North Carolina's Ridiculous Cosmetology Rules Prevent Makeup Artist From Opening Her Own School
She can't teach makeup artistry unless she teaches a whole bunch of unrelated classes too.

North Carolina, like many states, requires makeup artists to obtain a government-issued license before they can ply their trade. Getting that license, in North Carolina, requires a year of training at a cosmetology school. That year of schooling, which includes training in a wide range of skills not necessarily related to what an individual makeup artist wants to do professionally, costs around $8,000.
It's a great deal for the cosmetology schools, but would-be makeup artists could benefit from having more options for completing the training requirements.
That's what Jasna Bukvic-Bhayani was thinking when she decided to open a school to teach makeup skills—not how to remove hair, how to shampoo scalps, or how to give a manicure or pedicure. Her proposed school could be an alternative for some students who want narrowly focused training.
The North Carolina Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners says she's not allowed to do that. Under state law, Bukvic-Bhayani can only get a license to open her school if she spends five hours teaching other skills for every hour she spends teaching makeup.
That's like being told you can't teach elementary school unless you also learn how to teach college. Sure, it's all teaching, but there's a huge difference in how you teach a 5-year-old versus how you would teach a 20-year-old, and it would be foolish to require would-be teachers to spend the time and money to learn skills they will never use.
But the North Carolina Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners refuses to make this distinction. So Bukvic-Bhayani is suing the board with the help of the Institute for Justice, a Virginia-based libertarian law firm. The institute filed the suit today in federal court.
"North Carolina's law is unconstitutional," says Justin Pearson, a senior attorney at the institute. "The U.S. Constitution protects the right to speak for a living—whether the speakers are authors, journalists or makeup artists like Jasna—and it protects the rights of listeners to hear from those speakers."
Bukvic-Bhayani's situation reveals how licensing laws limit economic opportunities by requiring one-size-fits-all training requirements for professions full of people with a diverse sets of skills. Some states have enacted small changes to exempt hairbraiders or makeup artists from cosmetology licensing rules, but this lawsuit is a reminder of how much these laws still restrict competition.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's like being told you can't teach elementary school unless you also learn how to teach college.
Seems more like saying if you want to teach Math you should also know how to teach English.
Ummm, college professors are not qualified to teach elementary school. You can get a PhD in math all you want, without that teaching certificate you can only teach at the college level. Knowing your shit in math isn't as important as knowing your shit in the latest trans-collaborative intersectional technologies in intra-personal communications pedagogy as it relates to holistically transformative epistemology.
^ What he said.
Require *everyone* to have a license to *apply* makeup.
Think of the JOBS!
Something is seriously twisted when it takes twice as many schooling hours to cut hair than it does to become a cop.
"The U.S. Constitution protects the right to speak for a living"
Justin Pearson is a funny guy!
The Institute started a new Occupational Licensing web site which is fun to poke around. Some gobsmacking humor to be had!
North Carolina stands firmly behind women going Natural.
Do you need a license to decorate pumpkins? I'd just have a class on pumpkin decorating. If students forget to bring their pumpkin to class, they can use their face as a substitute. Start with how to apply eyeliner and blush to a pumpkin.
Dude, you're getting me super horny here. Please stop all the sexy pumpkin talk.
"North Carolina's law is unconstitutional," says Justin Pearson, a senior attorney at the institute. "The U.S. Constitution protects the right to speak for a living?whether the speakers are authors, journalists or makeup artists like Jasna?and it protects the rights of listeners to hear from those speakers."
Is that still true if the potential speaker thinks men and women are different? In NC, I mean.
Does it apply to Milo? in NC, I mean.
Does it apply to Ann Coulter? In NC, I mean?
Does it apply to a statue of a Confederate? Anywhere, I mean.
etc
etc