Brickbat: Stacking the Deck

In a 5-0 decision, the nation's highest military court tossed out the 2012 rape conviction of Coast Guard Petty Officer John Riesbeck. The court found admirals placed five women, four of whom held jobs as advocates for victims of sexual assault, on his seven-person jury. The court noted the case against him was so weak a hearing officer wanted to throw it out but was overruled by an admiral and suggested a more balanced jury would not have found him guilty. The court threw out the conviction with prejudice, meaning Riesbeck cannot be re-tried.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We at Microsoft customer service believes in customer satisfaction and our first priority is to treat their problem like our own. We are having team of dedicated and well-qualified problem resolving personal assistance team so, that user's doesn't face such issues in future
microsoft customer support
None of this is true.
What gave it away? The grammar, the URL or your own personal experiences with Microsoft customer support?
Yes.
Can you help me with my Linux machine?
Thank you, come again.
How very in admiral bull.
Hey breaux, lets down a couple of these gummies before our shift tonight, eh?
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/ca.....-1.4509048
So I guess we can't call them the Woke Guard just yet.
Admiral pensions secure. Anchors aweigh!
In addition to all the other issues, does anyone else have a problem with the idea of a "seven-person jury"?
seven is a prime number!
And seven x six is 56!
Why not a 2-person jury? Or like in ancient Athens in the trial of Socrates, a jury of all Athenian citizens who show up for the trial?
The Constitution requires a jury, but doesn't specify the size. The 12-member jury is from common law, but the military has it's own traditions. In addition, it's recognized that an effective military requires compromises on some constitutional rights - for instance, only in the military can you be imprisoned for disobeying your boss. Anyone who joins the military should have done enough research to know that he signs away some rights when he takes the oath of enlistment.
One of the many weird things about this case was the punishment:
"Petty Officer Riesbeck was convicted of rape, two charges of making false statements and one charge of communicating indecent language. The jury sentenced him to three months of confinement, a reduction in rank and a bad-conduct discharge."
Three months for rape plus other charges? California would hit you harder than that for owning a couple normal capacity magazines.
At least he wasn't expelled from university, the normal punishment for "rape" these days.
And he gets his rank back, the Bad Chicken Dinner goes away and he gets back pay all the way back to 2012. He might even get a promotion out of it.