Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police

An Iowa Man Wins His Free Speech Suit After Being Charged for a Facebook Rant Against a Cop

Jon Goldsmith was charged with third-degree harassment after calling Deputy Cory Dorsey a "stupid sum bitch" online.

Zuri Davis | 7.9.2019 10:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Jon Goldsmith | ACLU of Iowa
(ACLU of Iowa)

Jon Goldsmith of Red Oak, Iowa, was charged with third-degree harassment after calling Adams County Sheriff's Deputy Cory Dorsey, among other things, a "stupid sum bitch" on Facebook. Nearly a year after the incident, Goldsmith has won his free speech lawsuit against the sheriff's office.

As Reason previously reported:

According to the lawsuit, Jon Goldsmith of Red Oak witnessed Adams County Sheriff's Deputy Cory Dorsey stop a motorist and conduct a drug dog search on a vehicle at a festival in July 2018. No drugs were found. Goldsmith also said he saw Dorsey body-slam another man. When Goldsmith later saw the man's mugshot on Facebook, he shared the picture in a post criticizing Dorsey.

Goldsmith called Dorsey out by name and accused him of being "butthurt" that the drug search was fruitless. He also called him a "stupid sum bitch" and offered to hire Dorsey to walk his dog and "pick up his shit" if he were fired over the incident.

A few weeks later, Goldsmith was accused of writing "a threatening and vulgar statement about Cory Dorsey on Facebook" by an affidavit. Sergeant Paul Hogan, Dorsey's supervisor, had filed charges of third-degree harassment against Goldsmith on behalf of his subordinate.

The charges were short-lived after Goldsmith's attorney managed to get them dropped for violating the First Amendment. A year later, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed suit on his behalf against the county, Dorsey, and Hogan, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

Goldsmith won his case, according to a Monday press release.

The Adams County Sheriff's office will pay Goldsmith $10,000 in damages, which includes the cost of the lawyer he hired to defend himself in court. A judge also ordered the deputies to stop charging civilians for criticizing its law enforcement, as they've done at least two other times.

Officers will be receiving ACLU-approved training on free speech and implementing an ACLU-approved social media policy.

"As the Court's injunction today confirms, people have a constitutional free speech right to criticize their government. Police are not allowed to charge people with crimes because they annoy the police or say things the police disagree with—on social media like Facebook, or otherwise. There is no exception because someone expresses anger in inartful ways, causes offense, or uses curse words," said Rita Bettis Austen, the ACLU of Iowa's legal director.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Kamala Harris' Plan To End the Racial Homeownership Gap Doubles Down on the Worst Aspects of U.S. Housing Policy

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

PolicePolice AbuseIowaSocial MediaFree SpeechCriminal JusticeTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (53)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. OG   6 years ago

    I like his orange shirt. Thank you sir for defending yourself and us all.

    1. Quixote   6 years ago

      Fortunately, the ACLU has limited itself in recent years to litigating "easy" cases of the sort, but even so, rather than dropping the charges, the state should have been a bit more creative and looked for additional criminal statutes that could have been used to apply just a little bit of pressure to this man and help put an end to his inappropriate "speech." If a similar situation arises in the future, I would recommend seeking our assistance here at NYU, as we are quite experienced with such matters and can give a good deal of advice on how to get around the "first amendment" that everyone keeps touting as if it were some kind of a rule that can never be avoided. Really, do reach out to us if there's ever a problem with some form of "expression" that nobody likes. For a good example of how we've handled such delicate little matters in the past, see the documentation of our nation's leading criminal "satire" case, in which we are glad to have played a role, at:

      https://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

  2. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Seems like there should be more of a direct consequence to arresting a person for an act that isn't criminal.

    1. Longtobefree   6 years ago

      You're not from around here, are you?

      1. Quixote   6 years ago

        (Apparently he's not--he thinks the act "isn't criminal.")

    2. damikesc   6 years ago

      You'd think so...but the government has never been effective at policing itself. Weird how that works.

    3. Sometimes a Great Notion   6 years ago

      But they have a new policy in place. Problem solved.

    4. Zeb   6 years ago

      If "ignorance of the law is no excuse", then they should absolutely be charged with false imprisonment at the very least. How is arresting someone for something that is not criminal any different from me locking someone in my basement for no reason?
      But it seems that it doesn't apply to police.

    5. Ben of Houston   6 years ago

      It should be punished by summary execution. It is "punished" by the department covering expenses.

    6. Get To Da Chippah   6 years ago

      Look, they slapped the taxpayers on the wrist. What more do you want??

    7. voluntaryist   6 years ago

      Really, you think? Next you'll be asking why the LEOs aren't punished for bringing self-serving unConstitutional charges that would increase their policing powers, as if ...

    8. markm23   6 years ago

      What? Don't you think having to spend a couple of hours in a conference room with a bunch of other cops, having to listen to some ACLU commie blather on about free speech rights is punishment enough?

      Can cops bring these charges all by themselves, or do prosecutors have to sign off on them? Any lawyer that signs such charges should be disbarred as either incompetent, or willingly breaking fundamental laws.

  3. Brandybuck   6 years ago

    Respect. Dah. Authoritah!

  4. Dillinger   6 years ago

    rock on dude. well played.

  5. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   6 years ago

    A judge also ordered the deputies to stop charging civilians for criticizing its law enforcement, as they've done at least two other times.

    WHAT ABOUT THEIR FREE SPEECH RIGHTS?

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   6 years ago

      After all, arresting someone IS an art form as much as exotic dancing. Lying on the reports and as a witness IS pure speech.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   6 years ago

        I like to think of what cops do as a kind of performance art. They're the 2LiveCrew of public servants.

        1. Zeb   6 years ago

          Nice. I might have to borrow that.

    2. voluntaryist   6 years ago

      How is using the law to suppress and exploit "free speech"? It's free authoritarianism, granted by all who vote to their rulers.

      When will the self-enslaved get it? When they vote they forfeit their sovereignty to politicians, bureaucrats, LEOs. It's like saying: "Permission to be forced, exploited, and lied to, Master, but remember to protect me and limit your power to whatever you think is reasonable.

      1. markm23   6 years ago

        Look up "sarcasm" and "satire" in the dictionary.

  6. Crusty Juggler - Lawbertarian   6 years ago

    The Adams County Sheriff's office will pay Goldsmith $10,000 in damages

    Time to seize someone's assets.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   6 years ago

      "seized asset" was my nickname for my former wife.

  7. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

    Someone please ask Elizabeth Warren if people should be allowed to use the world "bitch" on Facebook. If she says "no", the follow-up question writes itself, "What exactly would you do as president to stop it?"

  8. IJustWorkHere   6 years ago

    Did Dorsey lose his job? Did Goldsmith follow through on his promise to hire Dorsey to scoop dog poop?

  9. IJustWorkHere   6 years ago

    Adam County has about 4,000 residents. Do you think this is the first or last interaction between Goldsmith and Dorsey?

    1. neoteny   6 years ago

      Yeah, but now Dorsey can't fuck too badly with Goldsmith as it is easy to pin a retaliation charge on the cop.

  10. Alcibiades   6 years ago

    Is Reason moderating comments now?

    1. Zeb   6 years ago

      Doesnt' seem to be.

      1. Alcibiades   6 years ago

        Submitted a comment and it appeared with:

        "You comment is awaiting moderation" above it.

        It contains two Youtube links re Moultrie, GA cops arresting Jeff Gray for exercising his First Amendment right to protest on July 3rd.

        1. Zeb   6 years ago

          Must be links. I can't remember if I've posted any links with the new system yet.

        2. Get To Da Chippah   6 years ago

          I believe it's the multiple links in one post.

        3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   6 years ago

          Yes, multiple links in a post throws you into moderation hell.

    2. Brandybuck   6 years ago

      Do you see any moderation? I sure as hell don't see any moderation.

      1. Alcibiades   6 years ago

        Tried again, same deal.
        I think the Youtube links are causing the problem.

      2. Dillinger   6 years ago

        i was going to post like 1000 comments but decided to only post 10

  11. Tony   6 years ago

    I wonder why cops are so fat, but more than that, I wonder why they're so fat in such a particular way. Their necks and heads are fat. They are so fucking fat. Is it donuts?

    1. Zeb   6 years ago

      They probably once were muscular and it's all turned to flab since they started spending 8 hours a day sitting in a car eating donuts.

    2. neoteny   6 years ago

      Their necks and heads are fat.

      They're meatheads.

    3. Brandybuck   6 years ago

      It used to be a Marine thing and people called them "Jarheads". I know some cops and a lot are that way. I know someone who hasn't been a cop in about ten years. He's that way, so it can't be the donuts. It's weird.

  12. Alcibiades   6 years ago

    Wanna see how the Moultrie, GA City Manager and Moultrie cops react to a citizen exercising his First Amendment rights.

    Go to Youtube and search on "honorYourOath", it's Jeff Gray's latest two videos.
    Lawsuit to follow and hopefully qualified immunity revoked.

    1. retiredfire   6 years ago

      It's piss-ants like that, who try to claim that one's freedom of speech includes using a profane expression - that makes no real sense - that detract from real efforts to protect peaceable petitioning to the government for a redress of grievances, which is what the First Amendment was intending.
      Not being able to act like a child and use language that one wouldn't use with one's mother.
      P.S. you had to get to the end to see that what his idea of free speech was, was holding a sign that said "fuck city hall".
      This little twerp needs to grow up.

  13. D-Pizzle   6 years ago

    I assume Goldsmith didn't have a dog for them to shoot.

  14. Uncle Jay   6 years ago

    Yes, Mr. Goldsmith has a right to free speech by calling Cory Dorsey a name.
    Just like Corey Dorsey has a right to sue Mr. Goldsmith for libel (and/or slander).
    Funny how that works.
    Being held accountable for your actions can be a bitch.

    1. Get To Da Chippah   6 years ago

      Dorsey has a right to try to sue for libel or slander, but as a public official he will surely fail to win such a case.

      1. retiredfire   6 years ago

        Getting a job with the government doesn't make one a "public figure".

    2. Atlas Slugged   6 years ago

      Do you know how libel & slander cases work?

  15. Alcibiades   6 years ago

    Twitter have locked out John Lott Jr. over one of his tweets.

  16. Iowa Man Wins BIG Free Speech Battle Against Cops - ForLiberty.News   6 years ago

    […] Read the entire article at Reason. […]

  17. LiborCon   6 years ago

    "As the Court's injunction today confirms, people have a constitutional free speech right to criticize their government.”

    Unless you insult Frederica Wilson, the rodeo clown who moonlights as a congresswoman.

  18. voluntaryist   6 years ago

    Someone sees police overreach, brutality, and reports it on facebook. He gets arrested, then gets off.
    What about the US police state? What about the "Dorseys" who are out there everyday, thriving, and retiring with benefits? Why isn't that the top story?
    Of course not. That would be too deep, too probing for the masses to take. Let's keep it simple, concrete, so nothing really changes.

  19. voluntaryist   6 years ago

    Iowa man gets to rant about police injustice, but police continue to give us something to rant about. They just can't stop our complaining about it. Why? That's what makes us free.

    If Dorsey had confronted Goldsmith with "Are you the one who made me look like an asshole?" Dorsey, taking a cue from Picasso, could have said: "No, you did!"

    Why aren't more people reporting the police state?

  20. Alan@.4   6 years ago

    Sounds as if some law enforcement types need a hell of a lot more than remedial lessonsin the rights of the citizenry.

  21. An Iowa Man Wins His Free Speech Suit After Being Charged for a Facebook Rant Against a Cop - Popular Crime   6 years ago

    […] Click here to view original story: An Iowa Man Wins His Free Speech Suit After Being Charged for a F… […]

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Is the Energy Department Making Rules About Sex and School Sports?

Jeff Luse | 6.17.2025 5:25 PM

Citizen Fundraisers Outpace E.U. in Arming Ukraine Against Russia

Miroslav Hanušniak | 6.17.2025 3:45 PM

South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years

Rob Johnson and Daryl James | 6.17.2025 1:45 PM

How Much of Trump's 'Built in America' Phone Is Actually Built in America?

Jack Nicastro | 6.17.2025 1:00 PM

Lab-Grown Salmon Gets FDA Approval

Emma Camp | 6.17.2025 11:12 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!