The BMJ Joins The Lancet in Supporting Drug Legalization
The venerable British medical journal urges governments to "investigate more effective alternatives to criminalisation of drug use and supply."

Last March a panel of experts organized by The Lancet condemned the war on drugs and recommended that countries "move gradually towards regulated drug markets." This week another esteemed British medical journal, The BMJ, followed suit, urging governments to "investigate more effective alternatives to criminalisation of drug use and supply."
The BMJ editorial notes that consumption of psychoactive substances is an ancient and persistent aspect of human behavior and that attempts to suppress it have had horrendous consequences, including crime driven by artificially high drug prices, promotion of blood-borne diseases, deaths linked to unpredictable potency and unreliable quality, and "appalling violence" in countries such as Mexico and the Philippines. "Too often the war on drugs plays out as a war on the millions of people who use drugs," the editors say, "and disproportionately on people who are poor or from ethnic minorities and on women."
In response to these costs, says The BMJ, "many countries have removed criminal penalties for personal drug possession," while "jurisdictions such as Canada, Uruguay, and several US states, now including California, have gone further, to allow regulated non-medical cannabis markets, retaking control of supply from organised crime." Because doctors "have ethical responsibilities to champion individual and public health, human rights, and dignity and to speak out where health and humanity are being systemically degraded," the editors argue, they "should use their authority to lead calls for pragmatic reform informed by science and ethics."
Addendum: Stephen Rolles, a senior analyst at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation in the U.K., notes that BMJ Editor in Chief Fiona Godlee signaled her support for drug legalization back in 2010, when Rolles wrote a antiprohibition essay for the journal. "He says, and I agree, that we must regulate drug use, not criminalise it," Godlee wrote at the time.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I blame Harry Anslinger.
Speaking of the BMI, why are so many stoners skinny? Aren't potheads generally slovenly and constantly munching? What's the deal?
You've never met SugarFree or me.
Hey! Stop being accurate!
Seems like this is pretty much a required disclaimer if you want to convince proggies that something is Not Okay.
I always like how they throw women in at the end. Even though women in the west are a majority, have large amounts of wealth and are not thrown in jail that often for drug crimes
This policy will drastically increase the rate of addiction, overdose, suicide and death. I knew this kid who was an A+ student and then he starting smoking dope and then he got strung out on meth and then killed himself with opiates and booze in his early 50's. He was in the prime of his life - handsome and successful. The disease of addiction is an equal opportunity destroyer, and these stupid doctors know nothing.
"The BMJ editorial notes that consumption of psychoactive substances is an ancient and persistent aspect of human behavior"
We have evolved cannabinoid receptors throughout our bodies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabinoid_receptor
Human behavior is one aspect; what about human physiology?
The medical community following Trump's lead?
MAGA
...retaking control of supply from organised crime.
Regulating and taxing drugs will do wut?
Why in the fucking world are supposedly scientific journals getting involved in politics? That's the outrage.
Too bad Trump has done a complete u-turn on his original calls to completely end the Drug War.
Unfortunately for us, the doctors who have sense and agree with legalization are either too busy or too timid or not interested in hammering out the legal details or something, because the psycho doctors are getting far more air time.