day in Western Pennsylvania by playing on the playground outside of their day care.
But on July 23, the parking lot was the scene of a botched a drug bust resulting in a shootout between the suspect and undercover agents. The suspect was killed and an undercover agent was shot.
A witness described the scene as "chaos" with shoppers inside Big Lots reportedly barricading the door with a refrigerator in an effort to protect themselves from gunfire. A 34-year-old mother said her children were rushed inside the daycare building when shots rang out. Four-year-olds were ushered away from windows and huddled into corners as gunfire erupted outside. In the aftermath, frantic parents drove past a gray sedan and a gold SUV surrounded by crime scene tape, both vehicles with bullet holes through the windows.
Why did Pennsylvania's top law enforcement agency choose this spot for an armed confrontation with a low-level drug dealer?
"Look, this work is dangerous work and we don't get to dictate the terms of every location where we meet," Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D–Pa.) said dismissively in response to questions during a press conference.
But that's simply not true. I know, because I was a major crimes detective for nearly a decade.
Parking lots are routinely chosen by police to conduct drug busts because it is easy to hide surveillance vehicles in a crowded parking lot. In training classes for undercover operations, instructors often recommend conducting drug buys in parking lots for this very reason.
At the Ross shopping center, officers were conducting an "undercover buy/bust operation" when the suspect opened fire on one of the undercover agents, according to Allegheny County Police Superintendent Coleman McDonough. Buy/bust operations are preferred by many police agencies because they are efficient. They typically result in a quick arrest and ensure a successful prosecution because of the large amount of evidence uncovered in a short period of time. In a buy/bust, you have the testimony of surveillance officers, the testimony of the undercover officers making the buy as well as evidence such as marked bills. Buy/busts save money because they do not involve lengthy investigations.
But buy/bust operations are also notoriously dangerous due to the "shock and awe" aspect of the arrest; they usually involve several screaming cops with guns drawn ordering the arrestee to the ground. This danger is magnified when the undercover officers attempt to make the arrest themselves, because the subject likely doesn't even realize he or she is dealing with police, as robbery is common in drug transactions.
In this case, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office chose to conduct the most dangerous type of drug bust, using undercover agents to make the arrest—despite having other options.
Buy/bust operations are typically used when the identity of the subject is unknown. But the now-deceased suspect, Omari Thompson, was no stranger to police. Rather, he had an extensive criminal history and was considered to be armed and dangerous. In fact, at the time of this incident, Thompson was on probation for drug and weapons charges, which means he is subject to warrantless searches of his residence. In other words, police had numerous alternatives to make this arrest without a violent confrontation. They did not choose those options.
State agents knew the identity of the suspect, knew he was armed and dangerous, knew he has responded violently to an armed confrontation in the past, knew there was another mechanism to investigate his illegal activity, and they still chose to conduct this operation in mid-afternoon surrounded by innocent men, women, and children.
This isn't an isolated incident. Another botched drug bust resulting in a shootout at a busy shopping plaza occurred in May at the hands of the Pennsylvania State Police. Undercover cops in Detroit unknowingly attempted to arrest each other in November 2017, resulting in a brawl in the streets. In 2015, an Albuquerque Police Lieutenant shot his own undercover narcotics detective eight times during a drug buy because he mistook him as the suspect.
Ironically, these operations are known as "controlled buys." The term gives the false impression that the interaction will be predictable and under the control of the narcotics officers. Officers may even choose them because they believe they will be safer for their colleagues. But as the death of Thompson, the shooting of an undercover officer, and the panic of shoppers and toddlers demonstrate, there was nothing controlled about it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In all of this – no one chose to not enforce immoral laws.
Once that line was crossed, what other lines did anyone expect them to stop at?
Look, this work is dangerous work and we don’t get to dictate the terms of every location where we meet…
Any response starting with “look” should get immediate push back. And as this article goes on to show, they did indeed get to dictate the terms here. To zealots (or opportunists) in the drug war, collateral damage apparently isn’t a huge concern.
Josh Shapiro was a fucking liar for stating such an untruth.
someone is confused re: meaning of controlled.
“Why did Pennsylvania’s top law enforcement agency choose this spot for an armed confrontation with a low-level drug dealer?”
Because they need the public to see/experience just how dangerous the cops imagine their job to be, so they engineered a highly dangerous situation in the middle of a bunch of bystanders.
Yep, there is something like that going on in Philly at this very moment. So far 6 cops have been shot and they have brought in at least one armored vehicle.
Final body count is yet to be determined.
BUt yeah, anyone who tells the cops to stop this bullshit instead of participate in it is a dangerous commie and the drug war must rage on because well that’s the law. Bootlickers are my favorite “libertarian” commenters here.
The dangerous commies are generally ok with risky public busts. I’m fact. I would rather see resources used to use dangerous commies instead of drug dealers.
Democrat campaign offices have listed addresses, and Antifa subversives are retry easy to find. Go after them with deadly force.
Taking a chance of killing bystanders is ok as long as it keeps someone somewhere from getting high. Jesus Fucking Christ!
Must have been in the white part of town. People get upset about shooting there.
I am making 8 to 10 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 5 hour Dailly and make 40 dollar Easily .. This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily….
>>>>>>>>> Click here and check That <<<<<<<<<<<<<
So much wrong with this incident that I don’t where to start. But the big overriding umbrella of wrongness is the drug war. None of this would have happened if narcotics were legal.
The police state would rather scare teh shit out of toddlers and their caretakers than to allow some druggie to shove shit up his nose.
“State agents knew the identity of the suspect, knew he was armed and dangerous, knew he has responded violently to an armed confrontation in the past, knew there was another mechanism to investigate his illegal activity, and they still chose to conduct this operation in mid-afternoon surrounded by innocent men, women, and children.”
But of course they didn’t choose an alternative: it wouldn’t get plastered all over the media if they arrested himself somewhere else, and how is that going to help get them a nice, fat increase to their budget?
The shoppers and kids who had to see this, hell, even the injured agent who participated in it are just more victims of the war on drugs.
Police are not “victims” of the drug war. They are the perpetrators.
“was no stranger to police. Rather, he had an extensive criminal history and was considered to be armed and dangerous. In fact, at the time of this incident, Thompson was on probation for drug and weapons charges”
Known violent, armed, dangerous perp who was back/still on the street. And when another of his type decides to shoot up 4 or more vics, we’ll have to listen to another round of gnashing of teeth and wailing about “it’s the guns”, “it’s the mental health system”, “it’s the president’s rhetoric”, “it’s the violent movies and video games”, yada yada yada.
Abuse me once, shame on you. Abuse me a million or more times…
At this point, the only Americans who don’t deserve to be shot, are cops. Sure, cops are dogs, but the rest of us are worms.
Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/ADAMTS1-EIA-Kit-245280-500.htm word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.