Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Brickbats

Brickbat: Don't Touch That!

Charles Oliver | 1.18.2017 4:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Kenishirotie / Dreamstime.com
(Kenishirotie / Dreamstime.com)
Texting and driving
Kenishirotie | Dreamstime.com

Two Washington state lawmakers have introduced a bill that would make it illegal even to touch your phone while driving. The bill would also more than double the fine for distracted driving to $350 from $124.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump's First Week

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

BrickbatsCellphonesAutomobilesNanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (50)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Eurynom0s   10 years ago

    I didn't realizing Washington had such a severe inferiority complex when it came to California.

    1. Jerryskids   10 years ago

      The bill would also more than double the fine for distracted driving to $350 from $124.

      It's not an inferiority complex, it's prudent fiscal planning.

  2. straffinrun   10 years ago

    "It's about making a cultural shift, and I think we need to see how a first step like this bill actually changes behavior."

    She thinks this is "a first step". I bet you've spent every minute in office trying to change other's behavior.

    1. Mr Lizard   10 years ago

      You know who else wanted to shift culture?...

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz of the Galactic Hyperspace Planning Council?

      2. Trigger Hippie   10 years ago

        Boy George?

        1. Mr Lizard   10 years ago

          I knew one of you would get it

          1. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

            Do you really want to hurt me?

            1. Trigger Hippie   10 years ago

              *slap!*

          2. Trigger Hippie   10 years ago

            Tell me, Mr. Lizard, do you come and go? Come and gooooOOoo?

            1. Radioactive   10 years ago

              join the club

            2. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

              The Mr Lizard is a karma chameleon?

    2. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      Ooo, the wrong headed arrogance of that comment. It's breathtaking.

  3. Cdr Lytton   10 years ago

    At recent hearing in Baja Washington, the state police chief testified about how people only quit using their cellphones around troopers and moar penalties are needed to "deter" that behavior.

    No mention of any evidence that cell phone use is harmful or even unsupported assertions at this point. It's already moved to the proven assumption stage.

    Of course, the blindingly obvious question "if cell phone use during driving is that prevalent and always leads to accidents, why aren't accident rates through the roof?" was never asked.

    1. straffinrun   10 years ago

      Not to mention that this gives any cop any excuse to pull over anyone, anytime they want. As if they needed another excuse.

      1. Cdr Lytton   10 years ago

        Ah yes. More assertions without proof.

        "She used her cell phone."

        "Proof?"

        "Just my statement."

        "No camera to back it up? No second witness?"

        "Nope. Nope."

        "Well then, guilty."

        1. Mr Lizard   10 years ago

          Furtive movements, blood shot eyes, distinct odor of alcohol...forced blood draw via 40 cal hollow point

    2. The Hyperbole   10 years ago

      Don't you remember back in the 70's when everyone was distracted by their CB radios and died?

      1. Radioactive   10 years ago

        did they have a convoy?

        1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

          + Rubber Duck

      2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        I died

      3. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

        Look at how many weecks were caused, just by The Bandit!

        1. Radioactive   10 years ago

          east bound & down baby...

  4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    I'm sick of these wishy-washy lawmakers and their cowardly half-measures. Ban smartphones. Children are dying.

  5. Microaggressor   10 years ago

    So what do we do when we need the phone to navigate?

    1. Mr Lizard   10 years ago

      You reach into your glove box and select the appropriate nap then unfold it while driving(perfectly legal under this law)

      1. Radioactive   10 years ago

        won't napping while driving cause death and mass destruction?

  6. Jerryskids   10 years ago

    I'm pretty sure there are already laws that punish drivers for traffic infractions or actual harms. "Distracted driving" is dangerous and it really doesn't matter whether you're distracted by your phone, your kids, your lunch, your third beer, or the fact that you're 93 years old and half-blind and half-senile. If the distraction causes you to weave all over the road or run stop-signs or drive up on the sidewalk and kill three pedestrians, there's your cause for punishment. If the distraction doesn't cause you to drive any worse than any other idiot on the road, what's the problem?

    1. (((Renegade)))   10 years ago

      you're 93 years old and half-blind and half-senile

      This has not inhibited me whatsoever.

      1. Jerryskids   10 years ago

        How's the weather down there in Sarasota?

        1. (((Renegade)))   10 years ago

          I was just in Del Boca Vista visiting my mother. Holy shit, what a depressing place.

          1. Radioactive   10 years ago

            FL... the elephants graveyard?

    2. sarcasmic   10 years ago

      Here's the problem. Say someone we've got a person who is a crappy driver who can't handle driving and chewing gum at the same time. They get a ticket for swerving all over the road. Well, this person can afford a good attorney who digs out precedent where someone in the past who was chewing gum while driving got their case dismissed, so this case gets dismissed. There is no subjectivity here. Either anyone can chew gum and drive at the same time, or no one can. The fact that some people are shitty drivers while others are not is not a valid consideration. So that means that if chewing gum and driving is to be considered distracted driving, it has to be codified as such and applied to everyone equally. That's why we get these really stupid pieces of legislation that are then abused like the wanker of some dude in solitary confinement.

      1. SomeGuy   10 years ago

        The ticket is for failure to stay in your lane...not chewing gum.

        1. SomeGuy   10 years ago

          ticket for chewing gum is stupid and oppressive and pointless.

          1. Chip I. Alhazred   10 years ago

            "I'm here to chew gum and be oppressive + pointless...and I'm all out of bubble gum."

            Nada from They Live.

    3. geo1113   10 years ago

      I don't care if someone is on the phone except when they slow down in the passing lane and fuck up traffic.

      1. Radioactive   10 years ago

        all this is moot given the immanent arrival of our self driving autobot overlords!

  7. Suthenboy   10 years ago

    First they suggested, then they demanded. Then they nudged, then they pushed. Then they shoved. Now comes the fist.

    "There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters." - Daniel Webster

    1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   10 years ago

      Oooh, they mean. They mean, mean, men. They grammar suck too, even Daniel Webester suck at grammar back then. Or was it transcribed wrong?

      Yes, statists mean. Statists mean. Statists stupid. Statists selfish. Statists condescending. Statists arrogant.

  8. Longtobefree   10 years ago

    Is having the phone in your pocket considered "concealed touching"?

    1. geo1113   10 years ago

      Put on your law enforcement cap on. Now can you answer?

  9. yet another dave   10 years ago

    Yea I love the fact that every police cruiser I've seen has a laptop mounted on the console a radio next to that, you want to tell those knuckleheads aren't "distracted" or does that week of superduper police car driver training make them immune from that... BS money grab like most other tickets. Insurance companies and governments both love it, surprise surprise.

    1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

      Yes. Training is magical. That's why cops can drive around with their cell phone glued to their ear and their eyes on their pc without being any danger to anyone at all. Well, except for the fact that if they do get into an accident, that will no doubt be their fault, the person who they hit will be in a very real danger of being beaten and/or shot by the irate cop.

  10. Radioactive   10 years ago

    does this infraction incur if I touch myself?

    1. Pompey: Ho Class Mothersmucker   10 years ago

      I don't want
      Anybody else

      1. Chip I. Alhazred   10 years ago

        +1 Divinyls

    2. Radioactive   10 years ago

      how about if I use two phones, one in my pocket set on vibrate and one set to call that number every 30 sec, does that count?

      1. Radioactive   10 years ago

        I see lawyers getting rich...

    3. SomeGuy   10 years ago

      that is actually my response...so is it a crime or infraction for having my dick in my hand officer? Waht is the difference from my shifter and my dick? I drive automatic BTW.

      If you want to write me a ticket for having my dick in my hand go ahead and i will see you in court.

      That is my awaited response for this BS. I'll make every dollar worth it by making it highly entertaining for me and everyone else.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Congress Is Trying To Give Trump More Tariff Powers. He Wants Even More.

Eric Boehm | 8.18.2026 12:00 PM

Meme After Meme Shows Jayden Daniels Made One of the Dumbest P.R. Fumbles in Sports History

Jason Russell | 8.18.2026 10:25 AM

A Biological Need To Steal?

Peter Suderman | 8.18.2026 9:45 AM

Trump Courts Another Legal Defeat on Birthright Citizenship

Damon Root | 8.18.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: The Big Easy

Charles Oliver | 8.18.2026 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason