California Republicans to Enjoy Brief, Fleeting Moment of Relevance
The combative GOP primaries put the state into play.


While it's true that California has essentially become a single party state in Sacramento, there are still plenty of Republicans scattered around (particularly inland). They don't get much love and don't have all that much influence on state government, but they do have representation in Congress (and just as with the coastal Democrats, the state's top-two election runoff system helps entrench single party domination in those areas).
Because the Republican Party's primaries are such a huge fight this election, it means that California's vote in June actually matters. The way the delegate math works out could hand Donald Trump the delegates he needs, or it could guarantee a contested Republican convention. From the Associated Press:
California's primary amounts to 54 separate races on a single day—one in every congressional district across the sprawling, diverse state, and one statewide. The winner in each district collects three delegates; then, the candidate who gets the largest number of votes statewide claims a bonus of 13 more.
That means a solidly Democratic district covering the heavily Hispanic neighborhoods east of downtown Los Angeles has the same importance as one in the traditional Republican heartland of Orange County, once the home of Richard Nixon.
Republicans account for a paltry 7 percent of the voters in the 13th Congressional District, which includes Oakland. But it awards three delegates to the winner, just like the 22nd District, a Republican fortress in the state's farm belt.
Polls have Trump ahead of Ted Cruz at the moment in California, but there are some factors in the state working against Trump. First, in California, the political parties get to decide whether or not to have open primaries. The Democratic Party primaries are open, but the Republican Party primaries are closed. You have to register as a Republican in order to vote for their candidates, denying Trump some possible cross-over or independent voters. There's also, beyond the typical Republican Party establishment loyalists, a significant number of Mormon and evangelical conservatives in the inland parts of the states. The percentages may be low compared to other states, but since we're talking about California, the flat numbers add up.
But working in Trump's favor, there are areas where the population demographics fit right into the wheelhouse of his voters. California was hit extremely hard by the recession and collapse of the housing bubble and some areas have not recovered. As Ron Bailey noted after Super Tuesday, Trump tends to win among Republican voters in those areas. If you check out the map Bailey references in his piece, once you look away from the coastal communities, California's inland looks as distressed as parts of the south (as does Arizona, which Trump won handily).
There is a lot of room for Cruz to maneuver in California and get those poll numbers up, but given that it's not a "winner-takes-all" state, the most likely end scenario is that nobody will run away with all the delegates. California won't stop Trump's march, but Cruz and even John Kasich can use the state to keep Trump from hitting the delegate threshold.
So California Republicans can look forward to actually being courted for their votes. The last time this happened was back in 2008 when California moved its primaries earlier to Super Tuesday. California helped Sen. John McCain secure the Republican nomination.
And then they can "look forward" to their votes completely not mattering in November when the state overwhelmingly votes for whomever the Democratic nominee is. Though it's interesting to note that while the state's Republican Party has been losing membership, they're not trading sides and joining the Democrats. They're declaring their independence from party membership entirely, making it harder to predict where they might go in the fall. Those are the kind of voters Trump lives for.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
California helped Sen. John McCain secure the Republican nomination.
Keep up the good work, folks.
The only thing I'll go throw my vote away for are the props legalizing weed and repealing the death penalty.
Hey, I contributed to Ron Paul's 4% haul here in the primary.
This is going to hurt
The National Enquirer Does Ted Cruz
um probably not. Nobody takes that rag seriously.
I'm surprised they're still in business.
They got John Edwards right.
when your paper accuses everyone of having an affair, they'll probably be right a couple of times. It's science.
Gary Hart too.
You'll miss 100% of the cheap shots you don't take.
I really don't buy it. The guy's been planning to be president for the last 6 years. There's no way that this wouldn't come out if it was true.
I have hear rumors that this is well known (not the details) in DC.
Then it must be true! Do you know many DC rumors I've heard that have turned out to be complete bollocks?
Well the National Enquirer has gotten two politics stories right. Gary Hart. John Edwards. This might be #3.
Politico had the rumors two weeks ago.
If it were true, then why on Earth didn't the Establishment knee-cap him after Iowa so Jeb! or Rubio could carry the day? Seriously, Jeb spent more on his campaign than the studios spend on a Michael Bay movie and they didn't bother to hire a couple of private eyes to look into Cruz?
Well that is a very good question. Maybe they all have secrets they want to hide - MAD. Trump brags about his affairs in his books. The dirt is going to roll off him.
Papers can get sued - even by politicians - for reckless disregard of the truth.
Man, sometimes we're terrible.
949? Speak for yourself now.
Yeah, the OC has plenty of Republicans.
Fuck this is boring
Check out this New Yawka over here who thinks the world revolves around Greenwich Village.
I second that vote for catapulting Greenwich Village into the sun.
I'm not overly-attached to it, but what's the beef with California's top-two system?
It makes sure that the general election is between two meaningful choices rather then a guaranteed win and a token runner. It also means that regardless of what letter (if any) is after your name, if you perform well enough in the primary you can get on the final ballot.
I'm curious what people's objections are.
Lots of handle hopping today, eh Tulpa?
It pretty much eliminates the possibility of any third party ever winning a seat. It did manage to squeeze out some entrenched assholes like Pete Stark though, so it's not all bad.
As opposed to all the seats they are winning now?
A chance no chance
#optimism
Apparently the greater than symbol is a microaggression and I'm on timeout.
This. I used to bother to vote. Now there's no point.
Because I'm effectively disenfranchised in the general election. Since it's been implemented, I've had the "choice" of two Democrats for both my State Senate and Assembly positions. I've started writing in Darryl Dixon for those seats.
I wonder if they would let him keep his crossbow in Sacramento.
I was thinking about this the other day. How would congrees be if we didn't have the popular vote for them. I don't know if I like the idea of the state house picking senators, but I'm also unsure about a preference vote or whatever you'd call it. How would that be better?
They don't get much love and don't have all that much influence on state government
Everything I read in the news about California carefully instructs that the Republicans are at the center of everything wrong with California.
I just switched my registration from Libertarian over to the GOP just to vote against Trump. There were only 5000 votes cast in my district in the 2012 GOP primary.
I also feel decidedly unclean.
I switched in 2008 to support Ron Paul (twice), for all the good that did. But at least it means I can vote for Cruz against Trump this time, before voting for Gary Johnson in the general election.
The Cruz campaign will be falling apart in the next 3 to 5 days.
Three of the women may have been identified and there could be a $500,000 bribe involved
http://classicalvalues.com/201.....-politics/