Martin O'Malley Marches Out of the Presidential Campaign
Martin, we hardly knew ye.

Not long after I moved to Baltimore in 2002, I met a reporter who was smitten with Mayor Martin O'Malley. She would go to his speeches even when she wasn't assigned to cover them, just because she really liked them. Nearly a decade and a half later, after the mayor-turned-governor entered the presidential race, I would periodically peek at the polls and figure that she was probably among the one to four percent of Democrats who supported his candidacy.
Or maybe she was for Hillary—she really liked the Clintons too. That's the O'Malley campaign for you: I'm not sure even the one true Martin O'Malley superfan I ever knew was planning to vote for him.
Either way, she won't get a chance now. After a pathetic performance in the Iowa caucus—the final numbers aren't in yet, but right now he's just barely ahead of "uncommitted"—Martin O'Malley is suspending his campaign. This isn't unexpected, except inasmuch as it wasn't clear how long it would take him to wise up and call it quits.
O'Malley had governed Baltimore and then Maryland as a corporate-liberal technocrat, yet was trying to run as an anti-establishment insurgent. This basic authenticity problem was bad enough on its own; it was worse still in a Democratic contest that already had both a corporate-liberal technocrat and an anti-establishment insurgent. As O'Malley alternately touted his executive experience and called for far-reaching federal programs, he tended to come across as a man wavering between being Clinton Lite and Sanders Lite.
Not surprisingly, there wasn't much demand for that. As I write these words, it still isn't clear whether Clinton or Sanders won tonight's caucus. But there's no question who finished last.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Best hair for a Democrat.
That's because he's the only Dem candidate that's not elderly.
Or who isn't overwhelmed when confronted by ten choices of comb.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Peter Principle reached in Iowa. Never should've got promoted past Baltimore, but better late than never.
As I write these words, it still isn't clear whether Clinton or Sanders won tonight's caucus. But there's no question who finished last.
O'Malley wasn't the only big loser tonight. As long as anybody won, we all lost.
Until the American people realize that liberty is all that matters, we will all lose.
They are 3 votes apart.
Well, delegates, no one is actually releasing a vote count that I've seen.
Still, I would have to do a search to figure out who in hell this guy is.
I've seen nothing to make me waste my time doing so; did the "The Rent's Too High" guy poll well? Not gonna waste my time there, either.
Not long after I moved to Baltimore in 2002, I met a reporter who was smitten with Mayor Martin O'Malley. She would go to his speeches even when she wasn't assigned to cover them, just because she really liked them...Or maybe she was for Hillary?she really liked the Clintons too.
How weird. I can't imagine that a journalist would have a rooting interest in politics. I wonder if there are others like her.