Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police Abuse

How Local Anti-Violence Activists Brought the Alton Sterling Shooting Video to the Public

A group founded by a former gang member brought transparency to the shooting after officers' body cams "fell off."

Anthony Fisher | 7.7.2016 3:24 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | The Advocate
(The Advocate)
Alton Sterling
The Advocate

The initial video of Alton Sterling's shooting — which began to go viral shortly after being uploaded to the internet late Tuesday — was not shot by random bystanders who happened upon the scene, but rather by members of Stop the Killing, a Louisiana-based group of activists whose mission is "To stop the violence and senseless killings in our communities," according to their website. 

The group's founder, Arthur "Silky Slim" Reed, is a former gang member who writes in his bio that he spent "12 years bouncing between gang life and prison" before finding his calling as an anti-violence activist, youth counselor, radio host, and filmmaker who creates work "geared to expose violence and senseless killings in communities throughout America."

Reed's group has access to police scanners, and as a practice, heads to scenes of potential violence, sometimes capturing murders on video and using the footage in documentaries geared at scaring young people straight from the potential allure of a life of crime.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Reed says members of Stop the Killing heard a call on their scanner which led them to the fateful scene of Sterling's shooting:

Early Tuesday morning, members of his team — he wouldn't say who, nor confirm he was present, citing safety concerns — filmed the fatal shooting of Alton Sterling outside the Triple S Food Mart. After police did not immediately release any footage of the shooting, Reed and his team uploaded the video to Facebook and Instagram at about 5 p.m. Tuesday.

'We see a great injustice, and we wanted it to be known," Reed said. "We're forcefully seeking justice. This is a civil rights movement, and this is the continuation of same struggle that black people have been going through for so many years."

By uploading the video, Reed could ensure that people would know exactly what happened.

Reed also told the Post that his group does not normally release violent footage to the public over social media, but that he felt compelled to do so in this case because "This is our third killing here in Baton Rouge by the police department."

The officers involved with Sterling's death — Blane Salamoni and Howie Lake — were both wearing body cameras, but both claim their cams "fell off" during the altercation. If not for the footage shot by Stop the Killing members, as well as the cell phone footage released by Triple S Food Mart owner Abdullah Muflahi, the public would have only the police version of events to go by. This is why maximum transparency, ideally provided by both the public and the police, is necessary to properly adjudicate tragedies like this.

Read more of Reason's coverage of the goverment's War on Cameras here. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why Hillary Clinton Has Privileges That Edward Snowden Doesn't

Anthony Fisher
Police AbuseLouisianaCamerasWar on CamerasCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. R C Dean   10 years ago

    The officers involved with Sterling's death ? Blane Salamoni and Howie Lake

    Mad props for publishing their names. Perhaps we could get some pix of them as well?

    1. timbo   10 years ago

      Baton down the hatches. There's going to be some protests soon.

      And of course by protests, we all know that means burning down some neighbor's sh*t.

      Can't the protesters just get used to getting f*cked by politicians just like the rest of us?

      I might not get profiled but I know what is happening with the broken economy and corrupt central planners. I am just keeping my head down however. Don't see the value in destroying stuff when the result is more of the same.

      Call me a-hole if nothing burns down this weekend.

      At last these cops have a better chance of being prosecuted. Seems pretty egregious use of force to me. Or, they 'll walk. I'm too tired to care actually.

  2. esteve7   10 years ago

    Statist: So you're saying the solution is to ban police scanners, right?

    1. All-Seeing Monocle   10 years ago

      Not ban them, no, that would be silly.

      Just some reasonable, common-sense regulations about who can own them.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Too many of them already out there.

        But, I believe the po-po are moving to spread-spectrum radio which renders old-school scanners worthless.

        1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

          The new ones are expensive

        2. JSpey   10 years ago

          My county just switched to encrypted radios. The reason? You guessed it, officer safety of course.

          http://www.ifiberone.com/news/.....c771a.html

  3. SugarFree   10 years ago

    You know what would be *really* fucked up but not entirely outside the realm of possibility (IMO)? The BLM activist in the car, who shot the first video, having some sort of altercation with Sterling and precipitating his death/initiating force/invoking escalation.

    1. bacon-magic   10 years ago

      He swatted him? That would be very fucked up, almost Clintonesque.

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Being clear, I'm spitballing hypotheticals rather than attempting to prognosticate facts not in evidence. I think it would mostly be a 'trial in the court of public opinion' sort of thing, but anything that they charge people with SWATting for; false report, conspiracy, misscarriage/obstruction, hoax...

        More to my point, cops staging/fabricating a 911 call to roll up on and kill a petty criminal seems like a lot of hassle and risk, both criminal and physical, for not a lot of (apparent/currently obvious) payoff. Meanwhile, getting a patsy executed and while you sit back and film the whole thing to advance your political cause seems like a crystal clear conspiracy theory practically begging to be perpetrated if it hasn't already.

        1. Brett L   10 years ago

          I'm pretty sure the 911 call was real. And I think the guy did have a gun. Its the part where they roll out of their patrol car, throw him, down, sit on him, then shoot him. Especially the part where they shoot him while sitting on him and controlling his arms, that I believe to be illegal and wish would stop immediately.

        2. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Why would the cops fabricate a call just to grease somebody? They don't need a call for that. They just need, not a reason, maybe more of an urge.

        3. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Why would the cops fabricate a call just to grease somebody? They don't need a call for that. They just need, not a reason, maybe more of an urge.

        4. junyo   10 years ago

          Thing is, that conspiracy theory only works if you can be assured that the police are bad at their jobs, and will escalate needlessly and initiate force....

          ...okay, yeah. Carry on.

    2. Riven   10 years ago

      SugarFree, I expect better from you. You have got to be kidding.

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Or, at the very least, getting someone killed in a quasi-legal fashion and then branding yourself as innocent in the court of public opinion by declaring yourself to be a part of the BML movement seems just as predictable as cops getting a call about a violent felon and him ending up dead.

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          IT DUN WHUT BE A COSPRINACY

      2. RBS   10 years ago

        You might want to search one of the earlier threads...

        1. SugarFree   10 years ago

          Aw, man. I was just getting warmed up.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

            Get a load of this guy, thinking he was on the ground floor of something.

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              Like you're getting anything but the steak knives.

              1. Riven   10 years ago

                Night of the long (steak) knives. Could be a good time.

          2. Warty   10 years ago

            You got the right tone, though. "Idiot using lots of words like he thinks smart people must" isn't easy to imitate.

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              Oh, I can't take credit...

              1. Warty   10 years ago

                IT WUZ TEH NIGGERS ALL ALONG

          3. RBS   10 years ago

            You know, right as I hit submit I realized I probably shouldn't.

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              No one wants Riven thinking badly of us.

              1. Riven   10 years ago

                I could never think any worse of any of you than I already do.

                Then again, I'm pretty comfortable here, so what's that say?

                1. SugarFree   10 years ago

                  That you are ours now. Welcome.

                  1. Riven   10 years ago

                    The song of my people

                  2. Azathoth!!   10 years ago

                    Gooble, gobble, gooble, gobble!

                    one of us!

  4. Adans smith   10 years ago

    I'm sure those body cams were held on by the finest scotch tape money can buy.

    1. SugarFree   10 years ago

      And still would have recorded the oh so important "we haven't seen what led up to this!!111!!!" part of the murder, but once they fell off, I guess they exploded or something.

    2. RBS   10 years ago

      I imagine they just hit them with the glue stick a couple of times and slap them on wherever.

    3. Tonio   10 years ago

      And I'm sure that the cam manufacturer, knowing the conditions in which the cameras would most likely be used, used a shoddy, substandard clip prone to falling off.

    4. Chipwooder   10 years ago

      No need. A wad of chewed gum is the preferred method.

    5. Spartacus   10 years ago

      I haven't looked at any of the video...I wonder if you can see the officers' body cams and see whether or not they actually fell off. Probably can't see that level of detail, but if you could tell whether they were actually wearing their cams or not that would be helpful.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The officers involved with Sterling's death...

    Come on. We're all adults here. You can say it.

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      I was involved with taking a dump this morning. The details are a little fuzzy.

      1. Riven   10 years ago

        Fuzzy? You should probably get checked.

        1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

          The Kefir was past the sell by.

  6. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

    "The officers involved with Sterling's death ? Blane Salamoni and Howie Lake ? were both wearing body cameras, but both claim their cams "fell off" during the altercation. "

    Fine. Show me footage of the cameras falling off. You have footage of that, right? RIGHT?

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      That is a damn good question. Show us the footage you do have.

      1. Adans smith   10 years ago

        The scotch tape has to go across the lens to hold the cam on.

      2. R C Dean   10 years ago

        "I always carry the body cam in my pocket. The sergeant told me I had to have it on me, but if it got lost or damaged it was coming out of my paycheck, so I figured my pocket was the best place for it."

  7. bacon-magic   10 years ago

    Turns out a bum swatted Alton...

    1. Playa Manhattan.   10 years ago

      I'm not sure if swatted is the right word.

      1. bacon-magic   10 years ago

        My bad, I was running with SF's conspiracy mockery above.

    2. mad.casual   10 years ago

      mad.casual|7.7.16 @ 1:17PM|#

      *tips spangenhelm appreciatively*

      I left off the part where the local crooked public official, tired of dealing with the BLM movement, orchestrates the whole thing.

  8. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    They're not going to jail

  9. Uncle Jay   10 years ago

    How Local Anti-Violence Activists Brought the Alton Sterling Shooting Video to the Public
    A group founded by a former gang member brought transparency to the shooting after officers' body cams "fell off."

    We must always give police officers the benefit of the doubt when they are busy shooting people.
    Otherwise the police might be held accountable for their actions.
    That would be the first step toward dismantling our beloved police state.
    I couldn't sleep at night knowing there isn't an army of police watching me and everything I do and say.

  10. The Fusionist   10 years ago

    I think I understand why the initial police reports in these cases are so miminalist - before committing to a particular story they want to know if there are any independent videos out there which might contradict the official account and make everything awkward.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Most Americans Hate Trump's Tariffs

Jack Nicastro | 2.6.2026 4:54 PM

The Trump Administration Is Taking Credit for a Long-Running Murder Decline

Alexandra Stinson | 2.6.2026 3:48 PM

American Presidents Shouldn't Endorse Foreign Political Candidates

Matt Welch | 2.6.2026 3:15 PM

Once Again, a Federal Judge Orders ICE To Stop Unlawful Warrantless Arrests

Autumn Billings | 2.6.2026 3:02 PM

Judge Orders Video and Texts Unsealed in Case of Chicago Woman Shot 5 Times by Border Patrol

C.J. Ciaramella | 2.6.2026 2:18 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks