Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Criminal Justice

Republican Senators Urge McConnell to Act on Criminal Justice Reform Bill

Supporters are concerned about the bill's future if it doesn't pass this year.

Joe Setyon | 11.20.2018 4:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS/Newscom

A group of Republican senators wants Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.) to bring a bipartisan criminal justice reform package up for a vote in 2018.

Reason's C.J. Ciaramella has explained that passage of the FIRST STEP Act, which President Donald Trump endorsed last week, could harken the biggest rewrite of federal prison and sentencing laws in more than 10 years. But despite bipartisan support, it's far from a given that the bill will become law, at least in the near future.

Both the House and Senate are scheduled to adjourn for the year on December 14. When Congress is back in session, Democrats will control the House. According to The New York Times, the bill's supporters are concerned that House Democrats might push for more comprehensive reforms. That would make it much more difficult for the bill to pass in the Senate, where Republicans will maintain their majority come January.

The existing bill still needs to be approved in both the Senate and House before it reaches Trump's desk. While the House's previous version of the legislation passed overwhelmingly (360-59) in May, things are more complicated in the Senate. McConnell has said he wants to ensure the bill is supported by at least 60 senators before he moves it forward. But on Thursday, McConnell told Trump there probably isn't enough time to bring the bill up for a vote before the end of the legislative session, no matter its level of support, according to the Times.

Some of the majority leader's Republican colleagues don't think that's good enough. Axios reported that Sens. Chuck Grassley (R–Iowa), Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.), Mike Lee (R–Utah), and Tim Scott (R–S.C.) called McConnell yesterday "and pressured him to move forward with a vote" on the bill this year. Axios cited a Hill source with knowledge of the situation, as well as a statement from Scott's office. "We had a good call and are hopeful that Leader McConnell will create floor time for a bill that we believe has 65 to 70 senators on board," Scott told the outlet.

The Times also reported on the phone call, adding that Grassley, who co-sponsored the bill with Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D–Ill.), cited his record of supporting McConnell in the past:

I have been there for you, Mr. Grassley told Mr. McConnell, the man standing in the way of a quick vote on the measure. And I would hope this is something that you would help me make happen, he said, according to three people familiar with the call who were not authorized to publicly discuss the conversation.

"I've been working on this issue for nearly eight years, and we have never been closer than we are right now," Lee told the Times, which also reported that various right-wing advocacy groups are pressuring McConnell as well.

Republican senators have also called on McConnell to move the bill forward in public. "Let's start 2019 on a positive note," Graham said Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press. "I'm urging Sen. McConnell to bring the bill to the floor of the Senate. It would get 80 votes. Mr. President, pick up the phone and push the Republican leadership."

Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) expressed similar sentiments. "With President Trump being in favor of this criminal justice reform, he came out publicly for it, really it only depends on one senator now," the Kentucky Republican said Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation. "If Sen. Mitch McConnell, from my home state, will allow a vote, it gets 65 to 70 votes in the Senate. It'll be one of the most popular things to ever pass."

Grassley, meanwhile, has indicated that if the bill doesn't pass this year, then its future is uncertain. "GOP colleagues: NOW is time to pass crim justice reform unless your argument is that you prefer to work w Speaker Nancy Pelosi to pass a bill?" Grassley tweeted Friday, referring to current House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who is looking to become speaker of the House.

The FIRST STEP Act's most vocal GOP opponent appears to be Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.). As Ciaramella pointed out, Cotton is worried the legislation will let dangerous criminals back on the streets and make it harder for prosecutors to gain cooperation from defendants.

Cotton, who said in 2016 that America has an "under-incarceration" problem, published an op-ed in USA Today last week laying out his case. He also claimed on Twitter—perhaps questionably so—that "there have been no hearings on this bill," in addition to going back-and-forth with Lee over what the legislation does and does not do.

So what does the bill do? As Reason's Eric Boehm explained, the legislation introduces reforms aimed at lowering the federal prison population. In terms of sentencing, Ciaramella noted that the bill has four main provisions:

Those provisions would eliminate mandatory life sentences for drug offenses under a federal "three strikes" law, reduce the "stacking" of firearm penalties for certain crimes (like the kind that led to a 55-year sentence for Weldon Angelos), expand the so-called "safety valve" to give judges more discretion in sentencing, and retroactively apply the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010's penalty reductions to crack-cocaine offenders sentenced before the law was passed.

Could the bill do more? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean its reforms aren't a good thing. This legislation represents just the first step, and a much-needed one at that. Instead of stalling until Congress is out of session, McConnell might want to consider listening to his colleagues.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bail Bond Industry Attempting to Force California Jail Reforms to the Ballot Box

Joe Setyon is currently an associate story editor for The Western Journal, a publication based in Arizona. He is a former assistant editor at Reason.

Criminal JusticeCongressSenateMitch McConnellRepublican Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (22)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Red Tony   7 years ago

    Alt-text: If he acts, we call him Mitch McConnell. If he doesn't, we call him BITCH McConnell.

    Also, Tom Cotton sounds like a real asshole.

  2. BigT   7 years ago

    Really think you can rush a turtle?

    1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      Yes

      1. Eddy   7 years ago

        Dr. Seuss was a voyeuristic turtle-pervert.

  3. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

    By all means rush a bill through instead of thinking about it.
    We have to vote on it to see what's in it.

    1. Calidissident   7 years ago

      This bill has been stuck for like 2 years because McConnell won't budge. It's not new.

  4. Eddy   7 years ago

    I would presume the bill has some bad stuff - it's "bipartisan," after all, and promoting a bill as "bipartisan" is almost as bad a warning sign as naming it after a crime victim.

    But it sounds like a bit of an improvement on the status quo - which of course was caused by "bipartisan" tough-on-crime bills.

    Maybe it takes bipartisanship to cure bipartisanship, like it takes a thief to catch a thief.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    slow and steady loses the race.

  6. Wearenotperfect   7 years ago

    I wonder how large of an incentive old Mitch is receiving from The GEO Group to hold off this bill as long as possible? I'm sure the passing of this bill would cut deep into its profits!

    1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      Fewer than 10% of all US federal and state prisoners are housed in privately operated prisons.

      In general, when it comes to lobbying state governments and the federal government, the public sector prison guard unions out spend the private prison operators by a wide margin.

      If you want to follow the money on this, you should be looking at how much he's getting from the public sector prison guard unions.

      1. Wearenotperfect   7 years ago

        True, note taken. But, I was looking at the bigger picture like companies or financial entities that may be invested in private prisons. I could be wrong but it doesn't sound too far-fetched to me.

        1. Spookk   7 years ago

          Neither of you are looking at the REAL money, which comes from using prisoners everywhere as slave-labor.

  7. wearingit   7 years ago

    What kind of moron thinks the US has an "under-incarceration" problem?

    1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   7 years ago

      The Republican trying out for 'the next Ted Cruz.'

    2. Flinch   7 years ago

      A methodist? [Just kidding]. Well, its somebody without common sense at a minimum. Looking at the excessive volume of law, people have two choices: behave like Sisyphus and try the impossible task of enforcement, or actually do something to reduce the staggering volume. At a minimum, it would be nice to back away from the awful position of lawyers needing lawyers.

  8. ILuvPolitics   7 years ago

    Let judges be judges, makes sense.

  9. Spookk   7 years ago

    The turtle is an evil SOB, and the poster child for why neither body should have any "rules" about restricting who gets to bring up legislation and when.

  10. gaoxiaen   7 years ago

    Yertle disagrees.

  11. Flinch   7 years ago

    More nonsense? While the house leadership is having showboat hearings as their swansong, McConnell is moving on maybe the one thing Trump could get from democrats? Bizarre. If there's anything that needs doing, its something to deal with voter fraud. My preference [as usual] is to pass a bill forcing states to indicate citizenship status on drivers licenses and give DHS something useful to do for a change.

  12. AD-RtR/OS!   7 years ago

    Yeah, Mitch, you need to pigeon-hole this abomination.

  13. cheapmcmbelt   7 years ago

    Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to http://www.mkoutletfire.com/mi.....white.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.

  14. milahrson   6 years ago

    I Make Money At H0me.Let's start work offered by Google!!Yes,this is definitely the most financially rewarding Job I've had . Last Monday I bought a great Lotus Elan after I been earning $9534 this-last/5 weeks and-a little over, $10k last month . . I started this four months/ago and immediately started to bring home minimum $97 per/hr ?
    . Heres what I've been doing,??.....HEAR>> http://www.geosalary.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!