Hot Girls Wanted: Exploiting Sex Workers in the Name of Exposing Porn Exploitation?
Porn performers are accusing Rashida Jones and other Hot Girls Wanted: Turned On producers of a host of unethical and exploitative practices.

Actress and porn-skeptic Rashida Jones has followed up her controversial 2015 documentary Hot Girls Wanted with a six-part docu-series on the same theme. The Netflix-original show—Hot Girls Wanted: Turned On—was released last week, earning high-profile coverage from entertainment and women's media and mostly glowing reviews. Yet in their rush to expose exploitation in adult entertainment, were Hot Girls Wanted producers indifferent to their own impact? In the past few days alone, a host of porn performers and producers have come forward with allegations of unethical practices, from using sex workers' images in the series without their consent to lying to them about the nature of the series and Jones' involvement in it.
Several adult-film workers involved with the series claim they were mislead about who was behind the project. The original movie's moralizing, breathless, and often biased take on the porn industry made it anathema among adult entertainers, and these workers say they would not have participated in the series had they known it was from Rashida Jones or other producers of the original.
"A few people in the adult industry have expressed disappointment in my facilitating their involvement in the Netflix docu-series project," author and porn performer Tyler Knight wrote in an Instagram post earlier this week. They were mainly upset that he did not "disclose the involvement of Rashida Jones." But Knight claims he didn't know that Jones was at all involved—in fact, he had specifically been told otherwise.
I asked members [of] the production several times. The producers lied. Flat out.
And "it was under this false pretense that they sought access to people and productions, from the top-level directors to new talent, who would otherwise have declined had they been informed," Knight wrote.
Porn producer and performer Jay Taylor concurred with Knight. "They lied about the nature of the project to get us to sign releases," Taylor told me Tuesday on Twitter. "We ASKED if it was HGW, and they swore up and down it wasn't."
"They said it wasn't even going to be hot girls wanted," chimed in porn star Gia Paige. "They just know how turned off we all were by that so it was a ploy."
"To our studio they said, 'it doesn't have a name yet'" said the folks at lesbian porn company Filly Films yesterday. "Wondering if they knew the whole time?"
I reached out to Herzog & Company, the group behind Hot Girls Wanted Turned On, for a comment but have not heard back. My outreach to series director/producers Jill Bauer and Ronna Gradus was also unsuccessful, as were attempts to communicate with the @HotGirlsWanted Twitter account or executive producer Peter Logreco. On Tuesday, I was able to reach the person listed on Hot Girls Wanted website as the official press contact. But he said that while he had worked on the original documentary he was not affiliated with the current series, and repeatedly demanded to know what why I was "trying to get all investigative."
The image claims first surfaced on Twitter last weekend, when someone shared a screenshot from the series with users @effy_elizabeth ("Effs") and @_AutumnKayy. It showed both womens' faces visible in episode six, though neither had been part of the production. The footage was from a short clip they had posted with the video-streaming app Periscope. "Uh y'all better get royalties if that is real," one Twitter user responded. "It is real," Effs replied, "we weren't even told it was happening."
When Effs and Autumn reached out to @HotGirlsWanted via Twitter, the account responded: "Hi, yes, happy to discuss further. We can put you in touch with our production company so they can explain fair use."
That the content falls under copyright law's "fair use" doctrine is probably correct—it was posted publicly to Periscope, and the portion used in Hot Girls Wanted was short. And while courts are instructed to considered "whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread," this refers to effect on "the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work"—not personal harm to the content's creators.
That does not erase the fact I was posted on one of the largest live streaming sites with 0 confirmation that I'd be okay with it.
— Effs (@effy_elizabeth_) April 23, 2017
But regardless of whether Hot Girls Wanted using sex-worker images without their consent is legal, the ethical issues should give us pause. Porn and all sorts of sex work are still very much stigmatized, as HGW acknowledges (and demonstrates). Outing someone as a porn performer isn't like outing someone as an accountant or baker, unfortunately. And that's effectively what did to these women: out them to the whole world. The clip may have been short, but it's now part of a high-profile Netflix series which people around the world can watch (and pause on, screenshot, etc.).
Surely the producers of a documentary about sex work and technology must understand how someone might feel comfortable "outing" themselves in front of a limited audience on Periscope (or a private cam site) but hesitate to be featured in a celebrity-produced mini-series streaming on a popular global entertainment platform? How seasoned, celebrity producers of a film condemning the exploitation of young women in adult-entertainment at the hands of older, savvier industry players should at least ask adult performers before blasting their photos out everywhere in service of the film?
Yet according to Effs and Autumn, Hot Girls Wanted producers never so much as told them their images would appear in the series, let alone asked.
.@effy_elizabeth_ @hollyrandall @hotgirlswanted Netflix is as mainstream as you can get, and you blasted someone's secret to the world that harms them and endangers them.
— kushtaka, yo. (@TeganTrex) April 22, 2017
Another performer, Gia Paige, told Vocativ's Tracy Clark-Flory that she had originally agreed to appear in the series but grew uncomfortable with producers pressing her to talk about her family and withdrew from the project. According to Paige and her ex-fiance, who did appear in the series, producers told Paige they would not use her footage in the series. They did—even showing her real name on screen.
.@hotgirlswanted BECAUSE I DO. THANKS FOR KEEPING YOUR WORD. SNAKES.
— Baeelzebub (@GiaPaige) April 23, 2017
While these might seem harmless mistakes to some, sex workers say that revealing their true identities puts them at risk of everything from future workplace discrimination to attracting the attention of stalkers or abusive exes. Filmmakers using footage of sex workers should strive to seek consent above and beyond what is required by law, and consider other sources when they can't get it (as several sex workers pointed out on Twitter, there are tons of porn performers and cam girls out there who would be happy to reach wide audiences). Failing to do so speaks ill of any producers, but it's especially unconscionable from producers who pride themselves on being feminist-minded, stress the importance of ethical porn consumption, and suggest that their project is meant to help combat exploitation in the adult-entertainment industry.
Hi @netflix where is the button for Please Don't Show Me Celebrity Documentaries Objectifying My Marginalized Cohort?
— Lorelei Lee (@MissLoreleiLee) April 23, 2017
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Actress and porn-skeptic Rashida Jones
I had no idea she was fighting the good fight against pornography. It almost makes me want to never have a wank about her again.
Almost.
Let's not be drastic here
Start earning $90/hourly for working online from your home for few hours each day... Get regular payment on a weekly basis... All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time...
Read more here,,.,.,.,.,.>>>> http://www.foxnews20.com
I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is what I do..,.,.,.,.. http://www.careerstoday100.com
I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is what I do... http://www.careerstoday100.com
I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is what I do...,,.,.,.,.,. http://www.careerstoday100.com
I can't masturbate to bangs.
Rashida Jones has porn preferences:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....ences.html
But while he had worked on the documentary he was not affiliated with the current series, and repeatedly demanded to know what why I was "trying to get all investigative."
ENB is Reason's own Magnum PI.
Rashida Jones is the worst character on Parks and Rec.
She's a mean Angie Tribeca, though.
Rashida Jones is *literally? the worst character on Parks and Rec.
*Rob Lowe voice
Failing to do so speaks ill of any producers, but it's especially unconscionable from producers who pride themselves on being feminist-minded, stress the importance of ethical porn consumption, and suggest that their project is meant to help combat exploitation in the adult-entertainment industry.
In order for us to help save these women, we must exploit these other women - it's the only way!
No part of this is about helping women... Profit is the only end; reached by unethical means.
Ethical massage for ethical profit.
I reached out to Herzog & Company, the group behind Hot Girls Wanted Turned On, for a comment but have not heard back. My outreach to series director/producers Jill Bauer and Ronna Gradus was also unsuccessful...
Maybe in your correspondences with them you misconjugated the past tense of mislead and it turned them off. And not to be confused with "missiled", which happens to adult film performers all the time. Well, maybe not in Filly Films productions. But I digress...
+1. Thank you. That's one of my orthographic pet peeves.
Man, I really liked her too. Angie Tribeca is fucking hilarious.
How can you be skeptical about porn?
You beat me to it. Never heard of a "porn skeptic" before. Does Jones not know that it's an actual thing? Next we'll be hearing about porn deniers.
A "porn denier" is every teenage boy whose parents are starting to ask tough questions about his Internet habits.
Sounds like Rashida Jones is against porn, but likes the fact that porn enables he to make money producing anti-porn agitprop. Thus, skeptical.
I'm still going to call them prostitutes, not sex workers, because that's what they are. Prostitutes.
I am an erotic service provider and you can kiss my ass. For a fee of course.
He's never go for it. Danny is saving himself for Sasha and/or Malia.
??????O Do you know everybody can make $500 to $600 per day for just easiest work from home. I have made $634 Today and $18623 last month by just doing an easy job online from home. I am vey happy that I have this job now and am able to earn Thousands Dollars online. Every person can join this job now by just click on the link given below??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-
Good, sexy work, ENB. This is ridiculously stupid and amateurish behavior. At least some of its viewers may read about this and see the hypocrisy.
"First they came for the sex workers, and i did not speak up, for i was also cumming for the sex workers..."
Thank goodness these euphemisms are getting easier to understand.
RE: Hot Girls Wanted: Exploiting Sex Workers in the Name of Exposing Porn Exploitation?
Porn performers are accusing Rashida Jones and other Hot Girls Wanted: Turned On producers of a host of unethical and exploitative practices.
"Several adult-film workers involved with the series claim they were mislead about who was behind the project. The original movie's moralizing, breathless, and often biased take on the porn industry made it anathema among adult entertainers, and these workers say they would not have participated in the series had they known it was from Rashida Jones or other producers of the original."
Misleading people in documentaries is always a good idea.
This way the documentary maker will score a ton of money off his lies.
Just ask Al Gore or Michael Moore.
I forget which French filmmaker said documentaries are the most dishonest form of film-making. But he was right.
I'm sure Katie Couric could offer some good advice on the topic as well.
It's exploitation all the way down.
"But regardless of whether Hot Girls Wanted using sex-worker images without their consent is legal, the ethical issues should give us pause."
Hold on. Didn't Reason.com just recently post an article about how Intellectual Property is theft?
Yeah, I'm not too sure that just because you're a sex worker, you have a right to be forgotten.
If Rashida Jones and company committed fraud, that's one thing, but if someone asked for and interview and you gave it to them and then they gave it to someone else, it starts to get a bit 3rd-party-doctrine-y (except the ultimate data holder isn't the FedGov). Not to mention that, "I was okay with the interview until you asked about my family." is a bit affirmative consent-y. Not saying that these girls must consent or, once consented, cannot revoke consent or refuse to answer questions, just that the details, as well as the Constitution, are very vague about people (private citizens) letting cats out of bags.
Further, as was my consternation before, I'm bamboozled as to how "Would you have sex on camera for money as long as I get to keep the distribution rights?" is a question women have complete agency to answer but "Would you answer questions on camera for money as long as I get to keep the distribution rights?" isn't.
While I agree with ENB calling these producers out on their duplicitous and two-faced behavior, I question any libertarian solutions or their value.
is a question women have complete agency to answer
Being clear, *these* women or porn stars in general.
I'd heard about the "fair use" stuff, but not about the producers straight-up lying to the performers to get them to appear in the series. How can anyone feminist-minded, who presumably cares about informed consent, be okay with that? I hope this gets everywhere.
At least no one's saying it's Netflix's fault. Yet.
Same thing happened with the A&E 8 minutes series but was much more grotesque because they literally promised the sex workers all sorts of assistance that they never intended upon coming through on! A lawsuit was filed and a Texas judge threw it out. But here you can watch them lie lie lie lie: https://vimeo.com/197134512
They are never 'harmless mistakes'
Remember that guy nicknamed Roosh V? He posted a blog post about the documentary "Hot Girls wanted" http://www.rooshv.com/the-docu.....ss-of-porn I guess lots of trigglypuffs will be triggered by his rant.
??????O I be certain ...that...my best friend had been realie taking h0me money part-time on their apple laptop. . there friend brother haz done this 4 less than 10 months and as of n0w paid the loans on their h0me and bourt a brand new Cadillac .look at this...________ ??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-