Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

The Slants

The Slants Know What it Takes to Win a Supreme Court Case

The Slants speak with Reason a year after winning the right to use their own name.

Zuri Davis | 8.31.2018 10:20 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
|||Facebook/The Slants
Facebook/The Slants

Contrary to popular belief, you probably won't see any country music stars by simply walking down Nashville's Music Row. But if you swing by Bobby's Idle Hour on 16th Street Ave., you just might catch a musician or two. This is where Simon Tam and Joe Jiang of The Slants, an all-Asian-American dance-rock band, perform on Thursday evening.

Tam, the band's founder, casually mentions his Supreme Court case onstage. "We were fighting against the U.S. government for the right to use our name," he says.

The bassist was referring to Matal v. Tam, which was ultimately decided in his band's favor last year. The high court ruled that federal Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) could not prevent the band from trademarking its name, even if it did "disparage…persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." When Tam sat down with Reason's Meredith Bragg a year ago, he explained that the group picked its name, in part, to reclaim an old anti-Asian slur. Both the name and the band were designed to put Asian Americans front and center in an industry that often left them in the background.

So what's it like to win a Supreme Court case? Tam reflects on the legal battle with Reason after his set.

Regulations, he learned, can do more harm than the thing being regulated. For example, the PTO used offensive imagery—even pictures of Miley Cyrus pulling her eyes back to make a stereotypical "slant"—to explain to a group of Asian Americans that they were really the ones disparaging a community. "The government thought they were doing us a favor by denying us rights," Tam says.

The court decision's biggest impact, he says, may just be to have ended a legal battle that nearly spanned a decade. He calls the case "the most frustrating thing in the world," adding that the "system is not designed for you to win." Tam advises anyone thinking of challenging the government to start "thinking like an artist and an activist." The politically and legally inclined tend to think within the realm of possibility, he explains, while artists think more creatively.

Earlier this month, the band formed The Slants Foundation, a nonprofit seeking to provide resources to "Asian Americans looking to incorporate activism into their art," in an effort to help other artists.

Days before entering the Supreme Court, The Slants released their album The Band Who Must Not Be Named on Martin Luther King Day. The band set up an impromptu concert at the D.C. memorial dedicated to the civil rights leader, and there Tam saw a quote from King: "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice." Tam agreed, but he also found himself thinking that the arc bends only when people work to bend it.

"It requires people who are intentional. It requires persistence. And it requires a community that's willing to stand up and say 'It doesn't matter how challenging this battle it. It doesn't matter what kind of hill we have to climb. It is the ultimate goal that's worth it. Even if it isn't addressed in our generation, it's still worth fighting for,'" he says.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 'National Sex Trafficking Crackdown' Nets Zero Sex Traffickers

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

The SlantsSupreme CourtFirst AmendmentTrademarksMusic
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. David Nolan   7 years ago

    I see the band's name differently. Pure defiance, which I love!

  2. Brett Bellmore   7 years ago

    So, this isn't about that Harvard law suit?

  3. Dillinger   7 years ago

    >>> It is the ultimate goal that's worth it.

    resurrecting forgotten slanders?

    1. Rock Lobster   7 years ago

      What a slanted viewpoint.

  4. BlueStarDragon   7 years ago

    with the law suite gone now, I hope they can improve their music. Watch them on you tube and their music needed real improvement. Anyway good going on winning the court case +1 for the band their.

    1. dchang0   7 years ago

      They may have been too busy working on the case to practice or write better songs.
      Still, at least they won, and they are gigging successfully, so good on them!

  5. Eddy   7 years ago

    Now you can just sit back and enjoy their music.

    1. Eddy   7 years ago

      But bear BlueStarDragon's warning in mind.

  6. Eddy   7 years ago

    Some common terms start out as insults. The Band Billy Penn and the Queer Quakers used to be edgy, but now everyone uses these terms.

    (I just made that band up, though someone may have thought of it independently)

  7. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

    Why haven't they gone after the Trans Siberian Orchestra?

  8. David Nolan   7 years ago

    Ha! I promoted their local concert to all my friends, when they were not as well known. .A couple freaked out, wondering how an atheist could promote their music. The younger ones gave me a high-five when I said, "It's supposed to be joyous, not so somber and pious."

  9. Galane   7 years ago

    Can the Washington Redskins, Cleveland Indians, and all other sports teams, school, amateur, use this ruling to tell protesters of their names and logos to go take a flying leap?

  10. LamarPye   7 years ago

    N.W.A.?

    1. flyfishnevada   7 years ago

      Not even the PTO was going to touch that one.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Major Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea To Ban Trans People From Owning Guns

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.6.2025 12:12 PM

I'm a Gamer. The NO FAKES Act Could Get Me in Trouble.

Sarah Montalbano | 9.6.2025 7:00 AM

Are Free Zones Really Free?

Roderick T. Long | From the October 2025 issue

Walz's Gun Plan Wouldn't Stop Shootings, but It Might Shred Civil Liberties

Jacob Swartz | 9.5.2025 5:20 PM

Josh Hawley's Anti–Driverless Cars Policy Would Kill a Lot of People

Jennifer Huddleston | 9.5.2025 5:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300