Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sex Trafficking

ACLU of Rhode Island Slams 'Sex Trafficking' Cops for Focusing on Consenting Adults

The chief result of the stings-which involved Homeland Security and the FBI-was the arrest of 14 sex workers and 14 men seeking sex from undercover cops.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 3.16.2016 3:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Cranston, RI Police Department/Facebook

Props to the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island (RIACLU), which is speaking out against old-fashioned prostitution stings disguised as "human trafficking busts." After 31 people were arrested in a recent sting operation around the city of Cranston, the RIACLU condemned the fact that "no fewer than eight law enforcement agencies were involved" in an operation that's chief result was the arrest of 14 people for "procuring sexual conduct for a fee" and 14 others on prostitution charges. In addition to Rhode Island police departments, the operation involved the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and the Rhode Island Human Trafficking Task Force.

"Law enforcement stings like this one often end up having little to do with trafficking, but a lot to do with embarrassing and penalizing consenting adults engaged in sexual conduct for a fee," said RIACLU Policy Associate Hillary Davis in a statement. "Conflating prostitution with trafficking does nothing to help the trafficking victims who remain ensnared while consenting adults are pursued and arrested." 

"By humiliating and charging johns for seeking consensual sex" and giving people "arrest records in the name of 'helping' them," operations like these mainly serve to make sex workers' lives "more difficult and dangerous, driving sex work even deeper into the shadows," Davis added. "We emphatically reject the notion that the only way these individuals can be helped is if they are first put into handcuffs."

The Cranston operation, like so many across the country, involved police posing as either sex workers or potential clients on the Internet and arresting those they reeled in. The people charged with trying to pay for sex had their names and pictures publicized widely by police. In total, agents from the Cranston Police Department, Homeland Security, and the rest of the vice supergroup arrested 14 sex workers, 14 "johns," and three individuals on other charges, including pandering and an outstanding bench warrant.

The remaining arrest was a 21-year-old female, who was charged with both prostitution and "human trafficking," according to a police press release. There is no specific charge of "human trafficking" in the Rhode Island criminal code, but because the alleged victim was a 16-year-old, the specific charged would likely be "sex trafficking of a minor." Cranston police did not respond to my call for more information Wednesday. But because the 21-year-old was charged with prostitution herself, it's a safe bet she was offering sexual services alongside the teen, also a female, rather than "trafficking" her in any meaningful way. Patch Cranston reports that both the 21-year-old and the teen arrived together at the sting location, where police were pretending to be a potential client; there is no mention of coercion or force. 

It's relatively common for barely-legal-themselves sex workers who work alongside teens to be charged under human trafficking statutes, since most states define sex trafficking a minor to include knowingly helping them sell sex in any way. There's no requirement for force, fraud, or coercion to come into play. Sex worker rights activists complain that this prevents young women from working in pairs for safety and actually increases the chances that vulnerable teens will wind up exploited by manipulative or violent traffickers. 

The Cranston police chief told Patch that if even one young person was saved, any number of sex-worker or john arrests are worth it. But it's a false dichotomy. There's no reason why helping underage victims requires arresting adult sex workers who are just trying to make a living and men whose only criminal acts involve communicating with the Cranston police. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Merrick Garland on Citizens United, the First Amendment, and Campaign Finance Regulation

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Sex TraffickingSex WorkDue ProcessPoliceSex CrimesACLURhode Island
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. HeteroPatriarch   9 years ago

    But going after violent criminals is hard!

    1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   9 years ago

      Since I suck at alt-text, I should probably just start making that the alt-text on all of these type stories...

      1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

        At least you are aware of your weakness.

    2. some guy   9 years ago

      Hard and dangerous. It's a good excuse to ask for more power and military surplus gear, though.

  2. Hyperion   9 years ago

    Did anyone think there was going to be any other outcome from all this new pants shitting? Since all of these notorious sex traffickers don't exist in reality, they have go after someone. The beast needs fed.

  3. swillfredo pareto   9 years ago

    Conflating prostitution with trafficking does nothing to help the trafficking victims

    What on Gaia's green earth could lead someone to believe the goal is to help "trafficking" victims?

    1. some guy   9 years ago

      Well, they keep talking about helping trafficking victims, so if you haven't been paying attention to actions and consequences I can see how you'd think that was the goal.

      1. DevilDocNowCiv   9 years ago

        Politics leads policing in almost all places. Human Trafficking is a staple of news and entertainment, and has been taught about for years as a large component of American sex business. So these cops may have believed it, and in fact even if Reason or its regular readership dont believe it, it still may be true.

  4. Restoras   9 years ago

    Yeah, but what's the Trump angle?

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      A masturbation euphemism?

  5. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   9 years ago

    The Cranston police chief told Patch that if even one young person was saved, any number of sex-worker or john arrests are worth it.

    Wait... A young person got saved? Or is he talking about the work the prison Chaplin will be doing?

  6. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

    RIACLU is my favorite Pokemon.

  7. R C Dean   9 years ago

    who was charged with both prostitution and "human trafficking," according to a police press release. There is no specific charge of "human trafficking" in the Rhode Island criminal code,

    Gives a whole new meaning to "we don't need no steenkin' laws".

  8. geral   9 years ago

    Meet the real fbi, if one dare:
    http://rochester.indymedia.org/node/147296

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Will AI Kill Our Freedom To Think?

Brendan McCord, Greg Lukianoff, and Philipp Koralus | 5.16.2025 8:59 AM

Trump's Plan to 'Unleash' Police Risks More Abuses of Everyone's Rights

Steven Greenhut | 5.16.2025 7:30 AM

Trump and Congress Target 'Efficiency' Rules That Hobble Home Appliances

J.D. Tuccille | 5.16.2025 7:00 AM

Review: The Rise of the 'Divorce Memoir'

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Prodigal Son

Charles Oliver | 5.16.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!