Why Is Hillary Throwing Obama's Core Legacy on Free Trade Under the Bus?
She was for the TPP before she was against it
President Obama stuck up for Hillary Clinton when the subject of E-mailGate came up on 60 Minutes — noting that

her private server hadn't jeopardized national security. But that doesn't mean that cutthroat Hillary is going to return the favor. Without compunctions, she has thrown the free trade agreement between America and Pacific Rim countries called the TPP under the bus even though it is supposed to be Obama's crowning legacy on the issue. What's more, she actually helped negotiate it, calling it the "gold standard" of trade deals.
Yet there she was during this week's presidential debate pulling a blatant switcheroo. Why was she doing it, asked Anderson Cooper? I can't, she said, "look in the eyes of any middle-class American and say 'this will help raise your wages.'"
But the fact of the matter is that if TPP is anything like NAFTA that her husband negotiated and she defended, then it'll actually help the middle-class, I note in my column at The Week. One would have expected NAFTA to result in the "giant sucking sound" of jobs fleeing to Mexico because labor unions had bid up wages of American workers to stratospheric heights.
But it didn't. Why?
Go here to find out.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
She's just too honest for that.
Without compunctions, she has thrown the free trade agreement between America and Pacific Rim countries called the TPP.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
It would be nice to see an actual free trade agreement someday. All of the supposed ones we have just seem to make more paperwork for exporting stuff. I suppose there are some lowered tariffs involved, but I don't see that end of it.
It would be nice to see an actual free trade agreement someday.
Hell, it would be nice to see the TPP someday.
This. I know my company is against TPP, and generally we're all about lower tariffs and freer trade. Cause we export AND import.
But what few facts we have do not look favorable. And I will never trust this (or prolly any) admin on "free" trade when they've proven to be such mendacious fucks who make up new meanings for words.
"But what few facts we have do not look favorable."
One of the facts being that he's keeping it secret. That alone is enough for me to oppose it; that lying pile of stuff has yet to deliver on *any* promise, so his word is NWS.
I agree
Cause we export AND import
You work for Vandelay Industries?
The Kochs, duh.
Yeah, all I've seen is one piece of evidence after another demonstrating that this thing is really all about micromanaging just about any economic decision an American makes.
Because she is trying to out-pander a Socialist.
In a nutshell
It's progressive vote gathering season. The votes are ripe on the tree, and it's just an easy matter of putting on your Pander Clothes and pulling them off the branches.
There's aways time to cook them into a Disappointment Pie after the election next fall.
President Obama stuck up for Hillary Clinton when the subject of E-mailGate came up on 60 Minutes ? noting that her private server hadn't jeopardized national security.
While his FBI is investigating. But maybe Hillary didn't like the IP stuff in the TPP.
Yep, no doubt Hillary is against it because it gives away too much to monied corporate interests. You know how much she hates those guys.
I'm not going there to find out. I'll just answer the question myself.
It's because she has no personality, character, principle or core beliefs beyond advancing her own political career. And she doesn't appear to be very good even at that anymore.
She has failed up for the last time. Fingers crossed.
Obama's Core Legacy on Free Trade
Holy crap, SHIKHA IS SHRIEK.
Mind = blown
What's next? Will Hilldog come out against Obama's brilliant market-based health insurance reform? Chaos!
"Why Is Hillary Throwing Obama's Core Legacy on Free Trade Under the Bus?"
"Why is a Reason Columnist Trolling Me with a Retarded Banner Headline?"
"Why is a Reason Columnist Trolling Me with a Retarded Banner Headline?"
It got you to comment, and therefore potentially see another page of ads, didn't it?
GODDAMNED CRONY CAPITALISTS!!!
*shakes fist*
Zeb and Dalmia, sitting in a tree....
She doesn't really seem like the tree climbing type.
Why is Hillary...?
She's hoping it gets her votes. It's really not that hard.
Holy shit that picture is amazing. In a horrific way.
They need to reprogram that thing and turn the enthusiasm down 40 percent.
No, they need to exhume Jim Henson to make The Dark Crystal 2 and cast Hillary as the head zombie Skeksis. Because that would be AWESOME. And they wouldn't even need makeup!
That hadn't occurred to me. But it does seem like the obvious thing now.
GELFLING?!?
See how perfect it is?!?
No, they need to find Hillary a woman to marry with green eyes so she can go off and rule the universe from beyond the grave, or check into a psycho ward, whichever comes first.
I'm a reasonable guy. But, I've just experienced some very unreasonable things.
What happened to all the good screenwriters, anyway?
Watched Outlaw Josey Wales with my father this weekend. That movie is just packed with great lines. When was the last time you could say that about a movie?
A man's got to know his limitations.
Dyin' ain't much of a living, son.
Dyin' ain't much of a living, BOY.
Have you seen Drive?
Yeah, but I don't recall any of the dialogue.
Hell, I barely recall that there was dialogue.
The best dialogue seems to be in TV at this point.
Son of a bitch MUST PAY!
That's the same face Hillary made when she caught Bill in the Lincoln Bedroom with Donna Shalala.
I thought that was the face she made every time they served up a platter of newborn kittens for hors d'ouvres.
"I like the mustard kind."
I think ranch goes better with kitten.
God, she has this whole portfolio of pictures out there in which is looks as if she is about to detach her lower jaw and devour some poor peasant whole.
Her handlers tried to get her to stop horking down the peasantry, but it turns out she needs to consume the screaming death essence of a sentient mind on a regular basis in order to maintain the illusion of a human form.
And if a sentient mind isn't available, she has to settle for the mind of one of her supporters.
That's what the rope lines are for, so that the other supporters aren't drenched in blood when she feeds.
Only at the very end, in horror, do they know.
Hillary is merciful, if you vote for her, she will eat you first.
Kick in an extra $250,000 and she will give a speech first, after which you will already be praying for the sweet release of death.
If I pay $500K, can we skip the speech?
Maybe she wants to read TPP before voting on it?
I burst a blood vessel laughing, Now I'm in a hospital bed.
THANKS A LOT , DJF
Core legacy? Crowning legacy?
Bad Shikha! You need a spankin'.
At no time in the future will anyone remember the TPP. What they will always remember is Obumblecare and the unmitigated disasters in the ME. There are too many other jewels in his crown to count, but those two will shine forever.
Oh, and the longest stagnant economy in history. People probably won't forget about that.
Still, I say those are a small price to pay for a post-racial America.
LULZ
People will forget all of the above in a few years. Very short memories among the voting public, especially with a complicit media.
Usually, the phrase "throw under the bus" is reserved for things that are treated unjustly, and do not rightly belong "under the bus".
Usually.
Usually the writers are dubious about the name of a bill/agreement having jack shit to do with the content of same.
Usually.
Did someone just pull Hillary out of the Lazarus Pit?
Holy shit! That picture..? Where have I seen that before?
Oh yeah... Sunday night, 9:00 PM, AMC.
If it says "Free Trade" in the title, I'm all for it.
They wouldn't lie to me, would they?
Post-facial America?
NOOOOOOOOOO!
At this point, I'd say that TPP can only be talked as an unknown from a libertarian perspective. It could be the greatest thing since sliced bread. It could also be something that locks the country into a stifling regulatory regime.
We just don't know. So, as much as I'm not a Clinton fan, I'll hold off on casting any defense or damnation of her for opposing the agreement.
There's so much to damn her for already.
Can't we condemn her for opposing something that she hasn't read?
Except she wouldn't oppose it if it was something that locks the country into a stifling regulatory regime. In fact, that's about the only way she would support it.
Obama's Core Legacy on Free Trade
Really?
This is the same guy who's made "Repatriation of foreign earnings" a common phrase.
her private server hadn't jeopardized national security.
Citation needed.
WH has already walked this one back:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g.....y-n2065664
Why Is Hillary Throwing Obama's Core Legacy on Free Trade Under the Bus?
Because of focus groups, coupled with a complete absence of principles.
If it really sneaks in SOPA and makes it unrepealable, then fuck the TPP. It's not a free trade agreement.
I'm assuming that Shikha's headline was tongue-in-cheek.
You know, since there's no evidence anything about this deal will encourage free trade. Plus the fact that the fucktarded leftists currently occupying the WH are the one's negotiating it doesn't bode well for it's free trade credentials either.
I'm not, Desig. Because of this:
But the fact of the matter is that if TPP is anything like NAFTA that her husband negotiated and she defended, then it'll actually help the middle-class, I note in my column at The Week.
If this isn't a defense of the TPP as a free trade deal, I don't know what to call it.