Michigan Marijuana Legalization Initiative Probably Won't Make Ballot
Rule controlling when signatures may be gathered to blame.


An effort in Michigan to let voters decide whether to legalize marijuana got plenty of signatures to appear on the fall ballot, even if tens of thousands were tossed out as fake or invalid. Proponents of the initiative submitted 354,000 signatures, 100,000 more than the state required.
But there is another rule that apparently is going to keep Michigan voters from getting the chance to decide. Michigan law requires that all signatures to get on the ballot be gathered within a 180-day time frame. MI Legalize, the group pushing the initiative, got a good chunk of signatures prior to the 180-day window. MI Legalize has challenged the mandate, saying that requiring all the signatures be gathered within that window is unconstitutional and not supported by state law.
There's an interesting twist on their claims, the Detroit Free Press reports. While the 180-day rule has been uncontested all along, MI Legalize is correct: It was not technically state law when they gathered the sigantures. Guess what happened next:
The requirement did not become state law until Gov. Rick Snyder signed a bill on June 8. His signing was announced minutes after the State Board of Canvassers voted 4-0 to disallow the 137,000 signatures, and less than a week after MI Legalize submitted a total of more than 354,000 signatures. The group needed about 253,000 signatures to be certified by state elections officials for a ballot spot.
In 1986, the Michigan Supreme Court upheld the 180-day signature window for petitions to amend the state constitution. But the MI Legalize complaint concerns the far more commonplace petition drives for ordinary ballot questions, which do not attempt to change the state constitution.
MI Legalize challenged the decision but the state's Michigan Court of Claims just upheld the decision. The group is filing an emergency appeal to try to get it in front of Michigan's Supreme Court. The Detroit Free Press notes that they've only got a couple of weeks to get a favorable ruling before clerks start getting ballots printed. Otherwise they might have to try to get it onto the 2018 ballot, assuming we're still having this fight about marijuana (Spoiler: We will be).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
MI Legalize, the group pushing the initiative, got a good chunk of signatures prior to the 180-day window.
The first time stoners fail to procrastinate and it blows up in their faces.
even if tens of thousands were tossed out as fake or invalid.
Sounds racist.
Libertarian moment!
Remember when Kit Bond died before they could change the ballot but they went ahead and elected him anyway despite the requirement that Senators be residents of the state from which they're elected and ignoring that dead guys ain't residents or that - while governors can replace office holders who die in office - there's nothing that says the governor can appoint a replacement for somebody who's never actually held the office? Or when Frank Lautenberg was allowed to replace Robert Torricelli on the ballot when he suddenly dropped out of the race shortly before the election despite the law saying such a late change couldn't be made? Funny how that blind eye government's got can see quite sharply in some cases.
(Sorry, not Kit Bond - Mel Carnahan.)
what if very much
thank you
you so right thank you
very much