Police Abuse

Man Free After Serving 25 Years for Murder Linked to Switched Bullets

The Detroit Crime Lab, shut down in 2008 for negligence, switched test bullets with autopsy bullets in order to convict Desmond Ricks.


Detroit Police car
Uli Deck/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom

After 25 years in prison for a crime he did not commit, charges against Desmond Ricks have been dropped. The Michigan Innocence Clinic showed that his 1992 conviction was based on fraudulent evidence contrived by Detroit law enforcement reported, The Detroit News.

Ricks was convicted of second degree murder for the death of his friend Gerry Bennett, who was shot outside of a Detroit burger joint. Prosecutors and police claimed that Ricks killed Bennett in cold blood using a gun that belonged to his mother, Mary Ricks. The Detroit Police Crime Lab, which was closed in 2008 due to an audit that found errors in ballistics testing, claimed to match the bullets from Bennett's body to those in Mary Ricks' gun. His case was referred to the Michigan Innocence Clinic in late 2011.

David Moran, director of the Michigan Innocence Clinic, spoke with Reason. He believes evidence shows that the Detroit Police Crime Lab acted fraudulently:

"On the same day that the police seized the gun from Mary Ricks, Desmond Ricks' mother, the Detroit Police Crime lab issued a one page report saying that the bullets pulled from Gerry Bennett's body matched that gun and no other gun in the world. And that's simply not possible because we now know what those bullets looked like. They were analyzed by the Michigan State Police and we have photographs of them. They are horribly mangled as you would expect from soft lead .38-caliber bullets that go from a skull all the way to the spine. There are just not enough marks left on the bullets to match them to any gun. So there is no way that those bullets could have been definitively matched to any gun…It's very hard to see how that could have happened otherwise outright fraud."

In the original trial, the judge appointed ballistics expert David Townshend to conduct independent analysis of the bullets. Townshend initially verified the Detroit Crime Lab's findings.

From prison, Ricks contacted Townshend and asked him to visit him here, even offering the retired Michigan State Police Officer gas money. As explained by Moran, Townshend would conduct his analysis by firing bullets from Mary Ricks' gun into a water tank and comparing those to the autopsy bullets given to him by Detroit police. Townshend was always suspicious of the bullets he received "because they didn't seem like they were mangled enough for having gone through a skull and in the spine. Nor did they have the stains that you would expect to see on bullets that had been pulled out of a dead body" Moran said.

After the 2008 crime lab scandal and visiting Ricks in prison, Townshend came to the conclusion that the autopsy bullets were switched with the Detroit Crime Lab's own test bullets. He signed an affidavit in 2015 stating that the bullets he received were not from Bennett's body.

Unfortunately, Ricks' case may just be the tip of the iceberg. According to Moran, the Detroit police violated the Constitution frequently in the 1990s by inventing false confessions or arresting and holding witnesses until they implicated a defendant. While the Wayne County Prosecutors Office received a grant to look into other cases that the Detroit Crime Lab may have mishandled, they only searched back to 2003. Moran intends to ask the Michigan Attorney General to launch a full independent investigation into convictions based on crime lab analysis.

For now, Ricks told The Detroit News that he is ready to move forward: "There's no excuse for what they did, but I have to move on. I just didn't want to die in prison. Now, I'm just trying to get some semblance of my life back. I just want to pay my taxes and be a good citizen."

He is also entitled to $1.25 million from the state.

NEXT: Trump Says He Was 'Vindicated' by Comey Testimony, Big Losses for British Conservatives, Candy Lab Launches First Amendment Lawsuit: A.M. Links

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Lee Harvey Oswald?

  2. “He is also entitled to $1.25 million from the state.”

    Works out to about $5.50 an hour, if you count 24/7. I guess I could research minimum wage for the past 25 years and run the numbers to see if they’re shorting him, but he’s happy to be out and doesn’t seem to be complaining about the settlement, so…

    Good for him.

    1. I mean, justice would be to take everything the people who committed fraud have and sell it to pay him back what they’ve done. And if that’s not enough, then take half their pay until they do. Failing that, a work camp could work just as well.

      Justice is repaying the victim, from the perpetrator. Repaying the victim from the taxpayers is not justice!

      1. The line gets blurry though when the perpetrator(s) are acting on behalf of the tax payers, as police officers and the court system is.

        1. That’s an argument against monopolies on justice, not an argument against justice.

      2. > . And if that’s not enough, then take half their pay until they do. Failing that, a work camp could work just as well.

        Do any of them have healthy kidneys we could sell?

    2. It works out to $50,000 a year, pretend he’s salaried =P

      If he was hourly, use 2080 hours * 25 years = 52000 hours.

      1250000 / 52000 = $24.04 hourly rate.

      There’s something bizarrely soothing about doing pay calculations.

      1. Well you’re numbers are WAY WAY off ! Lets do this the accountant way….

        24 hours X 7 Days = 168 hours a week

        168 hours X 52 weeks = 8,736 hours per year

        8,736 X 25 years = 218,400 hours

        218,400 hours divided by $1,250,000 EQUALS……..$ 5.72 per hour for 24/7 confinement

  3. ” To a cop the explanation is never that complicated. It’s always simple. There’s no mystery to the street, no arch criminal behind it all. If you got a dead body and you think his brother did it, you’re gonna find out you’re right.”

    Solving crime is easy – find the most likely or the most convenient suspect and frame him. I mean, he probably did it, or could have done it, or he’s a scumbag that’d be better off behind bars anyways, so who gives a shit if this particular guy didn’t do this particular crime?

    1. Seems legit.

    2. Never miss the opportunity to work a “Usual Suspects” quote into a comment.

      Well done.

    3. honest i have seen this mentality as a basic human thought process and its disgusting.

  4. Imagine being framed for the murder of your friend and then spending 25 years in prison. I’d be spending the rest of life and money trying to put those responsible in prison, or at least making them miserable with repeated lawsuits and public shaming.

    1. This should be handled Massachusetts style. Throw out every conviction that came out of this crime lab.

    2. or….just kill them…..I seriously wouldnt judge a guy for going postal of all those responsible.

      1. Rule 308 ALWAYS applies.

  5. He is also entitled to $1.25 million from the state.

    That’s before taxes. (I assume it will be taxed, most settlements are. But maybe not those paid by the government?)

    1. You better believe that’s a taxin’.

    2. It will depend on what they label the settlement, but most likely it will be. Unless he has a good enough lawyer to word it the right way.

  6. only 1.25 million for 25 years of bullshit? Man deserves 2-4 million in my book. And the shit judge, cops, and prosecutors all deserve to rot.

  7. Whoever switched the bullets deserves at least 5 years for gross negligence; if it was deliberate, give them the full 25.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.