Police

Baltimore Police Deploy Surveillance Tech Designed for the Iraq War

Cameras attached to the bottom of a small plane can capture an area of roughly 30 square miles at any given time, transmitting real-time images to the ground.

|

Aero-Imaging, Inc/Newscom

If you've visited Baltimore at any point during 2016, there's a good chance your every movement was tracked by the city's newest high-tech surveillance program.

The city is filthy with police surveillance cameras, but until this week little was known about the Baltimore Police Department's latest and most controversial tool for watching residents and visitors: a small aircraft that circles the city on an almost continuous basis, recording the movements of cars, people and everything else.

That aerial surveillance technology is the subject of a fascinating feature story published by Bloomberg Businessweek on Tuesday. Among the most startling details in the piece: the same program now being used in Baltimore—and being pitched to other police departments in other major cities—was originally designed to catch insurgents planting roadside bombs during the occupation of Iraq.

This is how the War on Terror comes home to roost.

More than six months after the covert eye-in-the-sky program was launched, the city is still barely admitting that it exists. The Baltimore Police Department never asked the public for permission—or, heck, even told them it was happening.

The project is run by an Ohio-based company called Persistent Surveillance Systems and relies on a "sophisticated array of cameras" attached to the belly of a small Cessna aircraft, according to Bloomberg's Monte Reel. The cameras can capture an area of roughly 30 square miles (about one-third the size of Baltimore) at any given time and continuously transmit real-time images to a group of analysts on the ground. All the footage is saved on hard drives for an unknown length of time.

Police have used the cameras to track suspected criminals and investigate a wide variety of crimes—"from property thefts to shootings," they claim in the article—but the secret cameras have also been used to keep tabs on peaceful protestors, like those who stood outside the city's courthouse on June 23 when one of the police officers accused of killing Freddie Grey was acquitted on all charges.

"This is a big deal," says Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst for the ACLU. "It continues to be stunning that American police forces feel that they can use deeply radical and controversial surveillance systems, which raise the most profound questions about our society and its values, without telling the public that will be subject to these technologies—the public they are supposed to be serving."

Even now that the program has been revealed by Bloomberg, the city still won't admit that it's happening. The police department refused to comment for the Bloomberg story and did not return calls from Reason.

Before Baltimore, Persistent Surveillance quietly conducted a nine-day trial with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department in 2012, flying surveillance planes over Compton. The people being watched—including Compton Mayor Aja Brown—weren't told about it until a year later, and they were rightfully outraged when they found out.

Residents of Baltimore should be equally outraged that this has happened without their consent or knowledge, though perhaps the city's long history of intrusive surveillance and abusive policing has numbed the response—being observed from the sky certainly beats getting kicked in the chest (literally), right?

Ross McNutt, founder of Persistent Surveillance, tells Bloomberg that he believes the aerial surveillance can help police departments reduce crime by as much as 20 percent, though he also admits that he has no actual data to support that claim. The usage of the planes in Baltimore seems like a trial run before the company tries to market the same program to other cities—McNutt says he's already approached police departments in 20 different jurisdictions.

This is actually the second time in less than a year that residents of Baltimore have found out they were subjected to secret aerial surveillance. In 2015, it was revealed that mysterious planes had circled the city for hours at a time during the violent protests that erupted across the city after Freddie Grey's death in police custody. The FBI later admitted that those planes were part of a fleet of surveillance planes used by federal law enforcement, but the AP reported that the FBI's fleet was not equipped for "bulk collection activities."

At the time, the ALCU noted the existence of Persistent Solutions and wondered if it was that company's technology at work. It wasn't, but only a few months later, the Baltimore Police Department allowed Persistent Surveillance to start making similar flights—without telling anyone it was happening or asking permission from city officials and the general public.

As the Bloomberg story makes clear, these flights are very much about bulk collection. Videos are saved on "massive hard drives" and can be accessed at a later date.

There would seem to be some major constitutional issues with police surveillance on such a massive scale, but decades of court rulings have given wide deference to cops' ability to observe and track anyone and everything—with human eyes or cameras, it doesn't seem to matter.

If cities can put surveillance cameras on every street corner, if police can use license plate scanners to identify and track vehicles even when they are merely sitting in their owners' driveways and if cops can fly over a fenced-in backyard to see if someone might be growing marijuana—well, at that point what Persistent Surveillance is doing might be a difference of degree but not of kind. McNutt's company is just taking the big picture, literally.

Still, this is the first time police have had the ability to surveil an entire city in such a broad way.

In the Bloomberg piece (and in a presentation McNutt gave to the ACLU, in an attempt to gain their approval for his technology—or at least to head-off a lawsuit from them), Persistent Surveillance argues that their technology is actually less intrusive than many forms of street-level surveillance because the resolution is too low to identify individual people. Rather, people are merely "pixelated dots."

Stanley says that's a hallow argument, since surveillance systems never stand in isolation. Those "pixelated dots can be followed forward and backward in time as they move around the city. Used in conjunction with street-level surveillance, these aerial observations have the potential to track almost anyone in the city.

"Baltimore, like some other cities, has a lot of ground based cameras, but those cameras do not cover every square inch of the city, and their feeds are not stitched together with an artificial intelligence agent that is capable of using them in a coordinated fashion to follow individuals around anywhere within a 30-square-mile area," Stanley says.

Despite claims by McNutt that this surveillance technology will only be used to help police solve "major crimes," there are already signs that mission creep is happening. Persistent Surveillance has used their cameras to track Black Lives Matter protestors who were not accused of any crimes after Baltimore police expressed concern about possible "disruptions."

Indeed, the whole project is an example of mission creep. McNutt's company was originally contracted by the U.S. military to help find and catch insurgents making roadside bombs in Iraq, but now the technology is being deployed on the home front—just like so many other leftovers from a decade-plus of war in the Middle East.

NEXT: A.M. Links: Ann Coulter vs. Donald Trump, Earthquake Death Toll Climbs in Italy, Gary Johnson Blasts Clinton Foundation

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Police have used the cameras to track suspected criminals and investigate a wide variety of crimes?”from property thefts to shootings,” they claim in the article?but the secret cameras have also been used to keep tabs on peaceful protestors…

    Any cameras focused on those nickel rides they like to hand out?

    1. It was the damnedst thing, the cameras malfunctioned at exactly the moment those rides were happening.

    2. Start working at home with GOOGLE! YAHOO. ABCNEWS AND MORE GLOBAL SITES? It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Monday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this ? 4 weeks past. I began this 7-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $97 per hour. i work through this web.. Go this website and go to tech tab for more details… http://goo.gl/jrG8Uv

  2. I am not a pixilated dot – I am a Number!

    1. You are OB-solete!

      1. AAgreed!

  3. You know, its funny, but if it weren’t for the police and legislature’s attempts to make every damn thing a crime – including prostitution and drug use – and drag every cent they can out of municipal fines (especially traffic fines) – this sort of thing could actually be tolerable.

    If government stuck to chasing down violent and property crimes and things like nude sunbathing in your backyard weren’t illegal (along with right turns on red and toking up), they could actually justify this capability as proper security.

    But since they insist on using every bit of it to ferret out things that are malum prohibitum – even to the neglect of the malum in se crimes – that its a cause of a major freakout and why they need to hide this shit.

    Everybody knows its not there to catch terrorists. That it will never catch a terrorist. Probably will never even catch a purse snatcher. But you can bet it’ll be deployed against Jons and crackhouses.

    1. ^ This is why Trump will lose. Thanks, Aggy.

      1. LOL.

        Like Hillary doesn’t want the same damn thing.

        1. Of course she does – but it’s not at the core of her support as it is with Trumpkins. She didn’t call herself the ‘law and order’ candidate (= “I will instigate violence across the country” candidate).

          1. Yeah, how’s that working out with Obama?

            1. I predict Obama will stop drone strikes by the end of his term. And then Kaine will demand a vote from Congress on the war, and they will refuse, and then peace will reign for 1000 years. Sorry kb, I know peace is ‘so boring’ for you.

              1. I predict you will be telling new lies in the future so you don’t have to be held to account for your current lies.

                1. You are a prophet for the ages, kb.

          2. If Trump loses, it will have absolutely nothing to do with his stance on Law and Order and everything to do with the doubleplusungood things he says.

        2. Super Predator Drones?

          1. Nice.

  4. Mass surveillance techniques radicalize people and will only increase crime and especially terrorism.

    1. Yeah, everybody’s a victim and nobody has agency.

      1. It’s true. You can’t rise above your pre-coded wetware. I mean, you can try. But beware the Singularity.

        1. Please, regale us with your self-serving bullshit. I’m sure it’s going to be so interesting to hear about how your problems are all someone else’s fault.

    2. Mass surveillance *coupled* with a ‘if we only make one more law’ attitude is what increases crime and terrorism.

      Unfortunately you can’t get rid of the latter anymore so you have to fight the former as hard as possible,

  5. Facebook gives you a great opportunity to earn 98652$ at your home.If you are some intelligent you makemany more Dollars.I am also earning many more, my relatives wondered to see how i settle my Life in few days thank GOD to you for this…You can also make cash i never tell alie you should check this I am sure you shocked to see this amazing offer…I’m Loving it!!!!
    ????????> http://www.factoryofincome.com

  6. I’m not voting for Trump because you people are all idiots and deserve to get raped by Mexicans and killed by Muslims. As for me – “pass the popcorn”.

    Jill Stein does not endorse the content of this message

  7. Well, one thing you can’t deny is the efficacy- Baltimore is deservedly reputed to be the safest city in the US and businesses and people are flocking back.

    1. It’s true! The burned out buildings are magically un-burning themselves! The ghettos are un-ghettoing! The hotel owned by the city is making money!

    2. I hold you, sir, responsible for the loss of a large mouthful of coffee and damage to a monitor and keyboard.

  8. While looking for roadside bombs near downtown, we happened to spot a pot plant in a backyard garden.
    No big deal.

  9. Expect really fun laser pointers like Wicked Lasers to be banned or whatever before long; those things fry optics on drones pretty fast.

    P.S. It wasn’t me Preet. Just the messenger.

  10. If you’re a Baltimore cop, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. We need to root the likes of you out of our country and ship you to perhaps Caracas, Havana, Pyongyang or Beijing.

    1. Wait, you think they feel shame or anything similar?

      1. I don’t think the people involved in this sort of thing have the slightest sense of guilt. They sleep quite well at night, I am sure.

        We wonder things like?.how did German people go Stasi?.or Russians and their vast inventory of psychotics ?.or Cambodians in the case of Pol Pot?.how do these people do what they do, and do it to their neighbors and fellow citizens. And, we like to think real Americans would never behave like that.

        Nonsense. We have no shortage of people here that will wear a huge US flag as a shoulder patch, deliver some mindless pabulum such as “protect and serve”, then endlessly pester, harangue and screw you sideways.

    2. Have you been to Baltimore? I’d take Havana over anywhere along the MLK.

  11. Live in a fascist state, get surveilled. Why is anyone surprised?

  12. I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do,

    ———— http://YoutubeJobs.Nypost55.com

  13. Listening to radio out of Baltimore, apparently the PD went out of their way to hide all traces of this. According to the report I heard, they solicited donors,, moved that money in private accounts so it would not be seen by the public, and deliberately hid the accounts from the city, so this would all remain secret. Accountability!

    1. But if we tell people then the terrorist win. Do you want the terrorist to win?

      Rudy G.

  14. Make all the images/streams at all times publicly available, and then they might have a leg to stand on.

  15. The Police State has arrived and it is well.

  16. Piper . I see what you mean… William `s storry is amazing, on monday I got a great Smart ForTwo since I been bringin in $6208 this past four weeks and-even more than, ten-k last-munth . this is certainly the best-work I’ve had . I actually started three months/ago and pretty much straight away was bringing home over $69 per-hr . check out this site..

    CLICK THIS LINK=====>> http://www.earnmax6.com/

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.