Here's the Time the EPA Used Duct Tape to Redact a FOIA Request
It really can fix anything.

I've seen a lot of weird Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) redactions. I've seen redacted complaints about Amtrak snack cars and the CIA cafeteria. I've seen pictures of FBI retirement parties where all the faces were replaced by blank squares, resulting in an oddly artistic tableau.
But duct tape is a new one.
Chris Horner, a longtime FOIA requester and litigator, tweeted out pictures today of a set of emails he received from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) back in 2015.
Usually federal agencies redact information using document production software, Adobe Acrobat, or in less high-tech cases, a Sharpie. This time, the EPA decided to get a little…creative:

It's not the worst FOIA redaction or most nonsensical document release by a longshot, though.
There was the time a British government agency accidentally highlighted paragraphs instead of redacting them. Or when the State Department released a set of documents to a requester in what appeared to be 4-pt font, so tiny that it was barely readable.
Let's not forget the time the CIA tried to convince a FOIA requester and a federal judge that the only way it could release a huge tranche of files in electronic format was to print out the files and then manually rescan them—a solution the unimpressed judge called "Rube Goldbergian."
But I must award the EPA the Red Green Show duct tape seal of approval for this bold new frontier in redaction technology.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I particularly like how even though the redacted part is in one chunk across the page they used three pieces of tape.
They were just using up a few old rolls instead of throwing them away to save money. The savings will go to their 10 million dollar yacht party at end year. Because hey they earned it.
A piece from 3 different new rolls of duct tape. Then each promptly tossed in a landfill as used and not fit for government.
What's bizarre about the Amtrak buffalo wings complaint? If you pay for a dozen wings and only get eleven, why wouldn't you complain that one is missing?
At least that one wasn't entirely redacted.
They're government workers, I'm sure they've already got the Quando omni flunkus moritati part down pat.
It's those damned GOP budget cuts. I was informed by my lefty gf's lefty (limousine illiberal) aunt that EPA doesn't even exist anymore since Team Red ascended to power. The forests burn and the rivers are filled with sewage. It's hell out there now.
Are you sure you just aren't visting San Fran?
Looks like Duck Tape. The bureaucrats duck after every FOIA release.