California's Marijuana Tax Revenue Still Sucks Stale Bong Water
High taxes and harsh regulations lead to a $223 million cut in budget projections.

California's largely incompetent and heavily taxed roll-out of legal recreational marijuana sales continues to not pay dividends.
This week Gov. Gavin Newsom's administration cut $223 million out of the state's projections of tax revenue from marijuana sales through June 2020.
At this point, that's not a surprise. Between its extremely high tax rates and its foot-dragging in vendor licensing, California has done such a terrible job implementing marijuana legalization that it made only half the taxes over the first year that the authorities projected—$345 million rather than $643 million. The Golden State has made it such a nightmare for consumers to buy legal recrational marijuana and for vendors to sell it—so much so that the state still has a massive black market. In some communities, according to the Associated Press, half of all marijuana purchases still take place illicitly.
This isn't entirely due to the state's huge excise taxes, but Sacramento still deserves a good chunk of the blame. It set high tax rates, then gave cities and counties the authority to charge additional taxes and to control the local licensing. And some cities have done an awful job of actually letting legal marijuana sales happen. Los Angeles, for example, has been so bad about licensing vendors that illegal dispensaries continue to operate, prompting the possibility of an expensive police crackdown that will perpetuate the drug war rather than end it.
And that's just in the communities that are allowing vendors. The state law also gives municipalities the authority to say no. Those cities' citizens can still grow their own or buy it elsewhere, but towns can stop marijuana shops from opening entirely.
Newsom is aware of this issue, and he has complained that such cities are depriving the state of tax revenue. Oh, and depriving citizens of the ability to buy marijuana legally. But, really, you know this is all about the money.
There is a bill to cut state-level taxes for a few years, which lawmakers hope will incentivize the development of legal marijuana businesses and reduce the need for black market sales. That legislation, AB 286, passed through the Assembly's Business and Professions Committee at the end of April and has been referred to the Appropriations Committee.
While cutting pot taxes would be a great idea, Newsom and the California legislature are so hot to find more sources of revenue these days that we should be skeptical about the bill's future. Newsom has said that he wants harsher enforcement against people selling weed on the black market. Sacramento wants its pay day, even if it means perpetuating the drug war.
Below, ReasonTV explores how California's mishandling of marijuana legalization has kept a thriving black market intact:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Let California be California.
I would rather put the more problematic parts of CA under martial law at this point. Enough is enough.
As Michigan says “hold my beer...”
I strongly suspect they’re going to fuck this up worse than California.
Wait until NYS tries to jump in.
Don't, like so many do, forget about Ohio.
Makes sense. Buy black market or grow your own. Not illegal to possess it, not like it has a serial number to be traced to the manufacturer or seller.
Call it the tax evasion made simple and encouraged by greedy tax law by California.
“not like it has a serial number to be traced to the manufacturer or seller.”
Not yet anyway.
Finest quality, superior workmanship, with a serial number. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8vaRVwF0xA
You're not entirely wrong, but my company and I are working on genetic markers in "junk genes" of various plants so that they can be traced and confirmed legal or illegal for modern marijuana markers. Sorry to burst your bubble but innovation can fix such loop holes in the law and violators will be charged.
So weed would be legal only if grown from approved (genetically marked) seeds? And I'm guess that sources of that seed will either be governmental, or government approved. Yeah, I can see that happening.
I mean, what is socialism other than a means to turn everyone into a sharecropper?
Will Comrade Newsom regulate bongs?
Oh yea, this is from Reason's way back machine.
Bongs Away!
https://reason.com/2009/01/16/bongs-away
All taxes suck.
Some more than others.
The progTard loves to tax and regulate. It really turns them on.
Weird, eh?
How to lose money in the drug trade...
Lawmakers that never even ran a lemonade stand think they know how businesses work.
Maybe they'd make more tax revenue if so many California cities didn't ban marijuana businesses. I saw more in a few blocks in Las Vegas than I've seen in the whole state of California.
This is what happens when you let politicians partially de-criminalize drugs.
The Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional and therefore illegal. Repealing the CSA would make all drugs legal again.
Then people could vote on adding taxes like they get to on all other products and services. Instead we have people wanting marijuana legal, so they sold their souls to give politicians power just for partially legal weed.
So they want to spend millions penalizing black market sellers so they can make more on taxes which they will spend penalizing black market sellers. Sounds about right.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.
Milton Friedman
Give California government 2nd place props for not being able to rationally handle sale of a plant that so many people want.
You assume their actual goals are not being met.
[…] This isn’t entirely due to the state’s huge excise taxes, but Sacramento still deserves a good chunk of the blame. It set high tax rates, then gave cities and counties the authority to charge additional taxes and to control the local licensing. And some cities have done an awful job of actually letting legal marijuana sales happen. Los Angeles, for example, has been so bad about licensing vendors that illegal dispensaries continue to operate, prompting the possibility of an expensive police crackdown that will perpetuate the drug war rather than end it. Read More > at Reason […]
Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to https://www.mcmbackpackonsale.com/wallets/large-wallets/mcm-large-patricia-star-eyed-bunny-visetos-crossbody-wallet-in-light-pink.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.