Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Security Drags Journalist Out of Trump-Putin Press Conference

After Sam Husseini refused to lower a sign that read "Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty," he was forcibly removed.

Joe Setyon | 7.16.2018 2:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

An accredited journalist covering Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's press conference in Finland today was forcibly removed before both leaders came out to answer questions.

Sam Husseini, who was covering the summit for the progressive publication The Nation, was holding up a sign that read "Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty" when security guards grabbed him and marched him out of the room. According to CNBC, Russian authorities considered his sign a "malicious item."

CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta reports that Husseini had been asked to leave the room earlier. He did so, then returned to retrieve his things; on his return trip, he told the assembled reporters that he had gotten the boot because of the sign. "At that point, as he held it up, the security officials grabbed him and forcibly removed him from the room," Acosta says.

Video captured at the scene showed the situation escalating. Husseini says his sign wasn't a protest, but a security guard keeps trying to get him to lower it anyway. When Husseini refuses and keeps talking, the guard attempts to wrest the sign from his hands, knocking the reporter's glasses off in the process. Several other guards join the effort, and Husseini is eventually dragged out of the room as a crowd of journalists watched.

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation correspondent Susan Ormiston has said on Twitter that Husseini had been "heckling" other journalists as they reported live from the briefing room. According to Ormiston, the people who removed Husseini were with the U.S. Secret Service.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Finnish Newspaper Tries to Remind Trump and Putin About Freedom of the Press

Joe Setyon is currently an associate story editor for The Western Journal, a publication based in Arizona. He is a former assistant editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (31)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Hugh Akston   7 years ago

    What the heck is an accredited journalist?

    1. Jerryskids   7 years ago

      It means some other partisan hack has certified that your partisan hackery is strictly neutral, unbiased and non-partisan. This is why you'll never see a journalist espousing a political position like campaigning for a nuclear arms ban treaty.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      What the heck is an accredited journalist?

      They have Obama jizz stains on their press outfit.

      Its really the only way the media can verify who is anti-Trump.

  2. DajjaI   7 years ago

    Sign, sign, everywhere a sign. This kind of behavior will become more common. The key is not to panic, but just to escort these assholes out and proceed. They will have any number of pet causes to protest. The worst thing you can do is to criminalize this behavior and radicalize them and turn them into martyrs. Also any laws you enact against 'disruption' will be used against you, and sooner than you expect.

  3. Echo Chamber   7 years ago

    Hey, another story by the press about the press! At least the squirrels won't have many comments to chew through

  4. Don't look at me.   7 years ago

    Imagine if everyone had a sign at every press conference.

  5. I can't even   7 years ago

    What an asshole.

  6. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

    A left wing reporter who was behaving unprofessionally, making some kind of weird grandstanding gesture and heckling the event was removed from a press conference. Right.

  7. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed   7 years ago

    Mmmm I'm ambivalent about this. You have been granted special access, you might get a question or two( I honestly don't know the percentage of reporters who get their question answered), don't waste the opportunity.

    But I also understand how you might not get a question answered and that you might feel the need to share your thoughts. In this case, the guy got the better end of it because it looks bad (or can be made to look bad rather) for Trump and Putin. So he probably made the choice that would get him the most coverage, possibly not intentionally.

    Still, I would prefer a world where journalists try to really hold politicians accountable with hard questions about tough subjects. I can dream.

  8. Real American   7 years ago

    Sorry. If he's holding up a political sign, he's an activist, not a journalist.

    1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

      Same attitude here. As usual, no one mentioned the unseen, which is the "real" journalist whose seat he took. Not everyone who wanted in, got in, so the hosts are the ones who decide how to allocate those scare resources, and he in effect stole a seat from somebody else, along with disrupting somebody else's meeting for his own selfish gain.

      Fuck him.

      1. mad.casual   7 years ago

        Not that I disagree with your point, but I can't believe a real journalist (or a dozen) wouldn't be 100% willing to wait on standby.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   7 years ago

      He's both.

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Only journalists were invited to the event.

        Activists are trespassing.

  9. mad.casual   7 years ago

    He should've taken his shoe off and thrown it at Putin/Trump.

  10. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    So it seems that there is a small difference in how a press conference is run in Russia as opposed to the US.
    Can we vote on the one we like more?

  11. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    You're not part of the "press" when you are there to make a political statement. It's hard to realize that considering how many activists have bylines now, but that's just the truth

  12. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

    The Deep State dipshits and their Block Yomommatard butt-buddies in the JournoList are so enraged that their pathetic attempt to undermine this summit failed and that World War III hasn't started yet, it's driving them bonkers. They seem to be losing their minds by the minute.

  13. Uncle Adolf's Gas and Grill   7 years ago

    Hopefully he got dragged off to a cell in the basement, where the local authorities gave him a good and proper tune up.

    1. Stephen54321   7 years ago

      So, just to clarify, you DON'T believe in due process but you DO believe in torture?

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Its was Finland, so who knows what rights they have.

        1. swillfredo pareto   7 years ago

          Its was Finland, so who knows what rights they have.

          The same as here. Whether they are secured or not is another question. The same as here.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            Finland has right to jury, right to non-excessive bail, due process rights, and right to keep and bear arms?

            Doubt it.

      2. Uncle Adolf's Gas and Grill   7 years ago

        When it comes to journalists - yes, I do!

        1. Stephen54321   7 years ago

          On what grounds? Why the animus against journalists?

          And if you don't like journalists, then I presume you also don't like op-ed writers & online bloggers & youtube vloggers (who report or comment on news and other journalistic stuff) as well and would like to see them tortured. That a fair presumption?

        2. Stephen54321   7 years ago

          Oh and I forgot to mention whistleblowers (who feed journalists their material) and which neither Obama nor Trump seemed to like. I presume you don't like them either and would like to see them tortured.

  14. Hackmaschine Mutter   7 years ago

    I found it amusing that Jim Acosta was used as a resource regarding the facts in this article.

  15. JeremyR   7 years ago

    Once you've started protesting, you've ceased to be a journalist.

    Beyond that, a nuclear ban is idiotic. Nuclear weapons are the only thing preventing a full scale war

    1. Stephen54321   7 years ago

      So you think North Korea and Iran both need to get hold of some nuclear weapons? Those being "the only thing preventing a full scale war".

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Everyone misread the sign.

      He doesnt want Russia and the USA to have nuclear weapons.

      Iran though. Those theocracies love people that disagree with them.

  16. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    MAGA!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

German Censorship Highlights Europe's Eroding Free Speech Protections

J.D. Tuccille | 5.12.2025 7:00 AM

How Joe Biden and Donald Trump's Perverse Pardons Undermined the Rule of Law

Jacob Sullum | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: 940 Days in the Hole

Charles Oliver | 5.12.2025 4:00 AM

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!