Will the Trump Administration Be Good For Liberland?
The "sovereign state" is hopeful President Trump will offer "silent support" for international recognition.

Will the Trump administration be good for Liberland, the self-described "sovereign state" of unpopulated land nestled between Croatia and Serbia? That's what Vit Jedlicka—the president and founder of the not-quite-country—is hoping.
Liberland's motto is "to live and let live" and its mission is to become an autonomous country built on economic and personal freedom with as little government interference as possible.
While in Washington, D.C. last week for President Donald Trump's inauguration, Jedlicka told the Washington Post, "What we are looking for here is the silent support for what we are doing with our administration…and also hopefully get Liberland fully recognized in a couple of years from now."
Conceding that Trump's trade protectionism is in direct opposition to Liberland's preference for free trade, Jedlicka remains encouraged by Trump's predilection to ignore or do away with long-established U.S. foreign policy—including cutting back on the U.S. commitment to NATO and possibly moving the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem—moves which Jedlicka believes bode well for the possibility of U.S. recognition of Liberland.
Jedlicka says Trump's controversial call with Taiwan's president was "a good sign of his openness to changing the paradigm in international politics."
Read more Reason coverage of Liberland here and watch Reason TV's interview with Jedlicka below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought I was getting "silent support" from my ex-wife. Turns out she was just quietly judging me.
Quietly?
Selective hearing, it's a helluva drug, no?
Libertopia plus sexy eastern european women?!
If this actually gets pulled off I may need to rethink my whole 'no such thing as god' stance.
The entire thing is 2.7 sq mi in size. I'm not seeing a lot of libertarians moving there. What size of a population could it support?
Looks large enough to hold all of us.
I laughed...and then cried.
Maybe, but then what would we do? I mean besides starve to death.
Beat the orphans harder?
Ask Hong Kong.
426 square miles.
According to wikipedia the areas of Hong Kong with the most "action" are Kowloon (18 sq. mi.) and Hong Kong Island (30 sq. mi.) A lot of that is craggy rock that takes/took tremendous cost and effort to tame. But yeah, having 17x more land would be cool.
And they all live in high-rises.
Having an excellent port helps HK a lot. And solid bedrock on which to build tall buildings.
It's not just the size. What could the economy possibly be based on? A purely agrarian society isn't going to attract too many people and may turn into The Farm.
Just one bank that refuses to provide client information to the US government (or any government) would attract enough depositors to keep at least a few people employed.
Of, course the US could bomb it out of existences in less than 10 minutes.
Croatia and Serbia could decide to simply agree to jointly annex the territory with little effort. Either country could do it unilaterally as well.
What could the economy possibly be based on?
Freedom?
Well, goddmamnit.
Come on, Hype. I don't have time to read or watch the content during the daylight hours. Let a dumb mook dream for a minute or three. :/
Sorry, I've said it many times, the only way your're going to start a libertopia anywhere, you're going to need some nuclear tipped missiles aimed straight at and able to hit Moscow, DC, and Shanghai. Once you have that, that's when you can start worrying about food and water. Without that, you're fucked.
So . . a rebellion starting in Montana then . . .
Hyperion takes the 'Big Boss' approach to his autonomous anti-global order nations.
If Trump thinks that talking with this guy will annoy someone and get him some attention, trust me on this one, he'll do it. Not that it will have any meaningful impact. Someone will lay claim to his swamp as soon as they have a reason to and that will be the end of the dwarf kingdom.
Just wait for Trump Towers Conch Republic.
No.
*patiently waits for Panny Z and Br. Titor to fill thread with esoteric, yet fascinating, historical anecdotes*
I'm not your goddamn monkey Groov, do your own research.
Though there is a potential for a series of Hansa-style Free Cities...I mean, wait, goddammit.
"Need a basic set of regulations to be acceptable to the international community."
I don't necessarily agree with this philosophy. I guess I get it that the 'international community' poses an existential threat if it doesn't deem Liberland to be unacceptable regulated, but the bar for 'acceptable regulation' will likely be way too high for a sufficiently libertarian society. Furthermore, if 'acceptably regulated' actually becomes a policy position of Liberland, the 'international community' will just use that as leverage to force more regulation.
More realistically, there needs to be regulation to enforce protection of negative rights - in keeping with the charter of a libertarian government. Honestly, something akin to the BoR would suffice, but with much stronger language about limits on positive rights.
Also, I don't quite get this: "encouraged by Trump's predilection to ignore or do away with long-established U.S. foreign policy?including cutting back on the U.S. commitment to NATO and possibly moving the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem"... Why is moving the US embassy to Jerusalem a big deal to Liberland? I guess it makes sense from a 'change in direction' standpoint, but if anything, it shows a potential for the Trump administration to not recognize currently unrecognized states (Palestine).
the self-described "sovereign state" of unpopulated land nestled between Croatia and Serbia
Unpopulated? Really? What do they need a sovereign state for then?
They may not be interested in anyone else, but it's certainly others who are interested in them once the area is populated.
I thought the headline said "Liberaland", and I thought it meant the blue states.
Fisher's going to get in trouble. He's supposed to be writing about school choice. Fight the man, Anthony L.!
I doubt Trump gives a shit so yes.
[quote]unpopulated land nestled between Croatia and Serbia? [/quote]
Has anyone asked Croatia or Serbia about this?
Neither are generally known as being open minded about other people using their land.
You know who else got in between Croatia and Serbia.
Ron Jeremy?
You know who else got in between Croatia and Serbia.
Not comprehensive, but:
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Hungary
Iran
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Mali
Nairobi
Oman
Portugal
Romania
Shit, forgot Qatar.
You know who else forgot Qatar?
What about Montenegro?
" land nestled between Croatia and Serbia"
Holy hell, that seems like a poor choice of neighborhoods to try to put up a Utopia.