Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police Abuse

A Georgia Cop was Fired for Stalking and Harassing Women

Former Sergeant Scott Martin is a certified creep.

Zuri Davis | 8.6.2019 3:55 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Police | Mathayward/Dreamstime.com
(Mathayward/Dreamstime.com)

A Georgia police officer was fired in June following disturbing allegations about his contact with several women.

WTVC reports that least four women came forward to accuse Sergeant Scott Martin of the Ringgold Police Department of sinister behavior. Police Chief Dan Bilbrey called for an internal investigation into the claims in June. The subsequent investigation, which can be viewed here, uncovered a pattern of stalking, sexual advances, and abuse of authority by Martin.

The first victim told investigators that she was contacted by Martin after he found her on Facebook. Martin told her that both he and his wife thought she was "cute" and repeatedly suggested that she sleep with his wife. She repeatedly denied his advances. When she messaged "oh my God STOP" on one occasion, he blocked her.

Martin found the second victim, a college instructor, through her Linkedin page. He located her at her college one day and sat in her class about gender and sexuality for about 15 minutes. He used pet names like "sweetie" and "stinker" in his messages to her and advised her to keep their conversations private from everyone, including the police. She feared that the demand was abusive as she had witnessed similar silencing tactics during her previous work with the Department of Family and Children's services. She also reported that he watched her on campus and that she tried to avoid him.

The third victim told investigators that she met Martin when he walked into the bank where she worked to request a change in address and a new debit card following his divorce. Though Martin knew she was married, he added her on Snapchat. Their innocent message exchanges turned inappropriate after Martin requested personal pictures from her. He also reportedly sent an unsolicited picture of his genitals. She deleted him after stating that she would not be cheating on her husband.

Martin continued to be present in her life after he tried to visit her at work. He eventually married one of her former coworkers and added her as a friend on their joint Facebook account. He repeatedly asked her on a double date, which she and her husband refused in light of the Snapchat incident. He also continued to ask for sexual favors. The victim said she feared for her job since she worked alongside Martin's aunt at the bank. She also expressed feelings of intimidation since Martin told her that he was a police officer.

The fourth victim told investigators that she met Martin as part of her job cleaning city properties. She said Martin continuously followed her at work and even to the gas station. At one point, she asked Martin if she broke any laws. He told her that she hadn't. Martin repeatedly asked her questions about her intentions when he saw her at work. She also stated that he questioned her intentions when he saw her at the grocery store or gas station. The victim told investigators that the situation creeped her out even more because Martin was supposed to be one of her points of official contact if she ever experienced discomfort at work.

The investigation's search into Martin's work history found that he was fired from a school while working towards his teaching certificate. During the incident that led to his termination, he illegally used a student's disciplinary record during a mock trial in a classroom. He was also found to have exchanged inappropriate messages with a female student. At another job, where he was employed as a counselor in training, he reportedly made an inappropriate sexual remark toward a head female counselor.

Administrators at that job also expressed concern about the idea of Martin becoming a police officer, speculating that he would possibly retaliate against others. Martin did not disclose his termination or this concern when he applied to be an officer.

As reported by WTVC, Martin was found to have violated five internal policies of the Ringgold Police Department, including "not conducting himself toward the public in a civil and professional manner as a police officer."

Luckily for the women of Georgia, state law considers police disciplinary records to be public records. Should Martin seek employment at another police department in the state, the history of his firing and alleged behavior should not be difficult to uncover.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: To Stop Mass Shooters, Trump Says, We Should Make Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Easier. No, We Shouldn't.

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

Police AbusePoliceGeorgiaInvestigationsCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (11)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   6 years ago

    The interesting thing is new Georgia police officers who come from other jurisdictions that dont make the disciplinary records public.

    Georgia police departments dont really know who they are hiring and then they commit illegal acts here making Georgia look bad when they are not even form here.

    1. vedife   6 years ago

      Gud one I am making 10,000 Dollar at home own laptop .Just do work online 4 to 6 hour proparly . so i make my family happy and u can do

      ........ Read More

  2. chemjeff radical individualist   6 years ago

    He also reportedly sent an unsolicited picture of his genitals.

    It's always the dickpics that get you into trouble.

    Never go full dickpics.

    1. Liberty Lover   6 years ago

      but, but, but ... my genitals are so large, beautiful and impressive EVERY woman should see them, wants to see them, deserves to see them! (sarc)

      1. DastardlyDick   6 years ago

        Women especially like pictures of genitals when they come out of nowhere, and with zero context....

        1. Robert the Bruce   6 years ago

          Even the dastardly ones?

  3. Jerryskids   6 years ago

    So they conduct background investigations after they hire cops rather than beforehand? I'm not a cop so I'm no expert on the theory and practice of conducting investigations, but that does seem a little counter-intuitive to the whole purpose of background investigations. And it seems it might raise questions on their competence in conducting criminal investigations into such things as murder and bank robbery and purse-snatching.

  4. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   6 years ago

    Should Martin seek employment at another police department in the state, the history of his firing and alleged behavior should not be difficult to uncover.

    That's never stopped a government office from ignoring that which is in front of their faces before.

  5. Eddy   6 years ago

    "The victim told investigators that the situation creeped her out even more because Martin was supposed to be one of her points of official contact if she ever experienced discomfort at work."

    You're saying he wouldn't be impartial? Cop-hater!

  6. NashTiger   6 years ago

    Don’t hate the playa....

  7. Inigo Montoya   6 years ago

    Sounds like Georgia lacks a police union. Anywhere else, he could have out and out raped everyone after shooting their pets, and the union would make sure his punishment would have been extra paid vacation and a fine paid entirely by taxpayers, with not so much as a dime coming from his own pocket.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!