Rand Paul

Rand Paul Worries Whether Surveillance Reform Will Even Be Debated in Senate

Will snooping reauthorizations just get quietly dumped into a spending bill?

|

Donald Trump and Rand Paul
Ron Sachs/SIPA/Newscom

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is concerned his peers will attempt to reauthorize and possibly even expand the federal government's surveillance powers without any public debate at all.

Paul spoke with journalists this morning about the USA Rights Act, the bill he has introduced with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Paul's goal, as when he has called for limits on government surveillance in the past, is compliance with the Fourth Amendment.

"What's most important to me is that, really, if we use less than a constitutional standard to gather information, that information should not be used to prosecute a crime," Paul said.

But yesterday afternoon, hours after Paul and Wyden unveiled their bill, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to essentially maintain the rules as they are. The way Section 702 of FISA is currently being implemented allows the FBI and other federal agencies to use communications they collect during surveillance of foreign targets to prosecute domestic crimes, all without getting a warrant to access the information. Section 702 expires this year, so lawmakers must either pass something or allow it to expire entirely.

Paul hopes there will be debate on reforming the Section 702 surveillance laws, but he worries that's not going to happen.

"Our hope is that we'll actually get a vote on this," Paul told reporters. "It's disappointing that we may not get a debate or vote. Typically we wait until deadline and then stick it on spending bills."

But if Paul doesn't get a lot of support from his fellow senators, he has bipartisan support from a significant number of representatives in the House. He says that only a handful of GOP senators support his push for restrictions, but he calculates that somewhere between 60 and 100 conservatives in the House are receptive. The conservative House Freedom Caucus opposes renewing Section 702 without better protections for Americans against unwarranted surveillance.

Paul was also asked about his recent interactions with President Donald Trump and whether he pushed for Trump to embrace these reforms. Paul wouldn't get into specifics, but he confirmed that he had been "discussing privacy issues" with the president. The White House has said that it wants Section 702 reauthorized without changes.

Trump's concerns about surveillance privacy have primarily involved the unmasking of people in his orbit during the investigation of possible Russian meddling in the election, and leaks of information about those communications to the media. The line from the White House has typically been that the unmasking and the leaks were illegal and must be stopped. Paul agrees with that. But there's not much evidence that Trump shares Paul's broader concern about surveillance without warrants as an issue affecting everybody else.

Advertisement

NEXT: For Congress, the Best Deal on Obamacare May Be No Deal At All

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Will snooping reauthorizations just get quietly dumped into a spending bill?

    I’m pretty sure we all know the answer to that question: yes. Because fuck you, that’s why.

  2. The White House has said that it wants Section 702 reauthorized without changes.

    I’m shocked!

    1. But I thought Trump was totally going to take on the Deep State?

  3. The debate will be ‘should we have a whole shit ton of surveillance’ or ‘should surveillance be ubiquitous’, as always.

  4. Trump’s concerns about surveillance privacy have primarily involved the unmasking of people in his orbit during the investigation of possible Russian meddling in the election

    It was just an honest investigation. Scott has learned to love and trust the FBI. How Libertarian of him.

  5. We are all just spiraling further down the deep state surveillance hole. It’s a wonder why anyone even cares.

  6. “Rand Paul Worries Whether Surveillance Reform Will Even Be Debated in Senate”

    I worry about whether the senate will ever get rid of Obamacare–because of Rand Paul.

  7. We literally saw the intelligence community get rid of a belligerent Trump appointee (Flynn) by abusing the surveillance state and leaking out incriminating information. You think both parties aren’t in awe of the power they can wield? This goes nowhere

  8. When Roy Moore blasts Rand Paul on the Senate floor for this anooping as a anti terrorism measure,

    I’ll be watching reason.com praise Paul for being the libertarian who was opposed to Moore from the very beginning

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.