Justice Dept. Attempts to Block Newspaper Sale for the Absurdest of Reasons
Fears of media 'monopolies' over the joining of two chains that have separately declared bankruptcy


Here's how absurd federal antitrust interventions have become: Tribune Publishing Company, owner of the Los Angeles Times and several other newspapers, filed for bankruptcy at the height of the recession in 2008 as a result of a plunge in advertising and high debt. Freedom Communications, owner of the Orange County Register and the Riverside Press-Enterprise in Riverside County, California, has filed for bankruptcy twice, in 2009 and just last year, for similar reasons. It used to be a larger chain, built by noted libertarian R.C. Hoiles, but it has since sold off most of its publications.
Freedom Communications' latest bankruptcy has resulted in the company being auctioned off. Tribune Publishing won the bid with a $56 million offer.
Not so fast, said the Department of Justice. They're filing suit to stop the purchase because—and try not to laugh at this explanation—they're concerned about the creation of a newspaper monopoly in Orange and Riverside counties and the impact on advertising and subscription rates.
In 2016. For real:
According to the department's complaint, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times and the Register together account for 98 percent of newspaper sales in Orange County and the Los Angeles Times and Freedom's newspapers together account for 81 percent of English-language newspaper sales in Riverside County. Tribune's acquisition of its most significant competitor would give it a monopoly over newspaper sales in each county and allow it to increase subscription prices, raise advertising rates and invest less to maintain the quality of its newspapers.
"If this acquisition is allowed to proceed, newspaper competition will be eliminated and readers and advertisers in Orange and Riverside Counties will suffer," said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division. "Newspapers continue to play an important role in the dissemination of news and information to readers and remain an important vehicle for advertisers. The Antitrust Division is committed to ensuring that competition in this important industry is protected."
Wherever will advertisers go if newspapers raise their rates? Wherever they've been going since they stopped going to the newspapers over the past 15 years. Here's what the newspaper advertising revenue market looks like:

The Department of Justice is attempting to justify intervening by treating the newspaper market as something separate from the media environment as a whole. This reads like an analysis that came from a mass communications textbook that was published in the 1970s. And that's exactly how the Tribune's spokesperson responded to the L.A. Times:
"The Division is living in a time capsule, with a framework that predates the arrival of iPhones, Google, Facebook, and modern media outlets that are killing the traditional newspaper industry," spokeswoman Dana Meyer said in a statement. "It wasn't competition from the L.A. Times that forced the Register into bankruptcy. It was the Internet and related technology."
The Times also notes that the Justice Department has said that it doesn't have any issues with Freedom Communications being sold to Tribune's own competitors in the region, so the federal government is actively, intentionally or not, threatening the bottom line of a company that has already gone through bankruptcy once. And now they'll probably have to spend additional money fighting the DOJ.
Were Hoiles still around, he's probably be disappointed in the way things played out with his former media empire, but he'd be utterly repulsed at the idea that the federal government would exert the authority to determine who had the "right" to own and operate his newspapers. (Though he might also get a kick out of the generally liberal Times being thwarted by the consequences of government intervention in the economy.)
(Full disclosure: Prior to coming to work for Reason, I edited one of Freedom Communications' smaller California newspapers. It has since been sold off to another media company.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well, after stopping the dreaded buggy whip monopoly the antitrust division needs something to do.
Why would the govenment start paying attention to economics now? This feels unfair, dammit, and that's what matters!
First Amendment? Congress shall make no law regarding freedom of the press? Anyone? Buehler?
Exactly! They're *protecting* freedom of the press by preserving a duopoly to prevent a monopoly.
preserving a duopoly that is bankrupt and may end up with a noopoly.
Government is a nooooope-opoly.
That would be awesome! Imagine all of the opportunities this would create for small mom-and-pop newspaper businesses to finally gain some traction when they're no longer in the shadow of the corporate behemoths!
panopoly?
Momandpopopoly?
head directly to a bar, order a drink, and tell them it's on me.
The bartender asked me who the fuck Curt was, did not accept "Curt from the internet" as sufficient, and demanded I pay up front.
I swear! Whatever happened to the good old days. They should know that I'm good for it. I've got a great job working for Ammy Thomas512. I make more money weekly from the comfort of my house.
if all newspaper reporters would just register with the govt, then this ugliness could be avoided.
Bring back the fairness doctrine.
I wish they would. And then somebody could slip in a rider about college campuses. That person would be my hero.
Given the makeup of print and television media, do they need to?
I'm sure the government' top men didn't come to this decision lightly; they know best and we need to respect that. The government has a plan and people just need to trust in their wisdom.
Is this smart power at its best?
The idea that there have ever been any monopolies except those created by government itself is absurd to begin with.
The was the one created by Parker Brothers, plus the 10,000 themed variations.
Didn't most cities become one-paper towns long before the internet? Raising that concern now makes even less sense than you think.
Since PBS accounts for more that 81% of Public Television Sales in Riverside and 3,006 other counties in the US, it's high time the DOJ busted their monopoly by ordering its sale to Hoiles.
Fixed the typo before the commentariat could even rake you over the coals. You win this round, Shackford!
Jesse Walker pointed it out to me post-publishing. I actually stared at it before publishing and thought "absurdist" looked wrong, but couldn't quite figure out why because it's an actual word.
Most absurd?
This is a fair point. I don't know that "absurdest" is an actual word.
The merit of words should derive from their ability to effectively communicate an idea, not arbitrary technicality.
I'm always shocked to find out the Orange County Register still exists.
Start making more money weekly. This is a valuable part time work for everyone. The best part work from comfort of your house and get paid from $100-$2k each week.Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week. For more details Check this link??
========= http://www.ReportMax90.com
Forgive me but I am actually confused. What does government gain here? What's in it for them? They wouldn't, couldn't possibly be acting if they didn't benefit. Is it simply fees of some sort? They get more money by having two papers in town? Or is it like a petty personal vendetta, corrupt action by a local bureaucrat?
Empire building.
noted libertarian R.C. Hoiles,
No relation.
But are you related to RC Cola?
First off, Tribune Publishing is run by a moron. He bought the Shicago Sun-Times, ruined, it, and then bought the Tribune. It's quality is sinking fast. I don't know how the guy is getting the money.
And I consider all of that a good thing. This monopolist is ruining the properties he is buying. Eventually he will go bust and his papers will fold. Once these behemoth brands are gone for good, only then will anyone be able to compete with a not-so-well-funded start-up. The phoenix can't rise from the ashes if you put the fire out too soon.