Privatization

Will Homeland Security Continue to Use Private Prison Companies?

After the Justice Department announced it will stop contracting with private prisons, advocacy groups are already pressuring Homeland Security to follow suit.

|

Brian Cahn/ZUMA Press/Newscom

The Justice Department's surprise announcement Thursday that it will phase out its contracts with private prison companies sent shockwaves through the criminal justice world and private prison industry, but the bigger question is whether the decision will pressure the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to sever its considerably larger ties with private contractors as well.

As I noted yesterday, the Justice Department's Bureau of Prisons contracts with private companies to run 13 prisons, which house about 12 percent—or 22,000 inmates—of the federal prison population, most of them foreign nationals. But private prison contractors currently run 46 U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) immigrant detention centers, housing about 70 percent—about 24,000 people a day on average—of the detainees held by ICE.

While the stocks of major private prison companies were taking a nosedive on the news of the DOJ announcement, The Washington Post reported just this week on a sweetheart $1 billion deal between DHS and Corrections Corporation of America, the largest prison company in the U.S., to build a huge new facility to house Central American asylum seekers. In 2015, CCA made $221 million, 13 percent of its overall revenue, from ICE contracts, according to a Center for American Progress report.

Asked if ICE would continue to contract with private prison companies, a spokeswoman said the agency "remains committed to providing a safe and humane environment for all those in its custody. For individuals in its custody, ICE seeks to reduce transfers, maximize access to counsel and visitation, promote recreation, improve conditions of confinement and ensure quality medical, mental health and dental care."

Which doesn't really answer the question one way or the other, but an ICE official also noted that ICE's immigrant detention facilities serve very different purposes than Bureau of Prison facilities. ICE detention centers, the official said, are not for punitive or rehabilitative purposes, but exist to hold detainees awaiting resolution of their immigration cases or until their removal order is completed.

However, the detention centers, especially ones used to house migrant families, have been accused by watchdogs and critics of inhumane conditions and unethical behavior.

GEO Group, a private prison company that runs one of those immigrant detention centers, strongly denied the accusations.

The three major private prison companies that the Bureau of Prisons contracts with say the Justice Department's decision was based on a faulty inspector general report that failed to take into account the different populations between their facilities and regular BOP prisons. Their facilities, they argue, house mostly foreign nationals, many of whom are violent gang members.

Civil liberties groups and critics of private prisons are already putting pressure on the Department of Homeland Security to follow suit. David Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project, called the Justice Department's announcement "an important and groundbreaking and decision."

"With its announcement today, the Justice Department has made clear that the end of the Bureau of Prisons' two-decade experiment with private prisons is finally in sight," Fathi said. "The ACLU applauds today's decision and calls on other agencies — both state and federal — to stop handing control of prisons to for-profit companies."

Rebecca Vallas, the managing director of the Center for American Progress' Poverty to Prosperity Program, said the DOJ decision a "long overdue step with both actual and symbolic value."

"Too many for-profit prisons have become havens of brutal force, unlivable conditions, inadequate nutrition, and denial of needed medical and mental health care, driven by incentives to keep costs down," Vallas said. "The Department of Homeland Security and the states should follow DOJ's example and bring their own contracts with private prisons companies to an end."

Vallas also called on the government to stop contracting with for-profit prison transport services, which have come under fire following a scathing news investigation by The Marshall Project, which found at least four people have died since 2012 in prison extradition vans run by a private company.

Vallas said for-profit prison transports are "home to notoriously hideous and inhumane conditions: inmates shackled for days on end until their wrists and ankles swell and bleed, forced to urinate and defecate on themselves for lack of bathroom stops, and female inmates sexually abused by guards."

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

22 responses to “Will Homeland Security Continue to Use Private Prison Companies?

  1. Did I miss the post about the Iran Ransom story?

    Reason can’t have possibly missed that one, right?

    Right?

    1. Anybody can earn 450$+ daily… You can earn from 9000-14000 a month or even more if you work as a full time job…It’s easy, just follow instructions on this page, read it carefully from start to finish… It’s a flexible job but a good eaning opportunity.. go to this site home tab for more detail… http://bit.do/ctDjs

  2. Justice Department vows to break ties with crony contractors, progressives overjoyed for some reason.

  3. Totally not a prison. Temporary housing facility. See?

  4. Alt text fail.

    How about, “Private sector jobs created or saved”

  5. OT: Remember how the Mexican soda tax was such a brilliant model for the world? Except that maybe it wasn’t.

    Supporters of a higher tax say they are taking action because domestic sales of fizzy drinks have largely recovered following an initial drop.

  6. $1 billion deal […] to build a huge new facility to house Central American asylum seekers.

    More benefits from “freedom of movement”! I can already feel my liberty increasing.

    1. “Stand back, baby, I don’t know how big this libertarian moment is gonna get!”

  7. The privatization of prisons is a conundrum for me, (and I consider myself a libertarian). Setting aside for now the ridiculously high incarceration rate, which preceded (& likely contributed to the existence of privately owned prisons)

    The problems I see:
    1) It insulates the state from criticism about treatment and conditions by giving politicians a layer of bureaucracy to say, “Not my fault, but I will look into that” basically a shirking of responsibility.
    2) Private prisons have economic incentives to keep prisoners who ought to be released juxtaposed to the state which has economic incentives to release prisoners (which also has built in problems, i.e. budget constraints)
    3) Punishing crime is actually a legitimate function of government and I don’t see how a privately operated prison, which must be, by it’s nature, managed by the state, gains any advantage in efficiency in costs to taxpayers.

    1. On the plus side, the prisoners might get Rodney Dangerfield as the warden.

    2. Involuntary incarceration isn’t something that can actually exist in any truly free and voluntary market. “Private” prisons are just a state created perversion of market forces.

      1. What, exactly do you do with murderers and rapists, then, in a “truly free and voluntary market?”

    3. I would expect to see huge principal agent issues with private prison set up: all the actors will obviously look to maximize profit and given that there presumably is a minimal level of “care” mandated by the state (ie floor on the costs), the next avenue will be increasing revenue and that can only come from influencing policy.

      1. Yeah government run organizations, like the VA for example, are so much better at care than privately run organizations…. Oh, wait.

        1. Yes, I too noticed no reference to how the private prisons compare, apples to apples, with the metrics of the non-private prison systems. Given the DOJ’s track history both recent past and about as far back as you might care to look, I am inclined not to believe a word of it.

          Perhaps better oversight ….. (Nah, that made me shart a little even as I typed it….)

  8. Huzzah!
    Those girls on OITNB are gonna be all set now that Uncle Sugar’s back in charge.

  9. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ??? http://www.NetNote70.com

  10. So much for all those “Feds put an end to private prisons” headlines. I guess, when it comes to government, if it seems too good to be true, it probably isn’t.

  11. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ??? http://www.NetNote70.com

  12. Thank you for the article was very helpful, I liked his discussion and hopefully a lot of other people who may read this article. Penyebab Permasalahan Nyeri Sendi Lutut

  13. $89 an hour! Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening?And i get surly a chek of $1260??0 whats awesome is Im working from home so I get more time with my kids.
    Here is what i did

    ===============>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.factoryofincome.com

  14. No brainer. If they vote at all, about 90% of government employees will vote for Democrats and about 70% of private sector employees will vote Democrat. The same holds roughly true for illegal immigrants. Think the VA governor wants to restore 200,000 felons right to vote as a freedom issue? Sure.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.