Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Trump Talks Immigration Plan, Death Toll Rises in Louisiana Flooding, Yemeni Hospital Hit in Airstrike: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 8.15.2016 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | FMB/Dennis Van Tine/Future Image/WENN/Newscom
(FMB/Dennis Van Tine/Future Image/WENN/Newscom)
  • Donald Trump
    FMB/Dennis Van Tine/Future Image/WENN/Newscom

    Donald Trump's big speech today on foreign policy and immigration involves an ideological test for those who want to enter the country.

  • Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, one of the more popular speakers at this year's Republican National Convention, blamed "progressive policies" for destructive behavior in response to a deadly police shooting over the weekend.
  • The death toll in the Louisiana flooding is up to six. Thousands have been forced from their homes.
  • On the other side of the country, August means California is on fire. More than 100 buildings have been destroyed in wildfires.
  • "Burqini" bans are spreading in France because protests have turned violent.
  • Doctors Without Borders says a hospital it helped operate in Yemen has been hit by Saudi-led coalition airstrikes, resulting in casualities.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Schumer, Norquist on Thin Ice With Olympic Tax Break

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (261)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Donald Trump's big speech today on foreign policy and immigration involves an ideological test for those who want to enter the country.

    The test will be very tastefully done.

    1. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   10 years ago

      How about "Are you now or have you ever been a member of an Islamist group?"

      1. Ted S.   10 years ago

        [Looks at bottle of Heinz ketchup]

        There are 57 card-carrying Islamists in the State Department!

    2. Citizen X   10 years ago

      If you get a perfect score, you get to be Trump's next wife.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Even if male.

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          Obviously, some extensive surgical modifications may be necessary.

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Even if female.

            1. Citizen X   10 years ago

              I believe SugarFree has covered this aspect of The Donald's sexuality in his "fiction."

              1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

                That shit is a documentary. SF's on the ground, collecting data.

              2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

                His friction fiction.

    3. Ted S.   10 years ago

      The test will be yuuuuuge!

    4. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      Hello.

      1. Johnny Hit n Run Paulene   10 years ago

        'Suf Ruf?

    5. Guy Behind the Guy, Jr.   10 years ago

      "I hold in my tiny little hand a list of bad, bad dudes!"

  2. Citizen X   10 years ago

    Doctors Without Borders says a hospital it helped operate in Yemen has been hit by Saudi-led coalition airstrikes, resulting in casualities.

    "They hate Doctors Without Borders! Stay away from Doctors Without Borders!"

    1. SugarFree   10 years ago

      Fuck 'em. They were providing aid to the enemy.

      1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

        The children?

        1. SugarFree   10 years ago

          The patients were muslims and all muslims are radical muslims. Those kids were already jihadi.

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            If they didn't wanna get blowed up, they shoulda been born in an awesome Western society instead of some crappy Islam place!

      2. Brett L   10 years ago

        You were Kos along?!!

    2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      Jerk.

  3. BearOdinson   10 years ago

    Yemen vs Saudi Arabia? I am confused, who are WE supposed to bomb?

    1. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

      Nuke it from orbit, it is the only way to be sure.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      Never Saudi Arabia. Don't bite the hand that feeds you.

      1. BearOdinson   10 years ago

        Honestly, there really is no fucking reason why we should have anything to do with those fucking camel-fuckers anymore. Fracking, Canadian oil, shale oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear can supply all of our energy needs and all the petroleum products we need. Not that companies shouldn't be free to trade with them, but we don't NEED them.

        1. That other Steve   10 years ago

          I don't think it's about the resources as much as the Arabian Peninsula is an excellent strategic location for our bombers and such.

          Uncle Sugar has a looong reach thanks to them.

          1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

            Yes, we need to keep bombing the Middle East so we can have bases for all the bombers we're using to bomb the Middle East.

            1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

              It's a pyramid scheme!

            2. That other Steve   10 years ago

              I'm pretty sure that sums up the logic pretty well.

              You let us bomb who we want from your country, then we'll help you bomb who you want from your country.

              I wasn't saying it's a great idea, I just think that the location is advantageous for war hawks to "Secure American Interest" which is the main reason America has "anything to do with those fucking camel-fuckers "

  4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    "Burqini" bans are spreading in France because protests have turned violent.

    Mankinis are still okay there, right?

    1. Citizen X   10 years ago

      I think they're required.

    2. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      This is France. It's required that you wear something that's spandex that barely covers your nether-regions. The fatter you are, the smaller the area the spandex should cover.

      1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

        First sentence: good

        Second sentence: awful

      2. Brett L   10 years ago

        Technically, it's all the same amount of Spandex. "One size, fits small"

    3. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      France is banning people from Burquina Fatso?

      1. Private Chipperbot   10 years ago

        John hardest hit.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   10 years ago

          Well, the first two words anyways

  5. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...August means California is on fire. More than 100 buildings have been destroyed in wildfires.

    All of them described as bungalows.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      I saw the smoke from the air yesterday. It was pretty bad.

    2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      The Santa Annas are another California feature I will not miss.

      1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

        It's awesome at the beach. Hot, and great waves.

  6. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

    ""Burqini" bans are spreading in France because protests have turned violent."

    I'm confused about what was being protested.

    Was it for more tits? I guess I'm on board.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      You want to see saggy Schumer tits?

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Ted has a collection, if you're interested.

      2. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

        I don't not want to see that.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      I thought bikini tops were illegal in France.

    3. Rhywun   10 years ago

      Was it for more tits?

      Basically, yes. Women are now required to expose some percentage (above zero) of their breasts. I guess this is the kind of twilight-zone stuff we'll be seeing more of leading up to the unpleasantness that is surely inevitable after the events of the last couple years.

      1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

        At least Brazil is fair. I have a couple Brazilian families in the neighborhood.

        All of the moms wear thongs at the beach, but the dads banana hammock too.

        1. Chip Woodier   10 years ago

          a couple Brazilian families in the neighborhood

          Now that's a lot of families.

        2. Brett L   10 years ago

          I guess t-backs are in for the barely pubescent this year? I feel like a creep every time I'm checking out some chick in a very high cut bikini and she turns around and looks like she's not in high school yet. That's when it's great to be holding a one year old.

          1. Lord at War   10 years ago

            Was it just me, or did the Chinese gymnasts all look like they were 10 yrs old? (and might have been...)

  7. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Thousands have been forced from their homes.

    And in an election year! Good thing the sitting president isn't up for reelection, I guess.

    1. DenverJ   10 years ago

      Yeah, I was gonna post something about how I'm sure the national media will blame Obama personally for this. "Heckuva job, Brownie"

  8. BearOdinson   10 years ago

    So burqini ban? It is funny that the Left wants the US to be more like Europe. And yet, Europe is the place that has attacks against Muslims in response to terror attacks by Muslims. France (one of the Left's favorite places) is the place that bans the Burqa.

    We have had a number of terror attacks by Islamists, and yet there is no significant amount of hate crimes against Muslims here in the US. Even by those evil white gun owners.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      We attack Sikhs instead.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      The French are also hella more racist.

      1. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

        And had massive protests against gay marriage.

      2. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

        The French are rest of the world is also hella more racist.

      3. NYC2AZ   10 years ago

        The French are rest of the world is also hella more racist.

  9. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    I live in Milwaukee, and fortunately my neighborhood has not been affected by the "protests." Hopefully this blows over quickly and the people targeting people based on the color of their skin get thrown in jail.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      So, both the local government *and* the BLM people?

    2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      people targeting people based on the color of their skin get thrown in jail.

      Don't they mostly already work at the jail?

    3. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

      Keep your head down and your powder dry.

      1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

        Jesus dude, it is 2016. Ammo comes with the powder inside a sealed metal casing. C'MON! Powder Dry...psha, you just stumbled in from the Wilderness I guess.

  10. That's A Bingo!   10 years ago

    The death toll in the Louisiana flooding is up to six. Thousands have been forced from their homes.

    Barack Obama doesn't care about Louisianans?

    1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      Heckuva job, Brownie!

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      This is Barack's Katrina.

  11. Auric Demonocles   10 years ago

    There might be a newly discovered habitable planet at Proxima Centauri. We couldn't get luckier than this if it turns out to be true. That's just over 4 light years away. I deem it "Libertalia".

    Also, fuck you California wildfires. Fucked up my hiking trip last year.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Last year? Which fire?

      1. Auric Demonocles   10 years ago

        The rough fire. I was doing the JMT and it hit the Sierras hard. I couldn't see more than 50 feet one day.

    2. Guy Behind the Guy, Jr.   10 years ago

      I deem it "Libertalia".

      DORK ALERT: The first planet I named in No Man's Sky is called Liberterra Prime.

      1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

        There should be a godwins law type thing for this...Anywhere where libertarians are present at least one will name something starting with "libert"

    3. John Titor   10 years ago

      Time to call Nwabudike Morgan.

    4. tarran   10 years ago

      4 Light years might as well be a million light years.

    5. BearOdinson   10 years ago

      I get why this can be kind of cool. I am a big Sci-fi nerd.

      But, reality is a bitch. People fucking forget how far a light-year really is. It will take a crew months (perhaps a couple years?) to get to MARS. Even if we had the power source to accelerate a ship to .01c (a ship which has the technology to support a living crew, not some tiny robot ship), it would still take over 400 years to get there. And it isn't like we are truly anywhere close to being able to put people into any sort of suspended animation, and revive them safely. So a colony ship? Now it has to be somewhat self-sustaining, which means much bigger a ship, more mass, more fuel to accelerate the ship. Or slower velocity, which means MUCH, MUCH bigger ship, to support a large enough population of humans to survive the generations it would take.

      Until we can manipulate gravity, we are stuck in our solar system.

      1. John Titor   10 years ago

        "Leif, there's no Vinland out west, lest not one you could get to by longboat. Let's just go back to Iceland and fuck our cousins."

        -Bear Odinson, Dream Killer, circa 1000 AD.

        1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

          Vinland pussy can't cook!

          1. BearOdinson   10 years ago

            They didn't stay end up staying in Vinland. So it really wasn't worth much after all.

            BTW: Historical foot note, Leif was a Christian (unlike his father Erik who wouldn't convert).

      2. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

        Where's Murph?

      3. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        +1 Trisolaran Fleet on the way

      4. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

        Even if we had the power source to accelerate a ship to .01c (a ship which has the technology to support a living crew, not some tiny robot ship), it would still take over 400 years to get there.

        Project Orion type setup is good for ~.2c or so depending on appointments, and could be built now.

        1. Overt   10 years ago

          We don't know what you could get out of Orion type propulsion, because we don't know what the ship would look like. But, at .2c, it would take 200 earth years to get there, though with time dilation that is shortened to some 195 Ship years.

          Now the question is whether or not you could build all the stuff required to support an ark ship 195 years, and still be able to power it up to .2c- and I am doubtful.

          Like BO, I love the fantasy, but believe it is only that for 100 years. In a way, I wish that humanity could focus on the near term. Once we have a foothold at the top of the earth gravity well, we have abundant resources in the solar system to support teaming life. But instead we are focused on going to mars or pluto or out of the solar system. That's why I'm happy with the startups that are just looking at farming near earth orbits. They are the ones that will bring us to the futures.

          1. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

            But, at .2c, it would take 200 earth years to get there, though with time dilation that is shortened to some 195 Ship years.

            .2c (20%) would get one to Proxima in about twenty years, time dilation basically immaterial. Orion vehicle is pretty well thought-out actually, I was surprised to learn the concept initially involved such vehicles taking off from the earth. People sure thought of the environment differently back in the late 50's/ early 60's.

            1. Overt   10 years ago

              You are right- I missed the order of magnitude on your decimal.

              Even so, at 20 years you are still talking about quite a ship.

              I did a research project on the Orion drive back in the late 80s. I am very familiar with it. However, the theoretical ships were all much smaller than a ship that would spend ~40 years away from earth. So again, I would question the scaling of such a system, let alone whether or not you could get such a large ship to .2c. As the ship gets larger, you need bigger bombs and more of them, and a larger blast plate to handle the larger boom, etc. So the mass keeps scaling. I am sure there is a sweet spot there- but is that sweet spot large enough to encompass an ark ship? dunno.

      5. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

        If that EM Drive pans out, it would be a game changer as things become much easier if you don't have to drag propellant around.

        1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

          Didnt pan out. Ambient heating from the power cable or something I read.

          1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

            Source? Seriously, I just looked and all the articles I can find are still of the "we still don't know if it works or not" sort.

            1. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

              I haven't heard of a test setup that can confidently get Emdrive thrust out of the noise. Even the NASA guys got the 'anomaly' from the one that wasn't supposed to work in their test setup.

              If anything is actually going on in there (doubtful), no one understands why - including the inventor.

    6. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Go hiking somewhere else.

  12. Arizona_Guy   10 years ago

    Derpbook update:

    It can actually be fun trolling friends.

    A friend posted an article "proving" Trump lies more than Clinton

    I pointed out that Trump being a liar doesn't make Clinton not a liar. And that bragging that she doesn't lie as much is just damning her with faint praise.

    And of course, Trump lies to make himself look good. Clinton lies to cover up her corruption. There is a huge qualitative difference in their lies.

    I feel no need to defend Trump, it's just fun watching former Bernie supporters rationalize voting for Clinton

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Everybody unfriended you, I presume.

      1. Arizona_Guy   10 years ago

        That remains to be seen.

        1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

          I'm praying for you bud. I hope by the end of the week you won't have any on theFaceySpace and can finally free yourself from Cthulu's grasp.

      2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        I would have unfriended the fucker who sent me that article, with extreme prejudice.

        /Probably why I don't book my face.

        1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

          I decided to severely roll back my participation on facebook a little while back through Facebook's settings and a chrome extension called FB purity. It's actually quite nice now. I only see stuff from the people I care about, shared things are hidden by default, and most of the crap I don't care about has been removed from the screen. It's facebook as it should be, a place to talk with the handful of relatives and friends who aren't textable/snapchatable for whatever reason, but I still value staying in contact with them.

          1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

            I only have one guy's posts blocked.

            And, I've only unfriended 1 guy, which I was required to do after he was convicted of a particular crime.

            1. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

              And, I've only unfriended 1 guy, which I was required to do after he was convicted of a particular crime.

              That sounds like FINRA or PCI-compliance bullshit. Which was it?

  13. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...blamed "progressive policies" for destructive behavior in response to a deadly police shooting over the weekend.

    Not that I doubt they're largely being a contributing factor, but did he enumerate which ones?

  14. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    KITTY!

    But Kelsi emerged soon after to join her cousins in the stream. "She got out of the tent because she couldn't find her shoe," Sevy, Kelsi's grandfather, said.

    In that moment, the mountain lion struck. The adults in the family heard screaming ? one of the 10-year-old cousins witnessed the ambush. And as they ran toward the sounds, they saw the cat holding Kelsi in its mouth.

    "The cat bit Kelsi on the side and tried to pick her up and drag her a little bit," Butt told East Idaho News. When the animal could no longer keep the child in its teeth, it attempted to grip her in its paws.

    Somebody call CPS.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      I'm reminded of this:

      https://xkcd.com/231/

    2. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Let the cougars pay the cougar tax. I pay the Homer tax.

    3. Krabappel   10 years ago

      I find the best way to fend off kitty attacks is to throw one of those little shiny foil kitty toys. One of my kittens really likes chewing on fingers.

    4. tarran   10 years ago

      Sooo, camping in the wilderness with no firearm to protect themselves against attacks from predators.

      How the fuck is that not neglect?

      1. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

        They might have fended off the cat but nothing would save them from indignant lefties.

        1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

          #justiceForPuma #catsArePeopleToo

    5. Citizen X   10 years ago

      Relevant.

    6. Careless   10 years ago

      The Butts rallied to Kelsi's defense.

      I feel bad laughing at a story of a four year old being attacked by a lion

      1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

        "I turned my head and saw the back part of the cat," Butt told East Idaho News.

        You mean you saw its butt?

        Thankfully the girl got away with no worse injuries than my housecats inflict.

        1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

          Please tell me his first name is Seamore.

      2. Microaggressor   10 years ago

        Butt's eyes did not deceive her.

        Also a good one.

    7. BearOdinson   10 years ago

      Is that what the daycare meant by "nature-based learning"?

      The only people who "love" nature are those who have never been stuck in it.

      1. Citizen X   10 years ago

        I love nature. That's why i enjoy watching it on teevee, in air conditioning, with narration by David Attenborough, the way God intended.

        1. Lord at War   10 years ago

          "Wild Kingdom"

          Marlin Perkins- "Let's watch Jim Fowler get attacked by that tiger over there!"

      2. Suthenboy   10 years ago

        "The only people who "love" nature are those who have never been stuck in it."

        Bingo.

    8. Microaggressor   10 years ago

      Kera Butt

      Nice... name.

    9. End Child Unemployment   10 years ago

      Those are some unbelievably light wounds for a child who was allegedly lifted in the mouth of a mountain lion. My dachsund had much larger canine wounds from the pit bull mix that attacked him, and it only managed to get hold with it's top teeth.

    10. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      My favorite human vs. wildcat video:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O16kGZ-Gm74

      I just love the panther's "AHHH, IT'S GOT ME!!" spaz out.

  15. John Titor   10 years ago

    Why the Doomsday Clock is a load of politically motivated nonsense.

    So the Doomsday Clock was originally started in the late 1940s by The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists to reflect the possibility of a nuclear war. Following the end of the Cold War, the clock declined dramatically until the mid-2000s, when suddenly they decided that it was also going to calculate for things like climate change.

    So now the clock is at 3 minutes to midnight since January 2015, citing things like the Paris conference being non-binding and continued lack of global political action to address climate change. For perspective, according to the Bulletin in 2016 we're at the same level of danger as the hottest part of the 1980s and in even more danger than during the Cuban Missile Crisis. All because we don't want to cripple the industrialized West apparently.

    1. That's A Bingo!   10 years ago

      That's usually what happens with organizations. The founder of MADD left after it became a neo-prohibitionist organization. Something similar happened with the founder of Greenpeace, if I recall correctly.

      1. John Titor   10 years ago

        One of the secondary founders, Patrick Moore. Another, Paul Watson, got kicked out for being too crazy. He's the guy who rammed Japanese whaling boats now. Most of the actual founders have been dead for decades.

        1. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

          Didn't Moore claim GP are now run by a bunch whackos now. It has nothing to do with the environment.

          1. John Titor   10 years ago

            Moore is a legitimate environmentalist, he actually thinks things like nuclear power and genetic modifications are ways to improve efficiency and reduce pollution (he has a degree in ecology as well). His arguments are all about technological improvements benefiting both humanity and nature, while Greenpeace is stuck in their hypocritical Technology-Is-Original-Sin bubble. Of course according to Greenpeace he's a shill for the nuclear power industry and Monsanto.

    2. Ted S.   10 years ago

      As if it wasn't politicized during the cold war.

    3. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

      That stupid thing still exists? Does anybody even pay attention to it?

      1. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   10 years ago

        I liked its bit in Watchmen.

    4. BearOdinson   10 years ago

      Obligatory:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qbRHY1l0vc

      1. End Child Unemployment   10 years ago

        Thank you.

        Every time, and I mean EVERY TIME something occurs at Midnight, for me, it occurs at two....minutes....to miiiidnniiiiiiigggghhh!

        1. Ted S.   10 years ago

          https://xkcd.com/1655/

      2. Rhywun   10 years ago

        +1 minute

    5. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      The Doomsday Cock, however, is all too real.

      1. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

        Win.

  16. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

    While Araud argued the ban was valid on the grounds that it protects women from "cultural oppression," Alouane said the law must protect religious freedom and state neutrality, instead of being, as she argued, "used as a tool to restrict both."

    So... something is folding in on itself here, but I'mma continue to monitor this sitch on the ground before I decide what.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

      Religious dress has long been a source of contention in France, whose secular laws forbid people from wearing religious symbols in public spaces, such as schools.

      So you can't wear say, a crucifix necklace? Really?

      1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

        Not according to this link

        1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

          From the link:

          Secularism guarantees freedom of conscience for all. Everyone is free to believe or not to believe.

          Bahahahahahaha.

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

            nor object to the school curriculum on religious grounds

            Wow. So even religious objections aren't allowed.

      2. John Titor   10 years ago

        Yep, the Revolution did a real number on France when it comes to religion.

        1. The Fusionist   10 years ago

          Strictly, the policy traces back to the early 20th century, it was aimed at you-know-who, later they decided that the Muslim situation would be a great excuse to ban crucifixes.

          1. John Titor   10 years ago

            The entire concept of secularism in France is wrapped up in the Revolutionary notion of secularism. Policies are a long standing product of that influence.

  17. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

    Stunner:

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/.....-1.3721015

    "...In response, Carlos Leitao told reporters the $15 number was "arbitrary" and that it didn't make much sense.

    "As an economist, what I want is a relationship between the minimum wage and the median wage," he said.

    "Whether it is $15, $14, $13 or $17, it depends on the reality of each state, each jurisdiction. The minimum wage in Quebec doesn't need to be the exact same as in Ontario, the United States or elsewhere."

    Sometimes politicians make so much sense...and then the same guy pulls this crap:

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/.....-1.3518594

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      It's all about government control.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

      It's Quebectown, Rufus...

    3. Juice   10 years ago

      15 was picked because it lends itself to alliterative slogans. Are you going to Fight for 12? I guess 14 would work for those too.

      And C$15? So like US$5.25?

  18. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

    Having finally gotten up to speed on the Milwaukee riot: is this really the hill on which #BLM and its fellow travelers are (metaphorically) willing to die? Is this really the man for whom they're willing to cashier the last of their intellectual honesty? When the movement had sympathetic victims dying under genuinely questionable circumstances, there was room for libertarians to make entreaties to attempt to bridge the racial divide for the sake of reforming abusive policing. Now, it's unclear they were ever serious or that #BLM was anything but another racist, racialist pressure group. They've gone from correct if misdirected to simply spreading lies to give rioters intellectual cover. Well, fuck 'em. If a bunch of prissy college kids want to gin up actual violence and burn down black cities, that's their cross to bear. Libertarians should sit this one out and focus on cities and areas of the country where reform is achievable. When the National Guard on standby to police harder than the police, it's clear there's no longer room for conversation.

    1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

      When the movement had sympathetic victims dying under genuinely questionable circumstances

      [citation needed]

      The only one I can think of is Freddie Gray. #BLM hasn't batted an eyelash at any of the truly questionable police brutality stories that I've seen over the past two years. They've gravitated to the shithead thugs who either try to fight the cops or pull weapons on the cops.

      1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

        Even Freddy Gray is questionable. The prisoner in the other compartment said he heard him banging around, as if he was trying to injure himself. It seems possible, especially since Gray was the beneficiary of an earlier injury lawsuit payout.

      2. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

        Eric Garner?

        1. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

          Tamir Rice?

          1. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

            Sandra Bland?

            1. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

              Walter Scott?

        2. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Pay your taxes, bitch

        3. JaimeRoberto   10 years ago

          Garner, the kid in Cleveland, and the guy in Charleston are the most sympathetic ones I can think of. For some reason BLM finds the worst examples like Michael Brown to hang their hats on.

        4. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

          Eric Garner

          Tamir Rice

          Fair enough.

          Sandra Bland

          Nope, she tried to fight a cop, got hauled off to jail, and offed herself because she was mentally unstable.

          Walter Scott

          The cop's murder trial is coming up in October. Seems like the department handled it correctly, to me.

          Overall, we have #BLM getting 2 right, getting it kinda right on Gray, and wrong on everybody else. They're swinging and missing, and have been since Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown.

          1. Sir Digby Chicken Caesar   10 years ago

            Nope, she tried to fight a cop, got hauled off to jail, and offed herself because she was mentally unstable.

            Actually, she resisted an aggressive cop who was getting physical with her. His attempt to arrest her was based far more on her pushing back against his authoritah than her traffic infraction (the only offense stated or noticeable). He should have de-escalated, but chose to escalate.

            He didn't kill her, per se, but he put her jail on bogus shit.

            1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

              Actually, she resisted an aggressive cop who was getting physical with her.

              Not really, that's not what the dashcam footage shows. In fact, the cop seems very reluctant to do anything but put handcuffs on her, even though she's a class A prick.

      3. dschwar   10 years ago

        Philando Castile.

    2. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      BLM jumped the shark pretty fast.

      1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

        BLM is to black people what WBC is to baptist churches. Or so it would seem.

    3. John Titor   10 years ago

      Is this really the man for whom they're willing to cashier the last of their intellectual honesty?

      I don't think BLM has had even an image of it, much less actual intellectual honesty. Once cops started getting shot people started to become suspicious rather quickly. Every single story I hear, even from people who would usually be sympathetic to causes like police abuse and racism, is all about how confrontational and annoying BLM is.

      My cousin's a tagger in the city, her and her friends were apparently all about BLM until the local BLM taggers tried to forbid them from using a public graffiti wall because it was a platform for 'black voices only'. Now they absolutely hate them with a passion and go out of their way to paint over their work.

      1. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

        BLM is planning to shut down Elvis Week at Graceland. That is not going to end well.

        1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

          I'm all shook up.

          1. The Fusionist   10 years ago

            They should get ready to play some jailhouse rock.

      2. DenverJ   10 years ago

        "My cousin's a tagger..." so, a vandal.

    4. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

      What has #BLM been saying? I've tried to find out, but it looks like every tweet with that hashtag is blaming #BLM for rioting.

      I notice that, on the site connected to Campaign Zero, they only list unarmed black people killed by police.

      1. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

        What's his name, the de facto spokesguy, has been on Twitter fanning flames. No engagement with the facts, afaik.

        1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

          You know...him.

          1. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

            This guy. It's probably not fair to call him the centerpiece of a movement with no center, but he's certainly whored for it hard enough that it's almost unfair not giving him the title.

            1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

              Stay woke.

              1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

                Stay woke.

    5. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      "Now, it's unclear they were ever serious or that #BLM was anything but another racist, racialist pressure group."

      It is? I don't think that is or ever was the case.

  19. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, one of the more popular speakers at this year's Republican National Convention, blamed "progressive policies" for destructive behavior in response to a deadly police shooting over the weekend.

    Yeah, okay. Or was he not referring to qualified immunity?

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Sheriff Clarke may actually be a bigger asshole than Arpaio, and that shouldn't be possible.

      1. Brett L   10 years ago

        But he's the right color, so its okay.

        1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Bullseye.

      2. Arizona_Guy   10 years ago

        and I'd bet money Arpaio gets re-elected this year.

        1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

          For the same reason Trump gets support. It isnt that their policies are liked, it is that the source of their derision and criticism is a postiitve indicator for them being good to their supporters. It is team all the way down.

  20. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Here's what happens when there's a wrong-door armed raid in England

    tl;dr: No pets killed, no people killed, and an actual apology and pledging to make things right. I'm stunned.

    Ch Insp Mark Dexter said: "When officers entered one address it was discovered to be unconnected to the investigation.

    "Officers have apologised to the occupants and will ensure any damage to the property is repaired."

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      Polite totalitarianism is so much better than rude totalitarianism.

    2. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      Did they invite them for tea at 4pm?

  21. lafe.long   10 years ago

    Chelsea Clinton: Donald Trump Reportedly Tried to Attend 2010 Wedding of Hillary Clinton's Daughter

    The book "Man of the World: The Further Endeavors of Bill Clinton" by Joe Conason claims that Trump tried to attain an invitation by calling Bill Clinton's former advisor, according to Politico.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Certainly it was because he liked Chelsea, right?

      1. Krabappel   10 years ago

        It's because she's such a good person.

      2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Hey, the man has standards.

    2. BearOdinson   10 years ago

      FFS, assuming this is true (which is hardly a given), he didn't crash the wedding. He called and asked if he was supposed to be invited. I get that for Fisher and Shackford, this is the smoking gun that Trump is worse than Hitler.

      Joe Conason is hardly a neutral source. I mean the story is written by someone, who got a hold of an excerpt from a book, written by a liberal commentator, which hasn't even been published yet, and who quotes someone close to the CLINTONS about something Trump may or may not have done in 2010.

  22. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

    Reposting this from my late post this AM.

    When Randys attack!

    1. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      Weld agreed with the FBI during the libertarian debate on CNN.

      Very unfortunate.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        I don't know what is more pathetic:

        1) That bumbling zeros like Gary Johnson and William Weld managed to win elections as republicans to the governorships of states with a primarily Democratic electorate.

        2) That the delegates of the Libertarian Party were so greedy for unearned votes that they decided that the free publicity garnered by handing their standard to the aforesaid bumbling zeros would way outweigh the idiocy that would become associated with the LP brand by the move.

        I honestly think that 12 years of running retread Republicans has destroyed whatever claim to legitimacy the LP ever had. Just as the Democrats aren't very democratic and the Republicans aren't very republican, the LP has become not very libertarian. It has morphed into just another political party whose name only has a tenuous connection with the policies advocated by its candidates.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      Reposts are gay.

  23. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    Some news from Canada that might cheer up heartless monocle-wearers of these here parts.

    Government rolls out new payment system, lots of government employees have problems getting paid. That's bad, but now, now it's a crisis:

    Union dues not collected properly under Phoenix pay system

    1. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      Trudeau has his cape and beanie on as we speak to fix the problem!

      1. Krabappel   10 years ago

        Shirtless?

        1. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

          Always. I'm surprised he even bothers to wear one in Parliament.

        2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          Pantsless.

          Shocker, he's like a Ken doll.

  24. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    So now the clock is at 3 minutes to midnight since January 2015, citing things like the Paris conference being non-binding and continued lack of global political action to address climate change.

    I have no objection to this, as long as the clock refers to that time at a date far, far, far in the future.

  25. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Come for the rather excellent New York Times article on just how fucked up things are in Venezuela, stay for the Chavista apologia in the comments. Also stay for the one woman in the comments blaming the US for the fucked up situation in Venezuela:

    Some will brush off my comment as, far too simplistic in a complicated world. Well, let them: the root of all this current world disorder is in a word: OIL!
    America in her greed, played her ugly part by opening "Pandora's Box" with the obscene vote wage WAR under the guise of rooting out Saddam. Sure he was a monster but the point is he was their monster and none of our affair.
    But....The extreme damage machine was perversely put into place and
    now we are looking at educated civilizations and her peoples desperate for food, CLEAN WATER and dying of bug bites. Oh sure, today it is Venezuela with Malaria. Well how about yesterday, the American CDC advising her citizens to not visit Miami, Florida? WE DID THIS! And American Society can turn upside down in a blink. Good luck out there today.

    1. Rufus The Monocled   10 years ago

      God these people are boring as they are predictable.

      Reminds me of a statement by Keynes:

      "Marxian Socialism must always remain a portent to the historians of Opinion ? how a doctrine so illogical and so dull can have exercised so powerful and enduring an influence over the minds of men, and, through them, the events of history."

      They're also very good at blaming others and hurling stupid strawman fallacies.

      1. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

        Never underestimate the lure of free shit to be paid for by Others.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

      No, I brush off her comment because it's retarded.

    3. This Machine   10 years ago

      *blinks twice*

      What the-

      *peers closer*

      What the actual fuck?

    4. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      +1 genuine frontier gibbersh.

    5. Ted S.   10 years ago

      I see the NYT is trying out promoted comments like H&R.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        They are always months behind on the cool trends.

    6. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

      Uh, sure, when a kleptocratic bolshevik thug attempts to fund his lavish socialist undertakings using a single commodity which then nosedives due to supply expansion, then oil is indeed to blame in the same sense it's to blame if I wrap my sedan around a tree.

    7. John Titor   10 years ago

      This is why all the other petrostates have all collapsed into horrible dystopias with slavery once OPEC killed the price of oil right?

      Oh wait, none of the other petrostates have. The only one that has managed to collapse into starvation and chaos is the one that had the more socialized, nationalized system. Odd how that works.

    8. NittanyCougar   10 years ago

      If it's OIL, maybe this graph + this graph is a sign that the world's descent into disorder may stall. We shall see.

  26. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    NYT commenters- God love 'em!

    1. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

      *kicks dirt*

      Do I gotta?

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Are you God?

        1. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

          Yes.

    2. BearOdinson   10 years ago

      None of my Gods love them!!

  27. Juice   10 years ago

    Donald Trump's big speech today on foreign policy and immigration involves an ideological test for those who want to enter the country.

    Like "Have you or anyone you know been a member of the Communist Party?" or "Have you or anyone you know been a member of a 'terrorist organization'?"

  28. Mazakon   10 years ago

    Responding to Trump's speech, #NeverTrump's Evan McMullin had some interesting responses:

    What @realDonaldTrump doesn't understand is that dictators create terrorists. They are two sides of the same coin. I've been there. I know.

    @realDonaldTrump would rather advance the ideas of dictators than those of democracy and basic human rights.

    How does @realDonaldTrump intend to work with our allies against terrorists when he's insulted them all?

    In @realDonaldTrump's "new approach," America turns its back on the universal cause of freedom and allows terrorism to thrive.

    "Extreme", @realDonaldTrump? You sound more like ISIS than an American president.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Barack Obama has no qualms calling people extreme.

    2. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      What @realDonaldTrump doesn't understand is that dictators create terrorists.

      Huh. What dictator created the IRA? The Weathermen? The Red Brigades? Or conversely, where are the North Korean terrorists? Or the Cuban or Zimbabwean terrorists?

      I'm not seeing much of a correlation.

      1. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

        The North Korean terrorists are in the regime.

        1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

          Different meaning of "terrorists."

  29. This Machine   10 years ago

    Reason #863,218,458 Why Socialism Doesn't Work

    At the Washington Post's Wonkblog on Monday, a guy named Matt O'Brien reports on the ongoing disaster in Venezuela. The title of the article is "Venezuela's death spiral is getting worse." I will give serious credit to Mr. O'Brien for actually doing some investigation of what is causing Venezuela's problems.

    [break]

    The essence is this: Suppose you get the government license to import butter, and are given the right to buy enough dollars to do it at the official rate of about 7 bolivars to the dollar. So you buy a dollar for 7 bolivars. Now, are you actually going to buy butter with that dollar, or are you going to turn around and go to the black market, where you can now get well over 1000 bolivars for that dollar? Probably, you'll buy a little butter to cover your tracks, and bolivars with the rest.

    Those bloodsucking kulak parasites, trying to make money while the country starves for butter. Unbelievable.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      They're just doing it wrong. They'd never run out of butter in a real socialist country.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Tariffs, of course. Is there anything more retarded than tariffs?

        1. dschwar   10 years ago

          Price controls? Or are they just another example of tariff?

      2. Chip Woodier   10 years ago

        Butter. Just one more line to stand in.

  30. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    This is apparently a thing that Mr. 9/11 Rudy Giuliani said today. I give up on everything.

    "Under those eight years, before Obama came along, we didn't have a successful radical Islamic terrorist attack in the United States. They all started when [Hillary] Clinton and Obama got into office."

    1. Trshmnstr, green and mangy   10 years ago

      It wasn't successful because we came together as a country!!!1!!1!

      /hurr durr

    2. tarran   10 years ago

      How dare you argue with a man who insightfully pointed out that liberty is the product of submitting to the government's orders! You are clearly the inferior intellect, sir!

    3. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      9/11. 9/11. 9/11. 9/11!!!!!!!

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Hey, Guliani has hijacked Playa's account!!

    4. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

      Eight years before January 2009 would have been three months after 9/11. Checkmate, atheists.

      1. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   10 years ago

        A 9/11, to be sure.

        1. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

          Who are you going to believe, me or your own lying counting fingers?

    5. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      Wait, didn't Obama have some public office before his Senate run?

    6. 0x90   10 years ago

      9/11 Truther take: "Giuliani admits 9/11 wasn't done by 19 hijackers!"

  31. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

    Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, one of the more popular speakers at this year's Republican National Convention, blamed "progressive policies" for destructive behavior in response to a deadly police shooting over the weekend.

    Politicians make bad laws, and force the popo to enforce them. The citizen's, angry about the enforcement of these laws burn their community down in protest.

    ...

    Profit ???

    =D

    1. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

      God I wish Mencken was alive to comment on the state of our society. =D

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        He would start all his essays with "I can't even."

        1. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

          Milly Mencken quote.

          "These people. I can't even"

          =D

        2. The Fusionist   10 years ago

          "Bootleg whiskey isn't going to do it for me this time, let me have some of that excellent 'marihuana,' as you yahoos call it."

    2. Juice   10 years ago

      The citizen's what?

  32. Pompey (91% LOLLOLZ)   10 years ago

    Badass. Man, I want to know the guy with the mountain lion t-shirt. Mancrush.

    1. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

      Is that an elephant gun ?
      It looks like a gun that my uncle owned.

      1. Pompey (91% LOLLOLZ)   10 years ago

        The deal is that this round was developed for big game hunting guides according to wiki. Nyah. I'm probably too much of a pussy to shoot that gun. Largest I ever shot standing up was .30-06 and 8mm Mauser. So if your uncle was/is a professional wild safari guide or an obscure gun nut, it's possible.

        1. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

          Well he was a gun nut and a Biker. Definitely possible.

          R.I.P. Uncle Frankie.

      2. commodious, blithering idjit   10 years ago

        Elephant Gun

      3. The Bearded Hobbit   10 years ago

        Is that an elephant gun ?

        Jack O'Connor said that more elephants were taken with a 7x57 than any other "elephant gun". His claim that the cartridge is so accurate that you could take an elephant by shooting it in the eye.

        ... Hobbit

    2. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      No, you need a wolf t-shirt.
      Read the reviews.

      1. Pompey (91% LOLLOLZ)   10 years ago

        That dude is so badass he probably has wolf, mountain lion, AND Kodiak bear.

    3. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      He does have great legs.

    4. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      That there is something that screams for a muzzle brake.

    5. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      I vaguely remember that Elmer Keith had a bolt action sporting rifle chambered in 50 Browning. Some sports writer came to interview him, saw that thing hanging on the wall and asked about it. keith told him what it was so the guy got all excited and just had to shoot it. Keith gave him a round and they went out back.

      After shooting it the guy was laying on his back on the ground with his eyes rolling around in his head he asked Keith "Jesus man! How can you stand to shoot that thing?"

      Keith replied "Oh, I just had it made as a novelty. I was never dumb enough to actually shoot it."

      The 577 T is basically the same thing.

      1. Pompey (91% LOLLOLZ)   10 years ago

        That's what makes mountain lion shirt guy so.... *swoon*

    6. Pompey (91% LOLLOLZ)   10 years ago

      OMG I think this is him!

  33. Rich   10 years ago

    [Biden] warned that Trump's false assertions last week about President Barack Obama founding the Islamic State could be used by extremists to target American service members in Iraq.

    Damn, I wish Uncle Joe had decided to run.

  34. Juice   10 years ago

    Both at the same time?

  35. This Machine   10 years ago

    Yyyyes.

  36. John Titor   10 years ago

    "Jesus Christ your test is old and you should feel old. Aren't both those women dead?"

    *Googles*

    Nope, just in their 70s and 80s.

  37. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

    Lovey.

    Thurston is old and rich, who's to say he'd make it back from a three-hour tour.

  38. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

    Can I just watch?

  39. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

    [Looks towards Canada]

    [Looks around]

    What are we watching? Those trees? Hmmmm, interesting trees.

    [Keeps staring towards Canada]

  40. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

    That's harsh. He can stay if he doesn't make eye contact, and maybe shouts a little encouragement.

  41. John Titor   10 years ago

    Europe: We're not into fucking mummies. Here, have a Slav.

  42. Jimmy Free Trade Pirate   10 years ago

    Uncle Joe has shitty taste in 80's female heavy metal musicians.

    Just saying.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioiiMuKkMTU

  43. Rich   10 years ago

    LOL

    And this.

  44. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

    "Don't make eye contact" is the cardinal rule of a devil's threesome.

  45. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

    Yeah, but you'd just be watching the good kind of threesome. And yelling things.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: A Man on the Inside

Charles Oliver | 4.10.2026 4:00 AM

Los Angeles Teen Blinded in One Eye by DHS Agent at 'No Kings' Rally, Attorney Says

Autumn Billings | 4.9.2026 5:06 PM

RFK Jr. Is Starting a Podcast

Robby Soave | 4.9.2026 4:15 PM

Trump Won With the MAHA Vote. Now He Might Be Losing It.

Reem Ibrahim | 4.9.2026 3:04 PM

Would U.S. Wildlife Laws Turn Greenland's Hunters Into Criminals?

Matthew Petti | 4.9.2026 2:24 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks