9/11

Most of the Lessons of 9/11 Went Unlearned

There has been a tremendous residual cost in freedom and in dollars to secure an elusive security.

|

Reason

"American citizens cannot delegate the responsibility for strengthening our security, in our airports and on our streets, to bureaucrats. We should undertake a vigorous dialogue on the national cost of pretending we have limitless freedom in our world."

You'd find that quote near the end of a very long piece I wrote for the Austin American-Statesman in the aftermath of 9/11, 16 years ago. But newspapers didn't do as much internet archiving then as they do now, so I can't direct you to it. It was part of a cover story for an extra, something newspapers don't do much of any more either.

I get the paper version out on the anniversary—not every year—to admire its crystalline prose (I'm keeping in mind you can't look it up) and to take stock of a few prescriptions I was willing to make on deadline, fresh off that harrowing Tuesday.

Like many of us watching something truly horrendous happen on our home soil, I got a lot of things wrong. Like Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, 9/11 brought out what we like to think is the best in the American spirit. But I think Ben Domenech, the publisher of The Federalist, was right when he wrote a couple of anniversaries ago that "We wept and we forgot."

September 11, I wrote, stripped from Americans "the illusion that the Unites States could bestride the world with its economic and political power and somehow not be of the world." This was a new kind of Pearl Harbor, an attack with a potentially transformative power to unite Americans. Vietnam divided and continues to divide a country. After 9/11, I supposed, how could anyone disagree about the enemy and what needed to be done?

NATO seemed to prove my point. Although it has long been forgotten, for the first time in the treaty's history NATO invoked Article 5, asserting that an attack on the US was an attack on all member countries. Even Russia pledged to join this war on terrorism. "The opportunity exists for this war to unify the democratic world," I wrote, "in a way that World War II did not."

Oh, my. That's a little embarrassing. The US has since lurched from President Bush's war in Iraq to President Obama's unilateral interventionism to President Trump's selective brinksmanship. The Reason archives are bursting with hundreds of dispatches detailing the spectacular failures of American foreign policy, both on their own merits and as an international democratic unifier.

In 2015, Matt Welch wrote an article that serves as a chastener for my unjustified optimism. "What would happen in a world where humans, including those in or near power, freely admitted that they don't know how to stop ISIS, can't tell the difference between a Yazidi and and Assyrian, have no convincing explanation for why crime stats are fluctuating this year, and don't know why Billy Beane's shit doesn't work in the playoffs?" he asked.

"For one, I think people would be a little less likely to champion or sign up for giant, mass-mobilizing schemes. If we are humble in the face of facts, and mindful of the unforeseen consequences that come with every grand plan, we might be more cautious about bending a sprawling nation's resources and will in one direction or another."

At least I didn't lose my mind on the home front. Politicians at the time indignantly insisted that freedom and security are American birthrights. That entitled mentality obscured one of the central concerns of my essay: I was pretty sure Americans would be asked (or told) to pay for security with their freedom.

And as James Bovard concluded in the June 2016 issue of Reason, we've been paying ever since, in freedom and in dollars, for something we've never secured. Few publications have been as vigilant as Reason in resisting those exorbitant and unreasonable costs.

Which brings me to that opening quote, and to the vigorous dialogue that took place on this website and in our magazine but was in no way a national discussion. In Texas and now in Florida, we've seen again that Americans are good people, maybe even great. But if 9/11 showed us anything, it's how tough it is to sustain our goodness when there isn't a disaster.

NEXT: Irma Weakens as Jose Approaches, Sen. Corker Mulls Retirement, Pope Defends DACA: P.M. Links

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. But I think Ben Domenech, the publisher of The Federalist, was right when he wrote a couple of anniversaries ago that “We wept and we forgot.”

    This photo is a few years old, but it sums up that sentence nicely.

    1. The forgetting part?

    2. Certainly been forgotten, whatever it was.

  2. We learned to hate Muslims more than ever before. And how to be cool with strangers ogling our naked bodies at airports.

    1. I don’t hate Muslims, and I’ve never been naked in an airport. I’m clearly missing out on life.

      I do recall being able to park 20 yards from the United terminal at O’Hare, 15 minutes before my flight, and still get on board. So fuck TSA agents ogling soft x-ray images of my body. I miss the efficiencies and savings of time, that scarcest of resources — for individuals, anyway.

  3. In 2015, Matt Welch wrote an article that serves as a chastener for my unjustified optimism. “What would happen in a world where humans, including those in or near power, freely admitted that they don’t know how to stop ISIS, can’t tell the difference between a Yazidi and and Assyrian, have no convincing explanation for why crime stats are fluctuating this year, and don’t know why Billy Beane’s shit doesn’t work in the playoffs?” he asked.

    “For one, I think people would be a little less likely to champion or sign up for giant, mass-mobilizing schemes. If we are humble in the face of facts, and mindful of the unforeseen consequences that come with every grand plan, we might be more cautious about bending a sprawling nation’s resources and will in one direction or another.”

    Sign me up for a one-way trip to that parallel dimension.

  4. . In Texas and now in Florida, we’ve seen again that Americans are good people, maybe even great. But if 9/11 showed us anything, it’s how tough it is to sustain our goodness when there isn’t a disaster

    Distractions > reality, plus if they are in charge they probably know what they’re doing, and if they mess up, we will just find the right person to be in charge.

    Anywhoways, GOT is AWESOME.

    1. No spoilers please.

      1. The dwarf gets it!

        1. That was a very short synopsis.

  5. I get the paper version out on the anniversary?not every year?to admire its crystalline prose (I’m keeping in mind you can’t look it up)…

    Lisheron’s girlfriend is Canadian. You wouldn’t know her.

    Americans have short memories and long longings for state security. Listen, if Congress can regularly offload its responsibilities onto the government, why can’t I? What do you want? Me to carry around with me everywhere a tool for my personal protection? I’m pretty sure that’s illegal.

  6. “For one, I think people would be a little less likely to champion or sign up for giant, mass-mobilizing schemes. If we are humble in the face of facts, and mindful of the unforeseen consequences that come with every grand plan, we might be more cautious about bending a sprawling nation’s resources and will in one direction or another.”

    *cough*Obamacare*cough*

    1. I looked up the definition of “humble” and it said

      (a) Something I am

      (b) Something other people should be

      1. That accounts for about 99.9% of the usage of that term in opinion journalism.

        1. How insightful. Please tell us more.

      2. (c) something I’m good at being

  7. “to take stock of a few prescriptions I was willing to make on deadline”

    Hmmm…at first I totally misunderstood that.

  8. Oh come on, if the managing editor can’t throw a few alt text words our way, what hope is there for fall interns before it’s even fall?

  9. Not a single word on Islamism? Go fuck yourself Mark!

    1. DIVERSITY! Even if it kills us all.

    2. Perhaps he thinks we did learn a lesson about Islamic terrorism.

    3. Is anyone confused about who the terrorists were?

  10. What kills me now is when you’re sitting there at a bar drinking and talking with someone and they tell you they were in 5th grade when it happened.

    1. “Who is Osama Bin Laden?”

      Was the number one google for almost a week after he was found and executed. Not that I support the USG narrative on what happened, just pointing out how many people didn’t know who he was and their ability to use google.

      If someone was born on 9/11/01 they could be getting their driver’s license today.

  11. Problem/Reaction/Solution
    The US government arms, trains, and subsidies
    Middle-Eastern terrorist groups during the
    Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan; subsidies
    the sworn enemy of those groups- Israel; and involves itself in ‘nation-building’ throughout the area.
    Off-shoots of those terrorist groups that were armed and trained by the US, start attacking the US.
    Now the US government rides in on a white horse and presents itself as the solution createing a humongous beauracracy, which, wouldn’t you know it, gives them
    more power and control.
    THAT’S the lesson not learned.

    solution?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.