Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Linda Brown Dies, Mark Zuckerberg Agrees to Testify Before Congress, and Kim Jung Un Might Be In China: P.M. Links

Christian Britschgi | 3.27.2018 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • protester
    Jeremy Hogan/Polaris/Newscom

    Linda Brown of Brown v. Board fame died today.

  • Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to testify before Congress about Facebook's privacy policies.
  • Paul Krugman argues that crooked conservative politicians get a pass, while dodgy Democrats have their careers ended.
  • Beloved PNW burger chain threated by IWW takeover.
  • North Korean mystery train arrives in Beijing, fueling speculation that Kim Jung Un is on board.
  • Opposition to California's sanctuary city law grows in Orange County.
  • Writing endings can be hard.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: If Republicans Are Doomed in 2018, It's Not Because Some Gerrymandered Districts Got Redrawn

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (132)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Writing endings can be hard.

    So can writing links. BOOM. Gotcha.

    1. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

      Hello.

      "Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to testify before Congress about Facebook's privacy policies."

      I been a vewwy, vewwy bad boy. I deserve gag balls and anal beads. The government needs to come in and watch over me.

      1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

        Mine have often been mistaken for gag balls.

        They're real, and they're spectacular.

      2. StackOfCoins   7 years ago

        Is Zucky low-T?

    2. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      He anticipated your snark with the alt-text.

    3. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Is Britches trying to tell us something? That he is already out of ideas for alt-text trolling?

    4. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

      Prescient. Of me. Our final PM Links.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Writing endings can be hard.

    Spoiler alert: The ending is REAGAN WINS COMMIES LOSE

    1. Red Tony   7 years ago

      I thought it was "Reagan goes senile, Gorbachev opens the USSR to capitalism, everybody in the USSR gives the finger to communism, Crusty deepthroats a chinchilla."

      1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

        Even Hollyweird can't sell that fiction.

      2. Rat on a train   7 years ago

        Berlin Wall falls, Erich Honecker resigns, Germany reunifies, man maintains illusion of communism to protect his mother's health, ...

    2. SIV   7 years ago

      REAGAN WINS COMMIES LOSE

      Fuck Yeah! Now we need to defeat all the commies on the home front.

  3. Red Tony   7 years ago

    Off-topic: Worst Reason trolls, semifinals, OVERTIME:

    Tony vs. Weigel's Cock Ring

    (Match ended 2-2 yesterday.)

    Tony vs. Weigel's Cock Ring, go!

    1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Tony's shallow, dishonest, annoying, and ineducable, but Mikey is a genuinely nasty little retard. It's gotta be Mikey.

      1. Yellow Tony   7 years ago

        Yeah, but which one do you think is hotter?

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          I'm reserving judgment until i figure out who sent me which dick pic.

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            I am gonna guess the worn out and leathery one is Tony's.

            1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

              Both of 'em look like used charcoal briquettes.

          2. The_Hoser   7 years ago

            Nixon or Van Patten?

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        My mom told me to never be mean to special people. But she never met Mikey.

        1. Yellow Tony   7 years ago

          Do we have proof that he is a person?

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            You are right, he could be a first trimester fetus.

        2. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

          Is there space on the retard bus?

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOcuEbUPyGU

    2. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

      Mikey.

      Tony is honest even if he is wrong.

      1. Brian   7 years ago

        You misspelled "mendacious."

    3. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

      Still going with Tony. Both prolific and generates great responses from the commentariat.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        I am also voting for Tony, just to make it a tie.

        1. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

          That's a great way to become a sleeper on Red Tony's troll bracket.

    4. Sometimes a Great Notion   7 years ago

      WCR for the win. Just doing some social signaling so I can get invited to a DC cocktail party someday.

    5. Kivlor   7 years ago

      Tony is truly repugnant, but I think he's pretty honest in his views. Mikey on the other hand is just insufferable with his strange Weigel obsession.

      I vote Mikey.

      1. Sevo   7 years ago

        "....but I think he's pretty honest in his views."

        "Honest" as in his views are predictably stupid and changable?

    6. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      Mikey

    7. silver.   7 years ago

      I have to double down on WCR. Tony was especially irksome today with his bizarre, manic arguments against guns, but I can't regard somebody who's willing to discuss the wording of SCOTUS rulings as a troll.

    8. H. Farnham   7 years ago

      I vote WCR, or, as I like to call him, do-mikey-dent... but not to his face.

    9. Red Tony   7 years ago

      Polls close. Weigel's Cock Ring wins, 7-2.

    10. American Mongrel   7 years ago

      Tony. Nothing but bad faith arguments and ad hominem. If a thread starts with Tony, I know to keep scrolling.

  4. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    North Korean mystery train arrives in Beijing, fueling speculation that Kim Jung Un is on board.

    Calm down, it's just Snowpiercer.

    1. Red Tony   7 years ago

      That's what they call Rufus's penis.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Fact: All Canadian condoms are made from flannel.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Some of them include maple-based lube.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

      It was Biden.

      1. Agammamon   7 years ago

        Only Biden could go to China in Amtrak.

        1. Rich   7 years ago

          "There's something about a *train*!"

          1. Red Tony   7 years ago

            Shut the fuck up John Patterson.

            1. Rich   7 years ago

              ?

              1. Red Tony   7 years ago

                For Better or For Worse. The patriarch of the family has an obsession with model trains. Becomes hilarious in a couple of fanfics about it, most notably "The New Retcons" and its sequel "Who Silenced Elly Patterson?"

                1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

                  That's such a deep cut that even I'm uncomfortable.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to testify before Congress about Facebook's privacy policies.

    So many camera-hungry congressman and senators just liked this news so hard their desks rose two full inches.

    1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

      His site sure loves those guys. Let's see how much they love him.

      1. Ron   7 years ago

        government just wants a little piece of the action

  6. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Paul Krugman argues that crooked conservative politicians get a pass, while dodgy Democrats have their careers ended.

    As much as I'd like to know his justification for this notion, I'm not reading that.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

      Without reading I am sure its something like Weiner and Franken were forced to resign by their party while GOP perverts like Hastert/Trump/Ensign etc get to stay on.

      And the GOP Senator who liked to blow strange men in airports - he finished his term.

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        Are we going to pretend like Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy never happened? Or are we not going to be more mature than the NYT?

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

          Or John Kennedy

        2. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

          Bill Clinton was impeached. He faced political repercussion.

          TK should have been arrested by the locals.

          1. BYODB   7 years ago

            It's amusing that you think using the Clinton impeachment is a point in your favor on the subject.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

              Nixon resigned rather than face impeachment.

              1. BYODB   7 years ago

                You couldn't make a better case against yourself if you tried. Tell me, do you still not see why?

              2. Libertymike   7 years ago

                Are you forgetting Gary Hart?

                Wilbur Mills?

          2. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

            Bill Clinton was impeached. He faced political repercussion.

            But not by his own party.

            1. Libertymike   7 years ago

              Or Andrea Mithcell, but I repeat what you said.

          3. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

            True. But then there's Charlie Rangel, who, as head of the house ways and means committee, lied for years about his assets to avoid paying taxes. Okay for him, but try that when you're a normal person.

            But that's not a sex scandal, so the public doesn't care. But there is or was a NJ senator that I'm pretty sure is a Democrat, who was frequently vacationing in the Caribbean just so he could have sex with very young teens. Consequences for him? Also nada.

            I think Krugman misses the larger point that it's about the powerful in general getting away with crap, not a particular affiliation.

        3. CatoTheChipper   7 years ago

          Or Barney Frank's rent-boy running a prostitution service out of his townhouse. No consequences of importance. Remained in office for decades.

          Or Gary Studd's getting is on with a his Congressional page-boy. No consequences of importance. Remained in office for decades.

          Contrast with the fates of Bob Packwood, Jack Ryan, and Larry Craig.

          Krugman has pretty much zero capability to think with all the noise in his echo chamber.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

        What about the wide-stance guy?

        1. Libertymike   7 years ago

          Larry Craig.

          1. Cyto   7 years ago

            Wide-stance guy was charged with "not-even-a-crime".

            The undercover toilet officer says he waved his hand and tapped his foot under the stall. Even if every word of it was true, and every word of it meant exactly what was charged - that Craig would like to have sex with him - they still have not even remotely approached criminal activity. You'd have to go all the way to "and then they had sex in public" before there is a problem.

            Too bad everyone involved is so invested in the system that they couldn't see the real story in that one. Everyone just went along with "gay guys asking if another guy is interested in hooking up is a crime." And because he had an (R) next to his name, they just went right along with it.

            But Ok Krugman.

            1. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

              But of course people were quick to defend him and denounce his detractors a homophobic, right? Just like they condemn people who insult Clarence Thomas as racists.

              Oh, wait. I forgot homophobia and racism are fine when it's directed against people from a different team! Silly me, forgetting that it's always about principals and not principles.

      3. XM   7 years ago

        No, he's talking about 4 convicted individuals (who already served their time) running for primaries. They haven't won a thing and the sample size is pretty much meaningless. Chelsea Manning was convicted of treason and he's running for office.

        I would say disgraced politicians being forced to resign (whose sins were ignored or covered up by their buddies) is much more telling than some individuals with criminal records trying to run for offices.

        1. Cyto   7 years ago

          I'm not sure, but I think Washington DC mayor Marion Barry has this category all sewn up. Not just a convict, but caught on tape smoking crack. Didn't hurt him at the polls at all. In fact, it may have helped him. He successfully played the race card to get a hung jury on all but one of the felony counts and then played it again as he won a third term.

          Krugman, you are even terrible at counting.

          1. Rat on a train   7 years ago

            Virginia delegate Joe Morrissey won a special election, to fill the seat he resigned, while in jail. He also spent part of his time in the legislature on work release.

    2. BYODB   7 years ago

      Just wave your hands around a lot while looking a picture of a unicorn. It'll be a more satisfying and deep analyses than whatever Krugman barfed up.

    3. Chinny Chin Chin   7 years ago

      The article contains all the deep economic theory that we expect from an intellectual luminary like Krugman.

    4. Rev. Arthur ?. Kirkland   7 years ago

      All you need to prove Krugman's point is to notice that Trump was made President while Hillary wasn't. But of course you won't acknowledge that.

      Carry on clingers.

      1. Red Tony   7 years ago

        Okay is this guy the regular Arthur Licks Koprolite or is it a copy stealing his schtick? The weird L is throwing me off.

        1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

          I think it's OBL.

        2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

          Yeah, it's different.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Beloved PNW burger chain threated by IWW takeover.

    I see touchscreen menu systems in someone's future.

    1. Rhywun   7 years ago

      I know Britches likes to be brief but this is getting ridiculous.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

        HE'S NOT GOING TO SPOON FEED YOU.

        1. Red Tony   7 years ago

          Will he spoon me?

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            It would be like wearing a backpack to bed.

            1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

              He will, like, totally gag you with a spoon.

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        That's what you get if you get rid of Britches: briefs.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

          I don't get it.

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            Most people wear some sort of undergarment under their pants to keep their ball sweat contained.

            1. Red Tony   7 years ago

              I use a cage.

  8. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

    North Korean mystery train arrives in Beijing, fueling speculation that Kim Jung Un is on board.

    Crazy. But that's how it goes.

    1. Red Tony   7 years ago

      Billions of people, they are his foes.

  9. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "Paul Krugman argues that crooked conservative politicians get a pass, while dodgy Democrats have their careers ended"

    Paul Krugman is definitely not going to see "Chappaquiddick", nor is he even going to acknowledge that such even occurred. He truly is well suited for the insular world of the New York Times

    1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

      Paul Krugman desperately batters the last of his credibility, while water remains wet.

  10. Rich   7 years ago

    Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to testify before Congress about Facebook's privacy policies.

    And, in a surprise twist, Congress has agreed to testify before Zuckerberg about the government's privacy policies.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Group therapy session about surveillance

      McConnell: And so, again, we empowered an unstable executive to eavesdrop on all Americans

      Zuckerberg: I sometimes save the bath suit photos that MILFs post on Facebook to my personal computer

      Schumer: I can't even count how many of my constituents I've threatened with an audit

      *group hug*

      1. Red Tony   7 years ago

        Invite us Tonys along. We'll make it a group fuck.

      2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        Please don't Humanize Zuckerberg.

  11. Rich   7 years ago

    Korean mystery train

    Nice band name.

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      It will turn out all the band members were hypnotized to perform for years in some very convoluted revenge plot for something they did in kindergarden.

      1. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

        Or they'll all be detained at the airport for suspicion of being trafficked for child prostitution. Never mind that the women's median age might be 35, the feds will think they're all underage (and think they all look alike).

    2. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   7 years ago

      Korean mystery train

      Was a guy named Fred wearing an ascot conducting?

  12. Agammamon   7 years ago

    Organizers believe they have the votes to win a union election, which would legally require Burgerville to negotiate with the store's workers.

    Someone should tell them - soon - that this actually means the opposite. If they are unionized then Burgerville will be legally *forbidden* from negotiating with the store's workers.

    It will have to negotiate with the union. And the workers will get what they get - and they'll still pay even if they don't get what they want.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      Imagine if reporters started reporting it this way.

    2. Michael Ejercito   7 years ago

      What if Burgerville refused to negotiate with the union?

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

        Unfair business practice.

        1. Michael Ejercito   7 years ago

          How is it unfair?

  13. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

    ""?Opposition to California's sanctuary city law grows in Orange County.""

    Ha Ha.

    I support this notion of the state cannot be required to enforce federal law. It will come handy if the Assault Weapons Ban of 2018 becomes law.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

      Not quite the same thing, but should counties be required to enforce state law?

      1. Rich   7 years ago

        Well, obviously individuals are not required to enforce *any* law.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

        ""Not quite the same thing,""

        Agreed.

        ""but should counties be required to enforce state law?""

        Maybe, maybe not

        Do we allow for lesser government to ignore the parent government's laws if the less government believes they are unconstitutional?

        1. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

          Yes. Unconstitutional laws should be ignored on any level.

          1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

            I just find it amusing that liberals are defending the idea that states do not have to enforce federal law, when they want to pass federal gun control.

            1. Rich   7 years ago

              "That's different somehow!"

            2. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

              I refer you to the Supreme Court decision in Principals v. Principles.

              1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

                Is that a different case from Vice Principals vs. Vice Principles?

                1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

                  That's a lower court case.

          2. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   7 years ago

            Well, that's about 82% of ther Federal Register ...

  14. Yellow Tony   7 years ago

    Students in Louisiana thought this math symbol looked like a gun. Police were called

    Police searched the student's home, where they found no guns or any evidence that he had any access to guns. Authorities also wrote there was no evidence the student had any intent to commit harm.

    Not only do we need authorities need to perform a sueance to punish the nefarious malefactor who created this weapon of math notation, we need to commit this student into an asylum.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   7 years ago

      Only the military and law enforcement should have access to Bessel Functions.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Hey man, the rights of the people to cylindrical harmonics shall not be infringed.

        1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

          Did the officer's symbol discharge?

      2. Rat on a train   7 years ago

        No one under 21 should be able to use a tableau.

  15. Rich   7 years ago

    NBC Tried to Claim There Were 800,000 Gun Control Marchers in DC ? Not Even Close

    Get the Census Bureau on it, stat!

    1. silver.   7 years ago

      Isn't the rule-of-thumb for these million-human marches just to divide the claimed number by 3-4?

      1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

        Do any of those walking spambots count as human?

      2. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

        Do any of those walking spambots count as human?

        1. XenoZooValentine   7 years ago

          It seems the squirrels have taken offense to my human-centric rhetoric.

    2. Rat on a train   7 years ago

      At least the organizers of the Million Apathetics March don't dispute the low turnout.

    3. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   7 years ago

      Prolly used Chicago poll workers to count ...

  16. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to testify before Congress about Facebook's privacy policies.

    I'm sure he'll have much to say about the 2012 election.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

      And his Russian handlers

  17. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    Croatia's anti-fascist football club battles far right
    Zagreb 041 hopes to provide an alternative to mainstream football culture, where racism among fans is rife.

    by Patrick Strickland
    24 Mar 2018

    ANTIFA vs ACTUAL FASCISTS FOR THE CUP!

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      The Ustache approved this message.

  18. Eidde   7 years ago

    Linda Brown, RIP.

    She spent her life being proud of her Supreme Court victory and thinking it was the right thing.

    Which distinguishes her from Norma McCorvey, the Roe of Roe v. Wade, who asked the Supreme Court to undo its fatal abortion decision.

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      You misspelled "fetal."

  19. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

    OT: Just ran across this quote.

    "The mass-man sees in the State an anonymous power, and feeling himself, like it, anonymous, he believes that the State is something of his own. Suppose that in the public life of a country some difficulty, conflict, or problem presents itself, the mass-man will tend to demand that the State intervene immediately and undertake a solution directly with its immense and unassailable resources. This is the gravest danger that to-day threatens civilisation: State intervention; the absorption of all spontaneous social effort by the State." - Jose Ortega Y Gasset

    1. Libertymike   7 years ago

      Can you say

      Opiod epidemic?

      School shooting epidemic?

      Mass shooting epidemic?

      Gun violence epidemic?

      Russian government poisoning its KGB traitors epidemic?

      North Korea asserting its right of defense against the mass murdering empire epidemic?

      1. colorblindkid   7 years ago

        Only the first even comes close to being considered an "epidemic".

  20. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

    Another interesting Ortega Y Gasset quote:

    "Liberalism?it is well to recall this today?is the supreme form of generosity; it is the right which the majority concedes to minorities and hence it is the noblest cry that has ever resounded in this planet. It announces the determination to share existence with the enemy; more than that, with an enemy which is weak. It was incredible that the human species should have arrived at so noble an attitude, so paradoxical, so refined, so acrobatic, so anti-natural. Hence, it is not to be wondered at that this same humanity should soon appear anxious to get rid of it. It is a discipline too difficult and complex to take firm root on earth."

    1. Libertymike   7 years ago

      He is describing an aspirational concession, a right more honored in the breach, and one most commenters on this cite vehemently deny as being within the power of a judge in this country to honor over the objection of a putative majority.

    2. colorblindkid   7 years ago

      But this is not just due to the majority rethinking it, it is because the "weaker" minorities now gladly ignore their own histories of oppression and slavery and all the terrible aspects of humanity that were universal up until the last two centuries. They blame all of history's wrongs on that "liberal majority" and want to abandon the very principles that got us to the relatively peaceful and free world we live in today, BECAUSE those principles largely (although not entirely) originated from white people.

      The rise of victimhood culture and the growing zealous belief in "original sin"; that all European and white people are guilty of the sins of all white people, even ones they weren't even related to or had anything to do with, while also telling them they aren't allowed to feel pride for the good things other white people did.

      I, as a libertarian and individualist, despise all tribalism and think all racial and ethnic pride is inherently evil and corrupt. Nobody should be proud or angry about anything that they themselves had no power over. But the backlash was inevitable, and it is largely the fault of modern "progressives" who claim to be liberal.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    And so it ends.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Anti-Israel Violence Does Not Justify Censorship of Pro-Palestinian Speech

Robby Soave | 6.4.2025 4:31 PM

Belated Republican Objections to the One Big Beautiful Bill Glide Over Its Blatant Fiscal Irresponsibility

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 2:50 PM

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!