Hillary Clinton

Why Is Hillary Clinton So Unhappy?

We can start with the fact that she is her own worst enemy.

|

DonkeyHotey/FLickr

Why is Hillary Clinton so unhappy? According to her, when she and her husband left the White House, they were dead broke. Yet they left with a truckload of valuable furniture, dinnerware, and flatware that was the property of the federal government, for which they were never prosecuted. They also left with contracts for lectures and speeches worth between $20 million and $30 million in the ensuing years. And they have done quite well financially. According to The Washington Post, between the time Bill Clinton left office in 2001 and January 2013, when Hillary Clinton stepped down as secretary of state, Bill alone made $104.9 million for speeches, and Hillary's standard speaking fee is $200,000 a pop.

Why is Hillary so unhappy? We can start with the fact that she is her own worst enemy. No Republican dirty trickster could have put her into the legal and political mess into which she has put herself. Her surreptitious refusal to follow federal law and her congenital lying about it have caught up with her.

By using her own computer server instead of the government's in the four years of her tenure as secretary of state, she knowingly compromised the national security of the United States. She did this by receiving and sending at least 400 emails that contained information that under federal law was confidential, secret or top-secret, which is a felony.

The failure to preserve data of that nature is a federal crime, whether it is stamped with an official secret denomination, whether one has read it and perceived its secret nature, and whether it has fallen into enemy hands or not. Gen. David Petraeus was convicted of retaining the printed versions of secret and top-secret data in a desk drawer in his guarded home. It was alleged—but not proved—that he shared this data with one of his subordinates. Even though the subordinate had a security clearance, Petraeus was prosecuted.

In Hillary's case, the data have fallen into enemy hands, as one of the folks to whom she regularly sent her emails—in utter and reckless disregard for the secrets they contained—was her political adviser Sid Blumenthal, an employee of the Clinton Foundation at the time. Blumenthal's insecure server was hacked by Romanian intelligence agents, who were convicted and sentenced to prison.

Why is Hillary so unhappy? When the State Department was sued by public interest groups seeking copies of Hillary's emails—lawsuits permitted and even encouraged by the Freedom of Information Act, a federal statute that presumes that documents and emails in federal custody are available for the public to see—the State Department answered the litigation truthfully by telling a federal judge that it had none of Hillary's emails.

Then The New York Times blew the lid off this by revealing her exclusive use of her private server, and the same federal judge angrily ordered the State Department to get its hands on Hillary's emails. Then she revealed that she had erased 30,000 of the emails, which she said were personal. After that, she surrendered the printed versions of another 30,000 emails, which she characterized as governmental.

When the judge—who had been appointed to the federal bench by Hillary's husband—looked at what the State Department had turned over, it did not seem complete to him; crucial months were missing. So he ordered Hillary to swear under oath—"under penalty of perjury," as he put it—that she had surrendered all governmental emails in her possession. She did so swear in a document now made public. Then the House Benghazi Committee subpoenaed Blumenthal's emails, and its investigators discovered governmental emails Hillary sent to him that she had not surrendered to the State Department, even though she had sworn that she had.

Why is Hillary so unhappy? She is unhappy because she realizes that she needs a criminal defense lawyer to deal with the FBI investigation of her while she is running for president. The FBI is looking to see whether she failed to protect national security secrets (espionage), whether she destroyed government emails (obstruction of justice) and whether she lied under oath about all this to a federal judge (perjury).

She is unhappy because she has repeatedly characterized her own behavior as "allowed at the time," which flies in the face of the law and is simply incredible. It was allowed only in the depths of her self-justifying, narcissistic mind.

She is unhappy because the FBI has discovered that it can retrieve the emails she thought she destroyed and that her server was directly connected to the Internet, making it and the secrets she stored and transferred on it vulnerable to attack. She is unhappy because she was hacked—we do not know whether successfully or not—by the Russians, the Chinese and even the Israelis.

She is unhappy because she got caught in a scheme of her own creation. I suspect she is about to become even less happy when evidence of why she did this comes to light. I suspect that evidence will soon be made known that will demonstrate conclusively that she and her aides were part of a criminal conspiracy to enrich the Clinton Foundation by unlawful means—including moving levers of governmental power—and thus enrich her and her husband. And she is unhappy because the FBI will soon be asked to investigate that.

She is unhappy because only Democratic die-hards believe her. She is unhappy because voters will not elect an unhappy person as president—and she knows that.

COPYRIGHT 2015 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO || DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Advertisement

NEXT: That's Some Fine Police Work

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. What difference does it make now?

    1. You’re not doing it right. The correct Clintonesque phrasing is:

      “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

      It’s most authentic when delivered with a cringe-inducing voice, gestures, and facial expressions.

  2. Clinton, like other democrat progressive socialist modern day liberals, has an endless list of crybaby complaints whose only solution is to make the government even bigger with more rules, taxes, regulations, fees, fines, and mandates.

    She’s unhappy because there is always more stuff to worry about and to tax and regulate.

    Take cow farts.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cfPvuiJuPE

    1. Cow farts cause globabble warmerering, which is actually preventing us from falling into a VERY destructive new ice age. So the cow-licking Hindus are actually correcting, in cow-worshipping.

      All Hail Zebu, the Holy Cow!!!! AND His Holy Farts!!!!

  3. She should be in jail now but I don’t think anything is going to happen to her. I even think she will be nominated, our country is screwed.

  4. Are there enough questions in this article? Did Judge Napolitano answer too many of those he did pose?

    1. No?

  5. Why Is Hillary Clinton So Unhappy?

    She finally realized she is a lying, vapid cunt?

    1. I would amend that to say she finally realized that everyone knows she is a lying, vapid cunt.

    2. Cavernous cunt. Can you hear the echo? I think that’s Bill sawing his limb off to escape.

      1. Carnivorous?

  6. And yet nothing sticks. She’ll get away with it. I have exactly zero faith that she’ll ever be prosecuted.

    1. Her opposition is so incompetent that she stands zero chance now of any consequences. One more piece of evidence confirming that the Republicans really are the Stupid Party.

      1. Is it that or is it that she has so many enablers in Congress and the media?

      2. What are they supposed to do? The DOJ is under Obama’s control, not the Republicans’. She’s not in office, so they can’t impeach her. The Benghazi commission is under attack as being a partisan right wing conspiracy.
        The only party capable of holding her accountable is the media, and we all know where their sympathies lie.
        Not only is the hag going to get away with it, I’m afraid there’s a very good chance that she’s going to be the next POTUS.

        1. If someone believed by at least half the country to be somewhere in between thoroughly corrupt and treasonous is elected, I think we might actually have another civil war. How can you consider a government run by Hillary Clinton to be legitimate in any meaningful sense?

  7. How long before all this is resolved, one way or another?

  8. Republicans will not successfully get Hillary jailed, or even prosecuted, not because the are stupid, or incompetent, but because the Establishment GOP is not fundamentally different from the Democrats. Both parties are at core, the same people working to get other peoples money, and to control and exploit the population using the power of government.

    Bernie Sanders is an outsider to the core Democrats because he is a true believer, not part of the controlling oligarchy, just as Rand Paul and Justin Amash are outsiders because they are true believers, not part of the controlling oligarchy.

    Hillary and Bill are part of the ruling oligarchy and will, at worst be banished out of sight for while.

    1. Yaassss. People still think, even here, that the Democrats and Republicans are enemies and are battling each other. It’s just a show. Behind closed doors, when the cameras are off, they are eating together, laughing together, and enriching themselves at our expense together.

  9. …and she will still probably be the next President because the Left and many Libertarians will vote for her.

    True some Republicans have policies that Libertarians dislike but at least they are willing to compormise, maybe mostly because they have to compromes to rule, but this is not something Democrats have done in the last 7 years.

    Obama-Care and the President Exectutive Orders are fine examples.

    This woman craves power more than Obama and wants a legacy,,, so maybe there is a chance she will govern from the middle, unlike Obama.

    I am pretty sure we will see when she is President.

    1. If one actual libertarian votes for hillary they should loose any right to ever speak again.

  10. Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
    This is wha- I do…… ?????? http://www.buzznews99.com

  11. I don’t think she’s unhappy at all. That’s her normal face.

    What has she got to be unhappy about? Despite committing actual crimes, she continues to be the Democrat favorite. The Media lovers her. The GOP candidates are a circus. Foreign agents love working with her (wonder why that is?).

    Even if the Libertarian Party could fine ONE intelligent, dynamic candidate, nobody would know it because? well, who pays attention to Libertarians.

    Maybe she just appears unhappy because, like the IRS, Hillary says “I’m not happy until you’re not happy”.

    We’re screwed.

    1. Some people are just miserable fucks.

  12. Yet not a peep about 200M missing White House emails during the Dubya administration….

    1. Oh, there have been plenty of peeps, but Dubya isn’t under investigation and he isn’t seeking office. Besides, even if you disagree with his policies, he isn’t the phony, crooked, scumbag that Hillary is.

      BTW, tuqoque is the name of the logical fallacy you’ve just committed.

      1. Totally wrong: Bush was/is EXACTLY the same kind of phony, crooked, lying scumbag that Hillary is. He just isn’t running for office at this time.

        1. No, not at all. Bush was genuinely incompetent. Hillary is genuinely evil and dishonest. There is a difference.

        2. Bush is not sharp enough to be in the same league as Hillary when it comes to being phony and crooked.

      2. And the correct term is Tu quouque, or appeal to hypocrisy. I don’t believe that RUCB_Alum was making an argument to refute or defend Clinton’s actions, just pointing out the fact that the MSM isn’t pushing in our faces 24/7 as with Hillary.

        1. That’s because Dubya isn’t running for president.

        2. And the correct term is Tu quouque

          Yes? Well you can take that up with Google and Chrome’s spellcheck.

  13. She is unhappy because she can no longer taste the power.

    1. I’m sure if she asks nicely enough, Bill would let her taste the power any time she wanted to. He isn’t picky.

      1. She stopped sucking his power the night before they got married……guessing she does jot even know if Bill still has a dick

      2. She stopped sucking his power the night before they got married……guessing she does not even know if Bill still has a dick or not.

  14. Why Is Hillary Clinton So Unhappy?

    She is a woman… Equal opportunity…

  15. She’s the Leona Helmsley of national politics.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.