Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Defense Department Computer Network Among Top Sharers of Child Pornography

Plus: Florida legalizes vegetable gardens, Facebook bans anti-voting ads, and more...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 7.3.2019 9:38 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
sipaphotosfive797803 | Department of Defense/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Department of Defense/Sipa USA/Newscom)

Defense Department computers are among the top distributors of child pornography. An untold number of Department of Defense (DOD) employees and contractors have subscriptions to child pornography websites, and the problem is apparently so pervasive it requires new technical solutions to address it.

"Hundreds of DoD-affiliated individuals" were recently identified as suspects in child pornography cases, according to an investigation by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.

So far, authorities have only looked into about 20 percent of these cases. But already, they've found "several" individuals "using their government devices to download or share said pornographic material."

Last year, an investigation by the National Criminal Justice Training Program found DOD computers were among the top networks nationwide for peer-to-peer sharing of pornographic images of minors. DOD's network ranked 19th out of 2,891 computer networks studied.

To prevent such widespread abuse going forward, the "End National Defense Network Abuse Act" would "crack down on this activity by upgrading the training and technical capacity of military criminal investigative organizations to confront the misuse of DoD computers, facilities, and equipment," according to a press release. It would also arrange for DOD authorities to work more closely with civilian law enforcement on these cases.

"The notion that the Department of Defense's network and Pentagon-issued computers may be used to view, create, or circulate such horrifying images is a shameful disgrace, and one we must fight head on," said Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D–Va.), who co-sponsored the bill with Rep. Mark Meadows (R–N.C.).

A companion bill in the senate has been introduced by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska) and Brian Schatz (D–Hawaii).


AROUND REASON

Let freedom ring: Reason's offering a special Fourth of July subscription rate of two years (that's 22 issues) for $17.76. Sign up here.

P.S. Roundup will be taking a holiday hiatus tomorrow and Friday. See you again on Monday, July 8.


FREE MINDS

What could go wrong? In order to protect the press, Democratic presidential candidate Eric Swalwell wants the federal government to decide who is and isn't a journalist.

Assault is already a crime, and I don't want the government deciding who is and isn't a reporter. https://t.co/qEjH8iaYjy

— CJ Ciaramella (@cjciaramella) July 2, 2019

It's already illegal to assault a journalist you grandstanding idiot https://t.co/qoKAzxkXfh

— Jen Monroe (@thatjenmonroe) July 2, 2019


FREE MARKETS

Land of the Free? "After nearly six years of fighting…I will once again be able to legally plant vegetables in my front yard," said Hermine Ricketts after a lengthy battle in Florida. "I'm grateful to the legislature and the governor for standing up to protect my freedom to grow healthy food on my own property."


QUICK HITS

  • Almost $2.5 million is being diverted from the National Park Service's regular funds for President Trump's dick-swinging "Salute to America" tomorrow.
  • Facebook will ban ads that promote abstention from voting.
  • Judy Shelton, whom Trump has nominated to be one of the Federal Reserve Board's two governors, is a critic of central banking and a supporter of the gold standard.
  • "Ankle bracelets are promoted as a humane alternative to jail." But what's really going on?
  • More criticism of Sen. Josh Hawley's (R–Mo.) supremely silly social-media bill:

A take on Sen. Hawley's social media regulation from a former Google content moderator - @RSI's own @DaisySRivkin!! https://t.co/lJQJmpl6bS @WashTimes

— Shoshana Weissmann, Sloth Committee Chair ???? (@senatorshoshana) July 2, 2019

  • I may be reading too much into this image, but…

Gabbard's cool abstention from this sisterly farce here: priceless pic.twitter.com/wUTEkJhgSi

— Elizabeth Nolan Brown (@ENBrown) July 3, 2019

  • Democrats are asking Facebook to stop its cryptocurrency plans.
  • Georgia is being sued for allegedly discriminating against Puerto Ricans by making them jump through extra hoops to get driver's licenses.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: H.L. Mencken on Independence Day: ‘We Have Borne Rascality Since 1776, and We Continue To Survive’

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupDefenseMilitaryPentagonSex CrimesPornography
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (91)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

    "Almost $2.5 million is being diverted from the National Park Service's regular funds for President Trump's dick-swinging 'Salute to America' tomorrow."

    More like #TinyMushroomDick-swinging.

    #SoGladButtplugRememberedHisPassword

    1. Rufus The Monocled   6 years ago

      Hello.

      "Ankle bracelets are promoted as a humane alternative to jail." But what's really going on?"

      And sexier.

      1. markm23   6 years ago

        This is bizarre: the government has no trouble paying about $100 per day to keep people who have not yet been convicted of a crime in jail, but to release them it wants them to pay $10 a day expenses for the ankle monitor.

  2. Don't look at me!   6 years ago

    “Grandstanding idiot”.
    Excellent.

  3. Rufus The Monocled   6 years ago

    Check out the wamyn high fiving each other.

    Only one is authentic.

    1. Rufus The Monocled   6 years ago

      Also spelled 'wahmen'. Apparently. Apologies to clown world.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

      "Bake-that-cake, bake-that-cake, baker's person!
      So I will, gay master, as fast as I can,
      Pat it, prick it, mark it with a D,
      Put in the oven over Kamala and me."

    3. Unicorn Abattoir   6 years ago

      I didn't realize Kirsten Gillibrand was so short!

      1. CharlesWT   6 years ago

        5' 3"

        1. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

          That’s nothing. If you want to see a truly diminutive number, check out her IQ.

  4. Don't look at me!   6 years ago

    Is the one blond chick really that short?

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

      Let's just say she's held a lot of beers in her time.

      1. ErictheRed   6 years ago

        For the win

    2. Dillinger   6 years ago

      Fauxcahontas has the wingspan of a power forward

  5. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Reason's offering a special Fourth of July subscription rate of two years (that's 22 issues) for $17.76.

    Language of the oppressor.

    1. MP   6 years ago

      17.76

      Racist.

  6. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

    "Gabbard’s cool abstention from this sisterly farce here: priceless"

    Don't be fooled by Gabbard's calm demeanor or anti-war posturing. She's actually the most dangerous Democrat running for President because Russians like her too much.

    #GabbardRussia
    #LibertariansForGettingToughWithRussia

    1. Longtobefree   6 years ago

      One person's cool abstention is another person's 'why do they all ignore me?'.
      There is a sign is a chain restaurant that says "Just because no one wants you on their team doesn't mean no one likes you. They just don't like you on their team."

      1. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

        Is there a YouTube video of Gabbard dancing braless, like AOC?

  7. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

    More bad economic news.

    Job creation has another rough month in June as private payrolls rise by just 102,000

    #DrumpfRecession

    1. Longtobefree   6 years ago

      I have noticed that when there is a difference between "expectations" and reality, it is never the "expectations" that are questioned, only the reality. I would have thought the headline would be "experts miss jobs figure by 28%; 10,000 analysts fired".

      1. Sevo   6 years ago

        And then, when there is pretty much full employment, it's hard to hire folks.

  8. Aloysious   6 years ago

    I hope nobody on this board works at the DoD.

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

      I wonder what the DHS stats are.

      1. Aloysious   6 years ago

        Those paragons of virtue? I'm quite sure there behavior is spotless.

    2. JesseAz   6 years ago

      Palin and Jeff likely do

    3. Yellow Tony   6 years ago

      Gross. I like my surfer boys technically illegal.

      1. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

        Yeah Tony, but you live in Portland, NH.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Assault is already a crime, and I don't want the government deciding who is and isn't a reporter.

    Ciaramella just outed himself as NOT a journalist if he doesn't want the special protections.

    1. Anomalous   6 years ago

      Maybe he doesn't want to join any club that would have him as a member.

      1. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

        I only join clubs that will have my member.

        1. MatthewSlyfield   6 years ago

          I can think of a few clubs that would willingly half your member.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Almost $2.5 million is being diverted from the National Park Service's regular funds for President Trump's dick-swinging "Salute to America" tomorrow.

    Lateral move.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   6 years ago

      Nothing left to cut

  11. What's that smell?   6 years ago

    "DOD's network ranked 19th" in child porn collecting and dissemination.

    "If we all work together we can raise this number to be the TOP!"

    --some civil servant artard

    1. Don't look at me!   6 years ago

      They aren’t that ambitious.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Facebook will ban ads that promote abstention from voting.

    Always wear protection when voting, kids. You never know what you'll end up with.

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

      I always go to the voting booth wearing a full body condom.

      1. Yellow Tony   6 years ago

        That'll go well with the women dressing up as female reproductive organs.

    2. Mike Laursen   6 years ago

      Fine. As long as I can start voting from the comfort of my recliner just by saying, "Hey, Siri..."

    3. Gaear Grimsrud   6 years ago

      Vote or die mutherfucker vote or die.

  13. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 years ago

    In order to protect the press, Democratic presidential candidate Eric Swalwell wants the federal government to decide who is and isn't a journalist.

    This coming on the heels of the rhinestone cowpie, Frederica Wilson, saying that people who make fun of Congressional reps on social media need to be prosecuted.

    1. Nardz   6 years ago

      But both sides!

  14. Don't look at me!   6 years ago

    Facebook will ban ads that promote abstention from voting.
    Ads that promote voting against Trump will be free.

    1. Mickey Rat   6 years ago

      Will Reason's evergreen article on the futility of voting be removed from Facebook when it pops up again?

      1. TripK   6 years ago

        Probably, and meanwhile the Reason staff will praise them for it (just kidding, they believe they should have special rules that exempt them from the censorship).

  15. Nardz   6 years ago

    Remember when that white cop shot a black guy in the city a presidential candidate is mayor of, then that mayor blamed systemic racism and somehow excused himself from that system? I think it was only a couple weeks ago...

    Oh, my bad. Forgot we're trying to bury that news around here.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   6 years ago

      Dude is gay. They are super special people. If systemic racism momentarily escaped his attention it's because of homophobes like you.

  16. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

    This site is becoming damn near unusable in mobile. The page keeps jumping back to the top, and now I am getting autoplay videos? What the hell, Reason. I can't take this anymore.

    1. Longtobefree   6 years ago

      Bye.
      Some here will miss you.
      (the rest of us know it is a bluff)

      1. JesseAz   6 years ago

        We can still visit media.matters or slate if we want his talking points.

    2. Yellow Tony   6 years ago

      If you're on Android, Firefox allows addons like uBlock Origin so you won't have to deal with those annoyances. I also recommend uMatrix to accompany uBlock Origin.

    3. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

      Reason probably spent a ton of money just to fuck up their website like this. They should just revert the whole thing to the previous version.

    4. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      Reason is best read on a desktop screen.

  17. Weigel's Cock Ring   6 years ago

    Well, the scumbags at the New York Times are no longer holding back: they’re finally telling America and Americans what they really think of us. Spoiler alert: they think we pretty much suck.

    https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1146089900439064581?s=12

  18. Enjoy Every Sandwich   6 years ago

    From the photo I get the impression that Warren knows no more about high-fiving than she does about drinking beer.

    1. JesseAz   6 years ago

      She's doing the old Indian double open hand greeting to show she is unarmed. You literally see her mouthing "how" in the picture. Dont be racist.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Judy Shelton, whom Trump has nominated to be one of the Federal Reserve Board's two governors, is a critic of central banking and a supporter of the gold standard.

    It's going to figuratively destroy half the Reason staff that Trump is the most libertarian president to date.

    1. TripK   6 years ago

      It's already destroyed the entire Reason staff, along with any notion that this website was libertarian in the first place.

      1. Yellow Tony   6 years ago

        I guess we'll forget about Calvin Coolidge.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   6 years ago

      So tired of winning. KAG! But seriously can anybody imagine Reason's favored candidate, HRC would make this nomination?

    3. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      Yeah, Trump is the most libertarian president in my lifetime.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Georgia is being sued for allegedly discriminating against Puerto Ricans by making them jump through extra hoops to get driver's licenses.

    THEY SHOULDN'T BE GIVING DRIVERS LICENSES TO FOREIGNERS IN THE FIRST PLACE. USA!

    1. Don't look at me!   6 years ago

      Should be easy. I heard they were good at circus stuff.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Defense Department computers are among the top distributors of child pornography.

    FBI: Hold my beer.

  22. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

    "Facebook will ban ads that promote abstention from voting."

    Punching Zuckermuffin in the face is difficult, wrong, and illegal; you don't like Slack because it won't let you blab at random strangers . . . maybe there just doesn't seem like a better alternative to you than siccing the politicians on Facebook.

    Baloney! There are still other options, and here's one: Have you met MeWe?

    https://mewe.com/

    They're supposedly picking up 30,000 users daily. Plenty of their millions of users would love to hear what you think about what they wrote about someone else's Mom and her cat pics. Or if you want to tell all the MeWe users who will listen about how much you hated the last Avengers movie, you can do that!

    On the other hand, you can make your own posts as private as you want them to be--and that doesn't just mean private from other users. At the link, they claim that with them, "Your private life is #Not4Sale" and further that there are, "No Ads. No Spyware. No BS." with their service. Keep all your posts to invited friends and family if you like. They promise to keep your private shit away from advertisers!

    Regardless, there's nothing Zucksucks says or does that's so obnoxious and awful that it should make you so stupid that you'd trust Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, and the bureaucrats at the Federal Trade Commission to solve your problems for you--better than you can solve them for yourself.

    God, Facebook sucks! Don't let it make you stupid.

    1. Yellow Tony   6 years ago

      It'll be interesting if they survive past their VC funding rounds.

      1. TripK   6 years ago

        That's when they sell to Facebook or Google.

        1. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

          MeWe presumably wants to go public.

          Regardless, in the current political environment, I doubt anybody in the government would approve of Facebook or Google buying MeWe at this point. Facebook will be lucky if they can get out of this without the government forcing them to spin off Instagram.

          There's no way the government would let Facebook buy Instagram today. Letting them do that acquisition in first place is openly seen as a terrible mistake--and making them sell it is openly advocated as a remedy for the problems at Facebook. I'm not saying that's the way it should be, but I think that's the way it is.

          1. TripK   6 years ago

            I wish them the best of luck. I hope I am wrong on all of this.

      2. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

        I think they're well positioned for the demographic that Facebook has lost. I certainly hope they're successful. They don't need to have profit margins that are as fat as Facebook's in order to be profitable, and when I look at the size of their first funding round, it's kind of amazing how little money they apparently needed.

        http://labusinessjournal.com/news/2018/jul/07/facebook-alternative-mewe-raises-52m/

        They could have a burn rate a hell of a lot higher than that and stay alive for a long time to come, and only needing a few million to maintain that kind of increase in users is a big deal. It's not like they need to reinvent the wheel like Facebook did when the latter was taking on MySpace either. People use to pay through the nose for Excel and Word. It became a commodity product. The same thing happened to mp3 players. The same thing is happening to smart phones. All the heavy lifting in social media may already be done. And with all those disaffected, young ex-Facebook users out there, I wouldn't bet against MeWe. They're in a good spot at a good time.

        I did my libertarian duty and got my friends and family on Slack as a Facebook replacement. I (and they) love the way Slack integrates with other programs friends and family are already using. Slack probably won't ever have the kinds of margins that Facebook enjoyed, but they don't need to. That's the eternal bane of high margin companies like Facebook. Their new competitors don't need to be as profitable as Facebook, but Facebook need to convince marginal shareholders that their most profitable days are ahead of them.

        Facebook's outlook is worth hundreds of billions. That's what they lost when their prospects dimmed after last summer--despite their revenue increasing.

    2. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      Earlier this week, Facebook sent me a vague note about community standards. I considered typing back to them to get some clarification. Then I realized, they have an office 2 blocks from that library computer...

      As soon as I get my FBI background check done, a regular immigration visa, and steady work, I'm going to start spraying my hair blue on a regular basis.

  23. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

    "Let freedom ring: Reason's offering a special Fourth of July subscription rate of two years (that's 22 issues) for $17.76. Sign up here."

    Funny you should mention that.

    The Brave Rewards program pays out on July 5th. They give me a share of the revenue for the advertising I agree to see while I'm browsing, and right now, they're saying that this month, I'm getting paid 20.90 BAT or $6.45 USD on July 5th.

    I'd like to see journalism go to more of a subscription model again and depend less on advertising. I find that content creators, like other businesses, generally cater their services to please paying customers, and when the paying customers are advertisers and big donors, rather than subscribers, you're more likely to get content that caters to the tastes of Hollywood, Nike, and wealthy donors like George Soros rather than subscribers like Ken Shultz.

    You want to sell me a two year subscription for $17.76. I want to give Reason $6.45 this month. That would translate to $154.80 over two years if rates stay the same. I think Brave wants some small percent of that for the service. I'm sure their rates are competitive with Patreon.

    Unfortunately, Reason hasn't signed up for the Brave Rewards program. All they need to do is confirm that the people who say they own this site are the actual owners--so that when I send you the money, we all know it's actually going to you and not somebody else. It's not that hard.

    https://publishers.basicattentiontoken.org/

    Slide down for the details. The New York Times is verified. The Washington Post is verified. If Reason doesn't verify by July 5th, I'll go find someone whose innocent gun review videos have been demonetized on YouTube and give the money to them.

    That's some libertarian, market based justice right there. Google demonetizes innocent gun review videos. I install the Brave browser, deny Google revenue they'd get for advertising to me, and I take the money I earn from watching fewer ads than I normally would and give the money to a YouTube creator that Google has demonetized. Free minds and free markets!

    I'd rather give the money to Reason, but you gotta let me.

  24. TripK   6 years ago

    "Hundreds of DoD-affiliated individuals" were recently identified as suspects in child pornography cases, according to an investigation by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service."

    What a weird main story.. based on the one-pager about the END Network Abuse act, the operation that uncovered these DoD-affiliated individuals was conducted back in 2006. Not exactly what I would call "recently identified", unless I'm missing something.

    If Operation Flicker was conducted in 2006, why was the DoD allowed to continue sharing the illegal pornography for 13 years?? They've only followed up with investigations of 20 percent of these individuals in the past 13 years. Astonishing.

    1. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

      Are they talking about real kiddie porn, like the kind Chemjeff and Buttplug are into, or just tasteless shit, like pornographic Simpson’s cartoons and that kind of shit?

      1. TripK   6 years ago

        They don't specify, but they seem to be talking about the real child porn. I don't see any indication that it's cartoons.

      2. AHB   6 years ago

        You now realize there's a non-zero chance that a DoD worker has saved the "Bart, get out! I'm piss!" comic, not because of its meme status, but because they actually think it's hot.

  25. Dillinger   6 years ago

    dude. wtf, DoD? gross.

  26. Juice   6 years ago

    An untold number of Department of Defense (DOD) employees and contractors have subscriptions to child pornography websites, and the problem is apparently so pervasive it requires new technical solutions to address it.

    1. Tha fuck?
    2. How do they know?
    3. Do they know who the subscribers are?
    4. Why isn't this major news?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 years ago

      I think the biggest surprise was learning PB was a DoD employee.

  27. Juice   6 years ago

    Land of the Free?

    Whoever told you that is your enemy.

  28. Brandybuck   6 years ago

    From the article:

    > Ads telling people to “boycott the election” disproportionately targeted African American Facebook users

    Well maybe Facebook could stop selling ads that target African Americans. Period. I mean duh. You let advertisers target certain populations then you're going to get ads that target certain populations. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.

  29. Uncle Jay   6 years ago

    "Defense Department Computer Network Among Top Sharers of Child Pornography, Plus: Florida legalizes vegetable gardens, Facebook bans anti-voting ads..."

    Doesn't all this you make you proud that you're an American?

  30. New Report Declares That Defense Department Computers Are A Main Source Of Child Sexual Abuse Material - Walid Shoebat   6 years ago

    […] the senate has been introduced by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska) and Brian Schatz (D–Hawaii (source, […]

  31. neoteny   6 years ago

    An untold number of Department of Defense (DOD) employees and contractors have subscriptions to child pornography websites

    Yeah, but all those websites are run by the FBI.

  32. July 4, 2019 – Progressive News Service   6 years ago

    […] The Pentagon has a child pornography problem. “Last year, an investigation by the National Criminal Justice Training Program found (Department of Defense) computers were among the top networks nationwide for peer-to-peer sharing of pornographic images of minors.”   https://reason.com/2019/07/03/defense-department-computers-among-top-sharers-of-child-pornography/ […]

  33. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

    Yeah, we should stop that child porn sharing on DOD computers. While we're at it, let's raise the minimum enlistment age from 17 to 21 and sell discounted Penthouse magazines on the military bases. What type of pics do you expect 17 year old soldiers to search for when they are stuck on a base in a foreign country where the locals don't know English? Not every 17 year old lad has a thing for slutty professors.

  34. Počítačová sieť Pentagonu patrí k najväčším šíriteľom detskej pornografie v USA - Hlavné správy   6 years ago

    […] Počítače ministerstva obrany patria medzi top distribútorov detskej pornografie. Nespočetný počet zamestnancov a dodávateľov ministerstva obrany má dokonca predplatené webové stránky detskej pornografie a tento problém je zjavne všadeprítomný. Informuje portál Reason […]

  35. Počítačová sieť Pentagonu patrí k najväčším šíriteľom detskej pornografie v USA | | Správy, Novinky, Aktuality   6 years ago

    […] Počítače ministerstva obrany patria medzi top distribútorov detskej pornografie. Nespočetný počet zamestnancov a dodávateľov ministerstva obrany má dokonca predplatené webové stránky detskej pornografie a tento problém je zjavne všadeprítomný. Informuje portál Reason […]

  36. Vrazi a úchylové! Pentagon patří k největším šiřitelům dětské pornografie ve Spojených státech | Vlastenecké noviny   6 years ago

    […] pornografie. Takové závěry přineslo vyšetřování Obranné vyšetřovací služby,“ píše […]

  37. In the News (#953) | The Honest Courtesan   6 years ago

    […] The FBI should’ve just run their child porn sites on DoD computers: […]

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

German Censorship Highlights Europe's Eroding Free Speech Protections

J.D. Tuccille | 5.12.2025 7:00 AM

How Joe Biden and Donald Trump's Perverse Pardons Undermined the Rule of Law

Jacob Sullum | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: 940 Days in the Hole

Charles Oliver | 5.12.2025 4:00 AM

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!