NYC Police Union Tweets Video of Subway Blow Job To Criticize New Congestion Pricing Policy
This is not the first time a tweet from the Sergeants Benevolent Association has courted controversy.

Reactions have been mixed to the New York legislature's decision back in April to impose a congestion toll on drivers entering the lower portions of Manhattan.
Transportation wonks were generally pleased with the yet-to-be-implemented tolls' potential for reducing gridlock, while outer borough commuters have complained of the coming cost increases.
Perhaps the most colorful reaction came from the Sergeants Benevolent Association (SBA)—New York City's second-largest police union—which chose to protest the new traffic mitigation strategy by tweeting out a video Monday of one person performing oral sex on another in one of the city's subway stations.
"Our political leaders have the AUDACITY to implement Congestion Pricing to repair subways & quality of life is a total DISGRACE," reads the SBA's tweet. "Thank you Mayor de Blasio [sic] and Governor Cuomo. You have done nothing but ruin a city & the Police Commissioner remains your puppet."
The video has since been deleted, although it is not clear whether the SBA removed it voluntarily, or if it was taken down by Twitter.
The video's removal, along with local media outlets' tasteful cropping and/or blurring of screenshots of the tweet, makes it all the more difficult to draw a rhetorical connection between the video's contents and congestion pricing.
But the SBA is also not known for social media subtlety. The union has vented on Twitter about the need to obtain warrants before conducting searches and expressed irritation that officers have to show a modicum of restraint when deciding who to arrest. That said, the group's opposition to congestion pricing is not surprising.
Many New York City police officers commute into Manhattan from the city's outer boroughs, meaning they will certainly be hit with the congestion toll on their way into work. For this reason, union officials have been arguing that off-duty police officers, first responders, and other city workers should be exempted from these new tolls.
"The burden should not fall on the backs of already underpaid city workers, especially not the public safety professionals who protect the public," wrote Patrick Lynch, president of the Police Benevolent Association (another police union) in an April New York Daily News op-ed.
When the state legislature passed its congestion pricing policy as part of the state budget in April, it left a lot the specifics to be determined—including crucial details like new toll prices and who will and won't have to pay them.
As a result, every interest group under the sun has advocated for an exemption. Cops, yes, but also representatives of the trucking industry and low-income drivers who live in places like Queens and the Bronx.
The demands for special carve-outs are understandable. No one wants to pay for something they're used to getting for free. However, as I noted last month, the more exceptions, the less effective congestion pricing will be—both at reducing traffic and minimizing travel times.
No matter what kinds of sex people are having on the subway, off-duty cops should have to pay New York City's congestion tolls just like everybody else.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Transportation wonks were generally pleased with the yet-to-be-implemented tolls' potential for reducing gridlock, while outer borough commuters have complained of the coming cost increases.
Which for some mysterious reason aren't racist.
Democrat city, Democrat policy, no racism. Capiche?
"The burden should not fall on the backs of already underpaid city workers, especially not the public safety professionals who protect the public
lol @ underpaid and protect the public
...the more exceptions, the less effective congestion pricing will be at reducing traffic and increasing travel times.
I think the bigger incentive against them would be less revenue.
although it is not clear whether the SBA removed it voluntarily, or if it was taken down by Twitter
Option A: You work like Snapchat.
Option B: I make you work like Snapchat.
According to the precedent set in Bergen County, NJ when a certain judge read my blog ... I think the subway blow job Tweet is within the bounds of local community standards. Let me check the video to make sure.
Yep, judging from that screen shot in the linked to article, the blow job was within the bounds of normal political discourse in the area. It reminds me of the time an NYC judge sided with me when I got a ticket for giving the middle finder to two officers who had made a street vender move.
You're doing good work out there. No sarcasm.
Agree! 🙂
Everyone with a modicum of clout is expecting to be exempted and leave the hoi polloi to finance yet another bullshit revenue scheme.
Just like how the cops are fine with gun control when it doesn't affect them.
"...another bullshit revenue scheme."
Are they not ALL bullshit? I personally cannot think of any exceptions.
The demands for special carve-outs are understandable. No one wants to pay for something they're used to getting for free.
*contemplates what "free" is in this situation*
When one commutes to New York in a car one can presume one pays in some form of taxes many pieces of that road system that's used to manage the commute.
Cute.
Taxpayers have to pay for the roads and then have to pay to use the roads as well.
Seems like a really shitty deal.
Thank God I never want to visit NYC.
Taxpayers have to pay for the roads and then have to pay to use the roads as well.
Welcome to Northern Virginia.
Some roads in VA are built with private $$ in exchange for toll revenues. No toll -> no road.
I flew through JFK once, and thought about going there while I was in college but went to Rome instead.
I do not regret that choice. And I still haven't been to NYC and don't plan on it.
"The burden should not fall on the backs of already underpaid city workers, especially not the public safety professionals who protect the public," wrote Patrick Lynch, president of the Police Benevolent Association (another police union) in an April New York Daily News op-ed.
And lo and behold, there are no underpaid city workers affected by the tolls.
Imma go with:
there are no underpaid city workers
Maybe the city hall janitors? After all, day in and day out, they have to clean up after a bunch of politicians and their sycophants.
Well, that sucks!
Someone must have gone to see a Broadway musical and picked up on the subtext.
Think of the boost in ridership if your subway ticket came with a blowjob.
I can't imagine that government would provide much quality there.
Eh, not a big fan of blowjobs.
Wait 'til you have one!
I've already had 'em. That's right I've already had 'em.
good lord not from the right people apparently. no i'm not offering.
Well it seems Rockabilly is already using this site as a confessional [more along the lines of Onanism], so feel free to unburden yourself BUCS
I just strongly prefer vaginal intercourse. It's more involving. I have to do something, which I prefer. She's getting something from it. Feels better.
Also, I can talk about masturbation if you prefer. I'm somewhat of a known entity in that community.
Better answer: nobody should have to pay double tolls to use public roads. That toll is called taxation.
"No one wants to pay for something they're used to getting for free."
Chris Rock says it best.
https://youtu.be/XAmeW8bq08k
Can we just tax pretentiousness? That'd fund NYC for decades alone.
Once cars track where they go, drivers will send usage fees to concessionaires that “own” each road. Concessionaires bid for the right to collect the fees and maintain the road after posting a bond to guarantee the road will be maintained. Gov. is only needed to handle the bidding and bonding process.
Well I always knew police unions suck. I just didn’t realize it wasn’t limited to the figurative meaning of the term.
Love the picture, I'm stunned that the NYPD actually uses Fart Cars.
Can't wait to see which groups get the exceptions.
Notice how another New Yorker walks by texting on their iPhone and recharging it from their purse, not giving a damn about the sex.
""off-duty cops should have to pay New York City's congestion tolls just like everybody else.""
No one should have to pay a congestion toll. It's not about reducing traffic. It's a regressive tax. In this case, the money isn't even going to road maintenance. It's going to the MTA.
There was an article a while ago about how NYS does spend its gas tax money on roads.
I live in São Paulo and the traffic problem seems impossible to solve
E isso causa um imenso problema de disfunção erétil
I live in São Paulo and the traffic problem seems impossible to solve
E isso causa um imenso problema de impotência
[…] https://reason.com/2019/05/09/nyc-police-union-tweets-video-of-subway-blow-job-to-criticize-new-cong… […]