Microagression

Rutgers Orders Freshmen to Add Microaggression to Their Course Lists

New research says such diversity programs can make campus less inclusive and more polarized.

|

As part of a $175 student orientation package, Rutgers University requires all incoming freshmen take a course on the "big impact" of microaggressions, because nothing says welcome to college like a mandatory seminar on safe spaces and offensive phrases.

Microaggressions, statements that are subtly offensive to a marginalized group, are nothing new to the social justice scene. Everything from saying "that's crazy" to "you throw like a girl" could be considered a microaggression.

The Language Matters Campaign, organized by the university's Center for Social Justice Education and LGBT Communities, teaches students about how to avoid hurting their peers intentionally or accidentally with their words.

The course consists of a Prezi presentation and some Youtube videos. It concludes by encouraging students to report an act of bias toward anyone because of their "race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, atypical heredity or cellular blood trait, military service or veteran status."

It is a long list for new students to retain as they worry about which classes to take or how to pay for $400 textbooks. The Center for Social Justice Education, however, would prefer microaggressions be a student's top priority. Microaggressions, after all, can be detrimental to a person's health, according to the Prezi.

Microaggressions "can have a deep and negative impact on the experiences of your peers" and the Prezi even goes so far as to claim that "victims are affected physically, cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally."

Tying words to physical harm is an emerging trend for both sides of the political spectrum. When words are considered violence, preventing them from being spoken sounds reasonable. Censorship, then, is the proper precaution to ensure a student's safety. Reporting an act of bias becomes a civic duty.

The problem with microaggressions is they are entirely subjective. One person's microaggression is another's rude joke. While one person might laugh at the joke, another might feel uncomfortable. It can be tricky figuring out where to draw the line. But that isn't an excuse to forbid speech because it may be offensive to someone.

Respected researchers have begun to poke holes in the social justice advocate argument that science is on the side of microaggression theory. Althea Nagai, a research fellow at the Center for Equal Opportunity specializing in statistical studies in social policy, cites many technical flaws in critical race theory and, in turn, microaggression theory.

"This one-way racial framework accounts for the serious technical shortcomings in critical race theory studies—biased interview questions, reliance on narrative and small numbers of respondents, problems of reliability, issues of replicability, and ignoring alternative explanations," Nagai argued in a National Association of Scholars article.

Many universities, Nagai says, have embraced social justice theories of inclusivity and microaggressions in order to avoid any implications of racial bias. Solutions to perceived problems, like diversity programs, may actually exacerbate them.

"There is nothing in the current research to show that such programs work. I suspect most fail to create greater feelings of inclusion," Nagai contends. "In other words, 'social justice' and diversity programs may actually backfire, creating less inclusion, more polarization, and more findings of unconscious racism."

Rutgers University should consider Nagai's findings and those of her peers before mandating microaggression training for incoming freshmen, or risk the fallout of social justice run amok.

NEXT: Obama, Trump and the perils of illegal Obamacare subsidies

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. SANDWICH PICTURES MATTER

    1. So is there really some retarded sandwich thing going on now? I always miss the good stuff.

      1. ENB apparently made some bitchy response to a joke about women needing to make someone a sandwich or something. Sounds like she made too much of it. And of course people are going to obsess over it as if it matters what a paid writer whines about on Twitter.

        1. making too much of people making too much of other people making too much of something is the new sport for bored millennials.

          1. I find the terms ‘social justice’ and ‘microaggressions’ to be personally offensive.

            1. Clearly they should include a section on the dangers of “satire” in the course. I am sure many New York University faculty members would be delighted to provide guest lectures too. Surely no one here would dare to defend the inappropriate “First Amendment dissent” of a single, isolated judge in our nation’s leading criminal “parody” case? See the documentation at:

              http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

        2. He tweeted a picture of a sandwich along with the words “The best way for women to #MakeLibertyWin” directly to @ladiesofliberty. Some appear to allege that there was, on his part, a history of explicit hostile disregard for “including more women” in libertarian circles. (It may or may not be true.)
          Whatever that story is, ENB captured this tweet of his, and published it on Facebook and Twitter stating that “this is a young man who ostensibly wants a job some day”, “just wanna ensure that any prospective [his name, link] employers in the liberty movement and beyond sees this”, and asking people to RT on Twitter.

          1. Who is “he”, SIV?

            1. No. I also find that immaterial. Again, you can investigate the story. It’s rather recent.

              1. Oh, pardon my questions. I guess it would have been way easier for you not to respond at all.

                1. Easier still would be for you to check her twitter feed, but that would have deprived you of the opportunity to show your ass I guess.

                  1. Sure would have, you got me.

                    1. In the age of smart phones and Google, is conversation dead?

                      “Lets discuss event XYZ”
                      “No. Just read about what ABC said about event XYZ, ABC are always right”
                      “What shall we talk about then?”
                      “POINTLESS OUTRAGE OBVIOUSLY”
                      “But CBA said that your pointless outrage is stupid”
                      “#Racist”

                      Or something.

          2. Yeah, that. Which I don’t really approve of. But people are making it out like she’s now a traitor to the cause and history’s greatest monster or something.
            Who gives a fuck? We know about her because she writes for a magazine. If she writes something good, good. If she writes something bad, criticize it.

            1. Indeed this doesn’t eradicate what else she has done and is doing. Nor are purity and flawlessness wise standards. Finally, proportionality matters.

              (Interesting separation of spheres.)

            2. The initials ENB still make me think of E. Nelson Bridwell, a comic book writer who frequently used those initials to sign responses to letters-to-the-editor and such, back in the seventies (and I think the eighties). Does Elizabeth Nolan Brown ever use those initials to refer to herself? Is she related to David Nolan?

        3. I figured it was some stupid Twitterama thing.

        4. I wouldn’t let ENB make a sandwich for me. Everybody knows that the best cooks are men. And who wants long bleached-blond hairs in their sandwich anyway?

  2. That’s so retarded. It’s literally like being raped.

    1. It’s a microtyranny.

  3. The dude that drove into a crowd at Ohio State who then proceeded to get out and start hacking people with a machete in the name of Allah was in the middle of taking a class about microaggressions. I’m not even kidding when I think there is a connection. Teaching people to look for every single possible thing that could be an insult and training them to believe everything you encounter is meant to oppress you is dangerous.

    1. I think there is something to that. Whatever happened to “sticks and stones…”? They are instead teaching people to go out of their way to be offended by meaningless bullshit.

      1. sticks and stones

        Your exclusion of stick/stone bone-breaking non-binary/non-conformists is duly noted.

    2. It’s called the “law of ever increasing misery”, the historicist prophecy that the workers will gain class consciousness and rise up, once things have gotten inexorably worse enough. Since it doesn’t work the regular way (as things have dramatically improved), one has to create a new paradigm of misery: micro-aggressions. Of course these aren’t workers but Ivy League students, but that’s for another day.

      1. Of course these aren’t workers but Ivy League students

        Again – Rutgers isn’t in the ivy league. its not even a top-20 school. its probably somewhere in the top 50

        1. For the first time, I am speaking in reasonable hyperbole and include Ivy League. Nonetheless, I actually appreciate that you facilitate a baseline of exactitude. Good attitude.

          1. (shrug)

            don’t know what you’re on about. I just thought it was odd 2 different people made the same assertion in the thread, so figured i’d correct it.

            coincidentally I also went to a school that certain people pretended was on-the-cusp-of-Ivy-Status…. and was repeatedly reminded that “just because you were ranked higher than some Ivy members, you weren’t really part of the club”. so i guess i feel compelled to slap others schools down when people give them unwarranted-cred.

            1. It’s way too warm here. So, plainly, it is fine, Gil. The added flourish shall not distract from that.

              (That’s pretty good incentive.)

        2. Being an alumnus of Rutgers I have always wondered why people think it is Ivy League especially since it is a state school. However, I have always thought it deserved its reputation as “the Berkeley of the East”. I, at least, graduated from the School of Engineering. I usually cringe every time there is a story about RU as it usually is about some left wing idiocy.

  4. cellular blood trait, they say.

    “Look at that guy with sickle-cell anemia! What an idiot!” said no one ever.

    1. My mind went the other way.

      Whomever is pulling off the cellular blood trait microagression quips has got to be one clever motherfucker.

      1. “That guy’s so dumb he got a D on a blood test”

        1. “That gal is so dumb, she got a D for her cup size.”

          (ducks)

          1. Old Reader’s Digest joke: girl comes home crying from her first day in school– “they gave me an F in sex and I haven’t had a chance to learn about it yet!”

            1. That took me far to long to “get”.
              To the library for me then.

    2. Well, they might have if the person in question actually was an idiot. These traits are unrelated to each other.

      -jcr

  5. Pretty gay presentation if you ask me.

    Does anyone actually say “no homo” unironically?

    It’s like these people have never heard of humor.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuTqBd_ycHA

    1. It’s like these people have never heard of humor.

      THAT’S NOT FUNNY!

      1. Porky Pig raping Elmer Fudd is definitely funny.

        1. You are a heartless person. Take it back, I can’t get that thought out of my head. Oh the agony.

          1. Good thing he didn’t tell you the one about Mickey Mouth and Donald Dick.

  6. “The problem with microaggressions is they are entirely subjective.” The problem with microagressions is they are entirely bullshit. Even giving credence to the existence of them is ridiculous. If you feel persecuted by the constant onslaught of microagressions, you’re the problem. Or you’re the functional equivalent of a two year old. Time to put on your big boy pants, snowflakes.

    1. Nobody’s attempted to get in my face over a “microagression” yet, probably because I radiate my patriarchal straight white middle-aged male upper middle-class engineer privilege at them, but if it ever happens, they will regret it.

      -jcr

  7. I’m triggered by the word freshMEN. Dammit.

    1. And you can’t call them woMEN anymore.

      1. How about calling them “freshcritters”? That not only takes care of gender issues, but also species…

        Then we could have chaircritters, postcritters, etc.

        1. “critter” is triggering to those with phobias about spiders, snakes, etc!
          Suspension for you first offense, and 100 hours of remedial micro-aggression classes. Second offense is expulsion.

  8. One person’s microaggression is another’s rude joke.

    I took a human sexuality class which (as expected) was 90% political. The prof routinely denigrated men, straights, conservatives, and pretty much anyone mainstream. Rutgers students should report left wing faculty and admins every single time they say something so they can really embrace this policy.

    1. ^ This

      Maybe then they would see how foolish it is. (Most likely not, a straight man claiming he was microaggressed would be charged with a microaggression.)

    2. Sometimes one person’s microaggression is another person’s perfectly acceptable joke and that’s where a lot of the problem is. These things people keep getting offended over are often not offensive in the regular world.

    3. How did you restrain yourself from just saying “Oh, fuck off, you sexist, guilt-peddling twat” several times an hour?

      -jcr

  9. Oh no…you called them…”freshmen”…

    1. A friend that is a school teacher was tell me there was a discussion about calling it Human Events instead of HIStory.

      1. So that Jefferson guy was pretty woke when he wrote the Declaration of Independence?

      2. Fuck, I thought that was just a joke. So, coincidences of spelling are sexist now?

        1. Just wait how menstruation will be construed.

      3. *gasp* HuWHAT Events???

      4. So now heroes is going have to be humroes? BTW, “human” has the word “man” in it so back to the drawing board.

        1. Xiroes?

      5. Uhh…huMAN?

      6. Wait, how come it’s huMAN?

        1. Naw, it’s hue-man

          ‘Cos we wuz kangs n shit

    2. Should we all use the gender-neutral term, “fresh meat” instead?

      -jcr

  10. Are there any ivy league universities left that are un-fucked? Asking for a friend.

    1. You have to choose sides, University Woke or University White Privilege. Or Community College…BOO!!!

    2. Yeah, throw Rutgers in the same class as the ivies. Bwahahaha!

    3. Rutgers isn’t in the ivy league, but i think the answer is probably no

      1. Eh, Harvard thinks “curses, the courses, they do nothing!” and does its best to ban social clubs.

    4. U Chicago is in that caliber and specifically came out against PC culture in their acceptance letters a while back

    5. Nope. But they all gave their consent, so it’s OK.

  11. Asking for sex on the first date is a microaggression.
    Not putting out on the first date is a microaggression.

    1. Not putting out on the first date is a microaggression.

      Only if you’re turning someone down because you’re straight and they want you to fuck them anyway.

      -jcr

    2. You’re doing it wrong.
      You should be asking for sex on the first date before the first date.
      If she says no you save yourself time & money and ask the next one.

      #moderndating

      1. “You should be asking for sex on the first date before the first date.
        If she says no you save yourself time & money and ask the next one.”

        If she says no, ask her for a third date.

  12. Rutgers University should consider Nagai’s findings and those of her peers before mandating microaggression training for incoming freshmen, or risk the fallout of social justice run amok.

    Perhaps they’re trying to meet market demand.

  13. “Encouraged to report”? As in Students & Teachers Against Student Intolerance.

    1. Stasi something, sta-say something. Prezi seems like a good rebranding.

  14. Your race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, atypical heredity or cellular blood trait, military service or veteran status microaggresses me.

  15. Try not to be Jewish or Christian around the Muslim students, it may microaggress them.

    1. But not overtly Jewish or Christian just not within a certain radius, that might microaggress them too. What you need to be is just the right amount of Christian or Jewish at just the right distance.

      1. Said distance being within the swing radius of a beheading sword?

  16. Ironically, nobody in this conversation is as butthurt as you people.

    1. You people? YOU PEOPLE?!?! Really, Tony?

      1. Need a safe space, cupcake?

        1. A gay man calling someone cupcake. Precious.

          1. A “straight” man using the word precious. Curious.

          2. Tony isn’t gay. Gay has to do with sex, and Tony isn’t getting any of that. Even the AI sex dolls crash and shut down when he approaches.

            1. He claimed at one point to be making a living as a rent-boy, and I would assume that involves sex.

              -jcr

      2. I feel uncomfortable. Have I been microaggressed against by Tony?

    2. Ironically, nobody in this conversation is as butthurt as you people.

      Completely immune to irony, Tony attempts to mock free speech advocates with adjectives like ‘butthurt’.

      1. It didn’t stop his ilk from using phrases like Teabagger or Kkkochsucker either.

        Tolerance FTW!

        1. Fuck those faggots. Just not literally.

        2. “Liberal hypocrites are worse than libertarians who never claimed to be decent people in the first place.” Heard it. Don’t you have a cousin to fuck anyway?

          1. Given that children born to cousins only have a 2% higher chance of genetic abnormality… Why not!

            Party of Science Approved (TM)

          2. Tony once fucked his cousin, his sister, and his aunt– no, he only had sex once, they were all the same person.

    3. Given that I have no plans to attend university I wouldn’t say I’m hurt by any of this. It’s more like I’m amused by the prospect of people this incapable of taking care of themselves in even the most ordinary daily situations demanding that I regard them as my betters.

    4. My butt does hurt, but I think it’s just because of my bicycle seat.

      1. Mine hurts too, and it’s because of those Texas Madhouse Chikken Wings. Damn. Come on ice cream!

      2. My butt does hurt, but I think it’s just because of my boy… oh, never mind.

      3. Somebody stole your seat.

    5. Apparently libertarianism means just not having any opinion on culture war stuff, because that violates the NAP or free speech or private property or something

      1. You can be as needy and whiny and pained in your vaginas as you want, like I give a shit.

        1. Apparently you do give a shit, since you are all over this comment section.

    6. Tony, fuck off you Marxist shotbag.

    7. We aren’t “butthurt”, we’re just making fun of you people.

    8. Heaven forfend people stand up for freedom and liberty. Fuck off, shithead.

  17. “victims are affected physically, cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally.”

    And your point is …?

    1. “victims are affected physically, cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally.”

      So Hillary is a walking microaggression, and she is victimizing me?

  18. “diversity programs may actually backfire, creating less inclusion, more polarization, and more findings of unconscious racism.”

    Well, then those programs are obviously underfunded.

    1. Indeed. All we need to do is keep attacking white people until they know their place. There’s no possible way that could backfire.

      1. “”keep attacking white people until they know their place””

        I think it goes a little beyond that. They want whites to be discriminated against, because they once were.

        It’s not about equal rights, it’s an attempted form of payback.

        1. and I can understand why people that grew up in the ’50s and 60’s would want some payback. Not that it makes it right. But kids today think they know what oppression feels like are privileged and insulting what their elders actually went through.

          1. and I can understand why people that grew up in the ’50s and 60’s would want some payback

            I grew up in the 1960’s in a rather homophobic country. I got my “payback”: the politicians who are responsible for the homophobic policies are decrepit or dead. I hold no ill will towards the voters back then, towards today’s heterosexuals, or even today’s conservatives, which generally are all fairly tolerant.

            The people who piss me off these days are what “LGBT organizations” have turned into, which follows closely what happened to black liberation organizations: after successfully defending our negative rights they turned into virulent advocates for an ever expanding list of positive rights, positive rights that in the end do more harm than good.

      2. As Instapundit might put it: “Do you want more Trump? Because this is how you get more Trump.”

    2. Wouldn’t a program like this cause a cautious student to simply avoid anyone who might get microagressed? That’s not inclusive.

    3. I wonder how long it’s going to be before most people decided enough is enough and we deal with pots like these.

      1. Fucking autocorrect……and the squirrels.

  19. “This one-way racial framework accounts for the serious technical shortcomings in critical race theory studies?biased interview questions, reliance on narrative and small numbers of respondents, problems of reliability, issues of replicability, and ignoring alternative explanations,” Nagai argued in a National Association of Scholars article.

    All those problems only apply to cisheteronormative white male dominated science. You’re engaging in cultural genocide by not recognizing that all of those issues are irrelevant when you Know by Other Ways.

    1. ‘Cultural Genocide’ is an amusing misnomer. They’re implying your culture is embedded in your genes and can’t be altered, yet somehow the White Man is immune.

    2. “serious technical shortcomings in critical race theory studies”

      Like being as scientific as astrology?

  20. nothing says welcome to college like a mandatory seminar on safe spaces and offensive phrases.

    Kansas State gave me a frisbee…still have/use it, much more valuable than ^^^

  21. It concludes by encouraging students to report an act of bias toward anyone because of their “race,

    How about guilt-peddling aimed at anyone who’s white? Should they report that shit?

    -jcr

    1. The jocks need to get to together and start beating the shit out of these fags.

      1. What should the jock fags do? There are lots of those you know.

  22. “atypical heredity or cellular blood trait”

    My parents smoked pot, which made me smoke it, you can’t suspend me for it.

  23. “”how to pay for $400 textbooks.””

    I’m suppose to fill bad because someone called me a name, but being screwed on the cost of books is acceptable.

    1. Or feel bad.

    2. I’m suppose to fill bad because someone called me a name, but being screwed on the cost of books is acceptable.

      If printing out copies of your Powerpoint Presentation at the Fedex store around the corner for $6 and then requiring their purchase for $40 at the book store isn’t white privilege, I don’t know what is.

      1. Derp, Ivory Privilege, duh.

  24. Microaggressions, statements that are subtly offensive to a marginalized group, are nothing new to the social justice scene. Everything from saying “that’s crazy” to “you throw like a girl” could be considered a microaggression.

    As a veteran of combat, I DEMAND that all citizens cease using the following problematic microaggressions at once.

    a.) all use of the word ‘trigger’ and all derivatives
    b.) all use of the word ‘target’ and all derivatives
    c.) all use of the word ‘policing’ and all derivatives
    d.) all use of the word ‘intersection’ and all derivatives
    e.) all use of the phrase ‘safe spaces’

    This is NOT negotiable. I am part of a marginalized community, and hate speech is NOT free speech. American soldiers fight for freedom, and then are forced to come home to a country that just lets anyone say anything. We MUST protect democracy against fascism by punishing the general public when they think or speak incorrectly about our minority communities.

    1. And unlike the SJW’s, we can make them stop.

    2. Marginalized or not, thank you for serving.

  25. Everything from saying “that’s crazy” to “you throw like a girl” could be considered a microaggression.

    FTFY. Literally anything anyone says could be considered a “microaggression” so it’s probably best to just keep your mouth shut and never speak to anyone the entire time you’re at college. Especially if you’re one of those EVUL cis-hetero white male shitlords, which of course is the entire goal of these twats.

    1. Declining to speak is also a microaggression.

  26. “The Language Matters Campaign, organized by the university’s Center for Social Justice Education and LGBT Communities, teaches students about how to avoid hurting their peers intentionally or accidentally with their words.”

    So, just to make sure I’m hearing you correctly… you’re going to teach me how to avoid *intentionally* hurting my peers with my words.

    I won’t lie, I’m kinda curious about this part of the class.

  27. It’s almost like it has become a liability to the college. Take this class, and if you happen to get ‘facebook lived’ saying anything remotely offensive, we can say we did our best to try and make you woke.

    To a similar point – this new notion that everyone must accept everyone in order for those people to feel self love and validation for their differences is bullshit. I can’t look at makeup or fashion magazines any more because every story is: how this albino gender-queer came to love shze-self, why these women of color won’t let Trump’s America hold them back, why these badass girl bosses don’t need your approval for their cup size, how this plus sized ginger butch learned to love her thighs and doesn’t care if you do, why this woman is marching without a tampon to put an end to Trump’s America, why I don’t need you to mansplain how to change a tire.

    You get the point. It’s like everyone has to come up with their own boogeymanr in order to validate themselves for having issues and insecurities. And then they get over those issues by doing a photo shoot in ugly clothes while saying fuck you to the man.

  28. If someone says they like eating crackers, I think I’ll get offended and accuse them of cannibalism. J’accuse!

  29. Oh, giggling Gods! I suppose they will allow us to continue so long as we keep amusing them….

    Micro aggression class should consist of one lecture; with pictures of Klan rallies, riots, fistfights, and so on;

    “This is aggression. Everything else is piffle.”

    1. I want to sow them real aggression. The fact is that the moment the progtards realize we’re going to just start beating the ever loving shit out of them at every turn, this all goes away. They’re huge cowards.


  30. It concludes by encouraging students to report an act of bias toward anyone because of their “race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, atypical heredity or cellular blood trait, military service or veteran status.”

    That list is getting too long for anyone to remember. Those last two seem like they were added as an afterthought when some Military types were heckled and it turned out they didn’t really need a safe space but someone else was running the risk of needing a hospital. And religion? Please. We all know that only counts if you’re Non-Christian / Non-Jewish.

  31. I cannot figure out why they feel that a less polarized campus was the goal.

  32. So how do you use this as a skill on your resume?

    Yup, no requirement for personal finance or economics or anything .No instead a requirement to be whiny SJWs

  33. Microagressor Lives Matter!

  34. Language Matters Campaign,

    If only this were a campaign to teach proggies what words actually mean so they would stop misusing them.

    Microaggressions “can have a deep and negative impact on the experiences of your peers” and the Prezi even goes so far as to claim that “victims are affected physically, cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally.”

    Lol. I wish I could take one of these courses. I’d have the goal of committing the most “microaggressions” in the smallest amount of time I could. It’d be fun and maybe precious snowflakes would harden up a little.

  35. As stupid as this “microaggression” thing is, it’s probably not a bad life lesson to learn for college-aged students of today.
    – Any job you get today is going to be a similar level of PC’ness. You can get fired for making comments/jokes that happen to offend anyone within earshot at nearly any major corporation today. And this trend is only going one direction, which is not towards becoming less PC.
    – Many college aged kids spend their time flaming/trolling people on the internet and that’s often not an acceptable behavior in real life, especially in a professional environment. Often times I wonder if some kids see that or not, because they spend so much time online.
    – Like it or not, there are snowflakes everywhere in the world today, especially in professional office environments.

    IMO the real danger here is that pointing out all these “microaggressions” just feeds the microaggressed more PC fodder to go after people that they disagree with or don’t like. The only way to stop this nonsense is to provide consequences to those who make spurious claims of having their feelings hurt just to go after someone that they disagree with, etc.

    1. I should have added, free speech definitely applies to public universities, etc. However, your right to free speech stops at the door of a private corporation. Getting some education on what is likely to get you fired in the real world is not a bad thing to be teaching at colleges.

  36. “It concludes by encouraging students to report an act of bias toward anyone because of their “race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, atypical heredity or cellular blood trait, military service or veteran status.”

    So requiring that someone who is literate in English, and understands what words really mean, attend these classes is a macro aggression?

    I am so glad I attended college (to actually learn job skills, by the way) way back in pre-history.
    Full disclosure: I used my degree once; it allowed me to fill out my first job application. (college degree required). After that, nothing.

  37. As an employer, if i see Rutgers or Evergreen State College on a resume…..”Sorry, the position has been filled.”

  38. I’m from New Jersey, so I can say this with some buthority: Another reason not to go to Rutgers.

  39. What a bunch of pussy robots colleges want to create. Why not a class I real life. GEEZE!!!

  40. I’m a Rutgers alum. This is the latest reason that I’ve not donated $1 to them in the last 35 years.

    1. I wonder how many alums would have to tell them “if you can afford salaries for Zampolits, you don’t need my money” for them to clean up their act?

      -jcr

  41. very nice post. I like it. Thanks for sharing this information.
    Tinder is the best online chatting application. Try it.
    http://www.tinder-pc-download.com/ tinder for pc
    http://www.tinder-pc-download.com/ tinder download

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.