Kurt Loder Movie Reviews

Movie Reviews: Sully and The Beatles: Eight Days a Week – The Touring Years

Profiles in courage and '60s pop delirium.

|

Sully
Warner Bros

The well-known tale of Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger—the US Airways pilot who bravely ditched his plane in the Hudson River off of Manhattan in 2009 in order to save the lives of his 155 passengers—is a real feel-good story. It makes you feel good just knowing there are selflessly committed individuals like Sullenberger still around.

But the story's basic action—from the time Sully realized that a large flock of geese had clogged up both of his engines to the time his plane touched down on the water—only lasted about three minutes. The veteran pilot subsequently built a memoir around the incident, and it became a bestseller. But now Clint Eastwood has tried to build a movie around it, and even at 95 minutes the picture feels stretched and padded.

The digital effects Eastwood has used to help recreate the plane's emergency descent into the river are exciting—the action seems alarmingly real, and the terrified frenzy aboard the plummeting aircraft and then out in the water as the passengers await rescue is grippingly edited. But while Tom Hanks was a good choice to play Sullenberger—with white hair and a trim mustache, he radiates decency and self-deprecation—he's also a problem. Decency and self-deprecation aren't very interesting to watch—the character lacks complexity, and he doesn't evolve. Hanks' Sullenberger is a stand-up guy, and not much more. "I'm just a man who was doing his job," he tells a TV host in the wake of his celebrated exploit.

But Hanks is never less than likeable (as is Aaron Eckhart, in a strong performance as Sully's copilot, Jeff Skiles). The movie has more crucial flaws. Given the brevity of the central action, Eastwood is compelled to inflate the story surrounding it, to meager narrative purpose. So we see not only the ditching of Sully's aircraft, but also alternative versions of it that appear to him in nightmares and daydreams, with his plane diving down into midtown Manhattan, banging into skyscrapers along the way. (Echoes of the 9/11 Twin Towers attack seem clearly intended—"It's been a while since New York had news this good," says one of Sully's fellow officers, "especially with an airplane in it." But Eastwood's motivation for summoning these feelings seems banal.)

We also get a few aftermath shots of Sully jogging through Times Square and along a river promenade, lost in thought about whether he did the right thing. And he makes repeated odd calls to his worried wife (Laura Linney) back home in California. (Each time he gets her on the line he tells her he has to go.) There's also an overextended mini-story involving an air traffic controller who's reduced to tears when he loses contact with Sully's foundering plane.

In need of conflict, Eastwood and writer Tom Komarnicki have set up a team of investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board as the villains of the piece. Led by a sneeringly abrasive character named Porter (Mike O'Malley), they're determined to prove that instead of ditching in the Hudson, Sully could just as easily—and more safely—have returned to La Guardia Airport, his point of departure, or changed course for New Jersey's nearby Teterboro Airport. Computer simulations seem to prove the preferability of these alternatives, and the NTSB team is convinced that Sullenberger was recklessly wrong. (The real-life NTSB officials deny they had it in for Sully, and say they were simply following standard investigative procedure.) These second-guessing government bureaucrats are perfect targets for Eastwood's expected contempt; but they're so hostile to Sully that when they immediately collapse into admiration for him after their dubious computer recreations turn out to be flawed, the movie slumps like a mis-handled soufflé.

Chesley Sullenberger is clearly a man of cool-headed courage, an actual hero who deserved all the plaudits he received. Whether he, or we, needed this movie is another question.

Beatles
Apple Corps

The Beatles: Eight Days a Week – The Touring Years

The Beatles' music can never again be heard for the first time, in its original cultural context. Which is too bad, because a sense of revelation—of new sounds and new harmonic ideas being unveiled—was a key reason for the worldwide excitement the group provoked.

In assembling his awkwardly titled The Beatles: Eight Days a Week – The Touring Years, director Ron Howard must have known he couldn't make this music entirely new again—we've been drenched in it for the past 50-odd years. But Howard has been able to draw on what must have been miles of rare and in some cases previously unseen footage from period media reports, international TV libraries, fan hoardings, and the Beatles themselves, and he uses it to depict Beatlemania, in all of its mad passion, in a really electrifying way. More instructively, he also provides a detailed illustration of how the nonstop hysteria that grew up around these four musicians finally ground them down and brought an end to their touring days in August of 1966.

There are no real surprises here—the Beatles' story is so deeply embedded in pop-music consciousness that its most familiar beats can only be restated. Still, there's terrific footage following the group from the Cavern Club to the Continent and on to America, Tokyo, the Philippines and beyond. The music we hear is naturally all hits, from "She Loves You" and "Can't Buy Me Love" to "Ticket To Ride" and "Day Tripper." And the vintage audio tracks have been so expertly cleaned up and remastered that they've acquired a new power (you can hear the individual instruments clearly now, and the live-concert vocal harmonies have a fresh, tingling brilliance).

John Lennon and George Harrison are heard from only in old footage, of course (we see Lennon "apologizing" against his will at a press conference for his "more popular than Jesus" remark); but there are new interviews with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr, and bits of testimony from a number of famous Beatles fans. Some of these outside observers seem randomly chosen (Eddie Izzard? Malcolm Gladwell?), but some offer unexpected illuminations. Whoopi Goldberg, whose mother surprised her with hard-to-get tickets to the Beatles' Shea Stadium concert in 1965, says that, for a little black fan, "They gave me this feeling that everybody was welcome." And Sigourney Weaver has a sweet memory of her own Beatles-concert experience, surrounded by other hysterically delighted and in some cases weeping teenage fans. "I was feeling everything a girl can feel," she says.

I was unaware that the Beatles' tour contract for a swing through Florida emphasized their refusal to play to segregated audiences. And I don't believe I've previously seen the press-conference clip in which a reporter asks the boys why they think they're so insanely popular. (The answer: "If we knew, we'd start another group and be managers.") The movie can't fully retrieve that long-ago time, but it's fun to watch in this one.

NEXT: Alexander Hamilton May Rule Broadway, But He Was No Banking Genius

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. For this movie, I thank Canada, without whose geese it would never have been possible.

    1. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do… http://www.14earnpath.com

      1. Rather than click your link, Morgan, I’ll wait for the movie.

        1. You’ll be waiting a long time. These people are so lazy that they work only 12 to 20 hrs per week even though they’re making hundreds of dollars per hour.

    2. I’m making over $15k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. Read more on this web site… http://www.14earnpath.com

    3. I’m making over $15k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. Read more on this web site… http://www.14earnpath.com

    4. I’ve been to Canada more than those geese have.

  2. The real-life NTSB officials deny they had it in for Sully, and say they were simply following standard investigative procedure.

    This smacks of WDATPDIM. The reason these disasters are investigated is as much about learning what works and doesn’t, and avoiding mistakes in the future, as about assigning blame.

    1. Except that in a Federal regulatory environment, the investigation frequently descends into blame seeking. Not always, but often.

  3. I remember having the same reaction as KL to this movie, at every step of its publicity — what’s the point of making a movie about a successful ditching? It’s not like a terrorist attack, where there’s planning beforehand. The investigation after the fact is even more boring. If it were about the ditching and boat rescue after, why call it Sully? The whole project smelled of uselessness, and KL confirms that. This is one movie I sure won’t be watching.

    It would be more exciting to make a movie a movie about why Clint Eastwood (or his backers) decided to make this movie. At least there would be stupid Hollywood people to laugh at and make fun of.

  4. I’m making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now. I feel so much freedom now that I’m my own boss. This is what I do,

    ?? ? ? ? http://www.review40.com

  5. “selflessly committed individuals l”

    I’m pretty sure Sully was self-interested when he was trying to figure out to safely ditch the plane.

  6. At least they could have made them Muslim Geese or SOMETHING! Or some Muslims on the ground doing the Charlamagne thing.

    What Mr. Drucker did WAS amazing, but it’s best told via documentary or the docu-drama’s that are already on Youtube.

  7. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ??? http://www.NetNote70.com

  8. “Decency and self-deprecation aren’t very interesting to watch?the character lacks complexity, and he doesn’t evolve. Hanks’ Sullenberger is a stand-up guy, and not much more. “I’m just a man who was doing his job,” he tells a TV host in the wake of his celebrated exploit.”

    Oh, he ‘evolved’ alright:
    “It is my personal experience that my decision to remain in the profession I love has come at a great financial cost to me and my family. My pay has been cut 40%, my pension, like most airline pensions, has been terminated and replaced by a PBGC guarantee worth only pennies on the dollar”
    http://aircrewbuzz.blogspot.co…..-told.html
    Poor guy is doing what he enjoys and dammit, they’re not paying him more than he’s worth!

  9. just as Patrick answered I am inspired that you can earn $5103 in 1 month on the internet . see this website

    ?????? http://www.businessbay4.com/

  10. I’ve often wondered. If a flock of birds can bring down a jet aircraft, why can’t the Air Force develop inflatables to disable enemy jet planes?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.