Philadelphia's Government 'Expresses Interest' in Safe Injection Sites
The city's new district attorney also supports the idea.

Philadelphia officials are now open to allowing safe injection sites for heroin users. The city's health commissioner, Thomas Farley, does not yet have details about how such sites would be run, who would run them, or who would pay for them, looking instead to solicit for proposals from private and non-profit organizations.
"Part of what we're doing today is expressing interest," he told the local NBC affiliate.
The announcement comes on the heels of Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf's decision to offer a range of waivers for regulations that have made it harder for substance abusers to access life-saving treatments. Jeanette Bowles, a public health researcher who served on Philadelphia's Opioid Task Force Harm Reduction and Overdose Prevention Subcommittee, told Reason's Mike Riggs earlier this month that she hopes the governor's new policy means the state "might not get in the way" of a supervised injection facility. (Bowles' old subcommittee has recommended safe injection sites as a way to mitigate overdose deaths, which are a growing problem in the city.)
Philadelphia's new district attorney, Larry Krasner, endorsed the idea of safe injection sites while campaigning for the office last year, saying he'd support "properly run and appropriately supervised injection facilities."
Police Commissioner Richard Ross has said he an open mind about safe injection sites—but with "a lot" of questions. "What would our role be? What does that look like to us? What am I asking police officers to do?" he said to PhillyVoice.
A similar effort in Vermont has been stymied by U.S. Attorney Christina Nolan, who declared that safe injection sites would "encourage and normalize heroin use" after the state legislature began to consider such a proposal.
Safe injection sites currently operate in parts of Europe as well as Vancouver, offering American officials a number of models to consider. There are not yet any sites in the United States, although there are efforts to establish them in California and Seattle.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Spoiler alert: heroin use is already normal
already normal
Are you equating stability with normality? I'm having trouble finding another trait that describes 0.3% of the population that I would, in any way, describe as normal. About 0.3% of Canada identifies as being of Mexican origin so Mexican Canadians are a normal feature of Canada?
I'm sorry AddictionMyth is no longer with us. He would have appreciated stories like this.
Safe Injection
Something something nickname in college.
Not everyone likes heroin: the chow-chow, the dog food. If nothing else, it has interesting street names.
Just as long as the government doesn't pay for it
Yeah, while I don't bemoan the nod to include private proposals, but the notion sounds like something right out of a bad/dark Sci-Fi novel. The Purdue Pharma Clinic just begs to have a nefarious plot written around it. Like some real-world, modern-day adaptation of A Scanner Darkly.
Probably will raise the soda tax to pay for it.
Which means it's still voluntary
Thomas Farley, does not yet have details about how such sites would be run
That tends to be the tricky part.
Safe injection sites currently operate in parts of Europe as well as Vancouver, offering American officials a number of models to consider.
How could that city get any worse? Oh, I know. Be more like Europe.
I wish somewhere in the world this has been done before so we can evaluate whether it had a positive benefit or not.
Wait... it has! And it did!
See? Even Europe can offer lessons.
The message: Do heroin and you get to meet people all kinds of people!
In case anyone is wondering, the above is the pro-safe injection site argument. The dramatic increase of overdose deaths, crime, disorder and general fucked-upness described above is being brushed off by officials as "because of Fentanyl".
Insite still insists drug overdoses have decreased, so I'm not sure if they're drawing a circle around "heroin" overdoses and leaving Fentanyl overdoses outside the circle... either way, if you look upstream, it's very likely that "government cash injections" could be seen as more responsible for the problem they've got in Vancouver, more than the safe injection site.
It's like that scene in Apocalypse Now. Bomb the shit out of people, then offer them a bandaid.
What? No one has Narcan?
Every place in town will be an injection site as Krasner flexes his new powers and doesn't prosecute anyone anymore.
doesn't prosecute anyone anymore
Good. Libertarians will flock in droves.
SISs are a bad idea. They perpetuate the misery of the addict by giving up on them and expect that there is no help for them except to die an eventual early death. The 100% "positive" studies for SISs are unscientific at best, self-serving at worse. They increase public overdoses, public deaths, public use, needle litter, homelessness, crime.
My arguments against SISs is in the comment section here:
http://www.eastbaytimes.com/20.....-epidemic/
"If I came from a city like Seattle and I went to that Insite place, it would scare the hell out of me," Kral said. "I would think, 'Are we going to create one of those?'?""
I believe I linked to this article a while back. As I posted above, the impetus for the SIS is laudable, the logistics and reality of running it... that's where it gets tricky.
The proponents of Vancouver's Insite essentially admit that they've locked a whole neighborhood into an Escape-From-New-York style hellhole. They just claim it's all worth it because it saves lives. Yet depending on from what angle you view the statistics, it's not clear.