Peter Suderman on Michael Bay, Auteur of Awesome
I don't always like Michael Bay's movies (although sometimes I kind of love them), but even when I dislike one of his films I come away with a kind of respect for the force and consistency of his vision as a director, which is especially impressive given the commercial scale at which he works.
His latest, 13 Hours, which portrays the 2012 siege at a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya in Bay's typical over-the-top style, is smaller in scale and somewhat more restrained that his usual fare, but it is still very recognizably a Michael Bay movie in its tone and visual sensibility. And so I thought it would be a good opportunity to offer an appreciation of Bay's particular approach to moviemaking. Here's a sample:
More than anything else, Bay's movies, in particular the Transformers and Bad Boys films, are known for being big, loud, and dumb. His pictures are frequently lambasted by critics: Rolling Stone's Peter Travers once called Bay "the crassest hack in the business." And John Wilson, who founded the Golden Raspberry Awards — a.k.a. the Razzies, a sort of anti-Oscars designed to recognize especially terrible filmmaking — dismissed Bay (who has received four Worst Director Razzie nominations) as an inherently childish filmmaker. "He has this tendency to revert to the model of, 'It's Been 7 Minutes, Something Has to Blow Up Now,'" Wilson told Mother Jones in 2013.
Bay's most recent summer blockbuster, 2014's franchise reboot Transformers: Age of Extinction, scoring a dismal 18 percent rating on the movie review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. That's remarkably low even for a not particularly hyped summer release.
And yet Bay isn't simply crass and commercial; he's also a visionary with a clearly identifiable style and a tendency toward filmmaking that can be reasonably described as challenging and even experimental. In other words, he's an auteur — the author of a film — whose movies reflect a distinctive, personal sensibility.
Few filmmakers are as stylistically consistent as Bay, who recycles many of the same shots, editing patterns, and color schemes in nearly all of his films: He loves hot neon color contrasts (especially teal and orange), and his movies often appear to take place in a perpetual magic hour, with moody sunsets and sunrises looming in the background.
Bay is obsessed with motion and commotion, filling his frames with noise and activity and then moving the camera in ways that accentuate the chaos.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I stopped right there. You should have just started out the piece by saying "I hate awesome things."
I take back what I said...
Marry me, Suderman.
I absolutely hated Pain and Gain, though.
"His stories tend to be just as incoherent. This is especially true in the Transformers films, which feature the sort of disconnected narrative logic you'd expect from an 8-year-old playing with toys in a sandbox. Part of what's amazing about the movies is just how little sense they make when you try to break them down. (Here's one hilarious attempt.) They're so muddled that it cannot have been an accident. It had to have been by design."
Note: This paragraph comes from a DEFENSE of Michael Bay.
They're so muddled that it cannot have been an accident.
There's a whole lot of movies that you can say "its amazing about the movies is just how little sense they make when you try to break them down." A whole lot. I can't believe they are all by design, so if I'm gonna believe Bay is an exception to this rule, I'm going to need something else to go on.
The entire Fast and Furious series is muddled.
YOU'RE MUDDLED!
Next up from Suderman:
"Deep-Dish: the Pizza of Awesome."
Cut or Uncut, discuss.
A slice of pizza should bear a strong resemblance to an anteater.
(retching)
YEA! AT LAST AN HOMAGE TO A CHICAGO FAVORITE!
Fuck yeah! There is room in this world for more than one species of pizza.
Every Frame a Painting did a great video breaking down the visual vocabulary of Bayhem.
This from the linked hilarious review:
Why can only a Prime kill the Fallen? Why can Jetfire teleport? Why can the Fallen wave a staff and make shit fly around? Why do actual cars and Autobots get sucked into Devastator's maw, but John Turturro and that other kid can run around?
Because? because FUCK YOU, that's why.
He MUST be a reason commenter
Yeah, he probably didn't watch the video before commenting either.
huh?
I love Every Frame a Painting
It's the only one of those YouTube analysis shows I've seen that is actually insightful and interesting*. I watched some of that nerdwriter1 guy's videos and found it to be some of the lamest Serious, Insightful Analysis shows ever. (and needlessly political; his Children of Men video says nothing new and goes off the deep end about climate change)
*Unless RedLetterMedia counts, which I guess it should. But fuck everyone else.
You should check out No Small Parts. Really excellent series about character actors.
Hmm, thanks. I'm turned off by the guy declaring himself a character actor, but I'll check it out later.
Read the whole thing at Vox
*disappointed sigh, shakes head, resumes toiling in cheese mines*
Cheese mines? Is THAT why it has the holes in it?
"Bay isn't simply crass and commercial; he's also a visionary with a clearly identifiable style and a tendency toward filmmaking that can be reasonably described as challenging and even experimental?"
How much of this is Bay, and how much is actually Jerry Bruckheimer? I personally think the latter has a more-hilariously-cookie-cutter-style, and all Bay has ever done is add extra-explosions & slow-mo visuals to it.
"Read the whole thing at Vox"
No. That publication can't die soon enough.
It still amazes me at times (though I know it shouldn't) that critics dislike Bay for trying to take full advantage of a VISUAL MEDIUM. You want "story"? or "character development"? Go to the fucking "cinema".
I like popcorn, heroes and villains, aliens, and lots of SFX, particularly of the pyrotechnic variety.
One can dislike his style, but what he does, he does very well. He makes things go boom, in very colorful and loud ways. I am not saying Transformers (the first one is still my favorite) is one of the 10 films that should be preserved for all time or anything. But what the hell.
Philistine
*Wears the title proudly!*
😉
-1 Bicycle Thief.
Yeah, nothing wrong with straight up entertainment. It's not my favorite style of movie, but it does take skill and talent to produce.
What are you saying he does well? He tries to do comedy and it often falls VERY flat. His action can have some good images, but it often plays incoherently. The Transformer films barely have "heroes and villains," which implies some understanding of motives and obstacles. Rather, they have guys with authoritative voices and guys with evil voices. And they're so fucking looooong.
Now, The Rock is a movie where I think he does accomplish what he sets out to do, aided in large part by a decent script.
a Michael Bay movie in its tone and visual sensibility.
Do the American soldiers have spray tans?
What's interesting to me about Bay is that he seems to have a new desire to be taken seriously as a filmmaker, and he goes about it by imitating more respected auteurs. Pain and Gain was his attempt at a Coen brothers dark comedy. This looks like his take on a Michael Mann thriller; he even hired Mann's DP. It will be interesting to see if this continues.
(maybe you make this point in your review, but I'd rather not click on a Vox link)
Can we all at least acknowledge that Armageddon is the third greatest movie of all time? Can we at least do that?
I haven't seen it. No spoilers.
Read the book. It's better.
I don't know, that one just didn't have that deep of an impact on me
Well it didn't have a meteoric rise. But is sailed like a night of a comet in theaters.
( I feel liberated without Swiss's incessant gaze of smaller proportions )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeSUuj98Rx0
My wife hates Michael Bay with a passion for what he did to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
That's just good sense.
No.
Or as Sam from Transformers would say No. No no no. N-n-n-n-n-n-o. NOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I liked Pain and Gain. Not sure why it gets so much hate here.
On the other hand, does anyone think the studio brass greenlights a Michael Bay movie saying "This is just going to wow them at the Oscar committee!"? Bay doesn't make movies whose audience is the film cognoscenti. He makes movies mostly for little kids and people who like to watch things get blown up. And he serves that market quite well.