Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Heather and Joe Kachinske

Donate

Pornography

Spanking Website Wins Battle Against British Web Censors

The U.K. Office of Communications has ruled in favor of feminist pornographer Pandora Blake and her site DreamsOfSpanking.com.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.6.2016 11:12 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

@pandorablake/Twitter

Feminist porn producer and adult performer Pandora Blake has triumphed over British video regulators who banned her spanking website last summer. Blake describes the site, Dreams of Spanking, as a space devoted to "ethically-produced BDSM pornography" that prioritizes "gender diversity" and "enthusiastic consent."

The site was taken down by the British Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) in August 2015, pursuant to the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations (AVMS) of 2014. The new rules prohibited the depiction of certain sexual activity—included spanking, female ejaculation, and various BDSM acts—in TV and internet video-on-demand services. Blake and her friend Nimue Allen, also a fetish pornographer and performer, were active in speaking out against and raising money to fight these regulations.

"It's interesting that this site—which was doing visible and innovative work to raise the standard of ethical porn production in the UK BDSM industry—was the one ATVOD decided to make an example of," Blake wrote in a December 2014 post on her personal blog. "Is their aim to reduce harm—or to stifle free speech?"

Blake appealed to the U.K. Office of Communications (OFCOM). On Monday, the OFCOM published a ruling in her favor, holding that dreamsofspanking.com did not fall unter ATVOD's jurisdiction. "The site was not a video-on-demand service and therefore it was not subject to regulation," stated the OFCOM decision. 

ATVOD "had been widely criticised for acting against sites outside its remit and… campaigners also said it disproportionately acted against websites run by women," reports The Guardian. In fact, the "quango"—British for a quasi-governmental administrative body such as ATVOD—was recently stripped of its regulatory powers. 

Dreams of Spanking, which has been down since August 27, 2015, "will be reinstated very soon," Blake promised in a June 6 blog post.   

"The point of Dreams of Spanking was to make ethical porn based on my own fantasies," Blake stated. "I'm not ashamed of being kinky and there's no harm in adults sharing consensual BDSM films. The AVMS regulations effectively criminalised my sexuality. I was singled out because I criticised the new laws. ATVOD tried to shut me up, but they failed."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: May 2016 Was the Second Warmest May in the Satellite Record: Global Temperature Update

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PornographyCensorshipUnited KingdomSex WorkInternetSexFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

    You wanna have fun with a feather?

    No way! Let's use the whole chicken!

    1. geo1113   10 years ago

      Now that is fucking funny.

      1. Scarecrow & WoodChipper Repair   10 years ago

        Or funny fucking.

    2. Mainer2   10 years ago

      What's the difference between kinky and perverted, Alex.

  2. Idle Hands   10 years ago

    Looks like she won by a nose.

    1. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

      You never see the front side of her.

  3. Citizen X   10 years ago

    British porn star looks British.

    1. Quixote   10 years ago

      Let's not read too much into this decision. The mere fact that this particular site was technically not subject to regulation, does not mean that there is anything acceptable about the depiction of spanking or other offensive acts in forums that can be viewed by thousands of innocent people. Hopefully this loophole will be closed soon, just as we have closed certain loopholes that might once have allowed crime to masquerade as "parody" in New York. See the documentation of America's leading criminal "satire" case at:

      http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

  4. Citizen X   10 years ago

    British porn star looks British.

    1. geo1113   10 years ago

      Must be the teeth.

  5. Sevens   10 years ago

    Blake describes the site, Dreams of Spanking, as a space devoted to "ethically-produced BDSM pornography" that prioritizes "gender diversity" and "enthusiastic consent."

    Oh for fuck's sake, someone spank her.

    1. geo1113   10 years ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rXFhHM3x4A

      1. Mainer2   10 years ago

        can't follow the link at work, but let me guess...is there a grail shaped beacon involved ?

        1. geo1113   10 years ago

          You are on the right track but I got the short version.

  6. Mint Berry Crunch   10 years ago

    The new rules prohibited the depiction of certain sexual activity?included spanking, female ejaculation

    That's obviously a problematic rule. If a pre-operative transwoman ejaculates from "her" penis, isn't that "female ejaculation"?

    1. SugarFree   10 years ago

      The ruling on the field says... Yes.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

        I want to see the replay.

        1. Caput Lupinum   10 years ago

          ...in slow motion.

  7. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

    "The site was not a video-on-demand service and therefore it was not subject to regulation," stated the OFCOM decision.

    In other words, they weaseled out of addressing the question on a technicality.

    1. Robert   10 years ago

      If you call assuming power they didn't have a technicality.

    2. Sevens   10 years ago

      Great law.

  8. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

    And...I see someone beat me to the Monty Python joke again.

    1. geo1113   10 years ago

      Working from home gives me a certain amount of freedom to fuck off.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        Working from home gives me a certain amount of freedom to fuck off spank the monkey.

        FTFY

        1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

          Related.

          1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

            (And British to boot.)

            1. geo1113   10 years ago

              Also, The Office is better with Ricky Gervais.

    2. Sevens   10 years ago

      And...I see someone beat me to the Monty Python joke again.

      The correct term is "spank".

  9. Rich   10 years ago

    Does Pandora spank with her nose?

    1. Mainer2   10 years ago

      Rule 34 ?

  10. Mainer2   10 years ago

    Welly well well, Miss Pandora, have we been a naughty girl then ?

  11. Rich   10 years ago

    A portion of stores for GM's luxury division will become showrooms with virtual-reality headsets and no cars

    Will this technology allow you to virtually spank -- I mean, *kick* -- the tires?

  12. Feminist Killjoy   10 years ago

    I'm sure there are comments in some of those links from people wanting to protect this woman from cultural pressure that causes her fantasies and that if she were a real feminist she'd realize how oppressed she is. Women who get a kick out of pretending to be dominated by a man are just suffering from patriarchy brain! Fantasies are the true Freudian insight into what you really want!

    1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      Never really understood what's the problem with a strong, independent-minded woman wanting a similarly strong and independent man in her life. Or, for that matter, a quiet and unassuming woman wanting a masculine foil.

    2. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Hey, check this out.

      Too bad you need a subscription to read the full article, because I can't quite tell whether this is pro or con.

      1. Feminist Killjoy   10 years ago

        Yeah, can't tell from the abstract and the fact that the articles citing it are about Fifty Shades of Grey doesn't help. It's the kind of thing I find very interesting to read research on for some reason, even though I don't have an opinion beyond women are people and can do what they want without having to worry if their individual choices are letting down feminism.

    3. Sevens   10 years ago

      Is it pretending?

  13. ScarlettThomas   10 years ago

    Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income... You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection... Make $98 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up... You can have your first check by the end of this week...

    ____________________________ http://www.earnmore9.com

    1. Robert   10 years ago

      Does it involve making spank porn?

      1. Certified Public Asshat   10 years ago

        You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection

        Yes, sounds like it.

  14. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

    "Let's play businessperson and EU bureaucrat."

    "Naw, too hard-core for me, let's just do some flogging."

  15. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

    I'll be in my bunk...

  16. The Immaculate Trouser   10 years ago

    Feminist porn producer

    LOL

    Blake describes the site, Dreams of Spanking, as a space devoted to "ethically-produced BDSM pornography" that prioritizes "gender diversity" and "enthusiastic consent."

    But is it also locally-sourced?!

  17. JW   10 years ago

    Spanking? And then the oral sex?

    I will face the peril.

    1. WuzYoungOnceToo   10 years ago

      No, it's too perilous.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Brits to Blake: Paddle Your Wares Elsewhere

  19. WuzYoungOnceToo   10 years ago

    "Spank you very much, M'lud."

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 633 donors, we've reached $462,926 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

French Study on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Finds a Drop in Severe COVID—and No Increase in Deaths

Ronald Bailey | 12.5.2025 4:25 PM

Warner Bros. Accepts Netflix's $83 Billion Bid, but Antitrust Threats Still Loom

Jack Nicastro | 12.5.2025 3:36 PM

Reason Webathon Woodchips Through $400,000 Goal Before the Halfway Point!

Matt Welch | 12.5.2025 2:20 PM

The 'Threat' That Supposedly Justified Killing 2 Boat Attack Survivors Was Entirely Speculative

Jacob Sullum | 12.5.2025 1:45 PM

What America Can Learn From Japanese Housing

Andrew Heaton | 12.5.2025 11:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks