Illinois Libertarian Party Wins Court Victory for Easier Ballot Access
A 2012 lawsuit from the Illinois Libertarian Party (L.P.) has been resolved in their favor, with a decision for summary judgment on their behalf, reports Peoria Public Radio, making it easier for the L.P. to get on ballots without having to find candidates to run for a full slate of state offices or even county offices.

Existing Illinois law required third parties who hadn't achieved full legal ballot access, but not Democrats or Republicans, to run a full slate to get any state or country candidates on the ballot.
Illinois Libertarian Party Chair Lex Green said that:
defenders of the law use "high-minded language, to say 'We're trying to keep whackos and nut jobs from getting on the ballot.'
"Which I would argue that just because they have an R or D after their name doesn't mean they're any more sane or less so than the Libertarians," he says. "To me you can say whatever you want but it hides a political agenda. Because if you make the burden of getting on the ballot higher for somebody than for somebody else, then this is obviously unequal treatment under the law, which in my book is wrong … I personally think that it is all political maneuvering to keep the Democrats and Republicans in power in Illinois."
The order issued Friday by Judge Andrea R. Wood of the Northern District U.S. Court finds the full slate law unconstitutional. Her reasoning isn't yet known; a decision hasn't been published.
Richard Winger at the irreplaceable Ballot Access News site has more context on the history of Illinois' requirements, which came about to stymie the Communist Party back in 1931 when Illinois still had "cumulative voting" in state House races where voters had three votes they could distribute or concentrate among candidates as they pleased. They wanted to make sure that one Commie couldn't benefit unduly from concentrated votes.
Reason reported on the suit when it was filed back in 2012. A different federal judge from the beginning found the state's requirements questionable.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I hate Illinois Nazis."
Okie Skokie.
A 2012 lawsuit from the Illinois Libertarian Party (L.P.) has been resolved in their favor, with a decision for summary judgement on their behalf, reports Peoria Public Radio, making it easier for the L.P. to get on ballots without having to find candidates to run for a full slate of state offices or even county offices.
So I'd have to 1, move to Illinois to take advantage and 2, vote.
For a libertarian, those are pretty herculean hurdles.
A 2012 lawsuit from the Illinois Libertarian Party
And all this at a time when American's are eschewing party identity more than ever. That's like winning gay marriage right around the time people start losing interest.
So we can put you down as a Maybe for the "Not Totally Unfree State Project"?
From a link in Ballot Access News...
More nails in the Libertarian Moment coffin.
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/.....ry/2265530
As goes Florida, so goes the nation.
Dude that makes a ll kinds of sense man. Wow.
http://www.Anon-Net.tk
which came about to stymie the Communist Party back in 1931
And after all that, look at how many commies hold office in Illinois and the LP's still struggling.
It's not just Illinois.
"A 2012 lawsuit ..."
FOUR years? Justice delayed is justice denied.
If the Canadian Libertarian Party did this, it might restore some faith I had in them. Last election there was no Libertarian candidate for me to vote for.
Gotta love government inertia. A 1931 law made to keep communists from using a dumb 1870 voting system to score political points. The dumb 1870 system was finally replaced in 1982, but of course the 1931 reaction stayed around and it took another 30 years for someone to sue over it and 4 more years to decide a pretty obvious decision. So hey, only took 146 years to get things all fixed up.
Why is it a dumb voting system? The idea that you must put 100% of your support behind just one person seems stupid.
The technology is so developed that we can watch videos, live streaming, TV serials and any of our missed programs within our mobiles and PCs. Showbox
All we need is a mobile or PC with a very good internet connection. There are many applications by which we can enjoy videos, our missed programs, live streaming etc.