Brickbat: What You Don't Know


Six years ago, a Tennessee grand jury indicted pastor David Hoschar on a charge of sexual exploitation of a minor after law enforcement officers testified that someone at his IP address had downloaded child porn. What the officers didn't tell the grand jury is that neither of the computers they seized from his home had any actual child porn on it. Nor did they mention that their own experts concluded that the computers had not been scrubbed. Nor did they tell them that Hoschar's router was not secured so someone else could have downloaded the porn. Prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges. But a federal appeals court has just thrown out Hoschar's lawsuit against the officers saying they have "absolute immunity."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Absolute immunity my ass.This was false imprisonment and perjury,I'm sure he spent sometime in jail waiting..The king's men need to be held to account. I'm Tom Cotton approves though,not enough people in prison.
Where's Danny Glover when you need him to revoke stuff like that?
+1 old guy six shooter
Yeah, no.
"I mean, I don't even know how people who suffer consequences for their actions even do it. So glad I don't have that problem. Makes my job sooooo much easier."
"But no matter what I do, my life is untouched, right? Phew, thank goodness."
Having met a couple of Federal Prosecutors in real life.... they can certainly talk that talk when need be. But that is not their true attitude. In my experience they do not view their responsibility in any way that resembles "you need to believe the person is guilty beyond any doubt."
Their viewpoint is 100% "what can I sell in a courtroom?" They'll use the word "prove" instead of "sell", but that's what they really mean. They live by the a cowboy bravado that says "I can get a conviction on this scumbag."
Sure, if for some reason they felt a level of sympathy for the person - maybe he went to the same law school - they might give him the benefit of the doubt. But other than that, they'll take a pile of evidence that weighs 90 to 10 against conviction into court, as long as they think they can get most of the 90% excluded. Winning is the only thing that matters. If they have someone that they know for sure is guilty, but they think the evidence is going to be hard to sell in court, then they'll back off. They don't like to lose. They are winners! Guilty or innocent is irrelevant. Deserve's got nothing to do with it. All that matters is what can I sell in court.
At least that was my experience with a small sample size.
My best friend's ex-wife makes $95/hr on the laptop. She has been unemployed for 6 months but last month her income with big fat bonus was over $15000 just working on the laptop for a few hours.
Read more on this site.--------------------------- http://www.earnmore9.com
Not the article to be advertising your porn career, spambot.
" But a federal appeals court has just thrown out Hoschar's lawsuit against the officers saying they have "absolute immunity."
That's not good.
There is a war on cops. One rooted in pure intellectualism. It doesn't take a genius to understand that any thing or persons granted 'absolute immunity' begs for trouble.
In case you want more of everyone's favorite fraud...
You are a sentimental fellow.
I'm not clicking on that link unless you can assure me there's no Dunphy in it. I have a severe Dunphy allergy.
And how does it get this far - like some people have no idea what an IP address is or how the technology works. It's like a bank robbery where all they have is the getaway car's tag number and it's yours. That's enough for suspicion - but anybody could have stolen your tag, made a fake tag with your number, stolen your car, used your car. There's no proof at all there just from the tag number that you robbed the bank.
But a grand jury only hears what the prosecutor wants them to hear and there's no obligation to let the jury hear any arguments against an indictment. It's up to the grand jury to ask questions about what the prosecutor is telling them - but they don't. And depending on the jurisdiction, the grand jury is stacked and the foreman may well be a cop or related to somebody in the prosecutor's office.
The cops are lazy, the prosecutor is not acting in good faith, the grand jury doesn't understand its role, the judge (quite likely a former prosecutor) knows most defendants are guilty whether or not the cops made a good bust or the prosecutor presented a clean case - and this is what happens. The system is rigged with no actual checks on abuse. The informed jury movement doesn't go far enough if they're not keying on grand juries and how they work - that's the one place regular citizens have a direct voice in how the system operates.
Blah Blah Blah Blah. How many times are we going to come here with our lower case "l" libertarian outrage and say "Wrong! These guys need to be held accountable!" It's the same old damn thing a dozen times a day here on Reason. Kudos to the court for bringing it out in the open by stating point blank that pigs have "absolute immunity", no matter their crimes against decent people. This is a fucking fight we will never ever win under any circumstances and I am just sick of it. I'm done.
Buy an AR, ammo, and gold. Learn how to use the AR well. Wait.
Best use of your time. Fun, too.
It's just been revoked!
I didn't think that cops ever had absolute immunity, it is at best qualified immunity.
This suit however was against the prosecutors who presented the case to the grand jury, they can have absolute immunity for any function/action that was directly related legal prosecution.
This statement should be corrected in the article.
BTW, here is a link to the copy of that decision, still being processed likely before publication:
http://media-cdn.timesfreepres.....686475.pdf
good Once placed up, you'll discover Issue Royale in the All Apps section. Clashroyale PC Download For your comfort, we include received furthermore shielded Clashroyale on PC nice.
It is quite simple to use the wireless connection in case your Computer had a wireless network adapter. To setup the wireless router appropriately, all you have to do will be to stick to the consumer guide. The directions will be supplied in printed format as well as in a compact disc. You can download the application from the web on top of that.
David Frans
19216821ip.com
If you want to change your router settings in an effort to protect your current network, you must know the right IP address and sign in details.At the same time, if you think somebody has compromised your network this is the place to look for a resolution.We hope you have discovered a little more about the main advantages of the default IP address and why you should find out more concerning it.
Mauer Mattice from
IP Address Definition.com
Now, coming to the Showbox app, this is another superb app developed for movie lovers who want to get a better experience of watching movies and tv show on a bigger screen with more detailings.
And one of those applications is Showbox apk app. It is one of the best online streaming application for watching Movies and TV Shows. In the starting, this application has been released for only a few of the mobiles and allows users to watch shows online.