Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Congress

Rep. Duncan Hunter Uses Campaign Funds for Steam Games and Hawaiian Shorts

"Of course they are all campaign. Why else would I charge them to the campaign [credit] card."

Zuri Davis | 8.22.2018 11:25 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
|||John R. Mccutchen/ZUMA Press/Newscom
John R. Mccutchen/ZUMA Press/Newscom

The Department of Justice announced on Tuesday that Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and his wife, Margaret, were being indicted for misusing at least $250,000 worth of campaign funds.

According to the 47-page indictment, the Hunters often spent more money than they had. Their accounts were overdrawn over 1,100 times between 2009 and 2016, accumulating $37,761 in overdraft fees. The couple's credit cards were often maxed out, and for seven years they maintained less than $1,000 in reportable assets. Facing mounds of debt and overdue payments, the Hunters decided to dip into their campaign funds—and dip, and dip, and dip some more.

Here are some of the purchases the Hunters made, all of them allegedly campaign-related:

A Ring Pop from Target for "teacher/parent and supporter events"

One of the Hunters' purchases was a ring pop at the Santee Target. pic.twitter.com/OMH3revEI9

— Sara Libby (@SaraLibby) August 21, 2018

Hawaiian shorts for "the wounded warriors"

This is the funniest part of the Duncan Hunter indictment. https://t.co/5aDRwqD6CC pic.twitter.com/8m6bVHKdlh

— Dan McQuade (@dhm) August 21, 2018

Multiple games on STEAM

The first Congressman to go to jail for gaming pic.twitter.com/Sak83ytwf2

— lib crusher (@lib_crusher) August 21, 2018

Plus a gaming keyboard and mouse

what the hell kind of luxury gaming keyboard was this pic.twitter.com/QGvnJIg8gG

— lib crusher (@lib_crusher) August 21, 2018

30 Tequila shots and a steak for a friend's Bachelor party

Another amazing part of Duncan Hunter indictment for misusing campaign funds … pic.twitter.com/p8drkLoOLo

— Chris Reed (@chrisreed99) August 21, 2018

Since 2009, the Hunters' spending on international travel, doctor's appointments, and their children's tuition were all mischaracterized as campaign travel and other campaign-related expenses. Hunter's campaign treasurer repeatedly asked for confirmation that the various expenses were accumulated for their intended purpose. Once in 2011, Hunter told his treasurer, "Of course they are all campaign. Why else would I charge them to the campaign [credit] card." The conversation came a month after Hunter spent $169.24 for golf and sushi with an acquaintance.

Hunter will be up for reelection in three months, and state spokesperson Sam Mahood tells The Hill that there is "no process in California Elections Code for Duncan Hunter to remove his name from the November ballot."

The full indictment is available below:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: San Francisco Man Prevented from Turning His 'Historic Laundromat' Into Apartment Building Is Suing the City for $17 Million

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

CongressCampaign FinanceCalifornia
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Brian   7 years ago

    Really, how many of us haven't padded the expense account to grab the ring pops, Hawaii shorts, and steam games that make being successful worth while?

  2. Rich   7 years ago

    Their accounts were overdrawn over 1,100 times between 2009 and 2016, accumulating $37,761 in overdraft fees.

    "We learned it from *Congress*, OK?!"

    1. LarryA   7 years ago

      ^this.
      the Hunters often spent more money than they had. Their accounts were overdrawn over 1,100 times between 2009 and 2016, accumulating $37,761 in overdraft fees. The couple's credit cards were often maxed out, and for seven years they maintained less than $1,000 in reportable assets. Facing mounds of debt and overdue payments, the Hunters decided to dip into their campaign funds

      And we wonder why the U.S. budget is such a mess?

    2. Sebastian Cremmington   7 years ago

      What did Trump call it??? OPM?other people's money. If someone else is footing the bill and they never say anything you don't care how much it costs.

      1. UncleSam13   7 years ago

        Milton Friedman said essentially the same thing.

  3. Shirley Knott   7 years ago

    How does anyone rack up that many overdrafts and keep their accounts?
    I guess it's down to "if you owe the bank 10 grand, you have a problem. If you owe the bank 10 million, the bank has a problem."

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   7 years ago

      Leverage on bank regulations legislation?

    2. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

      If they kept paying the overdrafts, what's not to like?

  4. Dillinger   7 years ago

    >>>a white duck

    my Target doesn't sell livestock

    1. Ben of Houston   7 years ago

      Rubber Ducky?

      1. Dillinger   7 years ago

        maybe? to me rubber duck is "rubber duck" not "white duck" ... also mostly yellow

        1. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

          Obviously he's a duck racist on top of everything else...

  5. E. Zachary Knight   7 years ago

    The sad thing is, even with the indictment, this guy will still be reelected by clueless voters.

    1. CE   7 years ago

      You should see the other guy though.

  6. guyjones   7 years ago

    Hunter was stupid. He should have hired his wife or relative as a campaign "consultant," then paid her or him for "services rendered."

    Vile Maxine Waters funneled $700,000 to her daughter in this manner. This crone and harridan is ugly within and without, but, she does know how to be more surreptitious about funneling campaign contributions into her family's pockets.

    1. creech   7 years ago

      Rep. Chaka Fatta (D) wasn't so lucky. Some voters are more picky than others. Several years ago, Rep. Curt Weldon (R) lost his seat because his daughter's office was raided by the FBI just before the election. Later, nothing came of the investigation but his seat was lost. Republicans got it back next election but will lose it in 2018 due to illegal court redistricting and pissed off anti-Trump soccer moms.

      1. guyjones   7 years ago

        To be clear, I oppose any kind of misappropriation of campaign contributions for personal use. What amazes me, though, is that the rules and penalties aren't more clear-cut, here, in terms of establishing blanket prohibitions on this behavior, whether carried out clumsily (as with Hunter), or, cannily. I mean, pols such as Waters are able to effectively divert campaign contributions into their relatives' pockets, under the ruse of non-existent services rendered, and, they get away with this chicanery completely scott-free.

        Other pols who are less sophisticated, such as Hunter, get caught with their hand in the cookie jar. There needs to be some tightening of the law and Congressional ethics rules to make this conduct illegal and criminal, no matter how it is carried out.

    2. Sebastian Cremmington   7 years ago

      Hunter's wife is his campaign manager.

  7. BYODB   7 years ago

    Now, see, this is a clear cut case of breaking campaign finance law. Notice the differences between this and the Trump allegations? The lack of clear and damning proof.

  8. ThomasD   7 years ago

    $1500 in one month on Steam makes me almost believe their story about it being fraudulent. That is a silly amount of money for video games. Either that or he must have the best collection of hats in TF2 ever.

    1. Brandybuck   7 years ago

      Ditto. At an average of $30 a game, that comes out to 50 games a month. Fifty games a month. Not even the addicted of the video game addicts play fifty games a month. And who the hell puts a ring pop on a credit card? This whole thing smells. Not that I'm sticking up for Duncan Hunter, but the indictment is fishier than a crabby patty.

  9. Uncle Jay   7 years ago

    Now, now.
    Let's not get too angry at Mr. Hunter.
    Nobody here wants to see him without Hawaiian shorts.
    We all might go blind.

  10. Rockabilly   7 years ago

    No cocaine and hookers?

    What kind of politician are you?

  11. The Last American Hero   7 years ago

    Can we bring back tar and feathering, and riding them out on a rail?

  12. Mark22   7 years ago

    Remember, folks, these are the brilliant minds that presume to run your life for you, because you're too stupid to do it yourself.

  13. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

    When my kid was little, a ring pop was candy. It was sort of a gem-shaped lollipop on a plastic ring worn on a finger. It cost something like $1.99.

    If we are talking about the same thing, it sounds like someone just pulled out the wrong card to use. If you're going to try to cheat the system, are you really going to go for a $2 candy or a $30 video game?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Britain's Protectionist Trade Policies Created Valley Forge

Eric Boehm | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Reading Problem

Charles Oliver | 5.13.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Destroy Thousands of Acres of Tomato Crops in Florida

Autumn Billings | 5.12.2025 5:14 PM

Defenders of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Offer an Implausible Take on a 127-Year-Old Precedent

Jacob Sullum | 5.12.2025 4:52 PM

Why DOGE Failed

Eric Boehm | 5.12.2025 3:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!