Spanking Website Wins Battle Against British Web Censors
The U.K. Office of Communications has ruled in favor of feminist pornographer Pandora Blake and her site DreamsOfSpanking.com.

Feminist porn producer and adult performer Pandora Blake has triumphed over British video regulators who banned her spanking website last summer. Blake describes the site, Dreams of Spanking, as a space devoted to "ethically-produced BDSM pornography" that prioritizes "gender diversity" and "enthusiastic consent."
The site was taken down by the British Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) in August 2015, pursuant to the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations (AVMS) of 2014. The new rules prohibited the depiction of certain sexual activity—included spanking, female ejaculation, and various BDSM acts—in TV and internet video-on-demand services. Blake and her friend Nimue Allen, also a fetish pornographer and performer, were active in speaking out against and raising money to fight these regulations.
"It's interesting that this site—which was doing visible and innovative work to raise the standard of ethical porn production in the UK BDSM industry—was the one ATVOD decided to make an example of," Blake wrote in a December 2014 post on her personal blog. "Is their aim to reduce harm—or to stifle free speech?"
Blake appealed to the U.K. Office of Communications (OFCOM). On Monday, the OFCOM published a ruling in her favor, holding that dreamsofspanking.com did not fall unter ATVOD's jurisdiction. "The site was not a video-on-demand service and therefore it was not subject to regulation," stated the OFCOM decision.
ATVOD "had been widely criticised for acting against sites outside its remit and… campaigners also said it disproportionately acted against websites run by women," reports The Guardian. In fact, the "quango"—British for a quasi-governmental administrative body such as ATVOD—was recently stripped of its regulatory powers.
Dreams of Spanking, which has been down since August 27, 2015, "will be reinstated very soon," Blake promised in a June 6 blog post.
"The point of Dreams of Spanking was to make ethical porn based on my own fantasies," Blake stated. "I'm not ashamed of being kinky and there's no harm in adults sharing consensual BDSM films. The AVMS regulations effectively criminalised my sexuality. I was singled out because I criticised the new laws. ATVOD tried to shut me up, but they failed."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You wanna have fun with a feather?
No way! Let's use the whole chicken!
Now that is fucking funny.
Or funny fucking.
What's the difference between kinky and perverted, Alex.
Looks like she won by a nose.
You never see the front side of her.
British porn star looks British.
Let's not read too much into this decision. The mere fact that this particular site was technically not subject to regulation, does not mean that there is anything acceptable about the depiction of spanking or other offensive acts in forums that can be viewed by thousands of innocent people. Hopefully this loophole will be closed soon, just as we have closed certain loopholes that might once have allowed crime to masquerade as "parody" in New York. See the documentation of America's leading criminal "satire" case at:
http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/
British porn star looks British.
Must be the teeth.
Oh for fuck's sake, someone spank her.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rXFhHM3x4A
can't follow the link at work, but let me guess...is there a grail shaped beacon involved ?
You are on the right track but I got the short version.
That's obviously a problematic rule. If a pre-operative transwoman ejaculates from "her" penis, isn't that "female ejaculation"?
The ruling on the field says... Yes.
I want to see the replay.
...in slow motion.
"The site was not a video-on-demand service and therefore it was not subject to regulation," stated the OFCOM decision.
In other words, they weaseled out of addressing the question on a technicality.
If you call assuming power they didn't have a technicality.
Great law.
And...I see someone beat me to the Monty Python joke again.
Working from home gives me a certain amount of freedom to fuck off.
Working from home gives me a certain amount of freedom to fuck off spank the monkey.
FTFY
Related.
(And British to boot.)
Also, The Office is better with Ricky Gervais.
The correct term is "spank".
Does Pandora spank with her nose?
Rule 34 ?
Welly well well, Miss Pandora, have we been a naughty girl then ?
A portion of stores for GM's luxury division will become showrooms with virtual-reality headsets and no cars
Will this technology allow you to virtually spank -- I mean, *kick* -- the tires?
I'm sure there are comments in some of those links from people wanting to protect this woman from cultural pressure that causes her fantasies and that if she were a real feminist she'd realize how oppressed she is. Women who get a kick out of pretending to be dominated by a man are just suffering from patriarchy brain! Fantasies are the true Freudian insight into what you really want!
Never really understood what's the problem with a strong, independent-minded woman wanting a similarly strong and independent man in her life. Or, for that matter, a quiet and unassuming woman wanting a masculine foil.
Hey, check this out.
Too bad you need a subscription to read the full article, because I can't quite tell whether this is pro or con.
Yeah, can't tell from the abstract and the fact that the articles citing it are about Fifty Shades of Grey doesn't help. It's the kind of thing I find very interesting to read research on for some reason, even though I don't have an opinion beyond women are people and can do what they want without having to worry if their individual choices are letting down feminism.
Is it pretending?
Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income... You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection... Make $98 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up... You can have your first check by the end of this week...
____________________________ http://www.earnmore9.com
Does it involve making spank porn?
You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection
Yes, sounds like it.
"Let's play businessperson and EU bureaucrat."
"Naw, too hard-core for me, let's just do some flogging."
I'll be in my bunk...
LOL
But is it also locally-sourced?!
Spanking? And then the oral sex?
I will face the peril.
No, it's too perilous.
Brits to Blake: Paddle Your Wares Elsewhere
"Spank you very much, M'lud."