Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Saudi Robot Gets Citizenship, Best JFK Files Withheld From Trump Dump, Cruelty in Mississippi Justice System: A.M. Links

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 10.27.2017 9:04 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • At the urging of national intelligence officials, President Trump decided not to release certain federal files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The National Archives is allowed to publish about 2,800 files, "but about 300 additional records—the ones historians were most interested in seeing—will stay secret for now," reports The Washington Post.

  • A Mississippi judge is banning a mother from seeing her new baby until she squares unpaid court fees. ("Even in the annals of 'oppressive things done to poor people due to unpaid court fees,' this story seems particularly monstrous," comments Radley Balko.)
  • Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia.
  • Here's a fun, offline-until-now old profile of longtime New Republic Literary Editor (and alleged serial sexual-harasser) Leon Wieseltier that involves him wearing a coke spoon around his neck and playing intellectual gigolo to old Hollywood ladies.
  • George Bush Sr. continues to collect allegations of ass grabbing.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Can Donald Trump Actually Help his "Deplorables"? Probably Not [Podcast]

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (106)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Another Causal Friday at Reason.

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Causal Friday? Like, involving time travel?

      1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

        ENB plans to visit her great-grandmother and warn her about Michael Hihn.

      2. Brandybuck   8 years ago

        More like Friday being the cause d'etre of everything bad that happens on Saturday.

    2. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

      Hello.

      It is indeed monstrous.

      Over a fucken court fee?

    3. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

      Picture, if you will, President Trump speaking on the phone with Colin Kaepernick's agent. "He knew what he was getting into," the president's voice barks through the speakerphone with zero deference to the agent's sobs. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is at a podium with a wad of fresh cash in her pantsuit pocket screaming at the audience that Donald Trump's election should be tossed out because of his being in the pocket of Russian interests. Next pane widens out to see she is speaking at the annual meeting of the Conglomerate of Russian Uranium Importers/Exporters. Someone in the back yells out in broken English, "In Russia, clunkers cash you!"

      1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

        [I couldn't think up a new one so enjoy that repeat.]

  2. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    George Bush Sr. continues to collect allegations of ass grabbing.

    As long as we're not defining down assault.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   8 years ago

      He is clearly a rapist according to Citizen X.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Your logic and sense of proportion are what make you such a respected thinker, shreek.

      2. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

        A clearapist?

        1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

          Butt is psychologically an analrapist.

    2. mad.casual   8 years ago

      As long as we're not defining down assault.

      Look, you try losing your nose sometime or have the "You've got something on your shirt." trick go terribly wrong just. one. time. Then get back to us.

    3. Jimbo   8 years ago

      Hey, Bush signed the ADA (Americans for Disabled Ass), so he should get a little something. Amirite?

  3. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    A Mississippi judge is banning a mother from seeing her new baby until she squares unpaid court fees.

    He's hoping the child will imprint on the state.

    1. JFree   8 years ago

      That's funny

    2. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      You know the goal is accomplished when the child starts pecking on the state meal.

      1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

        State seal, damnit.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

          Why no one uses the secret edit button is beyond me.

          1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

            Because only Reason employees, like you, have access to it.

            1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

              Imagine all the other secret buttons those Reason employees have.

      2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

        I had a state meal once... once.

  4. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia.

    Way to bury the lede, ENB (which is in fact the headline of the article): A robot that once said it would 'destroy humans' just became the first robot citizen

    1. Bee Tagger   8 years ago

      Until it tweets that sentiment, I'm not too worried.

    2. Chinny Chin Chin   8 years ago

      Will they let her drive a car?

      1. Libertarian   8 years ago

        Will it be forced to cover its face?

        1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

          Will it be allowed to Hajj?

    3. juris imprudent   8 years ago

      Ha, just wait for Sophia to grab the whip and start lashing the Saudi men.

      1. Jimbo   8 years ago

        For free? I pay extra for that.

    4. lap83   8 years ago

      so it's an environmentalist robot

  5. Bee Tagger   8 years ago

    Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia.

    Instead of just wondering if my fellow citizens love their country, now I have to wonder if my fellow citizens are capable of loving their country.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    At the urging of national intelligence officials, President Trump decided not to release certain federal files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

    I guess he and the deep state are no longer feuding.

    1. Libertarian   8 years ago

      I'm continually disapointed in Trump's deal making ability.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   8 years ago

        If by "deal making" you mean stiffing his creditors he has still got it.

        1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

          Then there's deal making like enforcing American immigration law and getting huge reductions in illegal immigration across the US border, getting a ceasefire in Syria, getting China to put pressure on North Korea, getting Congress to enact some tax reform, etc.

          Aw, Butt and your TDS.

          1. Palin's Buttplug   8 years ago

            ICE and the DEA are stomping around more - I give you that.

            Not very libertarian at all though.

            1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

              ICE duties rounding up illegals are very constitutional and what Americans want.

              DEA duties are mostly based on unconstitutional drug laws and on their way out, as long as people dont fall for the propaganda that there is an opioid crisis.

              So some Libertarian ways and some not.

              Butt's got TDS ?

              1. Eek Barba Durkle   8 years ago

                There is nothing Libertarian about a state telling people where they can and cannot live, travel and work.

                There is no difference in 'border control' and the drug war (and gun control, and militarization of police etc etc) It's all the same myopic cowardice.

                1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

                  If they are not citizens of that country, sure there is a Libertarian interest in keeping borders secure. Just like enforcing property rights is Libertarian.

                  The myopic cowardice is following socialist dogma and hoping socialism works this time in the USA.

                  1. Zeb   8 years ago

                    No, there is a pragmatic and utilitarian interest in keeping borders secure. There is nothing libertarian about using force to prevent people from peacefully traveling from one place to another.

                    Perhaps tightly controlled borders are necessary to maintaining any semblance of liberty (I'm not convinced, but it's possible I guess). But that would be a compromise of principle, not an application of it.

                    1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

                      Libertarianism is partly about property rights and national defense.

                      You are assuming people are peacefully traveling from outside the USA into the USA.

                      Some of those illegals do not want to assimilate into American culture but want to change.

                      Doesn't sound like peace to me.

                    2. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

                      Real question. The overarching prevention of people from certain country denies me some aspect of my own property rights. That is, I am not allowed to bring them to my house and allow them to be there. In this way the federal trumps an individuals property rights. What is your opinion of that?

                    3. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

                      BestUsedCarSales|10.27.17 @ 1:15PM|#
                      Real question. The overarching prevention of people from certain country denies me some aspect of my own property rights. That is, I am not allowed to bring them to my house and allow them to be there. In this way the federal trumps an individuals property rights. What is your opinion of that?

                      See, YOUR property rights do not trump everyone else's. Its why eminent domain is in the Constitution. You don't get to harm everyone else's property rights because YOU hypothetically want a million illegals to live on your land.

                      Even eminent domain should be used in rare circumstances and after Due Process allows you reasonable compensation.

                      The common defense is an enumerated power of the federal government and that includes defense of of sovereign borders.

                      If you want a non-American to be on you land, obtain a visa for that person but YOU are responsible for that person skipping out and not leaving the USA. This would actually end more of this open borders nonsense.

                    4. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

                      See, YOUR property rights do not trump everyone else's. Its why eminent domain is in the Constitution. You don't get to harm everyone else's property rights because YOU hypothetically want a million illegals to live on your land.

                      So it is not a right in any sense? It is trumped if people disagree with you? Because you are saying that other people's property rights trump mine.

                      Imagine that I bought land on the border and I wanted people to come on in and visit from Canada freely. In what way is this going on other people's property rights?

                      Also do you believe that public property is a type of conglomerated property right?

                      The common defense is an enumerated power of the federal government and that includes defense of of sovereign borders.

                      I agree, but falling back on saying it's the law is not a meaningful moral or philosophical argument. That just is.

              2. Zeb   8 years ago

                ICE duties rounding up illegals are very constitutional and what Americans want.

                I didn't realize there were degrees of constitutionality.

                Deporting illegal immigrants is certainly constitutional. However, they way in which they go about it is not always so.

                1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

                  There is constitutional and unconstitutional.

                  In the case of rounding up illegals, its constitutional and the majority of Americans approve of it.

                  As with a recent example of ICE agents entering a home without a warrant, that is a violation of the 4th Amendment and should not be tolerated.

                  In the case of domestic surveillance, its unconstitutional and the majority of Americans don't approve of it yet the government still does it.

        2. Sevo   8 years ago

          Palin's Buttplug|10.27.17 @ 9:22AM|#
          "If by "deal making" you mean stiffing his creditors he has still got it."

          Ever pay off your bet, turd?

  7. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia.

    She's programed to not go into public unattended.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   8 years ago

      Not without an abaya she doesn't.

  8. Libertarian   8 years ago

    Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia.

    I see a future where computer-immigrants will be imported in pieces and then assembled here, much like cars are to avoid costly import duties.

    1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      Let's see....a German brain, a French tongue, African penis, Russian balls, Brazilian ass....am I missing anything?

      1. Chinny Chin Chin   8 years ago

        Tierra del Fuegan webbed feet, Laplander palate

      2. Eek Barba Durkle   8 years ago

        You're going to want to spring for the white privilege. I know, I know, nobody wants to fall for the upsell, but you're gonna want that protection if you find yourself confronted by the cisheteronormative patriarchy.

    2. Mike Laursen   8 years ago

      I got her one piece at a time / And she didn't cost me a dime / You'll know my ro-boy when I come through your town...

  9. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Increase in availability of rents leads to commensurate increase in rent seeking; political analysts shocked

    The truly terrifying revelation from this article is the picture.

  10. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

    I dug a little beyond WaPo about Judge John Shirley.

    One of the reasons he claimed why he did this monstrous thing was because:

    "After the women were arrested, the officer listed the child as "abandoned" because the mother had been detained. The baby's grandmother arrived to take the child soon after, but the officer still requested the mother and child appear in Pearl Youth Court."

    See? The cops detain the mother and the child suddenly becomes abandoned! Over a...traffic violation!

    A crystal clear case of how law enforcement fosters distrust among the poor.

    Beyond, this Shirley lacks compassion and decency. To take a mother away from her child for 14 months in this story is beyond the pale.

    And the prick is standing by his asshole decision:

    http://bit.ly/2yOK5yb

    1. cgr2727   8 years ago

      Surely he must be joking...

      1. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

        /narrows gaze.

    2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Well, is he a prick, or is he an asshole? He's actively making the world a shittier place, but he's also fucking somebody, so it's hard to tell.

      1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

        Some sort of retractable sphincter penis?

        1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

          That, or a urethral fistula.

        2. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

          Maybe he's actually a prick and a pussy? Then he'd be like one of those hyena psuedopenises.

    3. Eidde   8 years ago

      Looks like Reason buried the lede:

      "A judge resigned Wednesday and the city of Pearl voted to close its youth court after city leaders learned the judge had kept a mother from seeing her child for over a year, due to unpaid court fees."

    4. Hail Rataxes   8 years ago

      I dug a little beyond WaPo about Judge John Shirley.

      Yeah, so that's why the detail you posted was in Balko's WaPo coverage.

      Fuck off to the other site where your stupidity is appreciated.

  11. Palin's Buttplug   8 years ago

    Trump Is the GOP Mainstream

    http://www.nationalreview.com/.....as-shifted

    The last remnants of libertarianism are dying in the GOP.

    1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      I mean that's not saying much.

    2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

      Trump is doing Libertarian things in office. The GOP is not and will probably never be very Libertarian.

      Even Rand Paul is not a Libertarian, so you are just as clueless about the GOP as most lefties.

      Since the Democratic Party is imploding and will cease to be a force anymore, that is a great opportunity for the two-legged race to be Republicans vs. Libertarians in the future. Libertarians would set themselves apart from Republicans because Libertarians would be for social freedoms not matter what Jesus wants and fiscally limiting of government while republicans still raise the debt ceiling.

      1. Mike Laursen   8 years ago

        But the Republican Party is imploding, too. And the Libertarian Party has been a purity debate society rather than a political party ever since it adopted The Pledge.

      2. Eidde   8 years ago

        "Libertarians would be for social freedoms not matter what Jesus wants"

        You mean like Gary Johnson and his compulsory cakes?

        1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

          Gary Johnson is not the best example of a Libertarian. The buttsex thing really warps what he thinks Libertarianism is. That and the weed has probably taken its toll on his brain.

          Good point tho on the lack of freedom of association.

          1. Hail Rataxes   8 years ago

            Since when do you believe in freedom of association? You're shitting all over it upthread because "citizenship."

            1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

              Entering property of the USA is not freedom of association because its illegal and unsupported by the constitution. Americans have the constitutionally protected right to associate or not associate with whomever they choose. The Civil Rights Act, which stomps on other people's rights, makes it illegal for people to refuse to bake a gay cake. The CRA should be repealed as it is unconstitutional..

              Socialists like you rail on property rights and freedom of association all the time. You just support using useful idiots to vote the Constitution into oblivion.

              1. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

                Americans have the constitutionally protected right to associate or not associate with whomever they choose
                Unless you're an employer who wants to associate with an illegal immigrant, right?

                Even if we ignore all the other reasons your version of Freedom of Association doesn't work, you should at least acknowledge that "whomever they choose" only applies to other Americans, and that the federal government can willy-nilly restrict the right to associate with any non-American it wants.

  12. Memory Hole   8 years ago

    Re: Mississippi Judge

    Stop, no, don't, you must not help the poor women. Giving anything to poor people kills their souls. She has to suffer to grow. The judge was right to turn the screws. She'll appreciate not being tortured when the torture stops.

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Alright, which one of you guys broke Memory Hole?

  13. colorblindkid   8 years ago

    "Saudi Arabia has granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia."

    That robot has more rights than an actual woman named Sophia would.

  14. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

    Alabama Bill Would Eliminate Marriage Licenses, Nullify Federal Control in Practice
    Finally getting the supposed least progressive state out of the state sanctioned marriage business.

  15. Aloysious   8 years ago

    I don't think this guy is making the point he thinks he is making, but whatever.

    Democrats used to campaign on class ? and win. It's time to do it again.

    The reason the Democratic Party lost the last presidential election is simple.

    Or so a lot of Democrats seem to think.

    In the end, says one school of thought, it was all about race. As the influential journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates asserted in a recent Atlantic magazine cover story, "whiteness brought us Donald Trump."

    Trump, Coates pointed out, won whites of all genders, all ages, all incomes and all levels of educational attainment. "And so," Coates concluded, "it will not suffice to say that Trump is a white man like all the others who rose to become president. He must be called by his rightful honorific ? 'America's first white president.'"

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Congratulations to Ta-Nehisi Coates - the competition is fierce, but he definitely has a contender for Dumbest Thing Written in 2017.

      1. Aloysious   8 years ago

        The author, Andrew Romano, after quoting TNC, goes on to make the point that D's need to make economic arguments to win elections, among other things, and quotes Harry Truman. I'm having a hard time imagining HT as a modern day Democrat.

        1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

          You don't become a Democrat if you understand economics, so watching Ds try to make economic arguments should be fairly entertaining.

          1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

            True, but other than Rand, what Republican understands economics?

            1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

              Well, you generally don't become a Republican if you understand economics, either. Economics is properly the study of human choices - it's descriptive, not prescriptive. The business of politics is ignoring, denying, or manipulating human choice (it's nothing BUT prescriptive action) so economic knowledge is of very limited utility to a politician.

              1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

                It takes an increasingly rare type of i-don't-care-what-you-do as-long-as-it's-not-on-my-lawn curmudgeon to both identify with the GOP and possess economic understanding. Whatever Rand Paul has of that is certainly inherited from his dad.

              2. Chinny Chin Chin   8 years ago

                ...it's descriptive, not prescriptive.

                That's why Keynes became such a rock star. He promised pols that they could fiddle with Economic Lever A, and achieve Economic Benefit X. That they were actually in control of their nation's economy.

                1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

                  Same with Krugman - he leveraged some legitimately solid, Nobel-winning work on an obscure branch of macroeconomics into a cushy gig telling powerful people that they are right to do what they were going to do anyway.

  16. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Here's a fun, offline-until-now old profile of longtime New Republic Literary Editor (and alleged serial sexual-harasser) Leon Wieseltier that involves him wearing a coke spoon around his neck and playing intellectual gigolo to old Hollywood ladies.

    From the link: Wieseltier might be the Jewish, heterosexual answer to Oscar Wilde. "Why don't you take it a step further," he suggests, "and call me the 'Oscar very Wilde'?"

    I'd never heard of this guy before, but for that line alone, i hate him. Jesus Christ.

    1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      Probably a safe bet to assume there is absolutely no relation to Olivia Wilde?

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Educate yourself, girl. Her real name is Olivia Cockburn, though she did take her stage name from the unrelated Oscar.

  17. Sevo   8 years ago

    "SF looks to Oakland as it plans to regulate recreational pot sales"
    [...]
    "As the Board of Supervisors looks to approve a complex set of ordinances to regulate the sale of recreational marijuana next year, its members are turning to Oakland as a model, saying they want to uphold the same social justice credos that inspired the East Bay city's equity permit program."
    http://www.sfchronicle.com/pol.....310095.php

    (eyes closed, fingertips to forehead)
    I foresee someone's brother-in-law getting a prime location...

  18. creech   8 years ago

    What the hell did Bill O'Reilly do that caused him to make a (reportedly) $32 million settlement of a sexual harassment charge? $32 million????

    1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      An ass grab with some strategically positioned fingers. Citizen X calls it the bear claw.

  19. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

    Catalonia's regional parliament formally declares independence from Spain in an overwhelming 70-10 vote, and I think the shit is really about to hit the fan over there.

    1. Chipper Morning Truthjammer   8 years ago

      Congrats to the Catalans. Let's hope there is no bloodshed. The only amusing thing will be seeing all the liberals arguing against self-determination and watching their heads smoke from all the cognitive dissonance. Ah, who am I kidding, there will be no cognitive dissonance.

      1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

        Shortly after, the Spanish senate voted 214-47 to invoke Article 155 of the Spanish constitution, which apparently gives the Prime Minister a lot of latitude to suppress the revolt, take full control of the region, and arrest the rebels.

        Yes, we should all hope for the best, but this looks like a serious crisis in the making, as Rajoy clearly has no intention of letting them walk away peacefully.

        1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

          You know who else had a lot of latitude, suppressed the revolt, took control of a region, and arrested the rebels?

          1. creech   8 years ago

            George Washington against the Whiskey rebels?

            1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

              Nice try but all the rebels went home before George Washington's army arrived. No region was really controlled by federal forces and the 20 or so people arrested were later acquitted or pardoned.

        2. Chinny Chin Chin   8 years ago

          The article said that only 47% of "potential voters" actually cast ballots.

          With apathy like that, the fire might need more kindling before it can blaze into crisis.

          1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

            Only one-third of American colonists supported declaring independence and breaking away from mother England in the late 18th century. Another third remained loyal, and the last third didn't really give a shit and was content to go with the ultimate winner either way.

            1. Chinny Chin Chin   8 years ago

              I've seen that breakdown, too. You trust the polls that determined those numbers?

              Regardless, would the Revolution have come off like it did without the efforts of Sam Adams?

              Catalonia may need a Boston Massacre-type event to get your crisis going.

          2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

            All the poll results are in Spanish, so I cannot understand them.

    2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

      Ole!

  20. Brandybuck   8 years ago

    George Bush Sr. continues to collect allegations of ass grabbing.

    Attention must be deflected away from Weinstein!!!

    1. Azathoth!!   8 years ago

      From Weinstein? I thought we were deflecting attention from DNC and Clinton collusion with the Russians. Aren't we trying to make this as unspoken of as Rotherham?

    2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

      War vets need some hand action too.

      Bush Sr was shot down over the Pacific in WWII and was luckily picked up by a US submarine.

      I think the biggest issue is that people in power think they can do anything and there are no real consequences.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Anti-Israel Violence Does Not Justify Censorship of Pro-Palestinian Speech

Robby Soave | 6.4.2025 4:31 PM

Belated Republican Objections to the One Big Beautiful Bill Glide Over Its Blatant Fiscal Irresponsibility

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 2:50 PM

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!