Colorado County Spent $88 a Day Jailing Defendants Who Couldn't Pay $55 Fee
Judge orders an end to the practice after the ACLU sued.

Jasmine Still, a 26-year-old woman with a newborn, spent 27 days in a Colorado jail after a judge approved her release on her own recognizance.
Why? Still couldn't pay the $55 "pre-trial services fee," charged by El Paso County, so the county spent nearly $2,400 to keep her in jail, according to a lawsuit filed on her behalf by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Colorado.
Still, arrested in January after her mother reported her to police over a small bag of meth, pleaded guilty so she wouldn't have to stay in jail any longer, her lawsuit says.
In the last year, nearly 300 people in El Paso County had their jail stays extended because of a failure to pay the pre-trial services fee, according to the ACLU. This week, in response to the ACLU lawsuit, El Paso County's top judge, 4th Judicial District Chief Judge William Bain, ordered the county to release defendants who are granted personal recognizance bonds the day the bond is issued.
El Paso County public information officer Dave Rose defended the program in an interview with local KKTV. "Pretrial Services is a way to get people out of jail who are waiting for trial," Rose said, "and it's a way to lessen the impact on the accused and also reduce the cost of overcrowding and reduce the cost of operating the El Paso County Jail."
The county should not have faced a lawsuit to end the practice of keeping people released on their own recognizance in jail at a rate of $88 a day because they can't pay a one-time $55 fee. Common sense, often absent in the criminal justice system, should dictate that.
Too often, the system's driving force is perpetuating itself. Keeping people in jail for failing to pay a fee that's supposed to facilitate their release makes sense only in that context. It keeps the wheels of justice spinning, which keeps a lot of people employed.
It's hard, too, not to think some prosecutors abuse scenarios like this to extract just the kind of resolution that happened in Still's case—a defendant taking a plea deal to get out of the situation of languishing in jail over an unpaid fee.
Guilty or not, defendants pay when prosecutors choose to target them. It's a system with little incentive, outside of lawsuits like the ACLU's, to become less burdensome for defendants. Were prosecutors forced to pay for their lack of common sense, that would quickly change.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We just need to make the fine a minimum of $88/day of possible jail.
Problem solved.
I've been working for this company online for 2 years, now i get paid 95usd/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy AGi ,It's been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, .
Visit following page for more information,,,, http://www.netcash10.com
"It's not about revenue, it's about fairness"
-Some unimportant guy
Let me guess...
A Comedian?
It's a process of self selection. People who make their career in criminal justice tend to be mean, spiteful creatures who take pleasure in doing harm to human beings. I doubt it is more a lack of common sense or a hardon for a plea deal than simply enjoying the power to ruin lives.
you need to change your handle
It's them vs. a population of potential thugs.
I like when they make commercials about how they're coming after you, like we're supposed lick their nuts in admiration of their virile power to ruin people's lives over nothing.
Hopefully not the last time I say this, but
Great comment, Tony. It was sensible, factual, compassionate, and showed an understanding of the Nature of Things.
Thank you!
rediculous, however I always find it amazing that people who can afford drugs can't afford their bail? Are drug free nowadays
What's so amazing about that? If you've already spent your money on drugs, obviously you won't have enough left for bail.
Duh.
Maybe they can turn tricks for drugs. Can't turn tricks for bail.
Nope, but you can for smokes and longer visitation hours, and isn't that what it's all about (I mean, besides the hokey pokey and all)?
Sounds like she has a really horrible mother.
Naaah, Mom probably knows that the daughter has a bad problem and that her grand-baby is probably in danger from daughter's using, and wants to keep the baby safe.
Or is just a hater. We'll never know.
Naaah, Mom probably knows that the daughter has a bad problem and that her grand-baby is probably in danger from daughter's using, and wants to keep the baby safe.
Or is just a hater. We'll never know.
Naaah, Mom probably knows that the daughter has a bad problem and that her grand-baby is probably in danger from daughter's using, and wants to keep the baby safe.
Or is just a hater. We'll never know.
Sounds like a really horrible daughter. Bring drugs into my house? Hell nah. #civilassetforfeiture
They make it up in volume!
"Were prosecutors forced to pay for their lack of common sense, that would quickly change."
Shooting a prosecutor for lacking common sense is a little harsh, don't you thing?
I love my thing!
No more than caging a person for growing and smoking a plant, but that's my perspective.
I am from El Paso county.