When the Feds Leaned on Secure Email Company Lavabit, It Was Edward Snowden They Were After
Truth revealed in public due to government incompetence in unredacted court documents.
When in 2013 the secure email service Lavabit, run by Ladar Levison, bravely shut itself down in response to government demands for backdoor access to find info on one of its clients, the client in question was, it has now been revealed due to government incompetence, Edward Snowden, Wired tells us today (while implying all the cool kids in the field kinda already knew).
How we learned for sure:
With the Lavabit case long ended, Levison has kept fighting to get more of the documents unsealed and unredacted. He's been using money raised by supporters back in 2013 to fund the fight for transparency. He filed a motion in December asking an appeals court to unseal documents and vacate a non-disclosure order that has silenced him about the target.
It turns out he was a little more successful in that latter request than he thought he was—with a little help from a government error. After a hearing earlier this year, a court denied his motion to unseal and vacate but ordered US attorneys in the case to re-release all "previously filed pleadings, transcripts, and orders" with everything unredacted except "the identity of the subscriber and the subscriber's email address." After some negotiation, the government got the court to agree to let it redact other information as well that might harm its investigation into the target.
Then the government messed up. When the documents were re-posted to Pacer this month, Snowden's Lavabit email address was left unredacted in plain sight in an August 2013 document.
When asked for comment, Levison's lawyer Jesse Binnall told WIRED in a email that "due to the letter and spirit of the court's January 7, 2016 order, Lavabit has no further comment on the unredacted email address."
The unredacted address: Ed_Snowden@lavabit.com.
Nick Gillespie's recent interview with Snowden.
A Reason TV interview with Lavabit's Ladar Levison
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yeah, I thought we already knew this. (Which is also what I said when Snowden made his revelations.)
Hello!
Come on, your real name on this kind of email??
More seriously, I still have a hard time understanding why no one seems to care about this.
I don't know how far back Snowden was using Lavabit, but it's possible that Ed Snowden created that email before he knew or ever believed he'd be famous. There are lots of people that use their full names in their email.
It was mostly a joke. I use my full name in my email.
Just with a service like this, with encryption being the selling point, I would assume most people would use a handle of some type or another.
I agree, it seems kind of funny that Edward Snowden, a guy who was definitely aware of the Feds' reach used his full name.
I'm kind of a tradecraft guy myself so when it comes to email handles, I'd prefer to keep it as obscure as possible.
To each his own. I do have an email that is far off.
I have 4 emails: Work, personal, spam-catcher, and professional.
Work is myname at mywork.com, professional is myname at whatever.com, the others are handles. Using a handle for professional stuff is unprofessional.
My handle is SQRLSY One, but in real life, I am The Donald Trumpler, and I plan to Trumple all over yer liberties!
But PLEASE do NOT tell ANYONE who I really-really am!!!!
Do you even get a choice? When I was hired, it was "Welcome aboard! IT has set up an email account for you, it's firstinitial dot lastname at university dot edu" It's not like I could ask for "pussymonger@university.edu", as would be the accurate appellation.
Amusingly enough, back when I got an email account at college, it was different. Email was still a weird obscure thing used by very few people - they didn't give out accounts automatically, so you could choose your own username. One guy of my acquaintance chose "flirtman", which he came to regret when it came time to start applying for jobs.
Had an applicant who used "babygirl".
No see, I have a work email. I also have a professional email, for things like emailing resumes or bids. Then I have a personal one for friends, family, and derpbook.
Incidentally, my name is of Polish origin, so I can usually get myname@ at whatever.com I want. NOT LIKE STEVE SMITH
Come ON, now, "Diane Reynolds", we ALL know that ye are REALLY, in the real world, known as Preston Boophoo Bhuttcheacks the (III)d, of Phung Street, New Stunkistanistan, West Dakota... (Sorry to "out" ya, but it HAD to be done).
Ya think ya can HIDE in this Government Almighty-powered era? And POST on the web, fer Chrissakes?!?!?
Ya got another thing coming!
He really missed his shot to lock down eddie_snu-snu.
This was pretty obvious when it happened.
Still, though, it is amusing how the government let this slip.
It's exactly shit like this that gets my eyes rolling when someone says 9/11 was a government job, or they faked the moon landings. There is no way in hell those buffoons are competent enough to keep it a secret.
Some secrets get kept. Enigma was well kept for about 30 years.
I have never seen on line the secrets I was supposed to keep as a Naval Nuke. I have looked occasionally.
Well?
Dude - I'm on so many Federal lists for this and that bad opinion that I'm not even going to hint at it.
Okay, look. Replace the object in every sentence with kitten, and the subject with cradlefilth. And... go.
There's Crab People beneath the Earth's crust, isn't there?!
I have it on good authority that commodious is an FBI sock account. I wouldn't tell it anything if I were you.
Look, even *I* couldn't keep your dirty secrets secret. You're a sick bastard!
It's true. I read Sugarfree novellas while I'm on the toilet. I find it helpful.
'Scuse MEEEE... Secrets can NOT be kept, it is oblivious!
Look at MEEEE fer example! I can NOT even keep it secret, that in the near future, I will deploy my Secret Ultra-Weapon, AKA Booger-Beam, to throw Emperor Trump out of His Imperial Orrifice, and take over the Local Galactic Cluster!!!! (Because otherwise, the people will REVOLT!!! Look! They are REVOLTING already, as we speak!)
MMM-BWHA-ha-HAAA!!!!!!
Somehow the US got the Soviet Union to cooperate on the fake moon landings. When I find out how, that will prove the conspiracy.
Ed Snowden for president!
Q: how does the lay person know if their encryption is secure.
A: Without getting a PHd in computer engineering?
He makes an excellent point.
On a side note, it was Phil Zimmerman who was careful to point out that even computer scientists/programmers are not cryptographers, though many fancy themselves as such. He pointed out that really only mathematicians are capable of creating secure encryption. The computer engineer is largely responsible for making sure the encryption isn't weak at the endpoints or edges.
"Super great encryption you got there, too bad it sends keys in cleartext!"
I use my super secret decoder ring
Marvel Comics will have no issue cooperating with the FBI.
I like what Levison says about Net Neutrality. He takes a reasonable position.
Probably a Tulpa sock email account.
We are all Tulpa now, it is known.
What? I thought we were all Nick Gillespie.
So Snowden kept his email more secure than Hillary
This should be brought up as much as possible.
Hillary's email was perfectly secure. You were never going to see a single one, and she even had the server wiped. It wasn't until the evil federal government got involved that she had to start revealing what was going on. Had Hillary been more like Levison, we'd have never seen a single subject line, let alone email.
Secure from me sure. Secure from the Israelis and Russians?
I was trying to wrap up snark in a mystery and an enigma... or something.
*recalibrates sarc meter*
*standing ovation!*
Dude makes no sense at all man. Wow.
http://www.Anon-Net.tk
Look at that picture: Is Edward Snowden this Blue Libertarian guy I keep hearing about?